This article presents data emerging from ethnographic research that sought to explore the extent to which stop and search procedures in Scotland are underpinned by a focus on procedural justice and the impact they have on young people. Data were collected via participant observation of police deployments and semi-structured interviews with 23 law enforcement officers and 46 young people. The emerging insights suggested that differential views on and approaches to policing in different parts of the country were leading to varying experiences of stop and search and procedural justice. The young people interviewed in the east of the country had more positive relationships with the police and a stronger belief in procedural justice. Conversely, the tendency to use stop and search as a deterrent from crime in the west of Scotland resulted in deteriorated relationships, institutionalization of the use of the tactic, and a perceived lack of procedural justice.
Advisory Group on Stop and Search. (2015). The report of the Advisory Group on Stop and Search.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
Advisory Group on Stop and Search Secretariat.
2.
ArizaJ. J. M. (2014).
Police-initiated contacts: Young people, ethnicity, and the ‘usual suspects’. Policing and Society,
24, 208–223.
3.
AtkinsonR. (2003).
Domestication by Cappuccino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces.Urban Studies,
40(9), 1829–1843.
BottomsA.TankebeJ. (2012).
Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,
102, 119–170.
6.
BowlingB.PhillipsC. (2007).
Disproportionate and discriminatory: Reviewing the evidence on police stop and search.Modern Law Review,
70, 936–961.
7.
BradfordB. (2014).
Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion, and cooperation between police and public. Policing & Society,
22, 22–43.
8.
BradfordB. (2015). Unintended consequences. In DelsolR.ShinerM. (Eds.), Stop and search: The anatomy of a police power (pp. 102–122).
Houndmills, England:
Palgrave MacMillan.
9.
BradfordB. (2017). Stop and search and police legitimacy.
London, England:
Routledge.
10.
BradfordB.JacksonJ.StankoE. (2009).
Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police.Policing and Society,
19, 20–46.
11.
BradfordB.MurphyK.JacksonJ. (2014).
Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology,
54, 527–550.
12.
BrunsonR. (2007).
“Police don’t like black people:” African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences.Criminology & Public Policy,
6, 71–102.
13.
BrymanA. (2016). Social research methods(5th ed.).
Oxford, England:
OUP.
14.
CarrP. J.NapolitanoL.KeatingJ. (2007).
We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods.Criminology,
45, 445–480.
15.
ChalfinA.McCraryJ. (2017).
Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature.Journal of Economic Literature,
55, 5–48.
16.
ChanJ. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
17.
ClaymanS.SkinnsL. (2012).
To snitch or not to snitch? An exploratory study of the factors influencing whether young people actively cooperate with the police.Policing and Society,
22, 460–480.
18.
DavidsonN.FlemingL.JacksonL.SmaleD.SparksR. (2017).
Police and community in twentieth century Scotland: The uses of social history.British Journal of Criminology,
57, 18–39.
19.
DelsolR.ShinerM. (2006).
Regulating stop and search: A challenge for police and community relations in England and Wales.Critical Criminology,
14, 241–263.
20.
DelsolR.ShinerM. (2015). Stop and search. The anatomy of a police power.
Basingstoke, England:
Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
Densley, J. & Stevens, A. (2015). ‘We'll show you gang’: The subterranean structuration of gang life in London. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15, 102--120.
22.
Deuchar, R. (2009) Gangs, marginalized youth and social capital. Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
Deuchar, R., Miller, J. & Barrow, M. (2015). Breaking down barriers with the usual suspects: Findings from a research-informed intervention with police, young people and residents in the West of Scotland. Youth Justice, 15, 57–75
25.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
26.
FlacksS. (2018a).
The stop and search of minors: A ‘vital police tool’?Criminology and Criminal Justice,
18, 364–384.
27.
FlacksS. (2018b). Law, necropolitics and the stop and search of young people. Theoretical Criminology. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1362480618774036
28.
Floyd,et al. v. City of New York, et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 08 Civ 1034 (SAS), 2013.
29.
FyfeN. R. (2016). Policing Scotland post reform: Towards a shifting ‘culture of control’ and a new politics of policing? In CroallH.MooneyG.MunroM. (Eds.), Crime, justice and society in Scotland (pp. 167–181).
London, England:
Routledge.
30.
GauJ.BrunsonR. (2010).
Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner‐city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy,Justice Quarterly,
27, 255–279.
31.
GellerA.FaganJ.TylerT.LinkB. (2014).
Aggressive policing and the mental health of young urban men.American Journal of Public Health,
104, 2321–2327.
32.
GelmanA.FaganJ.KissA. (2007).
An analysis of the New York City Police Department’s “Stop-and-Frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias.Journal of the American Statistical Association,
102, 813–823.
33.
GenevieveL.MurrayK. (2018).
Under-regulated and unaccountable? Explaining variation in stop and search rates in Scotland, England and Wales.Policing and Society,
28, 157–174.
34.
GoelS.RaoJ.ShroffR. (2016).
Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy.Annals of Applied Statistics,
10, 365–394.
35.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice.
London, England:
Routledge.
36.
HarcourtB.LudwigJ. (2006).
Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review,
73, 271–320.
37.
HerbertS. (1997). Policing space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles police department.
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
38.
HerbertS. (2006).
Tangled up in blue: Conflicting paths to police legitimacy.Theoretical Criminology,
10, 481–504.
39.
HodgsonJ. F. (2001).
Police violence in Canada and USA: Analysis and management.Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,
24, 520–549.
40.
HoughM. (2013).
Procedural justice and professional policing in times of austerity.Criminology & Criminal Justice,
13, 181–197.
41.
HsiehH.ShannonS. (2005).
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Qualitative Health Research,
15(9), 1277–1288.
42.
HuqA. H.JacksonJ.TrinknerR. (2017).
Legitimating practices: Revisiting the predicates of police legitimacy. British Journal of Criminology,
57, 1101–1122.
43.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.HoughM.MyhillA.QuintonP.TylerT. (2013a).
Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology,
52, 1051–1071.
44.
JacksonJ.BradfordB.StankoB.HohlK. (2013b). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales.
Abingdon, England:
Routledge.
LennonG. (2016).
Searching for change: Scottish stop and search powers.Edinburgh Law Review,
20, 178–203.
47.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry.
Beverley Hills, CA:
Sage.
48.
LoaderI. (1996). Youth, policing and democracy.
London, England:
Palgrave MacMillan.
49.
LoaderI. (2006).
Policing, recognition and belonging.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
605, 201–221.
50.
LovedayB. (2018).
Police Scotland: Challenging the current democratic deficit in police governance and public accountability.Crime Prevention and Community Safety,
20(3), 154–167.
51.
MazerolleL.BennettS.DavisJ.SargeantE.ManningM. (2013).
Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews,
9(1), 1--146.
52.
McAraL.McVieS. (2005).
The usual suspects? Street-life, young people and the police.Criminal Justice,
5, 5–36.
53.
MilesM.HubermanM.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Thousand Oaks: CA:
Sage Publications.
54.
MurrayK. (2015). Landscape review on stop and search in Scotland.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
University of Edinburgh.
55.
MurrayK. (2014). Stop and search in Scotland: An evaluation of police practice (SCCJR Report 01/2014).
Edinburgh, Scotland:
SCCJR.
56.
MurrayK. (2016). Understanding and preventing youth crime survey (UPYC) early findings.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
University of Edinburgh.
57.
NaginD. S.TelepC. W. (2017).
Procedural justice and legal compliance.Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
13, 5–28.
58.
NawazA.TankebeJ. (2018).
Tracking procedural justice in stop and search encounters: Coding evidence from body-worn video cameras.Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing,
2, 139–163.
59.
O’NeillM.AstonL.KrauseA. (2015). The Fife division (Police Scotland) stop and search pilot evaluation: Findings and recommendations.
Dundee, Scotland:
University of Dundee.
PetersonA. (2008).
Who ‘owns’ the streets? Ritual performances of respect and authority in interactions between young men and police officers.Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention,
9, 97–118.
QuintonP. (2011).
The formation of suspicions: Police stop and search practices in England and Wales.Policing and Society,
21, 357–368.
67.
QuintonP.BlandN.MillerJ. (2000). Police stops, decision-making and practice.
London, England:
Home Office.
68.
QureshiF.FarrellG. (2006).
Stop and search in 2004: A survey of police officer views and experiences.International Journal of Police Science & Management,
8, 83–103.
69.
ReinerR. (2010). The politics of the police.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press
70.
ReisigM. D.WolfeS. E.HoltfreterK. (2011).
Legal cynicism, legitimacy, and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control.Criminal Justice and Behavior,
38, 1265–1279.
71.
RobertsonA.McMillanL. (2015).
Police training and procedural justice: Evidence from the Scottish Police and Citizens Engagement (SPACE) trial. Scottish Justice Matters,
3, 9–10.
72.
RosenfeldR.FornangoR. (2014).
The impact of police stops on precinct robbery and burglary rates in New York City, 2003-2010.Justice Quarterly,
31, 96–122.
73.
ScarmanL. (1981). The Scarman report: The Brixton disorders.
London, England:
HMSO.
Scottish Government. (2017). Code of practice on the exercise by constables of powers of stop and search of the person in Scotland.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
Scottish Parliament.
76.
Scottish Parliament. (2012). Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
Author.
77.
Scottish Police Authority. (2014). Scrutiny review – Police Scotland’s stop and search policy and practice: Final report and recommendations.
Glasgow, Scotland:
Author.
SkoganW. (2006).
Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police.Policing and Society,
16, 99–126.
80.
SkolnickJ. (1975). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society.
New York, NY:
Wiley & Sons.
81.
SmithD.GrayJ. (1985). Police and people in London: A survey of Londoners.
London, England:
Policy Studies Institute.
82.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research.
London, England:
Sage.
83.
SunshineJ.TylerT. (2003).
The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review,
37, 513–547.
84.
TankebeJ. (2009).
Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter?Criminology,
47, 1265–1293.
85.
TankebeJ. (2013).
Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy.Criminology,
51, 103–135.
86.
TaylorR.LawtonB. (2012).
An integrated contextual model of confidence in local police.Police Quarterly,
15, 414–445.
87.
TerpstraJ.FyfeN. R. (2014).
Policy processes and police reform: Examining similarities and difference between Scotland and the Netherlands.International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice,
42(4), 366–383.
88.
ThibautJ.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis.
Hillsdale, NJ:
L. Erlbaum Associates.
89.
TiratelliM.QuintonP.BradfordB. (2018).
Does stop and search deter crime? Evidence from ten years of London-wide data.British Journal of Criminology,
58, 1212–1231.
90.
TylerT. (2004).
Enhancing police legitimacy.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
593, 84–99.
91.
TylerT. (2006). Why people obey the law.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
92.
TylerT.FaganJ.GellerA. (2014).
Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,
11, 751–785.
93.
TylerT.HuoY. (2002). Trust in the law.
New York, NY:
Russell-Sage Foundation.
94.
WaddingtonP.StensonK.DonD. (2004).
In proportion: Police stop and search.British Journal of Criminology,
44, 889–914.
95.
WeberL.BowlingB. (2012). Stop and search: Police power in a global context.
London, England:
Routledge.
96.
WeisburdD.WooditchA.WeisburdS.YangS. (2016).
Do stop, question, and frisk practices deter crime?Criminology and Public Policy,
15, 31–56.
97.
Windmueller, E. J. (1991) Reasonable articulable suspicion: The demise of Terry vs. Ohio and individualized suspicion. University of Richmond Law Review, 25(3), 543--564.
98.
WolfeS. E.NixJ.KaminskiR.RojekJ. (2016).
Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy.Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
32, 253–282.
99.
WooffA. (2016).
‘Soft’ policing in rural Scotland. Policing,
11(2), 123–131.
