This work presents the results of experimental and numerical analyses of the static properties of architectural cores and the dynamic behavior of sandwich structures made with an auxetic or non-auxetic core. Three architectural cores have been studied which are re-entrant, rectangular and hexagonal honeycombs. Each configuration was produced with four relative densities depending on the number of cells in the width of the specimens. The specimens were made with additive manufacturing technology. The material used to make the specimens was polylactic acid with flax fibers. Several tensile tests were carried out on the architectural cores to analyze and understand the influence of the topology and the density of the core on the Poisson’s ratio and the Young’s modulus of these architectural structures. Then, vibration tests were carried out on the cores and the sandwich structures. The objective was to study the influence of these structures and their densities on the dynamic properties of sandwiches. The structural Poisson’s ratio shows a sensitive behavior to the core topology and density.
KshetrimayumRS. A brief intro to metamaterials. IEEE Potentials2004; 23: 44–46.
3.
EvansKENkansahMAHutchinsonIJ, et al.Molecular network design. Nature1991; 353: 124–124.
4.
MousanezhadDHaghpanahBGhoshR, et al.Elastic properties of chiral, anti-chiral, and hierarchical honeycombs: A simple energy-based approach. Theor Appl Mech Lett2016; 6: 81–96.
5.
MontiAEl MahiAJendliZ, et al.Experimental and finite elements analysis of the vibration behaviour of a bio-based composite sandwich beam. Compos Part B Eng2017; 110: 466–475.
6.
Shahverdi MoghaddamHKeshavanarayanaSYangC, et al.Anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive modeling of in-plane finite deformation responses of commercial composite hexagonal honeycombs. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24: 5–34.
7.
ScarpaFBlainSLewT, et al.Elastic buckling of hexagonal chiral cell honeycombs. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 280–289.
8.
KalubadanageDRemennikovANgoT, et al.Close-in blast resistance of large-scale auxetic re-entrant honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23: 4016–4053.
9.
LiCShenH-SWangH. Full-scale finite element modeling and nonlinear bending analysis of sandwich plates with functionally graded auxetic 3D lattice core. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23: 3113–3138.
10.
ScarpaFYatesJRCiffoLG, et al.Dynamic crushing of auxetic open-cell polyurethane foam. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci2002; 216: 1153–1156.
11.
EvansKE. Auxetic polymers: a new range of materials. Endeavour1991; 15: 170–174.
12.
LiuWWangNLuoT, et al.In-plane dynamic crushing of re-entrant auxetic cellular structure. Mater Des2016; 100: 84–91.
13.
EvansKEAldersonA. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking. Adv Mater2000; 12: 617–628.
14.
LakesRSElmsK. Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams. J Compos Mater1993; 27: 1193–1202.
15.
LakesR. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science1987; 235: 1038–1040.
16.
MohsenizadehSAlipourRRadMS, et al.Crashworthiness assessment of auxetic foam-filled tube under quasi-static axial loading. Mater Des2015; 88: 258–268.
17.
HouSLiuTZhangZ, et al.How does negative Poisson’s ratio of foam filler affect crashworthiness?Mater Des2015; 82: 247–259.
18.
HajmohammadMHKolahchiRZareiMS, et al.Dynamic response of auxetic honeycomb plates integrated with agglomerated CNT-reinforced face sheets subjected to blast load based on visco-sinusoidal theory. Int J Mech Sci2019; 153: 391–401.
19.
ScarpaFTomlinsonG. Theoretical characteristics of the vibration of sandwich plates with in-plane negative Poisson’s ratio values. J Sound Vib2000; 230: 45–67.
20.
HouSLiTJiaZ, et al.Mechanical properties of sandwich composites with 3d-printed auxetic and non-auxetic lattice cores under low velocity impact. Mater Des2018; 160: 1305–1321.
21.
DuttaSMenonHGHariprasadMP, et al.Study of auxetic beams under bending: A finite element approach. Mater Today Proc2021; 46: 9782–9787.
22.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Dynamic characterization of a bio-based sandwich with auxetic core: Experimental and numerical study. Int J Appl Mech2019; 11: 1950016.
23.
XuXDengZ. Wave propagation characteristics in thick conventional and auxetic cellular plates. Acta Mech Solida Sin2016; 29: 159–166.
24.
ChenGChengYZhangP, et al.Design and modelling of auxetic double arrowhead honeycomb core sandwich panels for performance improvement under air blast loading. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23: 3574–3605.
25.
ZamaniMHHeidari-RaraniMTorabiK. A novel graded auxetic honeycomb core model for sandwich structures with increasing natural frequencies. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24: 1313–1339.
26.
WanHOhtakiHKotosakaS, et al.A study of negative Poisson’s ratios in auxetic honeycombs based on a large deflection model. Eur J Mech-ASolids2004; 23: 95–106.
27.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LMahiAE, et al.Experimental and numerical analysis of the dynamic behavior of a bio-based sandwich with an auxetic core. J Sandw Struct Mater2021; 23: 1058–1077.
28.
EssassiKRebiereJEl MahiA, et al.Experimental and analytical investigation of the bending behaviour of 3D-printed bio-based sandwich structures composites with auxetic core under cyclic fatigue tests. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2020; 131: 105775.
29.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Investigation of the static behavior and failure mechanisms of a 3D printed bio-based sandwich with auxetic core. Int J Appl Mech2020; 12: 2050051.
30.
HuangJZhangQScarpaF, et al.In-plane elasticity of a novel auxetic honeycomb design. Compos Part B Eng2017; 110: 72–82.
31.
DucNDSeung-EockKTuanND, et al.New approach to study nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite cylindrical panels with auxetic honeycomb core layer. Aerosp Sci Technol2017; 70: 396–404.
32.
LiZGaoQYangS, et al.Comparative study of the in-plane uniaxial and biaxial crushing of hexagonal, re-entrant, and mixed honeycombs. J Sandw Struct Mater2019; 21: 1991–2013.
33.
SolyaevYBabaytsevAUstenkoA, et al.Static and dynamic response of sandwich beams with lattice and pantographic cores. J Sandw Struct Mater2022; 24: 1076–1098.
ASTM E756-2005. Standard test method for measuring vibration-damping properties of materials. West Conshohocken: American Society of Test Materials, 2010.
36.
XuXKoomsonCDoddamaniM, et al.Extracting elastic modulus at different strain rates and temperatures from dynamic mechanical analysis data: A study on nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng2019; 159: 346–354.
37.
DaoudHRebiereJ-LMakniA, et al.Numerical and experimental characterization of the dynamic properties of flax fiber reinforced composites. Int J Appl Mech2016; 8: 1650068.
38.
DaoudHEl MahiARebiereJ-L, et al.Characterization of the vibrational behaviour of flax fibre reinforced composites with an interleaved natural viscoelastic layer. Appl Acoust2017; 128: 23–31.
39.
HamrouniARebiereJLMahiAE, et al.Experimental analysis of the dynamic behavior of a sandwich with a bio-based auxetic core. In: International conference on advances in materials, mechanics and manufacturing. Springer, 2021, pp. 73–82.
40.
HamrouniARebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Experimental analysis of the Static and dynamic behavior of 3D printed bio-based conventional and auxetic architectural materials. Int J Appl Mech2022In press. DOI: 10.1142/S1758825122500259
41.
HamrouniARebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al.Dynamic behavior of sandwiches with an auxetic or a conventional core: Experimental study. In: WalhaLJarrayaADjemalF, et al. (eds) Design and modeling of mechanical systems - V. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 374–384.
42.
SchultzABTsaiSW. Dynamic moduli and damping ratios in fiber-reinforced composites. J Compos Mater1968; 2: 368–379.
