Abstract
Purpose
The management of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) remains controversial and lacks standardized guidelines. We report a case of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and mechanical embolus displacement 22 h after onset, along with a focused practical review of current surgical strategies.
Methods
A 50-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and hypertension presented with sudden visual loss and an inferior field defect in the left eye. After unsuccessful digital massage, IOP-lowering therapy, and anterior chamber paracentesis, a 25-G three-port PPV was performed 22 h after symptom onset. Posterior vitreous detachment was induced; intraoperative IOP was set at 8 mmHg; a diamond-dusted membrane scraper was used to gently displace and fragment the embolus distally. A PubMed search for qualitative synthesis identified 20 studies (61 eyes).
Results
Retinal perfusion was restored intraoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from counting fingers to 6/9 at 1 week and 6/6 at 1 month, remaining stable at 6 months. OCT showed resolution of inner retinal edema; fluorescein angiography confirmed complete reperfusion without recurrence. Literature analysis compared surgical approaches regarding PPV technique, invasiveness, timing, and visual outcomes versus non-invasive strategies.
Conclusions
PPV with minimally invasive embolus manipulation may restore retinal perfusion and achieve meaningful visual recovery beyond the conventional 4–6-h therapeutic window. This case in association with the reviewed literature suggest that in selected patients, vitrectomy, controlled IOP and targeted instrumentation is a viable and relatively safe option. Prospective trials are needed to define optimal timing, techniques, and patient selection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
