Transitioning from elementary to middle school is a time of particular vulnerability for students with behavior problems. This study examined the effects of class-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT) in three middle school classrooms to determine whether this multitiered intervention could help teachers proactively manage student behavior. With a focus on teaching classroom expectations, delivering behavior-specific praise, and providing differential reinforcement within an interdependent group contingency, CW-FIT is designed to teach functional replacement behaviors that support students’ academic engagement. Intervention effects were assessed with seventh- and eighth-grade students from diverse backgrounds. Results, evaluated using a single-subject withdrawal (ABAB) design, indicated improved rates of on-task behavior at both class-wide and individual student levels, with corresponding increases in teacher praise and decreases in teacher reprimands. The positive way in which participants viewed CW-FIT implementation and its accompanying effects on student behaviors was consistent with earlier findings in elementary schools. Study limitations and areas for future research are discussed.
Adjei-BoatengE.AmapduE. (2018). Collaborative learning as a pedagogical tool to improve students’ learning. In KeengweJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on pedagogical models for next-generation teaching and learning (pp. 118–134). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
2.
AlbertoP.TroutmanA. C. (2017). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Boston, MA: Pearson.
3.
AlgozzineB.DaunicA.SmithS. (2010). Preventing problem behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
4.
BernsteinE. (2002). Middle school and the age of adjustment: A guide for parents. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
5.
BushawW. J.LopezS. J. (2010). A time for change: The 42nd annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 9–26.
6.
CaldarellaP.WilliamsL.HansenB. D.WillsH. (2015). Managing student behavior with class-wide function-related intervention teams: An observational study in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43, 357–365. doi:10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3
7.
CaldarellaP.WilliamsL.JolsteadK. A.WillsH. P. (2017). Managing student behavior in an elementary school music classroom: A study of class-wide function-related intervention teams. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(3), 23–30. doi:10.1177/8755123315626229
8.
ChungH.EliasM.SchneiderK. (1998). Patterns of individual adjustment changes during middle school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 83–101. doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(97)00051-4
9.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 139–186.
10.
EpsteinM.AtkinsM.CullinanD.KutashK.WeaverR. (2008). Reducing behavior problems in the elementary school classroom: An IES practice guide. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
11.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB.McCoachD. B.SugaiG.LombardiA.HornerR. (2016). Relationship between school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports and academic, attendance, and behavior outcomes in high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 41–51. doi:10.1177/1098300715580992
12.
HansenB. D.CaldarellaP.WilliamsL.WillsH. P. (2017). Managing student behavior in dual immersion classrooms: A study of class-wide function-related intervention teams. Behavior Modification,41, 626–646. doi:10.1177/0145445517698418
13.
HarrisonJ. R.VannestK.DavisJ.ReynoldsC. (2012). Common problem behaviors of children and adolescents in general education classrooms in the United States. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 55–64. doi:10.1177/1063426611421157
14.
HayesL. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628–648. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.83.4.628
15.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
16.
JenningsP. A.GreenbergM. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525. doi:10.3102/0034654308325693
17.
JensonW. R. (1978). Behavior modification in secondary schools: A review. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 11, 53–63.
18.
KampsD.ConklinC.WillsH. (2015). Use of self-management with the CW-FIT group contingency program. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 1–32. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0003
19.
KampsD.WillsH. P.Dawson-BannisterH.KottwitzE.HansenB.FlemingK. (2015). Class-wide function-related intervention teams “CW-FIT” efficacy trial outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 134–145. doi:10.1177/1098300714565244
20.
KampsD.WillsH. P.Heitzman-PowellL.LaylinJ.SzokeC.HobohmT.CuleyA. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13, 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
21.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
KehleT. J.BrayM. A.TheodoreL. A.JensonW. R.ClarkE. (2000). A multi-component intervention designed to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 475–481. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(200009)37:5<475::aid-pits7>3.0.co;2-p
23.
LitowL.PumroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 8, 341–347. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341
24.
MagginD. M.JohnsonA. H.ChafouleasS. M.RubertoL. M.BerggrenM. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 625–654. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.06.001
25.
McIntoshK.FlanneryK. B.SugaiG.BraunD. H.CochraneK. L. (2008). Relationships between academics and problem behavior in the transition from middle school to high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 243–255. doi:10.1177/1098300708318961
26.
MuscottH. S.MannE. L.LeBrunM. R. (2008). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire effects of large-scale implementation of school wide positive behavior support on student discipline and academic achievement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 190–205. doi:10.1177/1098300708316258
27.
NaylorA. S.KampsD.WillsH. (2018). The effects of the CW-FIT group contingency on class-wide and individual behavior in an urban first grade classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 41, 1–30. doi:10.1353/etc.2018.0000
28.
NelsonM. A.CaldarellaP.HansenB. D.GrahamM. A.WilliamsL.WillsH. P. (2018). Improving student behavior in art classrooms: An exploratory study of CW-FIT Tier 1. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 227–238. doi:10.1177/1098300718762744
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM. (2013). Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS identifying areas for enhancement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 39–50. doi:10.1177/1098300712459079
31.
ReinkeW. M.StormontM.HermanK. C.PuriR.GoelN. (2011). Supporting children’s mental health in schools: Teacher perceptions of needs, roles, and barriers. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 1–13. doi:10.1037/a0022714
32.
SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. (2013). Handbook of positive behavior support. New York, NY: Springer.
33.
ScottT. M.BarrettS. B. (2004). Using staff and student time engaged in disciplinary procedures to evaluate the impact of school-wide PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 21–27. doi:10.1177/10983007040060010401
34.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0007
35.
SkibaR. J.CaseyA.CenterB. A. (1985). Nonaversive procedures in the treatment of classroom behavior problems. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 459–481. doi:10.1177/002246698501900409
36.
SkibaR. JShureL.WilliamsN. (2011). What do we know about racial and ethnic disproportionality in school suspension and expulsion?Bloomington: The Equity Project, Indiana University.
37.
SkinnerC. H.CashwellC. S.DunnM. S. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61–78. doi:10.1300/j008v12n01_04
38.
SpragueJ.WalkerH. (2000). Early identification and intervention for youth with antisocial and violent behavior. Exceptional Children, 66, 367–379. doi:10.1177/001440290006600307
39.
StageS. A.QuirozD. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
40.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exception-ality, 17, 223–237.
41.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.HienemanM.LewisT. J.NelsonC. M.. . . RuefM. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavior assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143. doi:10.1177/109830070000200302
42.
TeerlinkE. A.CaldarellaP.AndersonD. H.RichardsonM. J.GuzmanG. (2017). Addressing problem behavior at recess using peer praise notes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 115–126. doi:10.1177/1098300716675733
43.
TheodoreL. A.BrayM. A.KehleT. J. (2004). A comparative study of group contingencies and randomized reinforcers to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 253–271. doi:10.1521/scpq.19.3.253.40280
44.
Trevino-MaackS. I.KampsD.WillsH. (2015). A group contingency plus self-management intervention targeting at-risk secondary students’ class-work and active engagement. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 347–360. doi:10.1177/0741932514561865
45.
TrussellR. P. (2008). Classroom universals to prevent problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 179–185. doi:10.1177/1053451207311678
46.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (2nd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
47.
WeedenM.WillsH. P.KottwitzE.KampsD. (2016). The effects of a class-wide behavior intervention for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 285–293. doi:10.17988/bd-14-12.1
48.
WillsH. P.IwaszukW. M.KampsD.ShumateE. (2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day. Education and Treatment of Children, 37, 191–210. doi:10.1353/etc.2014.0016.
49.
WillsH. P.KampsD.CaldarellaP.WehbyJ.Swinburne RomineR. (2018). Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT): Student and teacher outcomes from a multisite randomized replication trial. The Elementary School Journal, 119, 29–51. doi:10.1086/698818
50.
WillsH. P.KampsD.FlemingK.HansenB. (2016). Student and teacher outcomes of the class-wide function-related intervention team efficacy trial. Exceptional Children, 83, 58–76. doi:10.1177/0014402916658658
51.
WillsH. P.KampsD.HansenB.ConklinC.BellingerS.NeaderhiserJ.NsubungaB. (2010). The class-wide function-based intervention team program. Preventing School Failure, 54, 164–171. doi:10.1080/10459880903496230
52.
WillsH. P.WehbyJ.CaldarellaP.KampsD.RomineR. S. (2018). Classroom management that works: A replication trial of the CW-FIT program. Exceptional Children, 84, 437–456. doi:10.1177/0014402918771321
53.
YoungE. L.CaldarellaP.RichardsonM. J.YoungK. R. (2012). Positive behavior support in secondary schools: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
