In this paper, we manufactured a novel sandwich panel that comprised of the foam core and the hybrid facesheets by vacuum-assisted resin infusion process. In the hybrid facesheets, the reinforcing phases are made of woven glass fabric cloth in company with wire nets, while the matrix is epoxy resin. Four categories of specimens with different wire nets contents are designed. To investigate the impact resistance ability of the designed sandwich panel, low-velocity impact tests are performed with respect to the contact load, absorbed energy, and failure mode. Compression-after-impact test is conducted to determine the residual mechanical properties of the postimpact sandwich panels. Digital image correlation technology is adopted to measure the strain distribution in the panels in compression-after-impact test. Results show that wire nets in the facesheet of the sandwich panel could enhance the energy absorb ability as well as the compression-after-impact strength significantly. Fiber/wire nets breaking, delamination, and foam core cracking are the main damage modes formed in the impact event, while the incident energy is mainly absorbed by wire nets breaking. In compression-after-impact test, bucking and delamination are the main damage modes, and the compressive stability is enhanced by the wire nets.
ChoeJHuangQYangJ, et al.
An efficient approach to investigate the post-buckling behaviors of sandwich structures. Compos Struct2018;
201: 377–388.
2.
YangBWangZZhouL, et al.
Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet. Compos Struct2015;
132: 1129–1140.
3.
HeJLiSWangS.Deformation behavior of sandwich hemispherical structure under axial compression at low temperature. Compos Struct2018;
203: 267–277.
4.
VescoviniRD’OttavioMDozioL, et al.
Buckling and wrinkling of anisotropic sandwich plates. Int J Eng Sci2018;
130: 136–156.
5.
ArachchigeBGhasemnejadH.Effect of variable core stiffness on the impact response of curved sandwich plates. Compos Struct2018;
200: 565–578.
6.
FunariMFGrecoFLonettiP.Sandwich panels under interfacial debonding mechanisms. Compos Struct2018;
203: 310–320.
7.
AbirMRTayTERidhaM, et al.
Modelling damage growth in composites subjected to impact and compression after impact. Compos Struct2017;
168: 13–25.
8.
TanWFalzonBGChiuLNS, et al.
Predicting low velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2015;
71: 212–226.
9.
YangBWangZZhouL, et al.
Experimental and numerical investigation of interply hybrid composites based on woven fabrics and PCBT resin subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos Struct2015;
132: 464–476.
10.
IlinzeerSRuppPWeidenmannKA.Influence of corrosion on the mechanical properties of hybrid sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets and aluminum foam core. Compos Struct2018;
202: 142–150.
11.
Al-HajajZSyBLBougheraraH, et al.
Impact properties of a new hybrid composite material made from woven carbon fibres plus flax fibres in an epoxy matrix. Compos Struct2019;
208: 346–356.
12.
ZhaoYCaoMLumWP, et al.
Interlaminar fracture toughness of hybrid woven carbon-Dyneema composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2018;
114: 377–387.
13.
TirillòJFerranteLSarasiniF, et al.
High velocity impact behaviour of hybrid basalt-carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Struct2017;
168: 305–312.
14.
HungP-yLauK-TChengL-K, et al.
Impact response of hybrid carbon/glass fibre reinforced polymer composites designed for engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng2018;
133: 86–90.
15.
RheadATHuaSButlerR.Damage resistance and damage tolerance of hybrid carbon-glass laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2015;
76: 224–232.
16.
NorAFMSultanMTHHamdanA, et al.
Hybrid composites based on Kenaf, jute, fiberglass woven fabrics: tensile and impact properties. Mater Today Proc2018;
5: 11198–11207.
17.
SafriSNASultanMTHJawaidM, et al.
Impact behaviour of hybrid composites for structural applications: a review. Compos Part B Eng2018;
133: 112–121.
18.
WanYDiaoCYangB, et al.
GF/epoxy laminates embedded with wire nets: a way to improve the low-velocity impact resistance and energy absorption ability. Compos Struct2018;
202: 818–835.
19.
OdessaIFrostigYRabinovitchO.Modeling of interfacial debonding propagation in sandwich panels. Int J Solids Struct2018;
148-149: 67–78.
20.
YangBXuanF-ZLeiH, et al.
Simultaneously enhancing the IFSS and monitoring the interfacial stress state of GF/epoxy composites via building in the MWCNT interface sensor. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2018;
112: 161–167.
21.
YangBXuanF-ZWangZ, et al.
Multi-functional interface sensor with targeted IFSS enhancing, interface monitoring and self-healing of GF/EVA thermoplastic composites. Compos Sci Technol2018;
167: 86–95.
22.
AbirMRTayTERidhaM, et al.
On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Compos Struct2017;
182: 242–250.
23.
AktaşAAktaşMTuranF.Impact and post impact (CAI) behavior of stitched woven-knit hybrid composites. Compos Struct2014;
116: 243–253.
24.
LiNChenPH.Experimental investigation on edge impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behavior of stiffened composite panels. Compos Struct2016;
138: 134–150.
25.
LiuHFalzonBGTanW.Predicting the compression-after-impact (CAI) strength of damage-tolerant hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon-fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2018;
105: 189–202.
26.
SunXCHallettSR.Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of laminated composites under compression after impact (CAI): experimental and numerical study. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manufact2018;
104: 41–59.
27.
TangYYeLZhangZ, et al.
Interlaminar fracture toughness and CAI strength of fibre-reinforced composites with nanoparticles – a review. Compos Sci Technol2013;
86: 26–37.
28.
XiongJ-JLiH-YZengB-Y.A strain-based residual strength model of carbon fibre/epoxy composites based on CAI and fatigue residual strength concepts. Compos Struct2008;
85: 29–42.
29.
AktaşMErsen BalcıoğluHAktaşA, et al.
Impact and post impact behavior of layer fabric composites. Compos Struct2012;
94: 2809–2818.
30.
SutherlandLS.A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: Part III – damage tolerance and durability. Compos Struct2018;
188: 512–518.
31.
LuoCYangBXuanF-Z, et al.
Experimental investigation of double-lap bolted composite joints with different outer plates subjected to bending loads. Polymers Polymer Compos2018;
26: 408–419.
32.
YangBXuanF-ZChenS, et al.
Damage localization and identification in WGF/epoxy composite laminates by using Lamb waves: experiment and simulation. Compos Struct2017;
165: 138–147.
33.
SalvettiMSbarufattiCGilioliA, et al.
On the mechanical response of CFRP composite with embedded optical fibre when subjected to low velocity impact and CAI tests. Compos Struct2017;
179: 21–34.
34.
GonzalezCRTrujilloEJChavezF, et al.
Low velocity impact response of composites and fiber metal laminates with open holes. J Compos Mater2016;
51: 1–14.
35.
GhelliDMinakG.Low velocity impact and compression after impact tests on thin carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part B2011;
42: 2067–2079.
