The current study examined the use of video modeling (VM)–based interventions to reduce the challenging behaviors of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Each study was evaluated using Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC’s) quality indicators for evidence-based practices. In addition, study effects were calculated along the three main categories of VM-based interventions (VM with other as model, video self-modeling, and video-feedback) using a response rate (calculated from visual analysis) and the percentage of non-overlapping data. None of the 12 included studies met all the quality indicators set forth by CEC. Overall effects were large for reducing challenging behaviors, though results should be taken with caution due to the small number of studies. Finally, implications for practice and future research are presented.
AlbertoP. A.CihakD. F.GamaR. I. (2005). Use of static picture prompts versus video modeling during simulation instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 327–339. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.002
2.
*AxelrodM. I.BelliniS.MarkoffK. (2014). Video self-modeling: A promising strategy for noncompliant children. Behavior Modification, 38, 567–586.
BakerS. D.LangR.O’ReillyM. (2009). Review of video modeling with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 403–420.
5.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287.
7.
*BloodE.JohnsonJ. W.RidenourL.SimmonsK.CrouchS. (2011). Using an iPod touch to teach social and self-management skills to an elementary student with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education & Treatment of Children, 34, 299–322.
8.
*BoothS. R.FairbankD. W. (1983). Videotape feedback as a behavior management technique. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 55–59.
9.
BradleyR.DoolittleJ.BartolottaR. (2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 4–23.
10.
BuskP. L.SerlinS. R. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
ClareS. K.JensonW. R.KehleT. J.BrayM. A. (2000). Self-modeling as a treatment for increasing on-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 517–522.
12.
*CleesT. J.GreeneE. B. (2014). Discriminative stimulus social skills training: The effects of video-based exemplars of teacher requests on the compliance of students with behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29, 1–15.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
ConroyM. A.StichterJ. (2003). The application of antecedents in the functional assessment process: Existing research, issues, and recommendations. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 15–25.
15.
CookB. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 233–246.
16.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.
D’AtenoP.MangiapanelloK.TaylorB. A. (2003). Using video modeling to teach complex play sequences to a preschooler with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 5–11.
19.
*DavisR. A. (1979). The impact of self-modeling on problem behaviors in school-age children. School Psychology Digest, 8, 128–132.
20.
*EsveldtK. C.DawsonP. C.FornessS. R. (1974). Effect of videotape feedback on children’s classroom behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 67, 453–456.
21.
*FalkG. D.DunlapG.KernL. (1996). An analysis of self-evaluation and videotape feedback for improving the peer interactions of students with externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 261–276.
22.
GageN. A.LewisT. J.StichterJ. P. (2012). Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions for students with or at-risk for emotional and/or behavioral disorders in school: A hierarchical linear modeling meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 55–78.
23.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E.ShadishW. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 224–239.
25.
HitchcockC. H.DowrickP. W.PraterM. A. (2003). Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 36–45.
26.
HornerR. H.CarrE. C.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify EBP in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
27.
JohnsonL. D.McMasterK. L. (2013). Adapting research-based practices with fidelity: Flexibility by design. In CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 26: Evidence-based practices, pp. 65–91). London, England: Emerald.
28.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2013). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
29.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
*KehleT. J.ClarkE.JensonW. R.WampoldB. E. (1986). Effectiveness of self-observation with behavior disordered elementary school children. School Psychology Review, 15, 289–295.
31.
*KernL.WackerD. P.MaceF. C.FalkG. D.DunlapG.KromreyJ. D. (1995). Improving the peer interactions of students with emotional and behavioral disorders through self-evaluation procedures: A component analysis and group application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 47–59.
32.
*Kern-DunlapL.DunlapG.ClarkeS.ChildsK. E.WhiteR. L.StewartM. P. (1992). Effects of a videotape feedback package on the peer interactions of children with serious behavioral and emotional challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 355–364.
33.
LandrumT. J.TankersleyM. (2013). Evidence-based practice in emotional or behavioral disorders. In CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 26: Evidence-based practices, pp. 251–272). London, England: Emerald.
34.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P. A.. . . MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6, e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
35.
LosinskiM.MaagJ. W.KatsiyannisA.EnnisR. P. (2014). Examining the quality and effects of interventions based on the assessment of contextual variables: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 80, 407–422.
36.
MagginD. M.O’KeefeB. V.JohnsonA. H. (2011). A quantitative synthesis of methodology in the meta-analysis of single-subject research for students with disabilities: 1985-2009. Exceptionality, 19, 109–135.
37.
MasonR. A.DavisH. S.BolesM. B.GoodwynF. (2013). Efficacy of point of view modeling: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 333–345.
38.
MasonR. A.GanzJ. B.ParkerR. I.BolesM. B.DavisH. S.RispoliM. J. (2013). Video-based modeling: Differential effects due to treatment protocol. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 120–131.
39.
MasonR. A.GanzJ. B.ParkerR. I.BurkeM. D.CamargoS. P. (2012). Moderating factors of video-modeling with other as model: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1076–1086.
40.
MooneyP.RyanJ. B.UhingB. M.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2005). A review of self-management learning interventions on academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–221.
41.
NikopoulosC.KeenanM. (2007). Using video modeling to teach complex social sequences to children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 678–693.
42.
*O’ReillyM. F.O’HalloranM.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. E.GreenV.EdrisinhaC.. . .OliveM. (2005). Evaluation of video feedback and self-management to decrease schoolyard aggression and increase pro-social behaviour in two students with behavioural disorders. Educational Psychology, 25, 199–206.
43.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2010). Combining non-overlap and trend for single case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
44.
PraterM. A.CarterN.HitchcockC.DowrickP. (2012). Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 71–81.
45.
ReidR.GonzalezJ. E.NordnessP. D.TroutA.EpsteinM. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 130–143.
46.
SanfordC.NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
47.
SchlosserR. W.RaghavendraP.SigafoosJ. (2013). Appraising systematic reviews: From navigating synopses of reviews to conducting one’s own appraisal. In CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 26: Evidence-based practices, pp. 45–64). London, England: Emerald.
48.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (l998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242.
49.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2012). PND at 25: Past, present, and future trends in summarizing single subject research. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 9–19.
50.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
51.
SeversonH. H.WalkerH. M.Hope-DoolittleJ.KratochwillT. R.GreshamF. M. (2007). Proactive, early screening to detect behaviorally at-risk students: Issues, approaches, emerging innovations, and professional practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 193–223.
52.
SmithC. R.KatsiyannisA.RyanJ. B. (2011). Challenges of serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Legal and policy considerations. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 185–194.
53.
SpearC. F.Strickland-CohenM. K.RomerN.AlbinR. W. (2013). An examination of social validity within single-case research with students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 357–370.
54.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO. (2011). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from singlecaseresearch.org
55.
VegasK. C.JensonW. R.KircherJ. C. (2007). A single-subject meta-analysis of the effectiveness of time-out in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 109–121.
56.
WagnerM.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.EpsteinM. H.SumiW. W. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.
57.
WangS. Y.CuiY.Rauno ParrilaY. (2011). Examining the effectiveness of peer-mediated and video-modeling social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis in single-case research using HLM. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 562–569.
