Power has always been an element of the program evaluation field, however, it has traditionally been attributed a negative connotation. With that in mind, power is seen as a force possessed to some extent by different stakeholders that can be imposed over others, and by which certain views, ideas, and decisions can be adopted. Given that program evaluation has a political character in which power is always present, we seek to explore a different notion of this concept. In this paper, we intend to take advantage of Michel Foucault's ideas to explore power in the program evaluation field. We illustrate the introduction of these concepts in collaborative evaluations and in doing so, we also explore power as well as power-knowledge relations, adopting a transformative perspective on power. The introduction of these concepts in collaborative evaluation is useful in illustrating how they can be used in non-collaborative evaluations.
BalanS. (2010). M. Foucault´s view view on power relations. Cogito, 2(2), 1–6.
2.
ChouinardJ. A. (2014). Understanding relationships in culturally complex evaluation contexts. Evaluation, 20(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014539428
3.
CornwallA. (2002). Making spaces, changing places: Situating participation in development. IDS Working Paper 170. Brighton: IDS.
4.
CousinsJ. B.ChouinardJ. A. (2012). Participatory evaluation up close: An integration of research-based knowledge. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
5.
CousinsJ. B.DonohueJ. J.BloomG. A. (1996). Collaborative evaluation in North America: Evaluatoŕs self reported opinions, practices, and consequences. Evaluation Practice, 17(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409601700302
6.
CousinsJ. B.WhitmoreE. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In WhitmoreE. (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (pp. 3–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
CoxP. J.KeenerD.WoodrardT. L.WandersmanA. (2009). Evaluation for improvement: A seven-step empowerment evaluation approach for violence prevention organization. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8.
DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (1982). Michel foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: The Harvest Press.
FederE. K. (2011). Power/knowledge. In TaylorD. (Ed.), Michel foucault: Key concepts (pp. 55–68). Durham: Routledge.
11.
FettermanD.WandersmanA. (2017). Essentials of empowerment evaluation. In FettermanD.Rodríguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. P. (Eds.), Collaborative, participative, and empowerment evaluation approaches (pp. 74–89). New York: The Guilford Press.
FettermanD. W.Rodriguez-CamposL.WandersmanA.ÓSullivanR. (2014). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Building a strong conceptual foundation for stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation (A response to cousins, whitmore & shulha, 2013). American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013509875
14.
FettermanD. W.Rodriguez-CamposL.WandersmanA.ÓSullivanR.ZukoskiA. (2018). An Introduction to collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation approaches. In FettermanD.Rodriguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. (Eds.), Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation (pp. 1–10). New York: The Guilford Press.
15.
FettermanD. M.WandersmanA. (2005). Empowerment Evalaution Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
FluhrJ. D.OmanR. F.AllenJ. R.LanphierM. G.McLeroyK. R. (2004). A collaborative approach to program evaluation of community based teen pregnancy prevention projects. Health Promotion Practice, 5(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903257687
17.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
18.
FoucaultM. (1975). 12 February 1975. In MarchettiV.SalomoniA.EwaldF.FontanaA. (Eds.), Abnormal: Lectures at the collège de France 1974–1975 (pp. 137–166). London: Verso.
19.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
FoucaultM. (1979a). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
Fornet-BetancourtR.BeckerH.Gomez-MüllerA. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An intervire with michel foucault on January 20, 1984. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145378701200202
26.
FoucaultM. (1988a). Critical theory/intellectual history (an interview with michel foucault by gérard raulet. In KritzmanL. (Ed.), Michel foucault politics philosophy culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984 (pp. 86–95). New York and London: Routledge.
27.
FoucaultM. (1988b). Politics, philosophy and culture-interviews and other writings 1977–1984. (Eds). Lawrence D. Kritzman, trans. Alan Sheridan et al. New York: Routledge.
28.
FoucaultM. (1990). The history of sexuality, volume I: An Introduction. New York: Vintage.
29.
FoucaultM. (1994a). In FaubionJ. (Ed.), Power essential works of michel foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 456). London: Penguin.
30.
FoucaultM. (1994b). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In BernauerJ.RasmussenD. (Eds.), The final foucault (pp. 3–12). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
31.
FoucaultM. (2003). Society must Be defended. London: Penguin Allen Lane.
32.
FuruboJ. E.StameN. (2019). The evaluation enterprise: A critical view. New York: Routledge.
33.
GallagherM. (2008a). ‘Power is not an evil': Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children's Geographies, 6(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280801963045
GrahamL. J.SleeL. (2008). An illusory interiority: Interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00331.x
38.
GreeneJ. (2000). Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation. In RyanK. E.DeStefanoL. (Eds.), Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue and deliberation (pp. 13–26). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
GuizzoD.De LimaI. V. (2015). Foucault´s contributions for understanding power relations in British classical political economy. Economia (Pontificia Universidad Catolica Del Peru. Departamento De Economia), 16(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2015.06.002
41.
HampshireK.HillsE.IqbalN. (2005). Power relations in participatory research and community development: A case from northern england. Human Organization, 64(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.64.4.bd9ktqj7194tyu6m
42.
HaugenJ.ChouinardJ. A. (2019). Transparent, translucent, opaque: Exploring the dimensions of power in culturally responsive evaluation contexts. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(3), 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018796342
KulynychJ. J. (1997). Performing politics: Foucault, habermas, and postmodern participation. Polity, 30(2), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235221
45.
LynchR. A. (2011). Foucault´s theory of power. In TaylorD. (Ed.), Michel foucault: Key concepts (pp. 13–27). Durham: Routledge.
46.
MidgleyG. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. Boston: Springer.
47.
MidgleyG.PinzónL. A. (2013). Systemic mediation: Moral reasoning and boundaries of concern. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 607–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2228
48.
NussbaumM. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
OksalaJ. (2010). Violence and the biopolitics of modernity. Foucault Studies, 10, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i10.3122.
50.
ÓSullivanR. G. (2004). Practicing evaluation: A collaborative approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
51.
ÓSullivanR. G. (2017). Collaborative evaluation of a multisite, multipurpose, adnd multiyear early childhood quality care iniciative. In FettermanD.Rodriguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. (Eds.), Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation (pp. 31–46). New York: The Guilford Press.
52.
Pinzón-SalcedoL. A. (2002). Exploring justice in professional mediation: a systemic intervention in Colombia. Hull: Ph.D thesis, University of Hull.
53.
Pinzon-SalcedoL. A.Torres-CuelloM. A. (2018). Community operational research: Developing a systemic peace education programme involving urban and rural communities in Colombia. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 946–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.040
54.
RodriguezS.AcreeJ. (2020). Biopolitical power in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth. Evaluation. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020914314.
55.
Rodriguez-CamposL. (2005). Collaborative evaluations: A step-by-step model for the evaluator. Tamarac: Llumina Press.
56.
Rodriguez-CamposL. (2018). Essentials of collaborative evaluation. In FettermanD.Rodriguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. (Eds.), Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation (pp. 10–20). New York: The Guilford Press.
57.
Rodriguez-CamposL.Rincones-GomezR.RokerR. (2017). A collaborative evaluation of an aquarium (A marine life program). In FettermanD.Rodríguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. P. (Eds.), Collaborative, participative, and empowerment evaluation approaches (pp. 21–30). New York: The Guilford Press.
58.
SpivakG. (1992). More on power/knowledge. In WartenbergT. E. (Ed.), Rethinking power (pp. 149–173). Albany: State University of New York.
59.
SturgesK. M. (2015). Complicity revisited: Balancing stakeholder input and roles in evaluation Use. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015583329
UlrichW. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A New approach to practical philosophy. Chichester: Wiley.
62.
WallersteinN.MuhammadM.Sanchez-YoungmanS.Rodriguez-EspinozaP.AvilaM.BakerE., … DuranB. (2019). Power dynamics in community-based participatory research: A multiple-case study analysis of partnering contexts, histories, and practices. Health Education and Behavior, 46(1S), 19S–32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119852998
63.
WandersmanA.Snell-JohnsJ. (2005). Empowerment evaluation: Clarity, dialogue, and growth. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278774
64.
WebbP. T.GulsonK. N. (2015). Policy scientificity 3.0: Theory and policy analysis in-and-for this world and other-worlds. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 161–174.
65.
YarbroughD. B.ShulhaL. M.HopsonR. K.CaruthersF. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
ZukoskiA.BossermanC. (2018). Essentials of participatory evaluation. In FettermanD.Rodriguez-CamposL.ZukoskiA. (Eds.), Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation (pp. 48–56). New York: The Guilford Press.
67.
ZukoskiA. P.LuluquisenM. (2002). Participatory evaluation: What is it? Why do it? What are the challenges?Community-Based Public Health Policy and Practice, 5, 1–6.
