This article examines regional data sharing for regional problem solving, drawing on the process evaluation findings of the East Valley, California COMPASS. The findings confirm prior research of regional data-sharing difficulties, such as technological and database expertise and participation. Our study points to more fundamental limitations of regional data-sharing development for regional problem solving. Problems in many communities are simply local phenomena that may not be aided by a regional approach. Consequently, the development of a data system for regional problem solving ignores the specific nature of problems and the practical barriers inherent to accessing diverse databases. We agree that regional data sharing is important, but may be better tailored toward sharing data for short-term tactical purposes (e.g., pattern analysis) or for simply identifying problems, the first step in the problem-solving process, regionally.
Albrecht, J., & Pingel, J. (2005). GIS as a communication process: Experiences from the Milwaukee COMPASS project. In F. Wang (Ed.), Geographic information systems and crime analysis (pp. 1-23). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
2.
Boba, R. (2005). Crime analysis and crime mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Boba, R., Velasco, M., & Weisburd, D. (1999). Winston-Salem/Police Foundation safe school partnership: Development of the Mapping and Analysis Program for School Safety (MAPSS) system. Final report for National Institute of Justice . Award #1999-LT-VX-K018.
4.
Braga, A., Weisburd, D., Waring, E., Green Mazerolle, L., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541-580.
5.
Bynum, T. (2001). Using analysis for problem solving: A guidebook for law enforcement. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
6.
Capowich, G., Roehl, J., & Andrews, C. (1995). Evaluating problem-oriented policing: Process and outcome in Tulsa and San Diego. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Social Analysis.
7.
City of Redlands. (2000). East Valley COMPASS initiative: A community safety proposal submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Redlands, CA: Author.
8.
Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1992). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. New York: Harrow and Heston.
9.
Clarke, R.V., & Eck, J. (2005). Crime analysis for problem solvers: In 60 small steps. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
10.
Cohen, M., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
11.
Cordner, G. (1986). Fear of crime and the police: An evaluation of a fear-reduction strategy. Journal of Police Science and Administration , 14, 223-233.
12.
Cowles, E.L., Gransky, L.A., Patterson, M., & Hagner, P. (1998). An evaluation of the Illinois' cash transaction reporting unit and drug conspiracy task force. Chicago : Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
13.
Dalton, E. (2002). Overview: Community mapping, planning, and analysis for safety strategies. Crime Mapping News, 4, 1-2.
14.
Eck, J., & LaVigne, N. (1994). Using research: A primer for law enforcement managers (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
15.
Eck, J., & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
16.
Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
17.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem oriented approach . Crime and delinquency, 24, 236-258.
18.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Groff, L., Fleury, J., & Stoe, D. (2000). SACSI (Strategic Approaches to Community Safety Initiative). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
20.
Homel, R. (Ed.). (1996). The politics and practice of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 5). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
21.
Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. In R. Clark (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 2). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
22.
Jefferis, E., Frank, J., Smith, B., Novak, K., & Travis, L. (1998). An examination of the productivity and perceived effectiveness of drug task forces. Police Quarterly, 1, 85-107.
23.
Kennedy, D.M., Braga, A.A., & Piehl, A.M. (1997). (Un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In D. Weisburd & T. McEwen (Eds.), Crime mapping and crime prevention (pp. 219-262). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
24.
Maltz, M., Gordon, A., & Friedman, W. (1991). Mapping crime in its community setting: Event geography analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag .
25.
Mazerolle, L., Ready, J., Terrill, W., & Waring, E. (2000). Problem-oriented policing in public housing: Using a mixed model approach to examine changes in violent and drug-related crime problems. Justice quarterly, 17, 129-158.
26.
McCoy, C. (2000). Mapping in action: Kansas City community crime-mapping initiative. Crime Mapping News, 2, 7-8.
27.
McEwen, J.T., & Taxman, F.S. (1995). Applications of computer mapping to police operations . In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
28.
Meeker, J. (1999). Accountability for inappropriate use of crime maps and the sharing of inaccurate data. Crime mapping and data confidentiality roundtable. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Crime Mapping Research Center.
29.
Meeker, J., Parsons, K., & Vila, B. (2002) Chapter 10: Developing a GIS-based regional gang incident tracking system. In W. Reed & S. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs: Evaluation and research (pp. 289-329). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
Meeker, J., & Vila, B. (2002). Issues in developing and maintaining a regional gang information tracking system. In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 147-160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
National Institute of Justice. (2000). Project COMPASS overview. Retrieved August 25, 2003, from www.usdoj.gov/nij/programs/compass/about.htm
32.
National Institute of Justice. (2001). Solicitation for a research partner for the East Valley, California, COMPASS initiative. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
33.
Police Foundation. (2002). Research partner: East Valley COMPASS initiative. A Proposal Submitted under the Solicitation: National Institute of Justice Solicitation for a Research Partner for the East Valley, California COMPASS Initiative.
34.
POP Center. (2006). The SARA model. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://www.popcenter.org/about-SARA.htm
35.
Rich, T. (1995). The use of computerized mapping in crime control and prevention programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
36.
Sampson, R., & Scott, M. (2000). Tackling crime and other public-safety problems . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
37.
Scott, M. (2000). Problem-oriented policing: Reflections on the first 20 years. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services .
38.
Vila, B., & Meeker, J.W. (1997). A regional gang incident tracking system. Journal of Gang Research, 4, 23-36.
39.
Vila, B., & Morris, C. (1999). The role of police in American society: A documentary history. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
40.
Wartell, J., & McEwen, T. (2001). Privacy in the information age: A guide for sharing crime maps and spatial data. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Crime Mapping Research Center.
41.
Weisburd, D.L. (2002). From criminals to criminal contexts: Reorienting criminal justice research and policy. Advances in criminological theory, 10, 197-216.
42.
Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. (Eds.). (2006). Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42-65.
