The study investigated experienced police officers’ (N = 30) lie detection accuracy. Each police officer conducted an interrogation of a college student acting as a suspect either guilty or innocent of a mock crime and made a veracity judgment of the suspect. The police officers had the opportunity to conduct the interrogation in the manner of their own choice. The lie detection accuracy of these police officers was compared to that of police officers judging videotaped versions of the interrogations. The police officers failed to detect deception better than chance. There was no difference in accuracy between police officers interrogating live and observing video. The interrogators reported to rely on verbal content more when interrogating than when watching video. It seems as though police officers have a difficult time detecting deception not only in passive contexts but also in active ones.
Allwood, C. M., & Granhag, P. A. (1999). Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgments in everyday life. In P. Juslin & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches(pp. 123-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Baldwin, J. (1992). Video taping of police interviews with suspects—an evaluation (Police Research Series Paper 1). London: Home Office.
3.
Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interviewtechniques: Establishing truth or proof?British Journal of Criminology, 33, 325-352.
4.
Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D.,& Hunsaker, F. G. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational partners as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25-40.
5.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A. S., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303-325.
6.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., White, C. H., Afifi, W., & Buslig, A. L. S. (1999). The role of conversational involvement in deceptive interpersonal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 669-685.
7.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
8.
DePaulo, B. M.,& Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
9.
Einhorn, H. J. (1982). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases(pp. 268-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Ekman, P.,& O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
11.
Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M.,& Frank, M. G. (1999). Afewcan catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263-266.
12.
Feeley, T. H., & de Turck, M. A. (1997, May). Perceptions of communications as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer: The case of lie detection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
13.
Gilbert, D. T.,& Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 193-202.
14.
Granhag, P. A., Andersson, L. O., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals’beliefs about deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 103-119.
15.
Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2000). Deception detection: Interrogators’ and observers’ decoding of consecutive statements. The Journal of Psychology—Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135, 603-620.
16.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (2002). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Andersson, L. O. (2004). Suspicious minds: Criminals’ ability to detect deception. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 83-95.
18.
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2002). Deception detection: Effects of conversational involvement and probing. Göteborg Psychological Reports, 32(1).
19.
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.-Å. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45.
21.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E.,& Buckley, J. P. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore: Williams & Walkins.
22.
Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
23.
Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-233.
24.
Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
25.
Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Does it work?Social Behaviour, 2, 1-17.
26.
Kraut, R. E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209-216.
27.
Mann, S. A. (2001). Suspects, lies and videotape: An investigation into telling and detecting lies in police/suspect interviews. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
28.
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
29.
Miller, G. R., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31.
Mortimer, A.,& Shepherd, E. (1999). Frames of mind: Schemata guiding cognition and conduct in the interviewing of suspected offenders. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing(pp. 293-315). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
32.
Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (1993). Police questioning techniques in tape-recorded interviews with criminal suspects. Policing and Society, 3, 223-237.
33.
Moston, S.,& Stephenson, G. M. (1993). The changing face of police interrogation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 101-115.
34.
Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M.,& Williamson, T. M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
35.
Pearse, J.,& Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). Police interviewing techniques at two South London police stations. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 63-74.
36.
Pearse, J.,& Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytic approach. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 221-238.
37.
Porter, S., Woodworth, M.,& Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
38.
Sear, L.,& Williamson, T. (1999). British and American interrogation strategies. In D. Canter& L. Alison (Eds.), Interviewing and deception(pp. 67-81). Dartmouth, UK: Ashgate.
39.
Soukara, S., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2002, September). Investigative interviewing of suspects: The real picture!Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Psychology and Law, Leuven, Belgium.
40.
Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2002, March). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A metaanalytic synthesis. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in Austin, Texas.
41.
Street, R. L., Mulac, A.,& Wiemann, J. M. (1988). Speech evaluation differences as a function of perspective (participant versus observer) and presentational medium. Human Communication Research, 14, 333-363.
42.
Strömwall, L. A.,& Granhag, P. A. (2003). Howto detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 19-36.
43.
Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M.,& Granhag, P. A. (2003). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behavior during a police interrogation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44.
Vrij, A. (1993). Credibility judgments of detectives: The impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills and physical characteristics on impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 601-611.
45.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and its implications for professional practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
46.
Vrij, A. (2002). Telling and detecting lies. In N. Brace & H. Westcott (Eds.), Applying psychology(pp. 179-241). Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
47.
Vrij, A. (2003). We will protect your wife and child, but only if you confess. In P. J. van Koppen & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems(pp. 55-79). New York: Kluwer Academic.
48.
Vrij, A., Edward, K.,& Bull, R. (2001). Police officers’ability to detect deceit: The benefit of indirect deception detection measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 185-196.
49.
Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law, 5, 144-148.
50.
Vrij, A.,& Mann, S. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187-203.
51.
Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect reallife high-stake lies. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 7, 119-132.
52.
Vrij, A.,& Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts’beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 56-80.
53.
Williamson, T. M. (1990). Strategic changes in police interrogation: An examination of police and suspect behaviour in the metropolitan police in order to determine the effect of newlegislation, Technology and Organisational Policies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kent, United Kingdom.
