In this methodological review, the authors apply special education research quality indicators and standards for single case design to analyze mathematics intervention studies for secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD). A systematic methodological review of literature from 1975 to December 2012 yielded 19 articles that met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed eight studies investigated functional relation between mathematics interventions and mathematics performance for secondary students with EBD. The remainder investigated functional relation between behavioral interventions and mathematics performance. The body of research had limitations in methodological rigor that prevented identification of evidence-based practices for mathematics interventions for learners with EBD. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
BillingsleyG.ScheuermannB.WebberJ. (2009). A comparison of three instructional methods for teaching math skills to secondary students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35(1), 4–18.
3.
BlackorbyJ.ChorostM.GarzaN.GuzmanA. (2003). The academic performance of secondary students with disabilities. In WagnerM. (Eds.), The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (pp. 4-1–4-15.). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
4.
BlackorbyJ.ChorostM.GarzaN.GuzmanA. (2005). The academic performance of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. In BlackorbyJ. (Eds.), Engagement, academics, social adjustment, and independence: The achievements of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. A report from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study (SEELS) (pp. 4-1–4-22). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
5.
*BraschT. L.WilliamsR. L.McLaughlinT. F. (2008). Effects of a direct instruction flashcard system on multiplication fact mastery by two high school students with ADHD and ODD. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30, 50–59.
6.
*CadeT.GunterP. L. (2002). Teaching students with severe emotional or behavioral disorders to use musical mnemonic technique to solve basic division calculations. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 208–214.
7.
*CarrS. C.PunzoR. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy & productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 241–250.
8.
CookB. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 233–246. doi:10.1177/0741932514528995
9.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.
10.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Author.
11.
*DavisW. R.HajicekJ. O. (1985). Effects of self-instructional training on mathematics task with severely behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 275–282.
12.
*DeMagistrisR. J.ImberS. C. (1980).The effects of life space interviewing on academic & social performance of behaviorally disordered children. Behavioral Disorders, 6, 12–25.
13.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1400 et sec. (1975).
14.
*FrancaV. M.KerrM. M.ReitzA. L.LambertD. (1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education & Treatment of Children, 13, 109–128.
15.
*HawkinsJ.BradyM. P.HamiltonR.WilliamsR. E.TaylorR. D. (1994). The effects of independent and peer guided practice during instructional pauses on the academic performance of students with mild handicaps. Education & Treatment of Children, 17, 1–28.
16.
*HaydonT.HawkinsR.DenuneH.KimenerL.McCoyD.BashamJ. (2012). A comparison of iPads and worksheets on math skills of high school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 232–243.
17.
HodgeJ.RiccominiP. J.BufordR.HerbstM. (2006). A review of instructional interventions in mathematics for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 297–311.
18.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et. seq. (2005).
20.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
21.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: 1990 to the present. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for function-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340.
23.
*LazarusB. D. (1993). Self-management and achievement of students with behavior disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 66–74. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(199301)
24.
*LeeD. L.LyloB.VostalB.HuaY. (2012). The effects of high-preference problems on the completion of nonpreferred mathematics problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 223–228. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-223
25.
MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2002). Perceptions and application of NCTM standards by special and general education teachers. Exceptional Children, 68(3), 325–344.
26.
MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M.FergusonT. D.ClarkC. (2014). A comparison of rubrics for identifying empirically supported practices with single-case research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 287–311.
27.
*McQuillanK.DuPaulG. J.ShapiroE. S.ColeC. L. (1996). Classroom performance of students with serious emotional disturbance: A comparative study of evaluation methods for behavior management. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 162–170. doi:10.1177/106342669600400303
28.
MooneyP.EpsteinM. H.ReidR.NelsonJ. R. (2003). Status of and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 273–287. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050301
29.
MooneyP.RyanJ. B.UhingB. M.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2005). A review of self-management interventions targeting academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–221. doi:10.1007/s10864-005-6298-1
30.
*MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM. P. (2009). Effects of a contextualized instructional package on the mathematics performance of secondary students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 34(3), 136–150.
31.
MulcahyC. A.KrezmienM.MacciniP. (2014). Teaching mathematics to secondary students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Challenges and practical suggestions for teachers. Preventing School Failure, 58, 69–79.
32.
MulcahyC. A.MacciniP.WrightK.MillerJ. (2014). Measuring up: Common Core State Standards and mathematics instruction for secondary students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 39(3), 146–163.
33.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, D.C: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
34.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
37.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
38.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148.
39.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014, February). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I, Rev. ed.). PISA. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
40.
O’NeillR. E.McDonnellJ. J.BillingsleyF. F.JensonW. R. (2011). Single case research designs in educational and community settings. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
41.
PierceC. D.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2004). Teacher-mediated interventions for children with EBD and their academic outcomes: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 175–188. doi:10.1177/07419325040250030501
42.
*PraterM. A.HoganS.MillerS. R. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education & Treatment of Children, 15, 43–55.
43.
RuhlK. L.BerlinghoffD. H. (1992). Research on improving behaviorally disordered students’ academic performance: A review of the literature. Behavioral Disorders, 17(3), 178–190.
*SkinnerC. H.TurcoT. L.BeattyK. L.RasavageC. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412–420.
46.
SnyderH. N.SickmundM.Department of Justice, & National Center for Juvenile Justice. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
47.
*StowitschekC. E.LewisB. L.ShoresR. E.EzzellD. L. (1980). Procedures for analyzing student performance data to generate hypotheses for the purpose of educational decision making. Behavioral Disorders, 5, 136–150.
48.
*SwainJ. C.McLaughlinT. F. (1998). The effects of bonus contingencies in a class wide token program on math accuracy with middle-school students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 13, 11–19. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(199802)
49.
*SwansonH. L.ScarpatiS. (1985). Self-instruction training to increase academic performance of educationally handicapped children. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 64, 23–39. doi:10.1300/J019v06n04_03
50.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
51.
TempletonT. N.NeelR. S.BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 226–239.
52.
WagnerM.CametoR. (2004, August). The characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances (NLTS Data Brief, Vol. 3, No. 2). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.
53.
WagnerM.FriendM.BursuckW. D.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.SumiW. C.EpsteinM. H. (2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A national perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12–30. doi:10.1177/10634266060140010201
54.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP.SRI International. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
55.
WehbyJ. H.LaneK. L.FalkK. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 194–197.
