This study evaluated the effectiveness of Check-in/Check-out (CICO) for improving behavioral performance for three students referred for Tier 2 behavioral supports. An ABAB withdrawal design was used to evaluate CICO and results indicate that intervention was effective for reducing problem behavior as well as increasing academic engagement for all students as evidenced by direct observation of students’ behavior. Following effective implementation of CICO, a fading process was introduced that included use of Mystery Motivator (MM). Results indicate that MM successfully maintained behavioral performance for two of the three students. In addition, for one student, intervention was further faded such that self-monitoring replaced teacher ratings and feedback for behavior. Results are discussed in terms of CICO research and practice.
CampbellA.AndersonC. M. (2011). Check-in/check-out: A systematic evaluation and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 315–326.
2.
ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.SassuK. A.LaFranceM. J.PatwaS. S. (2007). Daily behavior report cards: (DBRCs): An investigation of the consistency of on-task data across raters and methods. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 30–37.
3.
CheneyD. A.StageS. A.HawkenL. S.LynassL.MielenzeC.WaughM. (2009). A 2-year outcome study of check, connect, and expect intervention for students at risk for severe behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 226–243.
4.
ColvinG.SugaiG.GoodR. H.IIILeeY. Y. (1997). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344–363.
5.
CooperJ. O.TimothyE. H.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
CroneD. A.HornerR. H.HawkenL. S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
DoggettR. A.EdwardsR. P.MooreJ. W.TingstromD. H.WilczynskiS. M. (2001). An approach to functional assessment in general education classroom settings. School Psychology Review, 30, 313–328.
9.
DoggettR. A.MuellerM. M.MooreJ. W. (2002). Functional assessment informant record for teachers: Creation, evaluation, and future research. Proven Practice, 4, 25–30.
10.
EdwardsR. P. (2002). A tutorial for using the functional assessment informant record for teachers. Proven Practice: Prevention and Remediation Solutions for Schools, 4, 31–33.
11.
FairbanksS.SugaiG.GuardinoD.LathropM. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288–310.
12.
FilterK. J.McKennaM. K.BenedictE. A.HornerR. H.ToddA. W.WatsonJ. (2007). Check in/check out: A post-hoc evaluation of an efficient, secondary-level targeted intervention for reducing problem behaviors in schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 69–84.
13.
FreerP.WatsonT. S. (1999). A comparison of parent and teacher acceptability ratings of behavioral and conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 672–684.
14.
HarrisK. R.FriedlanderB. D.SaddlerB.FrizzelleR.GrahamS. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156.
15.
HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2003). Evaluation of a targeted intervention within a school wide system of behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 225–240.
16.
HawkenL. S.MacLeodK. S.RawlingsL. (2007). Effects of the behavior education program (BEP) of office discipline referrals of elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 94–101.
17.
HawkenL. S.O’NeillR. E.MacLeodK. S. (2011). An investigation of the impact of function of problem behavior on effectiveness of the behavior education program (BEP). Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 551–574.
18.
HishinumaE. S. (1996). Motivating the gifted underachiever: Implementing reward menus and behavioral contracts with an integrated approach. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 19(4), 30–35, 43–48.
19.
HughesC. A.BoyleJ. R. (1991). Effects of self-monitoring for on-task behavior and task productivity on elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 96–111.
20.
KraemerE. E.DaviesS. C.ArndtK. J.HunleyS. (2012). A comparison of the mystery motivator and the get ’em on task interventions for off-task behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 163–175.
21.
LaneK. L.CapizziA. M.FisherM. H.EnnisR. P. (2012). Secondary prevention efforts at the middle school level: An application of the behavior education program. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 52–90.
22.
MaagJ. W.ReidR. (1993). Differential effects of self-monitoring attention, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 329–344.
23.
MadausM. M.KehleT. J.MadausJ.BrayM. A. (2003). Mystery motivator as an intervention to promote homework completion and accuracy. School Psychology International, 24, 369–377.
24.
MarchR. E.HornerR. H. (2002). Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 158–170.
25.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198.
26.
MathesM. Y.BenderW. N. (1997). The effects of self-monitoring on children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who are receiving pharmacological interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 121–128.
27.
McCurdyB. L.KunschC.ReibsteinS. (2007). Secondary prevention in the urban school: Implementing the behavior education program. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 12–19.
28.
McIntoshK.CampbellA. L.CarterD. R.DickeyC. R. (2009). Differential effects of a tier two behavioral intervention based on function of problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 82–93.
29.
MitchellB. S.StormontM.GageN. A. (2011). Tier two interventions implemented within the context of a tiered prevention framework. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 241–261.
30.
MongM. D.JohnsonK. N.MongK. W. (2011). Effects of check-in/checkout on behavioral indices and mathematics generalization. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 225–240.
31.
MooreL. A.WaguespackA. (1994). Mystery motivator: An effective and time efficient intervention. School Psychology Review, 23, 106–117.
32.
Office of Special Education Programs, Center on Positive Behavior Support. (2002). School-wide positive behavior support: Implementers’ blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene: University of Oregon.
33.
RaffertyL. A.ArroyoJ.GinnaneS.WilczynskiK. (2011). Self-monitoring during spelling practice: Effects on spelling accuracy and on-task behavior of three students diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4, 37–45.
34.
RaffertyL. A.RaimondiS. L. (2009). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Examining the differential effects among students with emotional disturbance engaged in independent math practice. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 279–299.
35.
RhodeG.JensonW. R.ReavisH. K. (1992). The tough kid book. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
36.
RobinsonK. E.SheridanS. M. (2000). Using the mystery motivator to improve child bedtime compliance. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 22, 29–49.
37.
RockM. L.TheadB. K. (2007). The effects of fading a strategic self-monitoring intervention on students’ academic engagement, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Behavior Education, 16, 389–412.
38.
RooneyK.PollowayE. A.HallahanD. P. (1985). The use of self-monitoring procedures with low IQ learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 384–389.
39.
SchandingG. T.Sterling-TurnerH. E. (2010). Use of the mystery motivator for a high school class. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 38–53.
40.
SimonsenB.MyersD.BriereD. E. (2011). Comparing a behavioral check-in/check-out intervention to standard practice in an urban middle school setting using an experimental group design. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 31–48.
41.
SoaresD. A.VannestK. J.HarrisonJ. (2009). Computer aided self-monitoring to increase academic production and reduce self-injurious behavior in a child with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 171–183.
42.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2008). What we know and need to know about preventing problem behavior in schools. Exceptionality, 16, 67–77.
43.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA. W.HornerR. H. (2001). School-wide evaluation tool. Eugene: University of Oregon.
44.
ToddA. W.CampbellA. L.MeyerG. G.HornerR. H. (2008). The effects of a targeted intervention to reduce problem behaviors: Elementary school implementation of check in- check out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 46–55.
45.
ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT.HornerR. H.SugaiG.SampsonN. K.PhillipsD. (2003). School-wide evaluation tool implementation manual. Eugene: University of Oregon.
46.
Von BrockT.ElliottS. N. (1987). The effects of complexity on teachers’ acceptability of classroom management techniques. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131–144.
47.
WhitleyB. E. (2002). Principles of research in behavioral science (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
