Abstract
Clinical records made during routine vaccinations were compared between populations of domestic shorthair cats and Bengal kittens. An increased incidence (12/244) of thoracic wall deformity was detected amongst the Bengal kittens. Deformities detected were: pectus excavatum (five), unilateral thoracic wall concavity (six) and scoliosis (one). Five-generation pedigrees were analysed for the affected kittens that showed a high degree of common ancestry indicating the likelihood of a familial cause.
Introduction
A variety of different thoracic wall deformities are described in kittens, including pectus excavatum (PE), flat-chestedness, scoliosis, lordosis, kyphosis, pectus carinatum and missing or extra ribs or thoracic vertebrae. However, there is a paucity of literature in this area, with only 23 cases of PE previously reported1–14 and a single article on flat-chestedness in Burmese kittens. 15
In humans, PE is the most common thoracic wall abnormality occurring in between 1:400 and 1:1000 live births16,17 with a male bias, and is commonly associated with connective tissue disorders such as Marfan and Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. The aetiology of PE in humans is uncertain, but a familial tendency has been found with multiple modes of inheritance suggested. 16 PE can occur as a single entity or associated with other abnormalities and may well be the phenotypic response to a variety of underlying conditions. In many cases, thoracic wall deformities are cosmetic but in some individuals the reduction in thoracic volume causes significant respiratory compromise.
The incidence of thoracic wall deformities in kittens is unknown, but information from breeders would suggest that they are not an infrequent occurrence. In a study of flat-chested Burmese kittens, Sturgess et al 15 reported an incidence of 3–4% of live Burmese kittens with a suspected genetic component, although the mode of inheritance was unclear; the number of kittens with PE in this study was also higher than expected (CP Sturgess, personal communication) and this was considered a separate clinical entity. 15 PE has been associated with mucopolysaccharidosis VII in cats, 18 but the underlying aetiology is unknown. There is a range in severity of deformity with various degrees of respiratory compromise induced by the loss of thoracic volume. The authors have examined multiple Bengal kittens affected by PE or other thoracic wall deformities. Some cases have been asymptomatic, while others have had severe respiratory compromise. This report describes the occurrence of multiple, different thoracic wall deformities in a group of related Bengal kittens and tests the hypothesis that the incidence of thoracic wall deformity within this group is greater than that of unrelated Bengals and also that the incidence within the Bengal breed is greater than that of a domestic shorthair (DSH) cat population.
Material and methods
Animals
Records of Bengal kittens presented for kitten vaccinations at a single UK practice were examined for evidence of thoracic wall abnormalities as it had been noted that more than one kitten within some litters was affected. A total of 252 Bengal kittens presented for primary vaccination between January 2004 and June 2011. Kitten name, age, sex, weight and results of clinical examination were available for 244 (125 male and 119 female) kittens and these were reviewed. A five-generation pedigree was then obtained from the breeders for all affected kittens. The incidence of thoracic wall deformities was then compared with those recorded in 1748 DSH kittens who presented for routine vaccination at the same practice over a similar period and for whom information on the same clinical parameters was available.
All animals (Bengal and DSH) underwent palpation of the thoracic wall as part of their routine clinical examination. Kittens were diagnosed with PE by palpation alone using previously described criteria. 15 In all cases, a prominent dorsal deviation of the caudal sternum was palpated resulting in dorsoventral narrowing of the caudal thoracic cavity. Any abnormal findings (eg, PE) were described in the clinical notes. Cats who presented as dyspnoeic were radiographed and advice only given to asymptomatic cases.
Data analysis
The incidence of thoracic wall deformities in Bengals was compared with non-Bengals, as well as the incidence in kittens related to the founder tomcat in the pedigree compared with other Bengal kittens.
Groups were compared using a two-sided Fisher’s exact test. Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Woolf’s approximation. Significance for statistical analysis was taken as P value of <0.05.
Results
No thoracic wall abnormalities were recorded in the DSH kittens compared with 12 cases in the Bengal kittens (P <0.0001). Odds ratio (OR) 1053 (95% CI 61–18103). Nine litters had affected individuals, with three litters having two affected kittens present. Five of the kittens were recorded as having PE, six with unilateral thoracic wall concavity (UTC) and one with scoliosis. Kittens in the related pedigree (Figure 1) were significantly more likely to have thoracic wall deformity than other Bengal kittens (P <0.001; OR 17.8; 95% CI 6.7–2030).

Five-generation Bengal pedigree
Of the three litters with multiple affected kittens, two had kittens with UTC only, whilst the third litter included one kitten with PE and one with UTC.
PE occurred in four female kittens and one male kitten (P = 0.37 male vs female), whereas UTC occurred in five male kittens and one female kitten [P = 0.07 male vs female; OR 8.1 (95% CI 0.87–74.7)].
Analysis of the five-generation pedigree (Figure 1) indicated a strong degree of common ancestry. There was no sex bias (6/23 male and 6/30 female) in the affected kittens (P = 0.74). There were 41 unaffected kittens within the nine litters (17 male; 24 female).
All of the Bengal kittens examined were bred by one of two breeders.
All of the affected kittens were asymptomatic at the time of initial examination. Three of the five kittens with PE represented with tachypnoea between 4 and 7 months of age. Two of these kittens underwent corrective surgery (external splinting). One kitten survived the postoperative period and is currently asymptomatic (18 months follow-up) whereas the second kitten (Figure 2) was severely dyspnoeic on presentation with marked pulmonary hypertension and died of re-expansion pulmonary oedema in the immediate postoperative period, a previously reported complication. 2 The remaining two cases of PE were lost to follow-up before skeletal maturity was achieved.

Radiograph of severely dyspnoeic kitten with marked pulmonary hypertension. This kitten died of re-expansion pulmonary oedema in the immediate postoperative period
The kittens with UTC were variably described in the clinical records as having either ‘rib cage/thoracic wall defects’ or ‘abnormal proximal termination of ribs’. In all cases, the caudal thoracic cavity was laterally compressed and in 5/6 cases this was a result of a concavity in the right caudal thoracic wall caused by either the absence or abnormal shortening of ribs at this site. UTC did not lead to respiratory compromise in any affected kitten.
Discussion
PE is an uncommon congenital defect which has been previously reported in cats.1–14 The UTC described here has not been previously reported. Unilateral lumbarisation of T13 has been previously described, 19 but this would not lead to the marked deformities seen in the kittens presented in this report. It has not been possible to radiograph the affected kittens to further elaborate on the nature of these defects and this may be seen as a shortcoming of this paper. The aim of this study was not, however, to describe the deformities seen. The aim of this paper was to test the hypothesis that there is an increased incidence of thoracic wall deformities within the Bengal breed compared with a DSH population and to compare the incidence of thoracic wall deformity in a group of related Bengals with that of unrelated Bengal kittens. The data presented here supports the hypothesis that these deformities are more common within the examined Bengal population than a DSH population and suggest that there may be a familial tendency.
Assuming that the various thoracic deformities recorded in this group of Bengal kittens represents a spectrum of phenotypic expressions resulting from a similar underlying cause, these data strongly suggest a familial association. A previous study has also made an association between an increased incidence of more than one thoracic deformity (PE and flat-chestedness) in a specific breed (Burmese) with indications of a familial tendency. 15 These results do not, however, establish that the thoracic wall deformities are necessarily heritable, as environmental influences have not been excluded. If the data presented represents a single heritable condition then it is occurring too infrequently to be a dominant mode of expression. Simple recessive inheritance is also unlikely, as more affected kittens would also be expected. The data set is too small to make further pedigree analysis but, similar to that suggested by Sturgess et al, 15 a complex inheritance is likely with possible incomplete penetrance and environmental influences.
Incidence of PE in humans has been estimated at affecting 1:400 to 1:1000 live births.16,17 Motivations for surgical repair include compromised respiratory function and cosmesis with associated psychological effects. 20 The most commonly performed surgical corrective procedures are modifications of the Nuss procedure, which involves placement of a substernal metal bar to correct and splint the deformity. 21
The most commonly used corrective technique in cats is to use an external body cast with circumsternal/costal sutures to traction the dorsally displaced caudal sternebrae. 1 Risks of this procedure include visceral trauma during suture passage 1 and re-expansion pulmonary oedema, 2 as well as the risks inherent to anaesthesia of a juvenile animal with respiratory compromise. Surgical correction is indicated when respiratory function is compromised. 1 Asymptomatic kittens should be monitored closely until adulthood and any evidence of respiratory compromise caused by PE should prompt clinicians to consider surgical intervention.
The severity of PE was not detailed in all cases presented here and so we cannot comment on whether or not the degree of PE seen at vaccination (age 9–12 weeks) correlates with likelihood of developing future respiratory compromise, other than all kittens with PE, for which long-term follow-up is available, went on to develop related signs.
This is a retrospective study and, as such, Bengal kittens with mild thoracic deformities may have been missed. Thoracic deformities clearly occur in DSH kittens (8/23 cases reported in the literature),2–14 but the incidence is unknown and, depending on its prevalence, could reflect under-diagnosis or under-recording in this study. All DSH and Bengal kittens were examined by the same veterinary surgeons and so detection rates of any abnormalities would be expected to be similar between the two groups. In fact, approximately 225 DSH kittens examined in this study would need to have thoracic wall deformities that were not detected or recorded for the incidence of thoracic wall deformities to be similar in the DSH kitten population as in the Bengal kittens. In the data presented there is a tendency towards a female bias in the PE cases, which is contrary to the experience in humans, but this may well be a statistical anomaly given the small numbers in this study. Interestingly, both Bengals with PE previously reported by Yoon et al 13 were male and 11/18 (61%) cases of PE reported in the literature to date (for which the gender is known) have been male kittens.
In summary, the data presented here suggest that thoracic wall deformities may be a relatively common potentially familial defect in Bengal kittens. Bengal kittens should have their thoracic wall carefully evaluated during routine clinical examination. Kittens with PE should be closely monitored for signs of respiratory compromise.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would also like to thank the Bengal breeders for providing the five-generation pedigree used in this study.
Funding
The primary author would like to acknowledge financial support from the RCVS Trust.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any potential conflicts of interest to declare.
