Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of a brief prompting intervention (verbal and visual reminder of classroom rules) to improve classroom behavior for an elementary student during small-group reading instruction in a special education classroom (Study 1) and for three high school students with mild disabilities in an inclusive general education classroom (Study 2). Using within-participant reversal designs, the teachers provided brief reminders of behavioral expectations just before class. Teachers were instructed to respond to the students’ appropriate and inappropriate behaviors in a typical manner to ensure no programmed changes in the contingencies for student behavior. Results indicated improvements in classroom behavior for all four students, and teachers and students indicated positive perceptions about the intervention and its effects. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
ColvinG.SugaiG.GoodR. H.LeeY. (1997). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344–363. doi:10.1037/h0088967
3.
ColvinG.SugaiG.PatchingB. (1993). Precorrection: An instructional approach for managing predictable problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 143–150.
4.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5.
CosbyS.JolivetteK.PattersonD. (2006). Using precorrection to manage inappropriate academic and social behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 16(1), 14–17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24011653
6.
CW-FIT at Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of Kansas. (n.d.). Available from https://cwfit.ku.edu/
7.
De PryR. L.SugaiG. (2002). The effect of active supervision and pre-correction on minor behavioral incidents in a sixth grade general education classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 255–267. doi:10.1023/A:1021162906622
8.
EnnisR. P.SchwabJ. R.JolivetteK. (2012). Using precorrection as a secondary-tier intervention for reducing problem behaviors in instructional and noninstructional settings. Beyond Behavior, 22(1), 40–74. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24011885
9.
EtzelB. C.LeBlancJ. M. (1979). The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 361–382.
10.
FaulA.StepenskyK.SimonsenB. (2012). The effects of prompting appropriate behavior on the off-task behavior of two middle school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 47–55. doi:10.1177/1098300711410702
11.
HaydonT.KroegerS. D. (2016). Active supervision, precorrection, and explicit timing: A high school case study on classroom behavior. Preventing School Failure, 60, 70–78. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.977213
12.
HaydonT.ScottT. M. (2008). Using common sense in common settings: Active supervision and precorrection in the morning gym. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 283–290. doi:10.1177/1053451208314491
13.
HolloA.BurtJ. L. (2018). Practices reflecting functional communication training for students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Systematically mapping the literature. Behavioral Disorders, 44, 20–39. doi: 10.1177/0198742917751697.
14.
KampsD.WillsH.BannisterH.Heitzman-PowellL.KottwitzE.HansenB.FlemingK. (2015). Class-wide function-related intervention teams “CW-FIT” efficacy trial outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 134–145. doi:10.1177/1098300714565244
15.
KampsD.WillsH.Heitzman-PowellL.LaylinJ.SzokeC.HobohmT.CuleyA. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
16.
KartubD. T.Taylor-GreeneS.MarchR. E.HornerR. H. (2000). Reducing hallway noise: A systems approach. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 179–182. doi:10.1177/109830070000200307
17.
LampiA. R.FentyN. S.BeaunaeC. (2005). Making the three Ps easier: Praise, proximity, and precorrection. Beyond Behavior, 15(1), 8–12. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24011434
18.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2015). Supporting behavior for school success: A step-by-step guide to key strategies. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
19.
LaneK. L.UmbreitJ.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E. (1999). Functional assessment research on students with or at risk for EBD. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 101–111. doi:10.1177/109830079900100204
20.
LewisT. J.ColvinG.SugaiG. (2000). The effects of pre-correction and active supervision on the recess behavior of elementary students. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 109–121. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42940520
21.
McIntoshK.HermanK.SanfordA.McGrawK.FlorenceK. (2004). Teaching transitions: Techniques for promoting success between lessons. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 37(1), 32–38.
22.
SaudargasR. A.FellersG. (1986). State-Event Classroom Observation System: Research Edition (SECOS-R). Knoxville: Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee.
23.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242.
24.
StormontM. A.SmithS. C.LewisT. J. (2007). Teacher implementation of precorrection and praise statements in Head Start classrooms as a component of a program-wide system of positive behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 280–290. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9040-3
25.
WillsH. P.KampsD.HansenB.ConklinC.BellingerS.NeaderhiserJ.NsubugaB. (2010). The classwide function-based intervention team program. Preventing School Failure, 54, 164–171. doi:10.1080/10459880903496230
26.
YoderP.SymonsF. (2010). Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
