This article draws on a study of differential treatment of young people in the youth justice system to present a typology of styles of policing that contrasts procedural justice with adversarial policing. It considers the factors that can trap police in adversarial styles of policing and offers suggestions about how best to move towards policing grounded on principles of procedural justice. It argues that ideas about procedural justice may be able to gain more traction in times of austerity, given that changing policing style does not necessarily incur significant costs.
BantonM (1964) The Policeman in the Community. London: Tavistock.
2.
BeethamD (1991) The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan.
3.
BowlingB (2007) Disproortionate and discriminatory: Reviewing the evidence on stop and search. Modern Law Review70(6): 936–961.
4.
BowlingB (2008) Fair and effective policing methods: Towards ‘good enough’ policing. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention8(1): 17–32.
5.
BradfordBJacksonJStankoE (2009) Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society19: 20–46.
FitzGeraldMHoughMJosephIQureshiT (2002) Policing for London: Report of an Independent Study Funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the Esmée Fairburn Foundation and the Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
8.
HoughMJacksonJBradfordB (2013; in press) Trust in justice and the legitimacy of legal authorities: Topline findings from a European comparative study. In: Body-GendrotSHoughMLevyRKerezsiKSnackenS (eds) European Handbook of Criminology. London: Routledge.
9.
HoughMJacksonJBradfordBMyhillAQuintonP (2010) Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing4(3): 203–210.
10.
JacksonJBradfordBHoughMMyhillAQuintonPTylerT (2012) Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azs032.
11.
Lappi-SeppäläT (in press) Punitivity and public opinion. In: Body-GendrotSLévyRHoughMSnackenSKerezsiK (eds) The Routledge Handbook of European Criminology. London: Routledge.
12.
Lappi-SeppäläT (2011) Explaining imprisonment in Europe. European Journal of Criminology8(4): 303–328.
13.
LewisPNewburnTTaylorMMcgillivrayCGreenhillAFraymanHProctorR (2011) Reading the Riots: Investigating England’s Summer of Disorder. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science and the Guardian.
14.
MayTGyatengTHoughM (2010) Differential Treatment in the Youth Justice System. London: Equalities and Human Rights Commission.
15.
MuirWK (1977) The Police: Streetcorner Politicians. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
16.
PackerH (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press and Oxford University Press.
17.
PhillipsCBowlingB (2003) Racism, ethnicity and criminology. Developing minority perspectives. British Journal of Criminology43(2): 269–290.
18.
ReinerR (1984) The Politics of the Police, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press
19.
ReinerR (1998) Process or product? Problems in assessing individual police performance. In: BrodeurJ-P (ed.) How to Recognise Good Policing. London: Sage, pp. 55–72.
20.
ReinerR (2010) The Politics of the Police, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
ShermanL (1993) Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 445–473.
22.
SkoganW (2006) Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society16: 99–126.
23.
SkoganW (2012) Assessing asymmetry: The life course of a research project. Policing and Society22(3): 270–279.
24.
Tyler TomR (2007) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
TylerTR (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In: TonryM (ed.) Crime and Justice – A Review of Research, vol. 30. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 431–505.
26.
TylerTR (2006b) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
TylerTR (2011a) Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology8: 254–266.
28.
TylerTR (2011b) Why People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
TylerTRHuoYJ (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.
30.
WaddingtonPStensonKDonD (2004) In proportion: Race, and police stop and search. The British Journal of Criminology44: 889–914.
31.
WilsonJQ (1968) Varieties of Police Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
