Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Practical relevance:

Auditory function is a sense that is central to life for cats - being important in situational awareness of potential predators, pursuit of prey, and for communication with conspecifics, humans and other species. Deafness in cats is most frequently the result of a genetic disorder, strongly associated with white fur and blue eyes, but may also result from acquired causes such as advancing age, ototoxic drugs, infection, environmental noise and physical trauma. Deafness can be sensorineural, where there is loss of cochlear hair cells, or conductive, where sound is muffled on its way to the inner ear.

Clinical challenges:

Establishing whether a cat is deaf can be difficult as behavioral testing of hearing is subjective and does not reliably detect unilateral deafness. Brainstem auditory evoked response testing is an objective measure but is limited in its availability. Currently, sensorineural deafness is irreversible because no treatments are available to restore lost hair cells. Conductive hearing loss can usually be treated, although full hearing recovery following otitis media may take weeks as the body clears the middle ear of debris.

Evidence base:

The author draws on the published literature and his extensive research on clinical aspects and molecular genetics of deafness, principally in companion animals, to review types and forms of deafness in cats. He also discusses current diagnostic approaches and provides brief advice for managing cats with hearing loss.

Auditory function, along with vision, is a sense that is central and critical to life for cats. It is important in situational awareness of potential predators, for pursuit of prey, and in communication with conspecifics, humans, and other species, among numerous other activities. Impairment or loss of auditory function is at best an inconvenience, but it can be life-threatening due to undetected dangers such as motor vehicles and predators.

Anatomy and physiology of hearing

In the normal ear, vibrations of sound in the ear canal - alternating compressions and rarefactions - produce vibrations of the tympanic membrane. These vibrations are transmitted by the three ossicles of the middle ear (malleus, incus and stapes) to the oval window of the inner ear (Figure 1), becoming amplified in the process. The vibrations are in turn transmitted into the inner ear as a standing wave going up the fluid-filled scala tympani to the apex and back down the scala vestibuli (which is continuous with the scala tympani) to the round window, which deflects 180° out of phase with the oval window. The pressures in the scala tympani and scala vestibuli cause deflections of the basilar membrane in the scala media (cochlear duct), upon which sits the organ of Corti that contains the sensory hair cells that ultimately transmit information about the sound into the brain via cranial nerve VIII (Figure 3).

Figure 1

Structures of the feline ear. 1 = pinna; 2 = external ear canal, consisting of a vertical canal and a horizontal canal; 3 = tympanic membrane; 4 = bulla/middle ear space; 5 = auditory tube; 6 = middle ear ossicles (malleus, incus and stapes); 7 = cochlea; 8 = vestibular structures; 9 = cranial nerve VIII. Reproduced from Ryugo and Menotti-Raymond,¹ with permission

Figure 2

Feline audiograms compiled from published sources.^2–7 Hearing range is usually based on the frequency range for responses below 60 dB SPL, and is typically cited as 45 Hz to 65 kHz

Figure 3

Structures of the cochlea in cross-section. Inner hair cells in the organ of Corti are the primary sensory transduction cells, while the outer hair cells utilize active processes to increase or decrease sensitivity. Pigment cells in the stria vascularis play a major role in maintaining high potassium levels in the cochlear duct to support hair cell viability. Hair cells synapse on neurons of the spiral ganglion, which in turn become components of cranial nerve VIII. Reproduced from Bloom and Fawcett,8 with permission

The organ of Corti consists of one row of inner hair cells and three rows of outer hair cells that map out along the basilar membrane as it coils around in the snail-shell shaped cochlea. The inner hair cells are primarily sensory in function, while the outer hair cells primarily serve as an active system that can increase or decrease sensitivity. In addition to the outer hair cells providing a means to decrease hearing sensitivity, the brain also has a mechanism to protect the cochlea against loud sounds through the actions of two muscles in the middle ear: the tensor tympani and stapedius muscles. These muscles contract as a reflex response to loud sounds (and prior to vocalizations or in response to touch) and, in so doing, dampen the transmission of sound through the ossicles. This protective reflex is not fast enough, however, to guard against percussive sounds like gunfire.

The organ of Corti sensory cells - the hair cells - have stereocilia on their top surface that project upward into a gelatinous structure in the cochlear duct known as the tectorial membrane, and are surrounded by a potassium-rich fluid called endolymph (Figure 3). The stereocilia on each hair cell are arranged in a chevron pattern, pointing from the shortest on one edge of the top surface to the tallest at the opposite edge (Figure 4). Each stereocilium is attached to adjacent stereocilia by fine microfilaments that are in turn attached to potassium ion channels. When the basilar membrane is deflected upward by a sound wave, the hair cell stereocilia are pressed against the tectorial membrane, bending them and putting tension on the microfilaments. The tension opens mechanically gated potassium channels, allowing a large influx of potassium ions from the endolymph; this influx depolarizes the inside of the hair cell. The potassium-mediated depolarization in turn opens voltage-gated calcium ion channels, and the resultant calcium influx further depolarizes the hair cell and triggers the release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate onto afferent spiral ganglion neurons that ultimately join to become cranial nerve VIII.

Figure 4

Scanning electron micrographs of cochlear hair cells. (a) Hair cells and their stereocilia. (b) Higher magnification view of the stereocilia on an outer hair cell. The stereocilia are approximately 5 μm in length. Reproduced from Bear et al,⁹ with permission

The high potassium levels in the endolymph fluid surrounding the hair cells are maintained by a modified vascular structure called the stria vascularis, located on the lateral wall of the cochlear duct. Important cellular components of the stria vascularis are melanocytes that migrated embryologically from the neural crest, and which play a vital role in maintaining the elevated potassium levels in the endolymph. Damage to hair cells can produce deafness as a primary event, but damage to the stria vascularis can also produce deafness, with hair cell death occurring secondarily to the strial degeneration and loss of potassium in the endolymph.

Forms of deafness

Numerous authors have discussed or examined the condition of deafness in white cats, dating back to as early as 1829¹⁰ and including Darwin in ‘The origin of species’.^1,10-33 However, many forms of deafness are possible, which creates the need for a classification system using a variety of criteria.

Hearing loss can be variously classified as:³⁴

Unilateral or bilateral, based on whether one or both ears are affected;

Partial or total, based on the extent of hearing loss for a given ear;

Syndromic or non-syndromic, based on whether other system diseases or phenotype abnormalities accompany the hearing loss;

Peripheral, involving the outer, middle or inner ear; or central, where the pathology is retrocochlear.

Peripheral deafness can in turn be classified based on three pairs of criteria:

Hereditary or acquired;

Congenital or late-onset;

Sensorineural, where cochlear hair cells die, or conductive, where loss results from reduced sound transmission to the cochlea.

These last three criteria combine into eight possible combinations including: hereditary congenital sensorineural deafness (the most common type in cats); acquired late-onset conductive deafness (probably the second-most common type); acquired late-onset sensorineural deafness; and others (Table 1).

Table 1

Types of peripheral hearing loss

Deafness type	Possible cause(s)	Frequency
Hereditary congenital sensorineural	White pigmentation gene (W)	Common
Hereditary congenital conductive	Not reported in cats	–
Hereditary late-onset sensorineural	Not reported in cats	–
Hereditary late-onset conductive	Not reported in cats	–
Acquired congenital sensorineural	Prenatal ototoxic drug exposure	Uncommon
Acquired congenital conductive	Cartilage defect, canal atresia	Uncommon
Acquired late-onset sensorineural	Otitis interna, drug toxicity, presbycusis, environmental noise	Moderate
Acquired late-onset conductive	Otitis externa/media, canal stenosis	Moderate

Not all of these types of peripheral deafness have been reported in cats. Hereditary congenital sensorineural deafness - the only type of hereditary deafness reported in cats to date - is most commonly associated with white fur, especially in cats with blue eyes. Acquired late-onset conductive deafness is most commonly associated with otitis media and/or externa. Acquired late-onset sensorineural deafness is most commonly associated with drug ototoxicity (eg, gentamicin) or age-related hearing loss (presbycusis).

Figure 5

Deafness in blue-eyed white cats is perhaps the most recognized form of deafness in animals. ©iStock.com/Pley

Hereditary deafness

Pathology of hereditary deafness

The forms of hereditary deafness can be separated based on the type of pathology present. Steel^35-37 developed a classification system with three types of pathology that cover observed forms of deafness. These include a morphogenetic pathology and two types of degenerative pathology, as described below.

Morphogenetic

This category includes all structural abnormalities of the membranous and bony labyrinths, which at its extreme includes a complete absence of auditory and / or vestibular components. The effects of this pathology on hearing can vary from profound deafness to no hearing loss that nevertheless is accompanied by effects on vestibular structures. This rare condition is essentially a major birth defect.

Neuroepithelial

This pathology presents with a loss of cochlear hair cells as the primary event, beginning when normal histological development of the organ of Corti is finishing following birth. outer hair cells degenerate before inner hair cells, beginning in the upper part of the basal turn and progressing to both the apex and the base.³⁵ Supporting cells of the organ of Corti collapse, leaving the basilar membrane and dedif -ferentiated cells (ie, those that have reverted back to their undifferentiated state). The stria vascularis and Reissner’s membrane are initially unaffected and any or all vestibular structures can be affected. The expression of this pathology is typically bilateral. An endocochlear potential (voltage measured between the cochlear duct and the exterior of the cochlea, and produced by potassium secretion by the stria) may still be present in the endolymph of the cochlear duct because of continued potassium secretion by the stria vascularis.³⁸

This pathology has been reported in mice,³⁹ guinea pigs,^40,41 dogs^42-44 and humans.⁴⁵ It may also occur in cats based on reports of the presence of deafness with coexisting vestibular pathology,^46,47 but this has not been documented histologically.

Cochleosaccular

This condition, also known as Scheibe type pathology, results from an initial degeneration of the stria vascularis on the outer wall of the cochlear duct, proceeding to degeneration of hair cells, and collapse of Reissner’s membrane. It may occasionally also include collapse of the saccule, with collapse of the saccule wall and macular damage but without any effect on the remainder of the vestibular structures. The expression of this pathology is more often unilateral, but both ears can be affected. No endocochlear potential remains due to the strial degeneration. The initial strial degeneration is usually linked to the absence of functioning melanocytes, and as a result may be described as pigment-associated, often also linked to lack of pigmentation in the skin, iris and tapetum lucidum.

Cochleosaccular pathology has been reported in the white cat,^21,22,48 the Dalmatian^49-51 and other dog breeds,^52,53 Hedlund white mink,^54,55 several mouse mutants,^56,57 and as Waardenburg syndrome in humans.⁵⁸ As background reference, the normal postnatal maturation of the stria vascularis has been described for the dog⁵⁹ and the functional morphology of melanocyte types has been described for the mouse.⁶⁰ Unilateral congenital deafness has been shown to produce minor alterations in the ventral cochlear nucleus in rats⁶¹ and cerebral cortex in cats,^62-64 but the changes are not sufficiently extensive to affect brain function except for localization of sound sources.

Genes associated with hereditary deafness

Along with deafness in Dalmatians, deafness in blue-eyed white cats is perhaps the most recognized form of deafness in animals. Most hereditary deafness in cats involves cochleosaccular pathology, although some neuroepithelial pathology associated with vestibular signs may also exist. Whether two genes or a single gene is responsible for white pigmentation in the cat is unsettled, as discussed on page 280.⁶⁵

Neuroepithelial deafness

Cases of combined deafness and vestibular disease have been reported in Siamese and Burmese kittens,^46,47 but little is known about neuroepithelial deafness in cats. Vestibular signs appear at or shortly after birth, are non-progressive, and may disappear with time. In some cases, deafness was determined based on behavioral tests; BAER testing was not routinely performed and histological studies were not reported.

Acquired deafness

Acquired hearing loss is much less common than hereditary deafness in cats. The most frequently encountered form is due to ototoxicity; other forms include presbycusis, and deafness due to infection, anesthesia, environmental noise or physical trauma.⁷⁷

Ototoxicity

A variety of drugs and other chemicals have been demonstrated to have toxic effects on the inner ear, affecting auditory and / or vestibular function.^78-83 The most prominent of these are the aminoglycoside antibiotics,^84-88 antineoplastic agents,⁸⁹ diuretics and antiseptics.

Aminoglycosides

Aminoglycosides are the most frequently used antibiotics worldwide for treating gramnegative infections in humans, and are likewise heavily used in veterinary medicine. This drug class includes gentamicin, tobramycin, neomycin, kanamycin, amikacin and streptomycin. Gentamicin is one of the most commonly used antibiotics for topical treatment of otitis externa.

The side effects of aminoglycosides are nephrotoxicity (often reversible) and ototoxicity (both cochlear and vestibular, usually irreversible), and can result from systemic or topical application. Toxicity usually develops after long-term, high-dose administration, but is unpredictable and may occur after a single high dose⁹⁰ or long after cessation of treatment. Three weeks of twice daily topical otic treatment in dogs produced no observable BAER changes with either intact or excised tympanic membranes.⁹¹ Perinatal cats are less susceptible to aminoglycoside toxicity than older animals, but still may be affected.⁹²

Studies in recent years have revealed the sequential mechanisms of ototoxicity to be iron chelation, followed by free radical formation, and thereafter caspase-dependent apoptosis.⁹³ Co-administration of aspirin⁹⁴ or other antioxidants such as D-methionine or N-acetylcysteine with gentamicin has been shown to reduce or prevent gentamicin ototoxicity, but the clinical utility of such treatments in veterinary practice has not been demonstrated. Other possibly protective antioxidants include deferoxamine, dihydroxy -benzoic acid, glutathione and a-lipoic acid.⁸³

Different aminoglycoside antibiotics vary in their effects on the cochlea and vestibular structures; as a result, vestibular signs may be more prominent than auditory deficits. The auditory deficits, which are progressive, are frequently not noticed by owners or clinicians until significant damage has occurred. In addition to gentamicin, streptomycin, neo -mycin and others in this drug class may cause hearing loss.

Antineoplastic agents

Chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin produce irreversible hearing loss by their actions on hair cells and on the stria vascularis, but the vestibular system is not affected. The mechanism is thought to be through production of reactive oxygen species. Co-administration of antioxidants may provide some protective effect when drug use is deemed necessary.

Diuretics and other drugs

Loop diuretics, especially furosemide and etacrynic acid, can produce hearing loss, but the loss is usually temporary. However, diuretics can potentiate the ototoxicity of aminoglycosides and antineoplastics.⁸³ The mechanism is probably related to effects on ion transport by the stria vascularis. Salicylates and quinine can also produce hearing loss, which is often accompanied by tinnitus, but the effects are usually reversible with discontinuation of the drug.

Antiseptics

The antiseptic chlorhexidine has demonstrated permanent ototoxicity. This was especially prevalent when chlorhexidine was marketed in an otic preparation, but as with other ototoxic products the toxicity was not consistent.⁹⁵ Removal of the otic indication from the product has reduced the prevalence of this toxicity, but some practitioners still apply dilutions of other chlorhexidine formulations for otic use as a misguided economy measure.

Presbycusis

Presbycusis refers to reduced auditory perception with advancing age.^96-98 The mechanisms are primarily sensorineural, although conductive middle ear effects may contribute, and are progressive.⁹⁶ The mechanisms are also primarily peripheral, although there may be central changes as a component.

Little research has been published on presbycusis in animals,^99-103 and no feline clinical studies appear to have been reported. one long-term study of dogs using tone-evoked BAER demonstrated a progressive loss of hearing in aging dogs, with middle and high frequencies affected first.¹⁰⁰

It is highly likely that presbycusis develops in a similar pattern in geriatric cats, but more study is required. Cats are considered to be geriatric based on when they are most likely to start having diseases associated with aging: >11.88 + 1.94 years, according to one source.¹⁰⁴ Another source classifies ⩾15 years of age as being geriatric and 11-14 years as being senior.¹⁰⁵ Based on what is known in dogs, the onset of losses associated with presbycusis might be expected to occur before the cat reaches geriatric age. However, recent unpublished data from the author’s laboratory show that presbycusis is uncommon in cats in their teen years, and, if present after that age, is much less severe than in dogs.

The presence of presbycusis may contribute to problem behaviors in older animals.^106,107

Other forms

A variety of other, less common forms of hearing loss exist, although the cause of acute-onset hearing loss is often never identified.

Infection Otitis interna, often accompanied by signs of vestibular disease, can result in sensorineural deafness that is irreversible. Appropriate treatment should be pursued to forestall hearing loss.¹⁰⁸

Anesthesia On rare occasions, cats (and dogs) awaken from general anesthesia with bilateral deafness, typically following dental procedures.¹⁰⁹ The etiology is unclear and may involve multiple factors. In some cases manipulation of the jaw may result in inflammation and occlusion of the auditory tube, leading to middle ear effusion of mucus secretions from the lining of the middle ear, which becomes dessicated and retained to produce conductive hearing loss. This can often be addressed surgically. It has also been suggested that distraction of the cat’s lower jaw with a mouth gag might restrict maxillary artery blood flow, resulting in cochlear hypoxia. A study in anesthetized cats found some indicators of reduced maxillary blood flow, but no cases of deafness were observed.¹¹⁰

Environmental noise Noise trauma, or noise-induced hearing loss, increasingly affects humans and animals. As discussed earlier, reflex contractions of the tensor tympani and stapedius muscles are protective mechanims to dampen noise transmission in the middle ear, but provide no protection against percussive sounds such as gunfire. The effect of the noise may be a temporary threshold shift, with hearing recovering in hours to days, or a permanent threshold shift that is irreversible, in which case the hearing loss is cumulative, primarily affecting the hair cells. It is not clear that noise trauma is an issue for cats, but guidelines established by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration for permissible human exposure provide a reasonable standard where environmental noise levels may be a concern, such as in animal shelters.^77,111,112

Trauma Physical trauma can result in hearing loss, which is usually conductive. Clinical localization of the site of trauma can indicate this source.

Other disease processes and anatomic defects Conductive deafness can also result from inflammatory changes associated with chronic otitis externa, polyps or other masses in the ear canal or bulla,¹¹³ or palatine defects.¹¹⁴ Surgical correction can often restore hearing; even partial or total resection of the ear canal can result in restoration of partial hearing if cochlear function was intact prior to the surgery.

Diagnosis of hearing loss

A cat presented with suspected hearing loss should first have otitis externa and otitis media ruled out by otoscopic examination, and otitis interna ruled out to the extent possible by testing for sensitivity to palpation of the ear and the presence of vestibular signs. Factors that can suggest other etiologies are age (presbycusis), skin/hair/iris color (white/white/blue, hereditary), and a history of recent treatment with potentially ototoxic drugs (especially gentamicin), noise exposure or trauma.

BAER testing

Objective testing of hearing is performed using the BAER (brainstem auditory evoked response), also known as the auditory brainstem response and several other variants.^115-118 This test can be performed both in awake and unconscious cats and is unaffected by drugs (except ototoxic drugs). An auditory stimulus is inserted into an ear and the response of the auditory pathway is detected by subdermal needle electrodes placed on the cranial vertex and outside the ear canal (Figure 6). The response is a series of peaks that occur within about 5 ms. The amplitude of the response is small enough (microvolts) that responses to multiple stimuli must be averaged to remove the confounding effects of physiologic (electromyogram and electroencephalogram) and other unrelated biologic and external signals that can mask the response. The stimulus typically used is a click sound, which contains all but the highest of the audible frequencies in the cat. Pure tone stimuli may also be used if attempting to obtain an audiogram of thresholds at different frequencies, but anesthesia is required and the process is time-consuming.

Figure 6

Cat gently restrained, with electrodes in place, and BAER testing of the right ear being performed

In the clinical setting, the BAER is used most commonly to screen for hearing or deaf ears, since pigment-associated hereditary congenital deafness nearly always presents as either total deafness in an ear or a normal response. The BAER recording of a deaf ear is essentially a flat line (Figure 7). The extent of partial hearing loss, when present, is very difficult to assess objectively with the BAER test. Response peak latencies increase and peak amplitudes decrease with increasingly softer stimuli or with progressively greater hearing loss, but due to test-retest variability and subject-to-subject variability it is unsafe to attempt to quantify partial hearing loss in the manner that is done in human subjects.

Figure 7

(top) BAER recording from a 2-year-old normal cat, with peaks I, II, III and V labeled on the tracing. Peak I is generated by cranial nerve VIII entering the brain, while the later peaks are generated in the brainstem. (bottom) By comparison, this essentially flat line is a recording from a bilaterally deaf cat. 0.5 μv/div and 1 ms/div

The availability of BAER testing is limited because of equipment costs. A partial listing of available test sites, both within and outside of North America, is available online.¹¹⁹

Other tests of auditory function

other tests of auditory function are available, but are less commonly utilized.¹²⁰ One of these involves otoacoustic emissions (oAEs), where the ear generates sounds, either spontaneously or in response to introduced test stimuli. OAEs are thought to reflect the function of cochlear outer hair cells, which contain contractile proteins that allow the cells to shorten or lengthen at a rapid frequency. Spontaneous OAEs are present in most normal ears at very low levels, and can occasionally be loud enough to be detected without amplification by the listener.¹²¹ Evoked OAEs provide a sensitive early indicator of loss of auditory function, but only of the outer hair cells by definition.

The evoked OAE that has proven most useful in humans is the distortion product OAE (DPOAE). Two pure tones (f₁ and f₂, f₂ > f₁) are introduced into the ear canal and the resulting pure tone - the distortion product - is recorded at a frequency of 2f₁-f₂. The frequency span of the cochlea is tested by varying f₁ and constraining the frequency ratio to f₂/f₁ = 1.21, a ratio proven to produce the strongest response.¹²² A response to a given test frequency pair that falls below the noise threshold may indicate loss of function. DPoAEs are increasingly being used in the veterinary setting, especially when it is desired to know what audible frequencies may be affected.^103,123,124

An alternate test is the transient evoked oAE (TEoAE), where a transient evoked response to a series of wideband clicks or chirps is recorded. DPoAEs evaluate a wider frequency range (above 10 kHz) than do TEoAEs, and might be preferred in species like the cat (or dog) with a higher frequency hearing range, albeit offer less sensitivity to minor and subclinical conditions. A failed oAE test typically mandates referral for BAER testing, so a lower instrument cost and briefer testing time may be offset by the need for further tests.

Middle ear and auditory tube function can be assessed using tympanometry (or impedance audiometry), which is a widely accepted and used technique in human medicine. This non-invasive method of examining the function of the middle ear involves varying the atmospheric pressure in the external ear canal and inferring the amount of sound energy that is transmitted through the tympanum by measuring the reflected sound energy.^120,125,126 Pressure is typically varied from -400 to +200 daPa (decaPascals or mmH₂o) while a continuous 226 Hz tone is presented, and the intensity of reflected sound is measured and plotted as a function of ear canal pressure. The resulting graph displays the compliance (or static acoustic impedance or admittance) of the tympanum. Variations from the normal response graph can indicate ossicle disarticulation, tympanum scarring or otosclerosis, middle ear fluid, tympanum rupture or auditory tube dysfunction.

Treatment approaches and limitations

The treatment approach is dictated by the form of deafness or mechanism responsible for the hearing loss.

Conductive hearing loss can usually be treated by mechanical (ear canal cleaning), surgical or antibiotic approaches. Full hearing recovery following otitis media may take a few weeks as the body clears the middle ear of debris.

Sensorineural deafness, whether due to genetics, aging, ototoxicity or noise, cannot be treated because no treatment modalities are available at present to restore lost hair cells. Current research suggests that this may be possible in the future.

Management of cats with hearing loss

Cats with unilateral deafness or partial hearing loss require no specific management, except that those with suspected hereditary deafness should not be used for breeding and those with acquired hearing loss should have the causative source removed or eliminated where possible.

With bilaterally deaf cats, the primary concern is protection from undetected dangers such as motor vehicles or predators.^127,128 Preferably these cats should be kept as indoor pets since it can be difficult (although not impossible)¹²⁹ to constrain cats with yard fencing and hence to protect them from threats. Some deaf cats with outdoor privileges have been trained to return in response to flashing porch lights, but behavioral training is notoriously challenging in cats. The danger to infants and toddlers from reflex bites or scratches inflicted when a deaf cat is startled should be kept in mind.

The use of gesture communication, including canine obedience training signals, American Sign Language signs, and others, has been found to be effective in deaf dogs.¹²⁷ Deaf animals are naturally more visually attentive to humans, making them amenable to training in this form of communication. owners of deaf cats may, with patience, be able to train their pets with this system.

Key Points

The most common form of deafness in cats is congenital and hereditary, and associated with white pigmentation, especially in white cats with blue eyes.

Ototoxicity, frequently from aminoglycoside antibiotics like gentamicin, can be unpredictable and often results in total and irreversible deafness before the owner or veterinarian is aware of hearing loss.

Behavioral testing of hearing is often unreliable. The brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) test is the most reliable assessment tool, but access to testing facilities is limited.

Sensorineural deafness is not currently treatable. Conduction deafness from obstructions of the outer or middle ear may be reversed.

Footnotes

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Ryugo

Menotti-Raymond

. Feline deafness. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 1179-1207.

Neff

Hind

. Auditory thresholds of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 480-483.

Elliot

Stein

Harrison

. Determination of absolute-intensity thresholds and frequency difference thresholds in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32: 380-384.

Gerken

Sandlin

. Auditory reaction time and absolute threshold in cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 602-607.

Costalupes

. Temporal integration of pure tones in the cat. Hear Res 1983; 9: 43-54.

Gerken

Saunders

Simhadri-Sumithra

, et al. Behavioral thresholds for electrical stimulation applied to auditory brainstem nuclei in cat are altered by injurious and noninjurious sound. Hear Res 1985; 20: 221-231.

Heffner

. Hearing range of the domestic cat. Hear Res 1985; 19: 85-88.

Bloom

Fawcett

. A textbook of histology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975, p 976.

Bear

Connors

Paradiso

. The auditory and vestibular systems. In: Neuroscience: exploring the brain. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 2016, p 381.

10.

Bree

. White cats with blue eyes always deaf. Magaz Nat Hist J Zool, Bot, Mineral, Geol Meteorol 1829; 1: 178-179.

11.

Darwin

. The origin of species. London: Murray, 1859, p 75.

12.

Tait

. Note on deafness in white cats. Nature 1883; 29: 164.

13.

Alexander

. Zur vergleichenden, pathologischen anatomie des gehororgan und gehirn einer unvollkommen albinotis-chen, weissen katze. Arch fur ohrenheilkunde 1900; 50: 159-181.

14.

Bamber

. Correlation between white coat colour, blue eyes and deafness in cats. J Genet 1933; 27: 407-413.

15.

Wolff

. Three generations of deaf white cats. J Hered 1942; 33: 39-43.

16.

Wilson

Kane

. Congenital deafness in white cats. Acta Otolaryngol 1959; 50: 269-275.

17.

Bosher

Hallpike

. Observations on the histological features, development and pathogenesis of the inner ear degeneration of the deaf white cat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1965; 162: 147-170.

18.

Bosher

Hallpike

. Observations on the histogenesis of the inner ear degeneration of the deaf white cat and its possible relationship to the aetiology of certain unexplained varieties of human congenital deafness. J Laryngol Otol 1966; 80: 222-235.

19.

Suga

Hattler

. Physiological and histopathological correlates of hereditary deafness in animals. Laryngoscope 1970; 80: 81-104.

20.

Bergsma

Brown

. White fur, blue eyes, and deafness in the domestic cat. J Hered 1971; 62: 171-185.

21.

Mair

. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1973; 314: 1-48.

22.

Mair

Elverland

. Hereditary deafness in the cat. An electron microscopic study of the stria vascularis and Reissner’s membrane. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1977; 217: 199-217.

23.

Pujol

Rebillard

. Primary neural disorders in the deaf white cat cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1977; 83: 59-64.

24.

Rebillard

Pujol

. Variability of the hereditary deafness in the white cat. I. Physiology. Hear Res 1981; 5: 179-187.

25.

Rebillard

Pujol

Rebillard

. Variability of the hereditary deafness in the white cat. II. Histology. Hear Res 1981; 5: 189-200.

26.

Saada

Niparko

Ryugo

. Morphological changes in the cochlear nucleus of congenitally deaf white cats. Brain Res 1996; 736: 315-328.

27.

Heid

Jahn-Siebert

Klinke

, et al. Afferent projection patterns in the auditory brainstem in normal and congenitally deaf white cats. Hear Res 1997; 110: 191-199.

28.

Heid

Hartmann

Klinke

. A model for prelingual deafness, the congenitally deaf white cat - population statistics and degenerative changes. Hear Res 1998; 115: 101-112.

29.

Ryugo

Cahill

Rose

, et al. Separate forms of pathology in the cochlea of congenitally deaf white cats. Hear Res 2003; 181: 73-84.

30.

Strain

. Aetiology, prevalence and diagnosis of deafness in dogs and cats. Br Vet J 1996; 152: 17-36.

31.

Strain

. Congenital deafness and its recognition. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1999; 29: 895-907.

32.

Strain

. Deafness in blue-eyed white cats: the uphill road to solving polygenic disorders. Vet J 2007; 173: 471-472.

33.

Strain

. Forms and mechanisms of deafness. In: Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 40-52.

34.

Strain

. The genetics of deafness in domestic animals. Front Vet Sci 2015; 2: 29. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00029.

35.

Steel

Bock

. Hereditary inner-ear abnormalities in animals. Relationships with human abnormalities. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 22-29.

36.

Steel

Niausset

Bock

. The genetics of hearing. In: Willott

(ed). The auditory psychobiology of the mouse. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1982, pp 341-394.

37.

Steel

. Inherited hearing defects in mice. Annu Rev Genet 1995; 29: 675-701.

38.

Tasaki

Spyropoulos

. Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. J Neurophysiol 1959; 22: 149-155.

39.

Ormerod

. The pathology of congenital deafness. J Otolaryngol 1960; 74: 919-950.

40.

Ernstson

. Cochlear morphology in a strain of the waltzing guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 1971; 71: 469-482.

41.

Festing

MFW

. Genetics. In: Wagner

Manning

(eds). The biology of the guinea pig. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1976, pp 110-111.

42.

Igarashi

Alford

Cohn

, et al. Inner ear abnormalities in dogs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972; 81: 249-255.

43.

Coppens

Kiss

Heizmann

, et al. An original inner ear neuroepithelial degeneration in a deaf Rottweiler puppy. Hear Res 2001; 161: 65-71.

44.

Coppens

Gilbert-Gregory

Steinberg

, et al. Inner ear histopathology in ‘nervous Pointer dogs’ with severe hearing loss. Hear Res 2005; 200: 51-62.

45.

Lindsay

. Profound childhood deafness: inner ear pathology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1973; 82 Suppl 5: 1-121.

46.

Chrisman

. Vestibular diseases. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1980; 10: 103-129.

47.

de Lahunta

. Vestibular system - special proprioception. In: Veterinary neuroanatomy and clinical neurology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1983, pp 238-254.

48.

Elverland

Mair

. Hereditary deafness in the cat. An electron microscopic study of the spiral ganglion. Acta Otolaryngol 1980; 90: 360-369.

49.

Johnsson

Hawkins

Murasaki

, et al. Vascular anatomy and pathology in the cochlea of Dalmatian dogs. In: De Lorenzo

AJD

(ed). Vascular disorders and hearing defects. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1984, pp 249-295.

50.

Mair

. Hereditary deafness in the Dalmatian dog. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1976; 212: 1-14.

51.

Sampaio

Paine

Schachern

, et al. Histopathological morphometric study of cochleo-saccular dysplasia in Dalmatian dogs. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74: 934-938.

52.

Coppens

Resibois

Poncelet

. Bilateral deafness in a maltese terrier and a great pyrenean puppy: inner ear morphology. J Comp Pathol 2000; 122: 223-228.

53.

Coppens

Steinberg

Poncelet

. Inner ear morphology in a bilaterally deaf Dogo Argentino pup. J Comp Pathol 2003; 128: 67-70.

54.

Sugiura

Hilding

. Cochleo-saccular degeneration in Hedlund white mink. Acta Otolaryngol 1970; 69: 126-137.

55.

Sugiura

Hilding

. Stria vascularis of deaf Hedlund mink. Light and electron microscopic studies of vascular insufficiency. Acta Otolaryngol 1970; 69: 160-171.

56.

Deol

. The relationship between abnormalities of pigmentation and of the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1970; 175: 201-217.

57.

Deol

. The origin of the acoustic ganglion and effects of the gene dominant spotting (Ww) in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1970; 23: 773-784.

58.

Fisch

. Deafness as part of an hereditary syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 1959; 73: 355-382.

59.

Coppens

Salmon

Heizmann

, et al. Postnatal maturation of the dog stria vascularis - an immunohistochemical study. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 270: 82-92.

60.

Cable

Steel

. Identification of two types of melanocyte within the stria vascularis of the mouse inner ear. Pigment Cell Res 1991; 4: 87-101.

61.

Jakob

Rosskothen-Kuhl

Illing

. Induction of single-sided deafness in the newborn rat and its consequence for cochlear nucleus volume development. Hear Res 2016; 333: 210-215.

62.

Kok

Chabot

Lomber

. Cross-modal reorganization of cortical afferents to dorsal auditory cortex following early- and late-onset deafness. J Comp Neurol 2014; 522: 654-675.

63.

Chabot

Butler

Lomber

. Differential modification of cortical and thalamic projections to cat primary auditory cortex following early- and late-onset deafness. J Comp Neurol 2015; 523: 2297-2320.

64.

Tillein

Hubka

Kral

. Monaural congenital deafness affects aural dominance and degrades binaural processing. Cereb Cortex 2016; 26: 1762-1777.

65.

Strain

. Hereditary deafness. In: Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 53-69.

66.

Geigy

Heid

Steffen

, et al. Does a pleiotropic gene explain deafness and blue irises in white cats? Vet J 2007; 173: 548-553.

67.

Searle

. Coat colour mutants in the Carnivora. In: Comparative genetics of coat colour in mammals. London: Logos Press, 1968, pp 138-180.

68.

Cooper

Fretwell

Bailey

, et al. White spotting in the domestic cat (Felis catus) maps near KIT on feline chromosome B1. Anim Genet 2006; 37: 163-165.

69.

Delack

. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1984; 6: 609-619.

70.

Cvejic

Steinberg

Kent

, et al. Unilateral and bilateral congenital sensorineural deafness in client-owned pure-breed white cats. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 392-395.

71.

David

Menotti-Raymond

Wallace

, et al. Endogenous retrovirus insertion in the KIT oncogene determines white and white spotting in domestic cats. G3 (Bethesda) 2014; 4: 1881-1891.

72.

Frischknecht

Jagannathan

Leeb

. Whole genome sequencing confirms KIT insertions in a white cat. Anim Genet 2015; 46: 98.

73.

Song

Choi

, et al. Identification and classification of feline endogenous retroviruses in the cat genome using degenerate PCR and in silico data analysis. J Gen Virol 2013; 94: 1587-1596.

74.

Montague

Gandolfi

, et al. Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 17230-17235.

75.

Clark

Wahl

Rees

, et al. Retrotransposon insertion in SILV is responsible for merle patterning of the domestic dog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 1376-1381.

76.

Clark

Wahl

Rees

, et al. Canine SINEs and their effects on phenotypes of the domestic dog. In: Gustafson

Taylor

Stacey

(eds). Genomics of disease. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 2008, pp 79-88.

77.

Strain

. Later onset deafness. In: Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 70-82.

78.

Callaghan

Culley

. Ototoxicity in the dog and cat. Vet Rec 1985; 117: 291.

79.

Lane

. Ototoxicity in the dog and cat. Vet Rec 1985; 117: 94.

80.

Merchant

. Ototoxicity. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1994; 24: 971-980.

81.

Pickrell

Oehme

Cash

. Ototoxicity in dogs and cats. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1993; 8: 42-49.

82.

Gotthelf

. Ototoxicity. In: Small animal ear diseases: an illustrated guide. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders, 2005, pp 329-338.

83.

oishi

Talaska

Schacht

. Ototoxicity in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 1259-1271.

84.

Webster

McGee

Carroll

, et al. Ototoxicity of gentamicin. Histopathologic and functional results in the cat. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1970; 74: 1155-1165.

85.

Leake

Hradek

. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear Res 1988; 33: 11-34.

86.

Shepherd

Chen

, et al. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear Res 1993; 70: 205-215.

87.

Gookin

Riviere

Gilger

, et al. Acute renal failure in four cats treated with paromomycin. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 1821-1823.

88.

Huth

Ricci

Cheng

. Mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity and targets of hair cell protection. Int J Otolaryngol 2011; 2011: Article ID 937861.

89.

Barabas

Milner

Lurie

, et al. Cisplatin: a review of tox-icities and therapeutic applications. Vet Comp Oncol 2008; 6: 1-18.

90.

Gooi

Hochman

Wellman

, et al. Ototoxic effects of single-dose versus 19-day daily-dose gentamicin. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008: 37: 664-667.

91.

Strain

Merchant

Neer

, et al. Ototoxicity assessment of a gentamicin sulfate otic preparation in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 532-538.

92.

Shepherd

Martin

. Onset of ototoxicity in the cat is related to onset of auditory function. Hear Res 1995; 92: 131-142.

93.

Rizzi

Hirose

. Aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15: 352-357.

94.

Sha

S-H

Qiu

J-H

Schacht

. Aspirin to prevent gentamicin-induced hearing loss. New Engl J Med 2006; 354: 17-18.

95.

Merchant

Neer

Tedford

, et al. Ototoxicity assessment of a chlorhexidine otic preparation in dogs. Progr Vet Neurol 1993; 4: 72-75.

96.

Willott

. Aging and the auditory system: anatomy, physiology, and psychophysics. San Diego: Singular, 1991, pp 1-286.

97.

Yamasoba

Lin

Someya

, et al. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear Res 2013; 303: 30-38.

98.

Roth

. Aging of the auditory system. Handb Clin Neurol 2015; 129: 357-373.

99.

Shimada

Ebisu

Morita

, et al. Age-related changes in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of dogs. J Vet Med Sci 1998; 60: 41-48.

100.

Ter Haar

Venker-van Haagen

van den Brom

, et al. Effects of aging on brainstem responses to toneburst auditory stimuli: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2008: 22: 937-945.

101.

Ter Haar

de Groot

Venker-van Haagen

, et al. Effects of aging on inner ear morphology in dogs in relation to brainstem responses to toneburst auditory stimuli. J Vet Intern Med 2009: 23: 536-543.

102.

Wilson

Mills

Dzulkarnain

. Use of BAER to identify loss of auditory function in older horses. Aust Vet J 2011; 89: 73-76.

103.

Strain

Rosado Martinez

McGee

. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in geriatric dogs. Vet J 2016; 216: 101-106.

104.

Goldston

. Geriatrics and gerontology: preface. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1989; 19: ix-x.

105.

Hoyumpa Vogt

Rodan

Brown

, et al. AAFP-AAHA: feline life stage guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12: 43-54.

106.

Houpt

Beaver

. Behavioral problems of geriatric dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1981; 11: 643-652.

107.

Gunn-Moore

. Cognitive dysfunction in cats: clinical assessment and management. Top Companion Anim Med 2011; 26: 17-24.

108.

Axlund

. Otitis interna and vestibular disease. In: Gotthelf

(ed). Small animal ear diseases: an illustrated guide. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2005, pp 339-348.

109.

Stevens-Sparks

Strain

. Post-anesthesia deafness in dogs and cats following dental and ear cleaning procedures. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010; 37: 347-351.

110.

Barton-Lamb

Martin-Flores

Scrivani

, et al. Evaluation of maxillary arterial blood flow in anesthetized cats with the mouth closed and open. Vet J 2013; 196: 325-331.

111.

OSHA. 29 CFR 1910.95. Fed Reg 1971; 36: 10466-10714.

112.

OSHA. Proposed occupational noise exposure regulation. Fed Reg 1974; 39: 37773-37784.

113.

Anders

Hoelzler

Scavelli

, et al. Analysis of auditory and neurologic effects associated with ventral bulla osteotomy for removal of inflammatory polyps or nasopharyngeal masses in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 580-585.

114.

Gregory

. Middle ear disease associated with congenital palatine defects in seven dogs and one cat. J Small Anim Pract 2000; 41: 398-401.

115.

Achor

Starr

. Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 48: 154-173.

116.

Strain

Tedford

Littlefield-Chabaud

, et al. Air-and bone-conducted brainstem auditory evoked potentials and flash visual evoked potentials in cats. Am J Vet Res 1998; 59: 135-137.

117.

Wilson

Mills

. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 2177-2187.

118.

Strain

. Brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER). In: Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 83-107.

119.

Strain

. Deafness in dogs and cats. BAER testing sites. http://www.lsu.edu/deafness/deaf.htm. (2016, accessed August 1, 2016).

120.

Strain

. Other tests of auditory function. In: Strain

. Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 108-116.

121.

Ruggero

Kramek Rich

. Spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions in a dog. Hear Res 1984; 13: 293-296.

122.

Lonsbury-Martin

McCoy

Whitehead

, et al. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 1: 11-22.

123.

McBrearty

Penderis

. Evaluation of auditory function in a population of clinically healthy cats using evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Feline Med Surg 2011; 13: 919-926.

124.

Schemera

Blumsack

Cellino

, et al. Evaluation of otoacoustic emissions in clinically normal alert puppies. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 295-301.

125.

Onusko

. Tympanometry. Am Fam Physic 2004; 70: 1713-1720.

126.

Strain

Fernandes

. Handheld tympanometer measurements in conscious dogs for evaluation of the middle ear and auditory tube. Vet Derm 2015; 26: 193-197.

127.

Strain

. Living with a deaf dog or cat. In: Deafness in dogs and cats. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 2011, pp 117-124.

128.

Scheifele

Clark

Scheifele

. Canine hearing loss management. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42: 1225-1239.

129.

International Cat Care. Fencing your garden. http://icatcare.org/advice/fencing-your-garden (accessed August 1, 2016).

Hearing disorders in cats: Classification,pathology and diagnosis

Abstract

Practical relevance:

Clinical challenges:

Evidence base:

Anatomy and physiology of hearing

Forms of deafness

Hereditary deafness

Pathology of hereditary deafness

Morphogenetic

Neuroepithelial

Cochleosaccular

Genes associated with hereditary deafness

Neuroepithelial deafness

Acquired deafness

Ototoxicity

Aminoglycosides

Antineoplastic agents

Diuretics and other drugs

Antiseptics

Presbycusis

Other forms

Diagnosis of hearing loss

BAER testing

Other tests of auditory function

Treatment approaches and limitations

Management of cats with hearing loss

Key Points

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest

References