The concept of power is a complex and often intangible aspect of the evaluation process that is frequently a focal topic among the conceptual evaluation literature concerning collaborative or culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) contexts. Unfortunately, there remains a significant theory to practice gap as power is often rarely addressed or specifically identified in empirical practice. In the current article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the empirical literature on CREs, with an emphasis on the manifestation of power in practice. The analysis of the literature selected for review leads to the development of a conceptual framework, which identifies intersecting power dynamics across the relational, political, discursive, and historical/temporal dimensions. The authors conclude with a research synthesis and implications for practice, including a discussion of practical ways that evaluators can begin with considerations of power rather than reflecting on the concept retrospectively.
AlkonA.TschannJ. M.RuaneS. H.WolffM.HittnerA. (2001). A violence-prevention and evaluation project with ethnically diverse populations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 48–55.
2.
Anderson-DraperM. (2006). Understanding cultural competence through the evaluation of “breaking the silence: A project to generate critical knowledge about family violence within immigrant communities.”The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 21, 59–79.
3.
Cardoza ClaysonZ.CastanedaX.SanchesE.BrindisC. (2002). Unequal power-changing landscapes: Negotiations between evaluation stakeholders in Latino communities. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 33–44.
4.
ChouinardJ. A. (2014). Understanding relationships in culturally complex evaluation contexts. Evaluation, 20, 332–347.
5.
ChouinardJ. A.CousinsJ. B. (2009). A review and synthesis of current research on cross- cultural evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 457–494.
6.
ChouinardJ. A.HopsonR. (2016). Toward a more critical exploration of culture in international development evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation30248–276.
7.
ChristieC. A.BarelaE. (2005). The Delphi technique as a method for increasing inclusion in the evaluation process. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 20, 105–122.
8.
CleggS. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CollinsP. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62–82.
10.
ConnerR. F. (2004). Developing and implementing culturally competent evaluation: A discussion of multicultural validity in two HIV prevention programs for Latinos. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 51–65.
11.
Copeland-CarsonJ. (2005). Applying theory and method in evaluation anthropology: The example of the South Bronx’s comprehensive community revitalization project. NAPA Bulletin, 24, 89–106.
12.
CousinsJ. B.ChouinardJ. A. (2012). Participatory evaluation up close: An integration of research-based knowledge. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
13.
DahlR. A. (1969). The concept of power. In BellR.EdwardsD. M.Harrison WagnerR. (Eds.), Political power: A reader in theory and research (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
DavisK. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.
15.
DodsonL.PiatelliD.SchmalzbauerL. (2007). Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: Shifting power and the unspoken contract. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 821–843.
16.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
17.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Vintage.
18.
FoucaultM. (1979). What is an author?Screen, 20:1, 13–33.
19.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
20.
GallagherM. (2008). “Power is not an evil”: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6, 137–150.
21.
GaventaJ. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37, 23–33.
22.
GaventaJ.CornwallA. (2006). Challenging the boundaries of the possible: Participation, knowledge and power. IDS Bulletin, 37, 122–128.
23.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
GramsciA. (2000). The Antonio Gramsci reader. In ForgacsD. (Ed.), New York: New York University Press.
26.
GreeneJ. C. (2002/9). Towards evaluation as a “public craft” and evaluators as stewards of the public good or listening well. Keynote address presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society International Conference, Wollongong, Australia.
27.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1992). “Culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 6–23.
28.
HampshireK.HillsE.IqbalN. (2005). Power relations in participatory research and community development: A case from Northern England. Human Organization, 64, 340–349.
29.
HarklauL.NorwoodR. (2005). Negotiating researcher roles in ethnographic program evaluation: A postmodern lens. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36, 278–288.
30.
HaywardC. R. (1998). De-facing power. Polity, 31, 1–22.
31.
KirkhartK. E. (1994). Seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road. Evaluation Practice, 16, 1–12.
32.
KirkhartK. E. (2010). Eyes on the prize: Multicultural validity and evaluation theory. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 400–413.
33.
KirkhartK. E. (2011). Culture and influence in multisite evaluation. In KingJ. A.LawrenzF. (Eds.), Multisite evaluation practice: Lessons and reflections from four cases. New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 73–85). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34.
KothariU. (2001). Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In CookB.KothariU. (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 139–152). London, England: Zed Books.
35.
LaPointV.JacksonH. L. (2004). Evaluating the co-construction of the family, school, and community partnership program in a low-income urban high school. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 25–36.
36.
LukesS. (1974). Power: A radical view. London, England: Macmillan.
37.
LukesS. (2005). Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 33, 495–521.
38.
Manswell ButtyJ. L.Daniel ReidM. D.LaPointV. (2004). A culturally responsive evaluation approach applied to the talent development school-to-career intervention program. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 37–47.
39.
MasonR.BoutilierM. (1996). The challenge of genuine power sharing in participatory research: The gap between theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Community, 15, 145–152.
40.
MatthewsH. (2001). Power games and moral territories: Ethical dilemmas when working with children and young people. Ethics, Place, and Environments, 4, 117–118.
41.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.
42.
MertensD. M.HopsonR. K. (2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. New Directions for Evaluation, 109, 35–51.
43.
MosseD. (2013). The anthropology of international development. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 227–246.
44.
ParkinsonS. (2009). Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 229–237.
45.
PrilleltenskyI.NelsonG.Sanchez ValdesL. (2000). A value-based approach to smoking prevention with immigrants from Latin America: Program evaluation. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9, 97–117.
46.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
47.
RyanK. E.ChandlerM.SamuelsM. (2007). What should school-based evaluation look like?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 197–212.
48.
SeidmanS. (2004). Contested knowledge: Social theory today (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49.
SmallS. A.TiwariG.HuserM. (2006). The cultural education of academic evaluators: Lessons from a university-Hmong community partnership. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 357–364.
50.
SmithD. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A sociology for people. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
51.
StokesH.ChaplinS. S.DessoukyS.AkliluL.HopsonR. K. (2011). Addressing social injustices, displacement, and minority rights through cases of culturally responsive evaluation. Diaspara, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 5, 167–177.
52.
ThomasV. G. (2004). Building a contextually responsive evaluation framework: Lessons from working with urban school interventions. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 3–23.
53.
Van der RietM.BoettigerM. (2009). Shifting research dynamics: Addressing power and maximizing participation through participatory research techniques in participatory research. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 1–18.
54.
VeneKlasenL.MillerV. (2002). Power and empowerment. PLA Notes, 43, 39–41.
55.
VillarrealM. (1992). The poverty of practice. In LongA. L. (Eds.), Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development (pp. 247–267). London, England: Routledge.
56.
Wilson CooperC.ChristieC. A. (2005). Evaluating parent empowerment: A look at the potential of social justice evaluation in education. Teachers College Record, 107, 2248–2274.
57.
ZulliR. A.FriersonH. T. (2004). A focus on cultural variables in evaluating an upward bound program. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 81–93.
