Many paraeducators have no formal education beyond high school and are provided with minimal training once on the job. Furthermore, as more schools turn to inclusionary practices, the impetus for highly qualified paraeducators becomes more important. However, little research has examined efficient ways to train paraeducators who work in inclusive classrooms. Through an adapted alternating treatments design (AATD), the general and comparative effects of two prominent training approaches were assessed: didactic instruction and performance feedback. Analysis of these approaches on paraeducators’ use of positive behavior support strategies in inclusive settings revealed that with an equal amount of training time for each approach, performance feedback consistently produced stronger immediate and maintained effects than didactic instruction.
AshbakerB. Y.MorganJ. (2012). Team players and team managers: Special educators working with paraeducators to support inclusive classrooms. Creative Education, 3, 322–327.
2.
BambaraL. M.GohA.KernL.CaskieG. (2012). Perceived barriers and enablers to implementing individualized positive behavior interventions and supports in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 228–240.
3.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49, 39–51.
4.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344–359.
5.
ConroyM. A.SutherlandK. S.SnyderA. L.MarshS. (2008). Classwide interventions: Effective instruction makes a difference. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 24–30.
6.
CorneliusK. E.NargoS. A. (2014). Evaluating the evidence base of performance feedback in preservice special education teacher training. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37, 133–146.
7.
DouglasS. N.ChapinS. E.NolanJ. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39, 60–74.
8.
DuchaineE. L.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D. (2011). The effect of teacher coaching with performance feedback on behavior-specific praise in inclusion classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 208–227.
9.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (215-2016).
10.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 287–297
11.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41–57.
12.
HallL. J.GrundonG. S.PopC.RomeroA. B. (2010). Training paraprofessionals to use behavioral strategies when education learners with autism spectrum disorders across environments. Behavioral Intervention, 25, 37–51.
13.
HawkinsS. M.HeflinL. J. (2011). Increasing secondary teachers’ behavior-specific praise using a video self-modeling and visual performance feedback intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 97–108.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
15.
JonesC. R.RatcliffN. J.SheehanH.HuntG. H. (2012). An analysis of teachers’ and paraeducators’ roles and responsibilities with implications for professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 19–24.
16.
KernL.ClemensN. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75.
17.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (2014). Training paraprofessionals to improve socialization in students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 2197–2208.
18.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case design technical documentation. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/229
19.
LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2013). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1–19
20.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.Moore-PartinT. C.RobertsonR.OliverR. M. (2009). Supervising paraeducators in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 18(3), 2–9.
21.
MathesonA. S.ShriverM. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.
22.
PoduskaJ. M.KurkiA. (2014). Guided by theory, informed by practice: Training and support for the good behavior game, a classroom-based behavior management strategy. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 83–94.
23.
RobinsonS. E. (2011). Teaching paraprofessionals of students with autism to implement pivotal response treatment in inclusive school settings using a brief video feedback training package. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 105–118.
24.
SchnorC. I.Freeman-GreenS.TestD. W. (2015). Response cards as a strategy for increasing opportunities to response: An examination of the evidence. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 41-54.
25.
SimonsenB.MyersD.DeLucaC. (2010). Teaching teachers to use prompts, opportunities to respond, and specific praise. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 300–318.
26.
SindelarP. T.RosenbergM. S.WilsonR. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.
27.
SobeckE. E.RobertsonR. (2019). Perspectives on current practices and barriers to training for paraeducators of students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of the American Academy of Specula Education Professionals, 131–159.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Paraprofessionals employed (FTE) to provide special education and related services to children ages 6 through 21 under IDEA, Part B, by qualifications and state: Fall 2010. Available from http://ideadata.org
29.
WatkinsM. W.PachecoM. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 205–212.
30.
WoleryM.BaileyD. B.Jr.SugaiG. M. (1988). Using data to compare treatments. In WoleryM.BaileyD. B.SugaiG. M. (Eds.), Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students (pp. 177-179). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
WoleryM.GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Comparison designs. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 297-345). New York, NY: Routledge.
