Due to a variety of factors, many paraeducators receive little to no opportunities to advance their professional skills. Asynchronous online learning opportunities offer a flexible way for districts to provide paraeducators opportunities to advance their knowledge, although little is known about what online resources are available, their features, or their overall quality. A review was conducted of 19 freely available online learning opportunities to evaluate features, alignment with federal legislation and professional standards, active engagement features, and usability. Results indicated that features and quality indicators varied across resources and half of the resources required active user engagement. Limitations, suggestions for future development, and future research directions are discussed with an emphasis on factors related to online delivery.
AdolphsonS. L.HawkenL. S.Stein CarrollM. (2010). Supporting students with disabilities in the general education classroom: The behavioral health assistant program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709340701
2.
AliW. G. M. (2012). Factors affecting nursing student’s satisfaction with e-Learning experience in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i2.1666
BangorA.KortumP. T.MillerJ. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
5.
Bassett-GunterR.AngevaareK.TomasoneJ.LeoJ.VarugheseB.LangveeJ.GinisK. M. (2019). A systematic scoping review: Resources targeting the training and education of health and recreation practitioners to support physical activity among people with physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.007
6.
BradyA. K.PradhanD. (2020). Learning without borders: Asynchronous and distance learning in the age of COVID-19 and beyond. ATS Scholar, 1(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0046PS
7.
BranzettiJ. B.AldeenA. Z.FosterA. W.Mark CourtneyD. (2011). A novel online didactic curriculum helps improve knowledge acquisition among non–emergency medicine rotating residents. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00951.x
8.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913501882
9.
BrookeJ. (1986). System usability scale (SUS): A quick-and-dirty method of system evaluation user information (Vol. 43, pp. 1–7). Digital Equipment Co Ltd.
10.
BugajS. J. (2002). Improving the skills of special education paraprofessionals: A rural school district’s model for staff development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 21(1), 16–24.
11.
BurnetteK.RamundoM.StevensonM.BeesonM. S. (2009). Evaluation of a web-based asynchronous pediatric emergency medicine learning tool for residents and medical students. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16, S46–S50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00598.x
12.
BurrellA.SodanA. C. (2006, April). Web interface navigation design: Which style of navigation-link menus do users prefer? [Paper presentation]. 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops, Atlanta, GA, United States.
13.
CardinalJ. R.GabrielsenT. P.YoungE. L.HansenB. D.KellemsR.HochH.. . . KnorrJ. (2017). Discrete trial teaching interventions for students with autism: Web-based video modeling for paraprofessionals. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(3), 138–148.
14.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399
ChauhanV. D.KalraJ.KalraV.NegiG.AgarwalP. (2019). Asynchronous versus traditional teaching for MBBS undergraduate students-effectiveness and students perspectives-A pilot study. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 9(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fijabmr.IJABMR_260_18
17.
CookD. A.LevinsonA. J.GarsideS.DuprasD. M.ErwinP. J.MontoriV. M. (2008). Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. Jama, 300(10), 1181–1196. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.10.1181
18.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2000). What every special education must know: The standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators (4th ed.). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED439545.pdf
19.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards (7th ed.).
20.
DanielJ.Uvalić-TrumbićS. (2013). A guide to quality in online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), Article E1. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12127
21.
dos SantosE.de LaraS.WatanabeW.FilhoM.FortesR. (2011, October). Usability evaluation of horizontal navigation bar with drop-down menus by middle aged adults [Conference session]. 29th ACM international conference on design of communication (pp. 145–150), New York, NY, United States.
22.
DouglasS. N.ChapinS. E.NolanJ. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415616443
23.
DouglasS. N.McNaughtonD.LightJ. (2013). Online training for paraeducators to support the communication of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(3), 223–242.
24.
DouglasS. N.UittoD. J.ReinfeldsC. L.D’AgostinoS. (2019). A systematic review of paraprofessional training materials. The Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022466918771707
FelderR. M.BrentR. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1–5.
27.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510397762
28.
FrantzR.DouglasS.MeadanH.SandsM.BhanaN.D’AgostinoS. (2020). Exploring the professional development needs of early childhood paraeducators and supervising teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121420921237
29.
GerencserK. R.HigbeeT. S.ContrerasB. P.PellegrinoA. J.GunnS. L. (2018). Evaluation of interactive computerized training to teach paraprofessionals to implement errorless discrete trial instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(4), 461–487.
30.
GiangrecoM. F. (2013). Teacher assistant supports in inclusive schools: Research, practices and alternatives. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2013.1
31.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerM. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10883576050200010201
32.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.SuterJ. C. (2011). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509355951
33.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535356
34.
GodinK.StapletonJ.KirkpatrickS. I.HanningR. M.LeatherdaleS. T. (2015). Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: A case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), Article 138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0125-0
35.
HamadC. D.SernaR. W.MorrisonL.FlemingR. (2010). Extending the reach of early intervention training for practitioners: A preliminary investigation of an online curriculum for teaching behavioral intervention knowledge in autism to families and service providers. Infants and Young Children, 23(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FIYC.0b013e3181e32d5e
36.
HollinkV.van SomerenM.WielingaB. J. (2007). Discovering stages in web navigation for problem-oriented navigation support. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 17(1), 183–214.
JaffeeD. (1997). Asynchronous learning: Technology and pedagogical strategy in a distance learning course. Teaching Sociology, 25(4), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319295
42.
JordanJ.JalaliA.ClarkeS.DyneP.SpectorT.CoatesW. (2013). Asynchronous vs didactic education: It’s too early to throw in the towel on tradition. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-105
LaydenS.HendricksD.IngeK.SimaA.EricksonD.AvelloneL.WehmanP. (2018). Providing online professional development for paraprofessionals serving those with ASD: Evaluating a statewide initiative. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180932
45.
LewE. K.NordquistE. K. (2016). Asynchronous learning: Student utilization out of sync with their preference. Medical Education Online, 21(1), Article 30587. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30587
46.
LewisJ. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
47.
LewisJ. R.SauroJ. (2018). Item benchmarks for the system usability scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 13(3), 158–167.
48.
MalloneeS.PhillipsJ.HollowayK.RiggsD. (2018). Training providers in the use of evidence-based treatments: A comparison of in-person and online delivery modes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1475725717744678
49.
MasonR. A.SchnitzA. G.WillsH. P.RosenbloomR.KampsD. M.BastD. (2017). Impact of a teacher-as-coach model: Improving paraprofessionals fidelity of implementation of discrete trial training for students with moderate-to-severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(6), 1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3086-4
50.
McCullochB.NoonanJ. (2013). Impact of online training videos on the implementation of mand training by three elementary school paraprofessionals. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 132–141.
51.
McGrathM. Z.JohnsB. H.MathurS. R. (2010). Empowered or overpowered? Strategies for working effectively with paraprofessionals. Beyond Behavior, 19, 2–6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ885717
NosikM. R.WilliamsW. L. (2011). Component evaluation of a computer-based format for teaching discrete trial and backward chaining. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1694–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.022
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (n.d.). Knowledge and skill development for special education paraprofessionals in Pennsylvania. PaTTAN. https://pattan.framewelder.com
SuterJ. C.GiangrecoM. F. (2009). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. The Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 81–93.
TristaniL. K.Bassett-GunterR.TannaS. (2017). Evaluating internet-based information on physical activity for children and youth with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 34(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1123/APAQ.2016-0012
63.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. W.O’herinC. E. (2009). Characteristics and consequences of adult learning methods and strategies. Research Brief, 3(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510402
64.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2021). 42nd annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2020. Washington, D.C.
65.
Virginia Department of Education. (n.d.). Effective strategies for students with learning and behavior problems, 25 elementary and secondary modules. TTAC Online. https://ttaconline.org/online-trainings
66.
WalkerV. L.DouglasK. H.BrewerC. (2020). Teacher-delivered training to promote paraprofessional implementation of systematic instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419869029
67.
WalkerV. L.SmithC. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 23(3), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986606
YuB. M.RohS. Z. (2002). The effects of menu design on information-seeking performance and user’s attitude on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 923–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10117
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
