Despite a large number of studies testing Broken Windows Theory (BWT), the reverse theoretical pathway has never been assessed longitudinally (risk perceptions → incivilities perceptions). It is estimated here using panel data from Baltimore, Maryland. Results show lagged, multilevel impacts of risk perceptions on shifting incivilities perceptions. Furthermore, impacts of risk perceptions on later shifts in perceived incivilities vary significantly across streetblocks. Findings support Harcourt’s assertion that “disorder” is not a fixed and unambiguous label; rather, it is dependent on a person defining his or her surroundings. People who report a high degree of crime risk are “biased” toward defining neighborhood features as more problematic than those who do not.
Brunton-SmithI. (2011). Untangling the relationship between fear of crime and perceptions of disorder. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 885-899.
2.
Brunton-SmithI.SturgisP. (2011). Do neighborhoods generate fear of crime? An empirical test using the British Crime Survey. Criminology, 41, 331-369.
3.
BursikJr., R. J.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods & crime. Lanham: Lexington Books.
4.
CarvalhoI.LewisD. A. (2003). Beyond community: Reactions to crime and disorder among inner-city residents. Criminology, 41, 779-812.
5.
CookF. L.SkoganW. G. (1984). Evaluating the changing definition of a policy issue in Congress: Crime against the elderly. In RodgersH. R. (Ed.), Public policy and social institutions (pp. 47-66). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
DuncanO. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In ReissA. J. (Ed.), Occupations and social status (pp. 109-138). New York, NY: Free Press.
FerraroK. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
FirebaughG. (1980). Groups as contexts and frog ponds. In RobertsK.BursteinL. (Eds.), Issues in aggregation (pp. 43-52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
FranziniL.CaughyM. O.NettlesS. M.O’CampoP. (2008). Perceptions of disorder: Contributions of neighborhood characteristics to subjective perceptions of disorder. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 83-93.
11.
GallagherN. A.GretebeckK. A.RobinsonJ. C.TorresE. R.MurphyS. L.MartynK. K. (2010). Neighborhood factors relevant for walking in older, urban, African American adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 18, 99-115.
12.
GarofaloJ.LaubJ. (1978). The fear of crime: Broadening our perspective. Victimology, 3, 242-253.
13.
GauJ. M.PrattT. C. (2008). Broken windows or window dressing? Citizens’(in)ability to tell the difference between disorder and crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 163-194.
14.
GlazerN. (1979). On subway graffiti in New York. The Public Interest, 54, 3-12.
15.
HalabyC. N. (2004). Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 507-544.
16.
HarcourtB. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promises of Broken Windows Policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HarcourtB. E.LudwigJ. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 1, 271-320.
18.
HippJ. (2010). Resident perceptions of crime and disorder: How much is “bias,” and how much is social environment differences?Criminology, 48, 475-508.
19.
HoxJ. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Routledge.
20.
HunterA. (1978, November, 8-12). Symbols of incivility: Social disorder and fear of crime in urban neighborhoods. Paper presented at the 1978 meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Dallas, TX.
21.
InnesM. (2004). Signal crimes and signal disorders: Notes on deviance as communicative action. British Journal of Sociology, 55, 337-355.
22.
InnesM. (2005). What’s your problem? Signal crimes and citizen-focused problem solving. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 187-200.
23.
JacksonJ. (2004). Experience and expression: Social and cultural significance in the fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 66, 946-966.
24.
KellyG. A. (1955). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
25.
KubrinC. E. (2008). Making order of disorder: A call for conceptual clarity. Criminology & Public Policy, 7, 203-213.
26.
LaGrangeR. L.FerraroK. F.SupancicM. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: Role of social and physical incivilities. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 29, 311-344.
27.
MarkowitzF. E.BellairP. E.LiskaA. E.LiuJ. (2001). Extending social disorganization theory: Modeling the relationships between cohesion, disorder, and fear. Criminology, 39, 293-319.
28.
MatsuedaR. L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying as symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 27, 1577-1611.
29.
McGarrellE. F.GiancomazziA. L.ThurmanQ. C. (1997). Neighborhood disorder, integration, and the fear of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 479-500.
30.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society (MorrisCharles W., Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
PerkinsD. D. (1989). Description of data set and methods: NIMH final grant report appendix A (Grants #R01-MH40842-01 and -02). Unpublished manuscript. Philadelphia, PA: Department of Criminal Justice, Temple University.
32.
PerkinsD. D.BrownB. B.TaylorR. B. (1996). The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 85-111.
33.
PerkinsD. D.TaylorR. B. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 63-107.
34.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
RobinsonJ. B.LawtonB. A.TaylorR. B.PerkinsD. D. (2003). Multilevel longitudinal impacts of incivilities: Fear of crime, expected safety, and block satisfaction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 237-274.
36.
RossC. E.MirowskyJ. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 258-276.
37.
RountreeP. W.LandK. C. (1996a). Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities: A multilevel analysis across Seattle neighborhoods and census tracts. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 33, 147-180.
38.
RountreeP. W.LandK. C. (1996b). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data. Social Forces, 74, 1353-1376.
39.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “Broken Windows.”Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319-342.
40.
ShadishW. R.CookD. T.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
41.
SkoganW. G. (1990). Decline and disorder: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York, NY: Free Press.
42.
TaylorR. B. (1994). Research methods in criminal justice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
TaylorR. B. (1996). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11, 41-74.
44.
TaylorR. B. (1997). Order and disorder of streetblocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social organization. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 113-155.
45.
TaylorR. B. (1999). The incivilities thesis: Theory, measurement, and policy. In LangworthyR. H. (Ed.), Measuring what matters (pp. 65-88). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, National Institute of Justice.
46.
TaylorR. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear and decline. New York, NY: Westview Press.
47.
TaylorR. B. (2005). The incivilities or “Broken Windows” thesis. In SullivanL. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of law enforcement (pp. 30-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
TaylorR. B. (2010). Communities, crime, and reactions to crime multilevel models: Accomplishments and meta-challenges. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 455-466.
49.
TaylorR. B.CovingtonJ. (1993). Community structural change and fear of crime. Social Problems, 40, 374-397.
50.
TracyP. E.CarkinD. M. (2014). Adjusting for design effects in disproportionate stratified sampling designs through weighting. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 306-325.
51.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Population, households, population by age, population by race, labor force and income: Data from the American Community Survey, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.baltometro.org/content/view/148/210/#sources
52.
WallaceD. (2015). A test of the routine activities and neighborhood attachment explanations for bias in disorder perceptions. Crime & Delinquency, 63(4), 587–609.
53.
WeisburdD. L.GroffE. R.YangS. M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
WickesR.HippJ. R.ZahnowR.MazzerolleL. (2013). “Seeing” minorities and perceptions of disorder: Explicating the mediating and moderating mechanisms of social cohesion. Criminology, 51, 519-560.
55.
WilsonJ. Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York, NY: Basic Books.
WyantB. R. (2008). Multilevel impacts of perceived incivilities and perceptions of crime risk on fear of crime: Isolating endogenous impacts. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 45, 39-64.
