Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025-10
Demographic Reporting of Students and Implementation Teams in School-Based Single-Case Research for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Systematic Review
Assessing the extent to which interventions might generalize involves an understanding of for whom and in what contexts interventions have succeeded. Identifying the characteristics of service recipients as well as observers, teachers, and other members of implementation teams involved in intervention research represents an emerging consideration in special education literature involving single-case designs. In addition, the effectiveness of interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) may be influenced by cultural, linguistic, and economic differences between students and interventionists. This review describes the characteristics of students with EBD and implementation teams featured in single-case design behavior intervention studies published in nine special education journals from 2000 to 2020. Screening of available studies (n = 4,877) resulted in a sample of 140 articles. Reports of student demographic data were high (66.4%–98.6% of articles depending on the variable); however, authors typically did not describe students’ socioeconomic status (SES). Information regarding implementation teams varied from 1.4% to 46% of articles depending on the variable. Implications for future research follows a discussion of findings.
BalA.Betters-BubonJ.FishR. E. (2019). A multilevel analysis of statewide disproportionality in exclusionary discipline and the identification of emotional disturbance. Education and Urban Society, 51(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517716260
2.
BalA.TrainorA. (2016). Culturally responsive experimental intervention studies: The development of a rubric for paradigm expansion. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 319–359. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315585004
3.
Bottema-BeutelK.Crowley LaPointS.KimS. Y.MohiuddinS.YuQ.McKinnonR. (2024). A systematic review of social validation procedures in intervention research with transition-age autistic youth. Exceptional Children, 90(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231167183
4.
BravemanP. A.CubbinC.EgerterS.ChideyaS.MarchiK. S.MetzlerM.PosnerS. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. JAMA, 294(22), 2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.22.2879
5.
BriereD. E.SimonsenB. (2011). Self-monitoring interventions for at risk middle school students: The importance of considering function. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291103600204
6.
BrownC.MagginD. M.BurenM. (2018). Systematic review of cultural adaptations of school-based social, emotional, and behavioral interventions for students of color. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(4), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0024
7.
BryantD.WilsonA. (2020). Factors potentially influencing discipline referral and suspensions at an affiliated charter high school. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.08
8.
CavendishW.ConnorD.GonzalezT.Jean-PierreP.CardK. (2020). Troubling “The Problem” of racial overrepresentation in special education: A commentary and call to rethink research. Educational Review, 72(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1550055
9.
ChowJ. C.MorseA.ZhaoH.KingsberyC.MurrayR.SoniI. (2023). A systematic review of characteristics of students with emotional disturbance in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 44(5), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221125890
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT.McWilliamR.TankersleyM.TestD. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
12.
CookB. G.CookS. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877
DunlapG.IovannoneR.WilsonK.KincaidD.StrainP. (2010). Prevent-teach-reinforce: A standardized model of school-based behavioral intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708330880
17.
FornessS. R.KimJ.WalkerH. M. (2012). Prevalence of students with EBD: Impact on general education. Beyond Behavior, 21(2), 3–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24011810
18.
GageN. (2022). Methodological issues and debates in the study of disproportionality in education. In GageN.RapaL. J.WhitfordD. K.KatsiyannisA. (Eds.), Disproportionality and social justice in education (pp. 75–96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13775-4_4
19.
GageN. A.AdamsonR.MacSuga-GageA. S.LewisT. J. (2017). The relation between the academic achievement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders and teacher characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917713211
20.
GarwoodJ. D.PeltierC.SinclairT.EiselH.McKennaJ. W.VannestK. J. (2021). A quantitative synthesis of intervention research published in flagship EBD journals: 2010 to 2019. Behavioral Disorders, 47(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920961341
21.
GiangrecoM. F.TaylorS. J. (2003). “Scientifically based research” and qualitative inquiry. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28(3), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.28.3.133
22.
GonsalkoraleK.ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C. (2009). Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.004
23.
GravesS. L.PhillipsS.JonesM.JohnsonK. (2021). A systematic review of the What Works Clearinghouse’s behavioral intervention evidence: Does it relate to Black children. Psychology in the Schools, 58(6), 1026–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22485
24.
GreenC. D.DvorskyM. R.LangbergJ. M.JonesH. A.FloydA. L.Jr. (2020). The impact of social determinants of health on the efficacy of school-based interventions for adolescents with ADHD. School Mental Health, 12, 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09367-w
25.
HallG. C. N.IbarakiA. Y.HuangE. R.MartiC. N.SticeE. (2016). A meta-analysis of cultural adaptations of psychological interventions. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.005
26.
HarrisK. R.FriedlanderB. D.SaddlerB.FrizzelleR.GrahamS. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390030201
27.
HaydonT.MaheadyL.HunterW. (2010). Effects of numbered heads together on the daily quiz scores and on-task behavior of students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9108-3
28.
HitchcockJ. H.NastasiB. K.SummervilleM. (2010). Single-case designs and qualitative methods: Applying a mixed methods research perspective. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 23(2), Article 8. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol23/iss2/8
29.
HornerR.CarrE.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
30.
JafarA. J. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies?Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
31.
JakS.CheungM. W.-L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000245
32.
JonesD.AntonM.ZacharyC.PittmanS.TurnerP.ForehandR.KhavjouO. (2016). A review of the key considerations in mental health services research: A focus on low-income children and families. Couple and Family Psychology, 5(4), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000069
33.
KingS.DavidsonK.ChitiyoA.AppleD. (2020). Evaluating article search and selection procedures in special education literature reviews. Remedial and Special Education, 41(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518813142
34.
KingS.WangL.DatchukS. M.RodgersD. B. (2022). Meta-analyses of reading intervention studies including students with learning disabilities: A methodological review. Journal of learning disabilities, 56(3), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221077688
35.
KingS.WangL.NylenB.EndersO. (2023). Prevalence of research design in special education: A survey of peer-reviewed journals. Remedial and Special Education, 44(6), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231152453
36.
KingS. A.NylenB.EndersO.WangL.OpeoluwaO. (2024). Examining the impact of design-comparable effect size on the analysis of single-case design in special education. School Psychology, 39(6), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000628
37.
KostewiczD. E.KingS. A.DatchukS. M.BrennanK. M.CaseyS. D. (2016). Data collection and measurement assessment in behavioral research: 1958–2013. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000031
38.
KratochwillT. R.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.MachalicekW.FerronJ.JohnsonA. (2021). Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades. Journal of School Psychology, 89, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.006
39.
KratochwillT. R.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.MachalicekW.FerronJ.JohnsonA. (2023). Single-case intervention research design standards: Additional proposed upgrades and future directions. Journal of School Psychology, 97, 192–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.12.002
40.
LedfordJ. R.LambertJ. M.PustejovskyJ. E.ZimmermanK. N.HollinsN.BartonE. E. (2023). Single-case-design research in special education: Next-generation guidelines and considerations. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137656
41.
LentzF. E.Jr. (1988). On-task behavior, academic performance, and classroom disruptions: Untangling the target selection problem in classroom interventions. School Psychology Review, 17(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1988.12085341
42.
LindoE. J. (2014). Family background as a predictor of reading comprehension performance: An examination of the contributions of human, financial, and social capital. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.021
43.
LindoE. J.KoD.HarkinsE.Faggella-LubyM. N.GunterA. (2024, March13–16). Critical review of the science of reading through an intersectional lens [Conference Presentation]. Annual Conference of the Council for Exceptional Children, San Antonio, TX, United States.
44.
MagginD. M.BartonE.ReichowB.LaneK. L.ShogrenK. A. (2022). Commentary on the What Works Clearinghouse Standards and Procedures Handbook (v. 4.1) for the review of single-case research. Remedial and Special Education, 43(6), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211051317
45.
MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A.FreemanJ.LombardiA.SimonsenB.CoyneM. (2016). Replication of special education research: Necessary but far too rare. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516646083
46.
McGradyP. B.ReynoldsJ. R. (2013). Racial mismatch in the classroom: Beyond black-white differences. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712444857
47.
MitchellB. S.KernL.ConroyM. A. (2019). Supporting students with emotional or behavioral disorders: State of the field. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918816518
48.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Race and ethnicity public school teachers and their students. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020103.pdf
NosikM. R.LukeM. M.CarrJ. E. (2019). Representation of women in behavior analysis: An empirical analysis. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000118
51.
OrtizC.Del VecchioT. (2013). Cultural diversity: Do we need a new wake-up call for parent training?Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2013.03.009
52.
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545
53.
Schroeder-MacKayC.VanDerwallR.SummyS.EhrhardtK.RagotzyS.FongerA.PolingA. (2021). Behavior analysts’ selection of research participants with EBD: Equity and social justice matter. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000210
54.
ScottT. M.MartinekG. (2006). Coaching positive behavior support in school settings: Tactics and data-based decision making. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080030501
55.
SheafferA. W.MajeikaC. E.GilmourA. F.WehbyJ. H. (2021). Classroom behavior of students with or at risk of EBD: Student gender affects teacher ratings but not direct observations. Behavioral Disorders, 46(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920911651
56.
ShepleyC.ZimmermanK.AyresK. (2021). Estimating the impact of design standards on the rigor of a subset of single-case research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320934048
57.
SkibaR. J.KnestingK.BushL. D. (2002). Culturally competent assessment: More than nonbiased tests. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014767511894
58.
SmolkowskiK.GirvanE. J.McIntoshK.NeseR.HornerR. (2016). Vulnerable decision points for disproportionate office discipline referrals: Comparisons of discipline for African American and White elementary school students. Behavioral Disorders, 41(4), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2753698
59.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. M.JakS. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher–student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.12.002
60.
SugaiG.O’KeeffeB. V.FallonL. M. (2012). A contextual consideration of culture and school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711426334
61.
TateR. L.PerdicesM.RosenkoetterU.ShadishW.VohraS.BarlowD. H.HornerR.KazdinA.KratochwillT.McDonaldS.SampsonM.ShamseerL.TogherL.AlbinR.BackmanC.DouglasJ.EvansJ. J.GastD.ManolovR.WilsonB. (2016). The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516652893
62.
TenopirC.AllardS.DouglassK.AydinogluA. U.WuL.ReadE.ManoffM.FrameM. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE, 6(6), Article e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
63.
TorelliJ. N.LloydB. P.PollackM. S. (2022). A systematic review of direct assessments to evaluate psychotropic medication effects for children with disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 127(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-127.2.103
64.
TosteJ. R.TalbottE.CummingM. M. (2023). Special issue preview: Introducing the next generation of quality indicators for research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231174106
WalkerH. M.YellM. L.MurrayC. (2014). Identifying EBD students in the context of schooling using the federal ED definition: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. In GarnerP.KauffmanJ.JulianE. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of emotional and behavioral difficulties (2nd ed.) (pp. 55–67). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247525.n5
69.
WegmannK.SmithB. (2019). Examining racial/ethnic disparities in school discipline in the context of student-reported behavior infractions. Children and Youth Services Review, 103, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.027
70.
WestE. A.TraversJ. C.KemperT. D.LibertyL. M.CoteD. L.McCollowM. M.Stansberry BrusnahanL. L. (2016). Racial and ethnic diversity of participants in research supporting evidence-based practices for learners with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 50(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916632495
WrightA.GottfriedM. A.LeV.-N. (2017). A kindergarten teacher like me: The role of student-teacher race in social-emotional development. American Educational Research Journal, 54(Suppl. 1), 78S–101S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216635733
73.
WymerS.CorbinC.WillifordA. (2022). The relation between teacher and child race, teacher perceptions of disruptive behavior, and exclusionary discipline in preschool. Journal of School Psychology, 90, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
