The purpose of this study is to partially test the broken windows thesis, and to evaluate the effect of Houston’s Differential Response Team (DRT) in particular at the patrol division level using crime-related calls for service data (CFS) in the city. Monthly DRT assignment data over a period of 13 years in five different space-time patterns were utilized to estimate the effect of targeted disorder enforcement from 2005 to 2017. Our findings suggest that the DRT overall did not produce significant effects on crime-related calls, with only one out of five space-time patterns showing demonstrable benefit. We highlighted the underlying features generating differential rates of crime across geographic areas as an explanation in the discussion section. The unique feature of this study was the focus on routine police activities as opposed to arrests as the key indicator of law enforcement intervention in the management of crime.
AndresenM. A.LinningS. J.MallesonN. (2017). Crime at places and spatial concentrations: Exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver BC, 2003-2013. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9295-8
2.
BanfieldE. (1974). Unheavenly city revisited. World of Books Inc.
3.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.
4.
BoggessL. N.MaskalyJ. (2014). The spatial context of the disorder-crime relationship in a study of Reno neighborhoods. Social Science Research, 43, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.10.002
BragaA. A.WelshB. C.SchnellC. (2015). Can policing disorder reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815576576
7.
BrattonW. (1998). Turnaround: How America’s top cop reversed the crime epidemic. Random House.
BuckA. J.GrossM.HakimS.WeinblattJ. (1983). The deterrence hypothesis revisited. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13(2), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009945
10.
CaetiT. (1999). Houston’s targeted beat program: A quasi-experimental test of police patrol dissertation and Houston state University, strategies [PhD dissertation, University Microfilms International].
11.
CormanH.MocanN. (2005). Carrots, sticks, and broken windows. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(1), 235–266.
12.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
13.
EckJ.RosenbaumD. (1994). The new police order: effectiveness, equality, and efficiency in community policing. In RosenbaumD. (Ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 3–23). Sage Publications.
14.
EhrlichI. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 521–565.
15.
EngleR. F.GrangerC. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
16.
EscobedoF. (2016). Differential response team. Houston Police Department.
FriedmanJ.HakimS.SpiegelU. (1989). The Difference between short and long run effects of police outlays on crime: Policing deters criminals initially, but later they may “learn by doing”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(2), 177–191.
GreeneJ. R. (2000). Community policing in America: Changing the nature, structure, and function of the police. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 299–370). US Department of Justice.
22.
HamiltonJ. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton University Press.
23.
HarcourtB. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Harvard University Press.
24.
HarcourtB. E.LudwigJ. (2006) Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review.
25.
HooverL.WellsW.ZhangY.RenL.ZhaoJ. (2016). Houston enhanced action patrol: Examining the effects of differential deployment lengths with a switched replication design. Justice Quarterly, 33(3), 538–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.915339
26.
Houston Police Department. (2008). Standard operation procedure: Differential response team. DRT.
27.
JohnsonR. R. (2016). Police organizational commitment: The influence of supervisor feedback and support. Crime and Delinquency, 61, 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466887
28.
KaneR. J. (2006). On the limits of social control: Structural deterrence and the policing of “suppressible” crimes. Justice Quarterly, 23(2) 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600688768
29.
KaneR. J.CroninS. W. (2013). Associations between order maintenance policing and violent crime. Crime and Delinquency Delinquency, 59, 910–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709336940
LawtonB. A.TaylorR. B.LuongoA. J. (2005). Police officers on drug corners in Philadelphia, drug crime, and violent crime: Intended, diffusion, and displacement impacts. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500364619
35.
LeeJ.-S.ZhaoJ. S. (2016). Disentangling the myth about citizen participation in collaborative work with police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 39(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2015-0089
36.
LumC.KoperC. S.WuX.JohnsonW.StoltzM. (2020). Examining the empirical realities of proactive policing through systematic observations and computer-aided dispatch data. Police Quarterly, 23, 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119896081
37.
McGarrellE. F.GiacomazziA. L.ThurmanQ. C. (1999). Reducing disorder, fear, and crime in public housing: A case study of place-specific crime prevention. Justice Research and Policy, 1, 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.1.2.1999.61
38.
MehlkopG.GraeffP. (2010). Modelling a rational choice theory of criminal action: Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interactions. Rationality and Society, 22, 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463110364730
39.
NaginD. S.SampsonR. J. (2019). The real gold standard: Measuring counterfactual worlds that matter most to social science and policy. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024838
NovakK. J.HartmanJ. L.HolsingerA. M.TurnerM. G. (1999). The effects of aggressive policing of disorder on serious crime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 22(2), 171–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519910271229
42.
NunnS.QuinetK.RoweK.ChristD. (2006). Interdiction day: Covert surveillance operations, drugs, and serious crime in an inner-city neighborhood. Police Quarterly, 9(1), 73–99.
43.
O’BrianD. T.FarrellC.WelshB. (2019). Looking through broken windows: The impact of neighborhood disorder on aggression and fear of crime is an artifact of research design. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024638
44.
OliverW. (2017). August Vollmer: The father of American policing. Carolina Academic Press.
45.
PizaE. L. (2018). The effect of various police enforcement actions on violent crime: Evidence from a saturation foot-patrol intervention. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29, 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417725370
RosenfeldR.FornangoR.RengifoA. F. (2007). The impact of order-maintenance policing on New York City homicide and robbery rates: 1988-2001. Criminology, 45(2), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00081.x
48.
RosenfeldR.TerryK.ChauhanP. (2014). New York’s crime drop puzzle: Introduction to the special issue. Justice Quarterly, 31(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.754923
49.
RothM. P.KennedyT. (2012). Houston blue: The story of the Houston police department. University of North Texas Press.
50.
SampsonR. J.CohenJ. (1988). Deterrent effects of the police on crime: A replication and theoretical extension. Law and Society Review, 22(1), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053565
51.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/210356
52.
SkoganW. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Free Press.
53.
SkoganW. (2015). Disorder and decline. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(4), 464–485.
54.
SteenbeekW.KreisC. (2015). Where broken windows should be fixed. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 511–533.
55.
WeisburdD.HinkleJ. C.BragaA. A.WooditchA. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms underlying broken windows policing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815577837
56.
WilsonJ. Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. Random House.
57.
WilsonJ. Q.BolandB. (1978). The effect of the police on crime. Law & Society Review, 12(3), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053285
58.
WilsonJ. M.CoxA. G.SmithT. L.BosH.FainT. (2007). Community policing and violence prevention in Oakland measure Y in action. Center for Quality Policing, Rand Corporation.
59.
WilsonJ. Q.KellingG. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety (3rd ed., 249, pp. 29–38). Atlantic Monthly.
60.
WorrallJ. L. (2006). Does targeting minor offenses reduce serious crime? A provisional, affirmative answer based on an analysis of county-level data. Police Quarterly, 9, 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611103258929
61.
WuX.LumC. (2017). Measuring the spatial and temporal patterns of police proactivity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 915–934.
