Feline comorbidities: hypersomatotropism-induced diabetes in cats

Abstract

Practical relevance:

Diabetes mellitus is the second-most common feline endocrinopathy, affecting an estimated 1/200 cats. While the underlying causes vary, around 15-25% of cats with diabetes mellitus develop the condition secondarily to progressive growth hormone (GH)-induced insulin resistance. This typically results in a form of diabetes that is challenging to manage, whereby the response to insulin is very variable or high doses are required to achieve even minimal diabetic control.

Clinical challenges:

Although uncontrolled chronic excessive GH may result in phenotypic changes that raise suspicion for acromegaly, many cats with hypersomatotropism (HST) do not have these changes. In these situations, a clinician's index of suspicion may be increased by the presence of less dramatic changes such as marked polyphagia, stertor or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. The current diagnostic test of choice is demonstration of a markedly increased serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) concentration, but some affected cats will have only a marginal increase; additionally, chronic insulin administration in cats results in an increase in serum IGF1, making the diagnosis less clear cut and requiring additional confirmatory tests.

Evidence base:

Over the past two decades, HST has increasingly been recognised as an underlying cause of diabetes mellitus in cats. This review, which focuses on diagnosis and treatment, utilises data from observational studies, clinical trials and case series, as well as drawing on the experience of the authors in managing this condition.

Keywords

Insulin resistance diabetes mellitus growth hormone IGF1 pituitary

Introduction

Physiology of growth hormone

Growth hormone (GH) in cats is almost exclusively produced by somatotrope cells in the anterior pituitary gland. In humans, there are several isoforms of GH due to alternate splicing, with the 191 amino acid 22 kDa variant being the most abundant and physiologically important form. The GH isoforms in cats are yet to be described. GH circulates as unbound and protein-bound forms, with protein binding prolonging the half-life and reducing the oscillations of circulating GH concentrations. The circulating half-life of GH in humans is around 30 mins.¹

GH secretion is pulsatile and its regulation complex. The main stimulus for GH secretion is GH-releasing hormone from the hypotha-lamus. Other known stimuli include alpha-adrenergic agonists and ghrelin, but GH secretion is not significantly altered by hypoglycaemia in cats, unlike many other species.² Inhibitors of GH secretion include beta-adrenergic agonists, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), somato-statins and dopamine receptor 2 agonists (Figure 1).

Figure 1

In this schematic diagram showing how growth hormone (GH) secretion is regulated, green arrows represent stimulatory actions while red arrows represent inhibitory actions. Yellow arrows represent target organs for the labelled hormones. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is produced in the hypothalamus and stimulates GH release from somatotropes in the anterior pituitary. In concert with insulin, GH stimulates insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) synthesis and secretion from hepatocytes. GH and IGF1 affect multiple tissues, including adipose tissue, bone and muscle. Negative feedback on GH secretion is exerted directly via GH and IGF1, and indirectly via centrally secreted somatostatin ± dopamine

GH exerts both direct and indirect effects (see 'Physiological actions of GH' box), the latter mediated by GH-induced hepatic synthesis and secretion of IGF1.^3-5 Similar to GH, IGF1 circulates as unbound and protein-bound forms. Serum half-lives are 10-30 mins and 12-15 h, respectively.⁶

Effects of hypersecretion

The cause of chronic excessive GH in cats is almost always a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma/neuroendocrine tumour. This results in numerous physiological alterations, such as excessive soft tissue and bone growth.⁷ These alterations can cause phenotypic changes and led to the condition being called acromegaly in people, a term first introduced in 1886 by the French neurologist Pierre Marie.⁸ As phenotypic changes were identified in only 26% of individuals with chronic excessive GH in one feline study, the term hypersomato-tropism (HST) is commonly used to describe the condition in cats.⁹ Other clinical consequences include neurological signs due to space-occupying effects of some pituitary tumours, a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenotype, osteoarthritis and arthral-gias.¹⁰ The other main sequela is glucose intolerance, which is discussed below.

GH, IGF1 and glucose

GH antagonises insulin by reducing muscular glucose uptake, decreasing glucose oxidation and increasing gluconeogenesis.^11,12 GH also stimulates increased IGF1 secretion, which enhances insulin sensitivity and improves glycaemic control in individuals with extreme insulin resistance.¹³ There is a high degree of sequence homology between the insulin receptor and IGF1 receptors, which allows insulin and IGF1 to activate each other's receptors. However, IGF1 has only 10% of the activation potency of insulin at the insulin receptor.¹⁴ The relationship between GH and IGF1 is non-linear, and with IGF1-binding proteins also affecting the availability of IGF1 to activate the insulin receptor, the effect on glycaemic homeostasis is likely to have high interindividual variability. Regardless, the global consequence is insulin resistance.¹⁵

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in human patients with acromegaly is 12-38%, and impaired glucose tolerance occurs in up to 54% of people with acromegaly.^16,17 Diabetes mellitus is more common in those who have had a longer disease duration.^18,19 This insulin resistance is reversible with control of the acromegalic condition.^19,20

In veterinary medicine, almost all cats diagnosed with HST have concurrent diabetes mellitus. One cat diagnosed with HST but without diabetes mellitus developed overt clinical diabetes several months after the initial diagnosis.²¹ The outcome of this patient adds weight to the idea that diabetes mellitus develops as a consequence of uncontrolled HST, with some cats progressing further to extreme insulin resistance.

Presenting signs and diagnostic testing

HST has an insidious progression in humans, and this is likely to be the case in cats. The most common scenario is that GH-induced insulin resistance is recognised at the point that it progresses to overt diabetes mellitus. Studies in Argentina, mainland Europe and the UK have reported a 15-25% prevalance of concurrent HST among feline diabetic patients.^9,22,23 Weight gain with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus occurs in roughly 17% of cats with HST, while 42% experience weight loss.²⁴ The clinical characteristics of 133 cats with a diagnosis of HST are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Clinical data for 133 cats diagnosed with HST presenting to the Royal Veterinary College, UK

Clinical characteristics
Age	11 (2-17)
(years)	IQR 10-12
Sex
Female	20%
Male	80%
Breed
Domestic shorthair	77%
Domestic longhair	9%
British Shorthair	6%
Maine Coon	4%
Other	4%
Body weight	5.5 (2.6-9.5)
(kg)	IQR 4.7-6.1
Body condition score	5 (2-9)
	IQR 4-6
Insulin dose at diagnosis
(U/kg q12h SC)
Glargine	1.1 (0.2-15)
	IQR 0.6-2.8
Lente insulin	1.2 (0.4-3.9)
	IQR 0.8-1.7
Protamine zinc insulin	1 (0.2-2.6)
	IQR 0.7-1.4
IGF1 concentration	1824 (712->2000)
(ng/ml, assessed by RIA)	IQR 1504->2000
Pituitary height	6 (<4-15)
(mm)	IQR 5-7

Data are the authors' unpublished observations, and represent median (range) and IQR, unless otherwise stated

HST = hypersomatotropism; IGF1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; IQR = interquartile range; RIA = radioimmunoassay

Other common presenting signs in cats include polyphagia and increased soft tissue growth, with resulting snorting and stertor.^25,26 Physical examination may identify broad facial features, clubbed feet and organomegaly.²⁶

Biochemical testing

Aside from changes consistent with diabetes mellitus, there are no routine blood or urine test results that are indicative of HST. The current blood test of choice is measurement of serum IGF1. An IGF1 concentration of >1OO0 ng/ml measured using a commercial radio-immunoassay (RIA) had a positive predictive value of 95% for the diagnosis of HST in cats in the UK.⁹ It is noteworthy that this study assessed IGF1 in cats with diabetes mellitus, and this cut-off may not be applicable to different populations of cats. An IGF1 concentration between 7OO and 1OOO ng/ml using this RIA represented a 'grey zone'. Ideally, measurement of serum/plasma GH would also be performed, particularly in a patient with a 'grey zone' result.

A GH RIA has been validated for use in cats,²⁷ and a basal serum GH concentration of >8 ng/l was consistent with a diagnosis of HST in that study. However, random GH assessment is an insensitive test for acromegaly in people and this may also be true for cats with a milder condition. Dynamic GH suppression testing would be more favourable than basal GH testing; the 'gold standard' test in human medicine is an oral glucose tolerance test, while the octreotide suppression test has been utilised in veterinary medicine. It should be noted that the sensitivity of the latter test is compromised because of the limited range of somatostatin receptors expressed in feline HST that are suppressed by octreotide.^28,29

Currently, the authors recommend that for patients with 'grey zone' IGF1 results, either repeat testing of IGF1 is undertaken at a later timepoint or intracranial imaging is performed.

Intracranial imaging

The normal pituitary dorsoventral dimension (height) in cats, as assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, is <3.8 mm.^30,31 Pituitary enlargement/neoplasia affects fewer than 2% of cats,^9,32 with somatotroph adenomas being the most common feline pituitary neoplasm.^33,34 Therefore, the combination of pituitary enlargement and an IGF1 concentration >7OO ng/ml, assessed using an RIA, is highly suggestive of HST in cats. Up to 94% of cats with HST have pituitary enlargement identified using CT imaging.⁷ Small pituitary lesions may require MRI for identification, but it is also possible for a cat to have HST without pituitary enlargement being identified using either imaging modality.^9,26

Additional findings

As GH induces soft tissue growth, cats with HST might reasonably be expected to have organomegaly. GH-induced soft tissue growth has been documented in a post-mortem investigation (unpublished data from the authors' institute). The study retrospectively analysed the histopathology reports of haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue samples of 60 cats with HST and diabetes mellitus, 12 cats with diabetes mellitus only and a control population of 75 cats. The specific organs assessed were the pancreas, thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal glands, spleen, liver, kidneys and heart. The cats with HST and concurrent diabetes mellitus had a higher incidence of hyperplasia within the assessed tissue(s) compared with those with diabetes mellitus only or control cats.

Visceral organomegaly was also reported in an ultrasonographic study, with adrenal thickness, renal length and left pancreatic limb thickness being significantly greater in cats with HST compared with control cats.³⁵

GH and IGF1 concentrations have been increased in some cats with an HCM pheno-type, with 6.7% of such cats having IGF1 concentrations >1000 ng/ml.^36-38 It is, therefore, possible that some cats with an HCM phenotype as their only presenting sign have concurrent HST. This is particularly noteworthy as the HST-associated HCM pheno-type is reversible following hypophysectomy (see later).³⁹

Treatment approaches

The quality of life of humans with acromegaly is improved following biochemical control of GH and IGF1, and management of ongoing clinical signs.⁴⁰ Quality of life in cats with the HST condition is decreased, more markedly so than in cats with diabetes mellitus alone.⁴¹ Therefore, although successful management of diabetes mellitus is a key consideration when deciding on a strategy to manage HST, successful control of excess GH and any other clinical signs also seems to be important (see 'Treatment aims' box).

Treatment options can be divided into three broad categories: medical management, pituitary radiotherapy and pituitary surgery (hypophysectomy).

Medical management

Diabetes mellitus management

Consensus guidelines from the International Society of Feline Medicine and the American Animal Hospital Association on the management of feline diabetes mellitus apply equally to the treatment of HST-induced diabetes mellitus.^42,43 Optimising body weight, use of long-acting insulin and feeding of an appropriate diet are key to achieving good gly-caemic control, as evidenced by an acceptable 'diabetic clinical score'.⁴⁴

Biochemical control of HST

There are several medical management options used in humans with acromegaly, including administration of somatostatin analogues, dopamine receptor 2 agonists and GH receptor antagonists. The two drug families that have been shown to improve biochemical control of HST and diabetes mellitus in cats are somatostatin analogues and dopamine receptor 2 agonists. This is not surprising as the feline pituitary gland expresses somato-statin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 1, 2 and 5, and dopamine receptor 2, all of which are targets for these drug families.⁴⁵

Pasireotide is the somatostatin analogue that has been the most effective in achieving biochemical control of HST in cats. This analogue has high binding affinity for SSTR subtypes 1, 2, 3 and 5, which leads to inhibition of GH secretion.^46,47 Short- and long-acting formulations have been trialled in cats with HST.^48,49 The authors start with 0.03 mg/kg q24h SC of the short-acting formulation and escalate the dose to q12h if there is an incomplete response. There is typically a rapid response to treatment, with patients requiring lower insulin doses and IGF1 concentrations decreasing within 5 days. The main adverse effects are gastrointestinal upset, with voluminous and pungent cowpat-like stool being common.

Cabergoline is the dopamine agonist of choice because of its longer duration of action and greater affinity for dopamine receptor 2 compared with bromocriptine. Cabergoline is recommended for 'mild' acromegaly (IGF1 <1.5 times the upper reference interval, mild clinical signs) in humans and achieves biochemical control in around one-third of patients.^50,51 The response to cabergoline in cats with HST has been, at best, variable; however, this could be due to too many (UK) treated cats having HST that is too severe to respond to this treatment. A study in the UK using a cabergoline dose of 10 [ig/kg q24h reported no improvement in IGF1 concentrations (median starting IGF1 concentration >2000 ng/ml) or diabetic control in eight cats that completed the 90-day treatment period.⁵²

A second study, in Argentina, using a cabergo-line dose of 10 [ig/kg q48h, reported diabetic remission in 8/22 cats that completed 6 months of treatment; IGF1 normalised in 6/23 cats (median starting IGF1 concentration 135O ng/ml), with those having smaller pituitary masses being more likely to achieve IGF1 control.⁵³ The greater likelihood of response to cabergoline in patients with smaller pituitary masses may be due to dopamine receptor 2 expression being decreased as pituitary mass size increases.⁴⁵

An option that has been utilised in human medicine is the concurrent use of a somato-statin analogue and dopamine receptor 2 agonist. This approach was reported to achieve biochemical control in around 5O% of patients who had experienced a partial response to somatostatin analogue therapy alone.⁵⁴ The rationale behind this approach is that dopamine receptor 2 and SSTR subtype 5 can heterodimerise, and thus combination treatment enhances the functional activity of both drugs. This approach has been trialled by the authors, without success to date, but could be considered when other treatment options are not available.

Other medical management

In addition to control of HST through GH inhibition, individual patient factors will determine other medical management protocols, including analgesia if there is osteo-arthritis, antithrombotics if there is significant cardiac disease, and furosemide if the patient has experienced a congestive heart failure event.

Pituitary radiotherapy

Fractionated and stereotactic pituitary radiotherapy protocols have been described in humans and cats to manage HST. In humans, up to 5O% of patients achieve condition remission, while another 25% achieve stable disease, by 2-5 years post-treatment. Approximately 9O% of patients experience a reduced tumour volume in these time periods.^55,56

Based on two published studies of stereo-tactic radiotherapy in cats,^57,58 the treatment is generally well tolerated, with mild radiation-associated side effects seen in up to 2O% of cats. Diabetic remission was reported to occur in 21-34% of cats, with a median time to lowest insulin dosage being 9-13 months post-treatment. IGF1 control was not described in either study.

Fractionated pituitary radiotherapy has been reported in several studies; however, the specific outcomes of the cats with HST is not always clear.^59-63 Where patients with HST can be identified, diabetic remission was achieved in 17-62% of cases; diabetic improvement occurred within 2 months, with diabetic remission reported at a median of 17 weeks post-treatment in one study.⁶² IGF1 concentration was not monitored in most studies; however, it remained increased in one case despite improved diabetic control.⁵⁹

Survival times for each treatment modality range widely, with median survival times of 1O72 days being described,⁵⁷ and an improvement in neurological signs being the most consistent response. The authors' view is that pituitary radiotherapy is best limited to those individuals with neurological signs secondary to a pituitary mass effect.

Pituitary surgery

In human medicine, acromegaly is managed by surgical resection of the pituitary mass, unless the patient is a poor candidate for the procedure.^50,64 Centres that regularly perform this surgery are more likely to achieve disease remission and have a lower complication rate.⁶⁵ Likewise, a learning curve for the procedure has been identified in veterinary medicine.⁶⁶ Currently, in veterinary medicine, hypophysectomy is performed rather than pituitary adenonectomy due to difficulties differentiating healthy from neoplastic pituitary tissue. To date, two centres (in the UK and the Netherlands) have described this treatment in cohorts of cats. The diabetic remission rate was between 71% and 92%, IGF1 control occurred in 9O% of patients that survived the first 4 weeks postoperatively, and a mortality rate of 4-15% was reported, with median survival times of 853-1347 days.^67,68 Most patients resume eating and drinking the same day as the surgery and are discharged around 1 week postoperatively. Postoperative treatment regimens include glucocorticoid, thyroid hormone and vasopressin supplementation.

Postoperative hypoglycaemia has been reported in 14-16% of cats, and, in some cases, even after insulin treatment has been discon-tinued.^67,68 In the UK study, sepsis accounted for the hypoglycaemia in 4/9 cats, one cat had no underlying identifiable cause and the remaining cats responded to supplemental glucose and/or an increase in the glucocorti-coid dose.⁶⁷ Hypoglycaemia occurred in 4/25 cats in the Dutch study, with 3/4 cats having an inappropriately increased serum insulin concentration during the hypoglycaemic event.⁶⁸ The authors of that study prescribed diazoxide for three cats that became hypogly-caemic after exogenous insulin administration had already been discontinued, and suggest diazoxide treatment for cats that become hypoglycaemic if additional glucocorticoids are insufficient to maintain normoglycaemia.

As improved quality of life is the key outcome when managing a patient, hypo-physectomy seems to be the treatment of choice.⁶⁹ It is likely that improved IGF1 control with hypophysectomy has unseen effects, which result in quality-of-life improvement that extends beyond effective control of diabetes mellitus. See the 'Factors affecting serum IGF1 concentration' box for a discussion of practical considerations when interpreting IGF1 values.

Key Points

✜ Diabetes mellitus is the end result of pancreatic beta cell failure, which may have many underlying causes. A pituitary adenoma leading to excessive GH is the cause in 15–25% of diabetic cats in the UK.

✜ Phenotypic changes associated with HST are commonly not recognised by veterinarians.

✜ Treatment of cats with HST is aimed at improving quality of life by adequately controlling the diabetes mellitus and any other concurrent comorbidities.

✜ Several treatment options are available for the management of HST, including medical management, pituitary radiotherapy and pituitary surgery. Hypophysectomy is associated with the highest quality of life post-treatment.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This work did not involve the use of animals and therefore ethical approval was not specifically required for publication in ]FMS.

Informed consent

This work did not involve the use of animals (including cadavers) and therefore informed consent was not required. No animals or people are identifiable within this publication, and therefore additional informed consent for publication was not required.

References

Shah

Aloi

Evans

, et al. Time mode of growth hormone (GH) entry into the bloodstream and steady-state plasma GH concentrations, rather than sex, estradiol, or menstrual cycle stage, primarily determine the GH elimination rate in healthy young women and men. ] Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 2862-2869.

Kokka

Garcia

Morgan

, et al. Immunoassay of plasma growth hormone in cats following fasting and administration of insulin, arginine, 2-deoxyglucose and hypothalamic extract. Endocrinol 1971; 88: 359-366.

Moøller

Joørgensen

JOL

. Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects. Endocr Rev 2009; 30: 152-177.

Arjunan

Sah

Woo

, et al. Identification of the molecular mechanism of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1): a promising therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases associated with metabolic syndrome. Cell Biosci 2023; 13. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-023-00966-z.

DiToro

Harbour

Bando

, et al. Insulin-like growth factors are key regulators of T helper 17 regulatory T cell balance in autoimmunity. Immunity 2020; 52: 650-667.

Guler

Zapf

Schmid

, et al. Insulin-like growth factors I and II in healthy man. Estimations of half-lives and production rates. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1989; 121: 753-758.

Lamb

Ciasca

Mantis

, et al. Computed tomographic signs of acromegaly in 68 diabetic cats with hypersoma-totropism. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 99-108.

de Herder

. The history of acromegaly. Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103: 7-17.

Niessen

SJM

Forcada

Mantis

, et al. Studying cat (Felis catus) diabetes: beware of the acromegalic imposter. PLoS One 2015; 10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127794.

10.

Peterson

Taylor

Greco

, et al. Acromegaly in 14 cats. J Vet Intern Med 1990; 4: 192-201.

11.

Fowelin

Attvall

Von Schenck

, et al. Characterization of the insulin-antagonistic effect of growth hormone in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Med 1995; 12: 990-996.

12.

del Rincon

Iida

Gaylinn

, et al. Growth hormone regulation of p85a expression and phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in adipose tissue. Diabetes 2007; 56: 1638-1646.

13.

Clemmons

DR.

Metabolic actions of insulin-like growth factor-I in normal physiology and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2012; 41: 425-443.

14.

Czech

MP.

Signal transmission by the insulin-like growth factors. Cell 1989; 59: 235-238.

15.

Parkinson

Ryder

Trainer

, et al. The relationship between serum GH and serum IGF-I in acromegaly is gender-specific. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5240-5244.

16.

Hannon

Thompson

Sherlock

Diabetes in patients with acromegaly. Curr Diab Rep 2017; 17. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-017-0838-7.

17.

Dreval

Trigolosova

Misnikova

, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with acromegaly. Endocr Connect 2014; 3: 93-98.

18.

Fieffe

Morange

Petrossians

, et al. Diabetes in acromegaly, prevalence, risk factors, and evolution: data from the French Acromegaly Registry. Eur J Endocrinol 2011; 164: 877-884.

19.

Arlien-S0borg

Dal

Madsen

, et al. Reversible insulin resistance in muscle and fat unrelated to the metabolic syndrome in patients with acromegaly. EBioMedicine 2022; 75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103763.

20.

Khan

Ram

Masood

MQ.

Patterns of abnormal glucose metabolism in acromegaly and impact of treatment modalities on glucose metabolism. Cureus 2021; 13. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13852.

21.

Fletcher

Scudder

Kiupel

, et al. Hyper-somatotropism in 3 cats without concurrent diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30: 1216-1221.

22.

Miceli

Garcia

Rey Amunategui

, et al. Prevalence of hypersomatotropism and hyperthyroidism in cats with diabetes mellitus from referral centers in Buenos Aires (2020-2022). J Feline Med Surg 2023; 25. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X221148565.

23.

Schaefer

Kooistra

Riond

, et al. Evaluation of insulin-like growth factor-1, total thyroxine, feline pancreas-specific lipase and urinary corticoid-to-creatinine ratio in cats with diabetes mellitus in Switzerland and the Netherlands. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 888-896.

24.

Scudder

Niessen

GH excess: acromegaly (hyper-somatotropism). In: Feldman

Fracassi

Peterson

(eds). Feline endocrinology. Palm Beach Gardens, FL: Edra Spa, 2019, pp 9-26.

25.

Fracassi

Salsi

Sammartano

, et al. Acromegaly in a non-diabetic cat. JFMS Open Rep 2016; 2. DOI: 10.1177/2055116916646585.

26.

Niessen

SJM

Petrie

Gaudiano

, et al. Feline acromegaly: an underdiagnosed endocrinopathy? J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 899-905.

27.

Niessen

SJM

Khalid

Petrie

, et al. Validation and application of a radioi mmunoassay for ovine growth hormone in the diagnosis of acromegaly in cats. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 902-907.

28.

Slingerland

Voorhout

Rijnberk

, et al. Growth hormone excess and the effect of octreotide in cats with diabetes mellitus. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2008; 35: 352-361.

29.

Capatina

Wass

JAH

. 60 years of neuroendocrinology: acromegaly. J Endocrinol 2015; 226: T141-160.

30.

Wallack

Wisner

Feldman

EC.

Mensuration of the pituitary gland from magnetic resonance images in 17 cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 44: 278-282.

31.

Tyson

Graham

Bermingham

, et al. Dynamic computed tomography of the normal feline hypophysis cerebri (glandula pituitaria). Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 33-38.

32.

Polledo

Grinwis

GCM

Graham

, et al. Pathological findings in the pituitary glands of dogs and cats. Vet Pathol 2018; 55: 880-888.

33.

Miller

Piotrowski

Donovan

, et al. Feline pituitary adenomas: correlation of histologic and immunohistochem-ical characteristics with clinical findings and case outcome. Vet Pathol 2021; 58: 266-275.

34.

Sanders

Galac

Meij

BP.

Pituitary tumour types in dogs and cats. Vet J 2021; 270. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105623.

35.

Louren^o

Randall

Seiler

, et al. Abdominal ultra-sonographic findings in acromegalic cats. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 698-703.

36.

Steele

MME

Borgeat

Payne

, et al. Increased insulinlike growth factor 1 concentrations in a retrospective population of non-diabetic cats diagnosed with hyper-trophic cardiomyopathy. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 952-958.

37.

Kittleson

Pion

DeLellis

, et al. Increased serum growth hormone concentration in feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med 1992; 6: 320-324.

38.

Freeman

Rush

Meurs

, et al. Body size and metabolic differences in Maine Coon cats with and without hyper-trophic cardiomyopathy. J Feline Med Surg 2013; 15: 74-80.

39.

Borgeat

Niessen

SJM

Wilkie

, et al. Time spent with cats is never wasted: lessons learned from feline acromegalic cardiomyopathy, a naturally occurring animal model of the human disease. PLoS One 2018; 13. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194342.

40.

Guo

Wang

, et al. Quality of life and its determinants in patients with treated acromegaly: a cross-sectional nationwide study in China. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106: 211-225.

41.

Scudder

AIP - and organohalogenated-chemical-associated acromegaly: a little help from a feline friend? PhD thesis. Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 2018.

42.

Sparkes

Cannon

Church

, et al. ISFM consensus guidelines on the practical management of diabetes melli-tus in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 235-250.

43.

Behrend

Holford

Lathan

, et al. 2018 AAHA diabetes management guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2018; 54. DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6822.

44.

Varela

Gostelow

Forcada

, et al. The Diabetic Clinical Score (DCS): evaluation of a simple standardised quantification tool to allow rapid description of clinical signs in diabetic cats. Proceedings of the BSAVA Congress; April 2016; Birmingham, UK, p 507.

45.

Scudder

Mirczuk

Richardson

, et al. Pituitary pathology and gene expression in acromegalic cats. J Endocr Soc 2019; 3: 181-200.

46.

Murray

Kim

Ren

, et al. The novel somatostatin ligand (SOM230) regulates human and rat anterior pituitary hormone secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 3027-3032.

47.

Schmid

Schoeffter

Functional activity of the multiligand analog SOM230 at human recombinant somatostatin receptor subtypes supports its usefulness in neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2004; 80: 47-50.

48.

Scudder

Gostelow

Forcada

, et al. Pasireotide for the medical management of feline hypersomatotropism. J Vet Intern Med 2015; 29: 1074-1080.

49.

Gostelow

Scudder

Keyte

, et al. Pasireotide long-acting release treatment for diabetic cats with underlying hypersomatotropism. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31: 355-364.

50.

Katznelson

Laws

Melmed

, et al. Acromegaly: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: 3933-3951.

51.

Kuhn

Chanson

Cabergoline in acromegaly. Pituitary 2017; 20: 121-128.

52.

Scudder

Hazuchova

Gostelow

, et al. Pilot study assessing the use of cabergoline for the treatment of cats with hypersomatotropism and diabetes mellitus. J Feline Med Surg 2021; 23: 131-137.

53.

Miceli

Garcia

Pompili

, et al. Cabergoline treatment in cats with diabetes mellitus and hypersomato-tropism. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 1238-1244.

54.

Sandret

Maison

Chanson

Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 1327-1335.

55.

Knappe

Petroff

Quinkler

, et al. Fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly: analysis of 352 patients from the German Acromegaly Registry. Eur J Endocrinol 2020; 182: 275-284.

56.

Gonzales-Virla

Vargas-Ortega

Martinez-Vazquez

, et al. Efficacy and safety of fractionated conformal radiation therapy in acromegaly: a long-term follow-up study. Endocrine 2019; 65: 386-392.

57.

Wormhoudt

Boss

Lunn

, et al. Stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of functional pituitary adenomas associated with feline acromegaly. J Vet Intern Med 2018; 32: 1383-1391.

58.

Watson-Skaggs

Gieger

Yoshikawa

, et al. Endocrine response and outcome in 14 cats with insulin resistance and acromegaly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (17 Gy). Am J Vet Res 2022; 83: 64-71.

59.

Littler

Polton

Brearley

MJ.

Resolution of diabetes mellitus but not acromegaly in a cat with a pituitary macroadenoma treated with hypofractionated radiation. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 392-395.

60.

Brearley

Polton

Littler

, et al. Coarse fractionated radiation therapy for pituitary tumours in cats: a retrospective study of 12 cases. Vet Comp Oncol 2006; 4: 209-217.

61.

Kaser-Hotz

Rohrer

Stankeova

, et al. Radiotherapy of pituitary tumours in five cats. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 303-307.

62.

Dunning

Lowrie

Bexfield

, et al. Exogenous insulin treatment after hypofractionated radiotherapy in cats with diabetes mellitus and acromegaly. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 243-249.

63.

Mayer

Greco

LaRue

SM.

Outcomes of pituitary tumor irradiation in cats. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20: 1151-1154.

64.

Giustina

Barkhoudarian

Beckers

, et al. Multidisci -plinary management of acromegaly: a consensus. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2020; 21: 667-678.

65.

Honegger

Grimm

The experience with trans-sphenoidal surgery and its importance to outcomes. Pituitary 2018; 21: 545-555.

66.

Kenny

Scudder

Keyte

, et al. Experiences of a newly established hypophysectomy clinic for treatmentof feline hypersomatotropism. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29: 449-450.

67.

Fenn

Kenny

Scudder

, et al. Efficacy of hypophy-sectomy for the treatment of hypersomatotropism-induced diabetes mellitus in 68 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 823-833.

68.

van Bokhorst

Galac

Kooistra

, et al. Evaluation of hypophysectomy for treatment of hypersomatotropism in 25 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2021; 35: 834-842.

69.

Corsini

Niessen

Miceli

, et al. Quality of life and response to treatment in cats with hypersomatotropism: the owners' point of view. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: e175-e182.

70.

Strage

Sundberg

Holst

, et al. Effect of insulin treatment on circulating insulin-like growth factor I and IGF-binding proteins in cats with diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2018; 32: 1579-1590.

71.

Woolhead

Teo Whee Wen

Scudder

, et al. Serial changes in insulin-like growth factor 1 and impact on hypersomatotropism-screening in feline diabetes mellitus. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 32. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14858.

72.

Alt

Kley

Tschuor

, et al. Evaluation of IGF1 levels in cats with transient and permanent diabetes mellitus. Res Vet Sci 2007; 83: 331-335.

73.

Reusch

Kley

Casella

, et al. Measurements of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 in cats with diabetes mellitus. Vet Rec 2006; 158: 195-200.

74.

Starkey

Tan

Church

DB.

Investigation of serum IGF-I levels amongst diabetic and non-diabetic cats. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 149-155.

75.

Berg

RIM

Nelson

Feldman

, et al. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentration in cats with diabetes mellitus and acromegaly. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 892-898.

76.

Gussow

Thalmeier

Gostelow

, et al. Method validation and establishment of reference intervals for an insulin-like growth factor-1 chemiluminescent immunoassay in cats. Vet Sci 2023; 10: 575. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10090575.

77.

Tvarijonaviciute

German

Martinez-Subiela

, et al. Analytical performance of commercially-available assays for feline insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), adiponectin and ghrelin measurements. J Feline Med Surg 2012; 14: 138-146.

78.

Tschuor

Zini

Schellenberg

, et al. Evaluation of four methods used to measure plasma insulin-like growth factor 1 concentrations in healthy cats and cats with diabetes mellitus or other diseases. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73: 1925-1931.

79.

Strage

Theodorsson

Strom Holst

, et al. Insulin-like growth factor I in cats: validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and determination of biologic variation. Vet Clin Pathol 2015; 44: 542-551.

80.

Maxwell

Butterwick

Batt

, et al. Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations are reduced by short-term dietary restriction and restored by refeeding in domestic cats (Felis catus). J Nutr 1999; 129: 1879-1884.

81.

van Hoek

Hodgkiss-Geere

Bode

, et al. Association of diet with left ventricular wall thickness, troponin I and IGF1 in cats with subclinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med 2020; 34: 2197-2210.

82.

Rochel

Burger

Nguyen

, et al. Insulin-like growth factor type 1 concentrations in hyperthyroid cats before and after treatment with thiamazole. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 179-183.