The current study surveyed a random sample of Texas law enforcement officers (N = 109) about their training in detecting deception. Texas officers reported that their training entailed the equivalent of a 2-day, lecture-style workshop in the kinesic interview technique or Reid technique, two popular police training modules, with subsequent training more often the exception than the rule. The authors examine these results in light of previous social science research regarding officers’ accuracy in detecting deception and make suggestions for future training programs for police officers in this area.
Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons’ and police officers’ beliefs regarding deceptive behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 461-471.
2.
Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Miller, R. S., & Lyons, P. M. (2004). U.S. police officers’ knowledge regarding behaviors indicative of deception: Implications for eradicating erroneous beliefs through training. Manuscript under review.
3.
DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
4.
DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M.,& Rosenthal, R. (1980). Humans as lie detectors. Journal of Communication, 30, 129-139.
5.
deTurck, M. A. (1991). Training observers to detect spontaneous deception: Effects of gender. Communication Reports, 4, 81-89.
6.
deTurck, M. A., Harszlak, J. J., Bodhorn, D. J., & Texter, L. A. (1990). The effects of training social perceivers to detect deception from behavioral cues. Communication Quarterly, 38, 189-199.
7.
Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
8.
Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
9.
Iacono, W., & Patrick, C. (1999). Polygraph (“lie detector”) testing: The state of the art. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 440-473). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., & Buckley, J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
11.
Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
12.
Kraut, R. E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209-216.
13.
Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429-496.
14.
Link, F. C., & Foster, D. G. (1989). The kinesic interview technique. Riverdale, CA: Interrotec Associates.
15.
Mangione, T. W. (1998). Mail surveys. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social science research methods (pp. 399-427). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Parker, A. D., & Brown, J. (2000). Detection of deception: Statement validity analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 237-259.
17.
Porter, S., Woodwirth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
18.
Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20(4), 443-458.
19.
Raskin, D. C. (1999). Criteria based content analysis: The less scientific road to truth. Expert Evidence, 7(4), 256-278.
20.
Sapir, A. (1987). The LSI course on scientific content analysis (SCAN). Phoenix, AZ: Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.
21.
Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: Signet.
22.
Sealey, G. (2002). Confused confessions: Police techniques questioned when wrong guy comes clean. Retrieved September 25, 2002, from http://www.abcnews.com
23.
Smith, N. (2001). Reading between the lines: An evaluation of the scientific content analysis technique (SCAN). London: UK Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
24.
Sporer, S. (1997). The less traveled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
25.
U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice. (1999). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. Retrieved July 17, 2001, from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook
26.
Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117-136.
27.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behavior Science and Law, 5, 144-148.
29.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Robins, E. (2004, March). Police officers’ true ability to detect lies: A study using real-life material and repeated lie detection testing. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
30.
Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts’ beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 65-80.
31.
Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Driver, R. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 105-114.
