Three population-based optimization techniques — particle swarm optimization, ant colony optimization, and simulated annealing — are applied to the multi-objective design of sandwich materials. The formulation of the algorithms is described, along with metrics for quantifying their performance. For the case study considered of a sandwich beam in bending, it is shown that the ant colony technique out-performs the other two algorithms with respect to identifying optimal geometries, materials, and lay-ups for a stiff sandwich in which low mass and low cost are the design objectives. The particle swarm and simulated annealing algorithms were found to have particular difficulties in handling the optimization of multi-ply oriented fiber-reinforced polymer facing laminates.
Hudson CW, Carruthers JJ and Robinson AMApplication of Particle Swarm Optimization to Sandwich Material Design. Plastics Rubber and Composites2009; 38(2-4): 106-110.
2.
Hudson CW, Carruthers JJ and Robinson AMMultiple Objective Optimization of Composite Sandwich Structures for Rail Vehicle Floor Panels. Composite Structures2010; 92(9): 2077-2082.
3.
Deb K.Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2001.
4.
Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S. and Meyarivan T.A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation2002; 6: 182-197.
5.
Ray T., Tai K. and Seow KCMultiobjective Design Optimization by an Evolutionary Algorithm. Engineering Optimization2001; 33: 399-424.
6.
Kennedy J. and Eberhart R. ( 1995). Particle Swarm Optimization, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, Vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948.
7.
Dorigo M., Maniezzo V. and Colorni A. : Ant System: Optimization by a Colony of Cooperating Agents, IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man, and Cybernetics - Part B1996; 26(1): 29-41.
8.
Abachizadeh M. and Tahani M.An Ant Colony Optimization Approach to Multi-objective Optimal Design of Symmetric Hybrid Laminates for Maximum Fundamental Frequency and Minimum Cost. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2008; 37(4): 367-376.
9.
Aymerich F. and Serra M.Optimization of Laminate Stacking Sequence for Maximum Buckling Load Using the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) Metaheuristic. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing2008; 39: 262-272.
10.
Kirkpatrick S. , Gelatt CD Jr and Vecchi PMOptimization by Simulated Annealing. Science1983; 220: 498-516.
11.
Cerny V.Thermodynamical Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem - An Efficient Simulation Algorithm. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications1985; 45: 41-51.
12.
Kubotani H. and Yoshimura K.Performance Evaluation of Acceptance Probability Functions for Multi-objective SA. Computers & Operations Research2003 ; 30: 427-442.
13.
Suppapitnarm A., Seffen KA, Parks GT and Clarkson PJSimulated Annealing Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. Engineering Optimization2000 ; 33: 59-85.
14.
Suman B. and Kumar P.A Survey of Simulated Annealing as a Tool for Single and Multiobjective Optimization . Journal of the Operational Research Society2005; 57: 1143-1160.
15.
Tekinalp O. and Karsli G.A New Multiobjective Simulated Annealing Algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization2007; 39: 49-77.
16.
Ulungu EL, Teghem J., Fortemps PH and Tuyttens D.MOSA Method: A Tool for Solving Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis1999; 8: 221-236.
17.
Allen HGAnalysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1969.
18.
Gibson RFPrinciples of Composite Material Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
19.
Matthews FL and Rawlings RDComposite Materials: Engineering and Science. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
20.
Zenkert D.An Introduction to Sandwich Construction. UK: EMAS Publishing, 1995.
21.
Ashby MFMaterials Selection in Mechanical Design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
22.
Van Veldhuizen DA and Lamont GB (1999). Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Test Suites, In: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, San Antonio, Texas, United States, pp. 351-357.
23.
Baran B. and Schaerer M. ( 2003). A Multiobjective Ant Colony System for Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows, In: Proceedings of the 21st IASTED International Conference on Applied Informatics, Innsbruck, Germany, pp. 97-102.
24.
Coello Coello CA, Pulido GT and Lechuga MSHandling Multiple Objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation2004; 8: 256-279.
25.
Reddy MJ and Kumar DNAn Efficient Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Swarm Intelligence for Engineering Design. Engineering Optimization2007; 39: 49-68.
26.
Garcia-Martinez C., Cordon O. and Herrera F.A Taxonomy and an Empirical Analysis of Multiple Objective Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms for the Bi-criteria TSP. European Journal of Operational Research2007; 180: 116-148.
27.
Zitzler E., Deb K. and Thiele L.Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results. Evolutionary Computation2000; 8: 173-195.
28.
Zheng L-G., Zhou H., Cen K-F. and Wang C-L.A Comparative Study of Optimization Algorithms for Low NOx Combustion Modification at a Coal-fired Utility Boiler. Expert Systems with Applications2009; 36: 2780-2793.
