Paraeducator Training to Support Students’ Behavioral Needs: Administrator,Teacher,and Paraeducator Perspectives

Abstract

Paraeducators play an important role supporting students who receive special education services under the guidance and direction of educational professionals. Although paraeducator guidelines articulate the importance for paraeducators to have knowledge and skills to support students’ social, emotional, and behavioral needs, paraeducators and those who supervise them consistently identify student challenging behavior as a high-priority training area for paraeducators. To explore paraeducators’ training experiences specifically in relation to challenging behavior, we conducted a convergent mixed-methods study that involved surveying and interviewing administrators, teachers, and paraeducators in the United States. Findings provide insights into paraeducator training content, delivery, and adequacy related to challenging behavior. We also share barriers, facilitators, and recommendations related to paraeducator training to support the behavioral needs of students receiving special education services. We discuss limitations, connect findings to existing literature, and share implications for policy, practice, and future research.

Keywords

paraeducator training professional development challenging behavior mixed-methods research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamson

R. M.

Nelson

Turner

J. S.

Post

(2023). Examining the rural context: Supporting paraeducator training and development with limited resources. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 42(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221150020

Borosh

A. M.

Newson

Mason

R. A.

Richards

C. D.

Collins Crosley

(2023). Special education teacher-delivered training for paraeducators: A systematic and quality review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231160575

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brock

M. E.

Anderson

E. J.

(2021). Training paraprofessionals who work with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: What does the research say? Psychology in the Schools, 58(4), 702–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22386

Brock

M. E.

Carter

E. W.

(2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477

Carter

O’Rourke

Sisco

L. G.

Pelsue

(2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399

Center on PBIS. (2022). Tier 3 brief functional behavior assessment (FBA) guide. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon.

Coogle

C. G.

Walker

V. L.

Ottley

Allan

Irwin

(2022). Paraprofessionals’ perceived skills and needs in supporting students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 37(4), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576211073699

Council for Exceptional Children. (2022). Core competencies for special education paraeducators.

10.

Creswell

J. W.

(2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.

11.

Douglas

S. N.

Bowles

Kammes

(2022a). Elementary principals’ views on the policies and practices of paraeducators in special education. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 107–126.

12.

Douglas

S. N.

Bowles

R. P.

Kammes

(2022b). Paraeducators: An important member of the educational team for students with disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 134–150.

13.

Douglas

S. N.

Chapin

S. E.

Nolan

J. F.

(2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415616443

14.

Douglas

S. N.

Uitto

(2021). A collaborative approach to paraeducator training. Beyond Behavior, 30(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295621997177

15.

Dunst

C. J.

Trivette

C. M.

Hamby

D. W.

(2010). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of four adult learning methods and strategies: Supplemental tables and references. Learning, 3(1), 91–112.

16.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, 20 U.S.C. § 1177.

17.

Fisher

Pleasants

S. L.

(2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510397762

18.

Flower

McKenna

J. W.

Haring

C. D.

(2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109

19.

Frantz

Douglas

Meadan

Sands

Bhana

D’Agostino

(2022). Exploring the professional development needs of early childhood paraeducators and supervising teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 42(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121420921237

20.

Giangreco

M. F.

(2021). Maslow’s Hammer: Teacher assistant research and inclusive practices at a crossroads. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1901377

21.

Giangreco

M. F.

Suter

J. C.

Doyle

M. B.

(2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535356

22.

Greene

J. C.

(2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley.

23.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

24.

Knowles

D’Agostino

Kunze

Uitto

Douglas

S. N.

(2022). A systematic review of asynchronous online learning opportunities for paraeducators. Journal of Special Education, 56(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221085306

25.

Leko

M. M.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Love

H. R.

Houchins

D. E.

Conroy

M. A.

(2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031

26.

Leverson

Smith

McIntosh

Rose

Pinkelman

(2021). PBIS Cultural Responsiveness Field Guide: Resources for Trainers and Coaches. Center on PBIS. https://www.pbismn.org/Tier1/2022/1_PBISCulturalResponsivenessFieldGuide2.pdf

27.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

28.

Mason

R. A.

Gunersel

A. B.

Irwin

D. W.

Willis

H. P.

Gregori

Z. G.

Ingram

P. B.

(2021). From the frontlines: Perceptions of paraprofessionals’ roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419896627

29.

McIntosh

(2023). Schoolwide positive behavioural interventions and supports and human rights: Transforming our educational systems into levers for social justice. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2116223

30.

Morin

K. L.

Nowell

Steinbrenner

Sam

Waters

Odom

S. L.

(2022). A survey of the experiences of paraprofessionals with roles, training, and communication when working with students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 37(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576211066897

31.

Ogden

Walker

V. L.

Tapp

M. C.

Carpenter

M. E.

(2022). Efficacy of teachers supporting paraeducators to implement functional communication training. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 38(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576221130715

32.

Ryan

Gannon-Slater

Culbertson

M. J.

(2012). Improving survey methods with cognitive interviews in small- and medium-scale evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 414–430. https://doi.org/0.1177/1098214012441499

33.

Sobeck

Douglas

S. N.

Chopra

Morano

(2020). Paraeducator supervision in pre-service teacher preparation programs: Results of a national survey. Psychology in the Schools, 58(4), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22383

34.

Sobeck

Douglas

S. N.

Uitto

(2023). Supporting paraeducators in special education and inclusive settings. Taylor & Francis.

35.

Sobeck

Tapp

Walker

V. L.

Douglas

Reilly

(2025). A mixed-methods study of paraeducators’ experiences supporting students’ behavioral needs. [Manuscript under review].

36.

Sobeck

E. E.

Robertson

(2019). Perspectives on current practices and barriers to training for paraeducators of students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 131–151.

37.

Sobeck

E. E.

Robertson

(2024). Tips for improving paraeducator implementation of behavior intervention plans. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 57(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599241231212

38.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2022). 43rd annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2021. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/2021-individuals-with-disabilities-education-act-annual-report-to-congress/

39.

Walker

V. L.

(2016). Assessing paraprofessionals’ perceived educational needs and skill level with function-based behavioral intervention. Exceptionality, 25(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196443

40.

Walker

V. L.

Carpenter

M. E.

Loman

S. L.

(2024). Paraeducator involvement in positive behavioral interventions and supports: A brief report. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241289055

41.

Walker

V. L.

Carpenter

M. E.

Lyon

K. J.

Button

(2021). A meta-analytic review of paraprofessional-implemented interventions to address challenging behavior among students with disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720911147

42.

Walker

V. L.

Conradi

L. A.

Strickland-Cohen

M. K.

Johnson

H. N.

(2023). School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and students with extensive support needs: A scoping review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2116232

43.

Walker

V. L.

Coogle

Mickelson

A. M.

Masud

A. B.

(2024). Paraeducator perspectives on supporting students with autism spectrum disorders: Implications for improving paraeducator training and supervision. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 39, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576241232887

44.

Willis

G. B.

(2015). Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design. Oxford University Press.

45.

Yates

P. A.

Chopra

R. V.

Sobeck

E. E.

Douglas

S. N.

Morano

Walker

V. L.

Schulze

(2020). Working with paraeducators: Tools and strategies for planning, performance feedback, and evaluation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512209107

46.

Zagona

A. L.

Walker

V. L.

Kurth

J. A.

Lansey

K. R.

(2021). Expert perspectives on the inclusion of students with significant disabilities in schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Inclusion, 9(4), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-9.4.276

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

3.26 MB

0.02 MB

0.00 MB