Collaboration is a widely utilized strategy for addressing complex social issues and for facilitating organizational innovation and performance. Evaluators are uniquely positioned to empirically examine the development and effects of interagency and interprofessional collaboration. In this article, the authors present the Collaboration Evaluation and Improvement Framework (CEIF), an extension of earlier work in collaboration theory development. The CEIF identifies five points of entry to evaluating collaborations and suggests actions that evaluators can take to (a) define and describe the evaluand of collaboration, (b) measure the attributes of organizational collaboration over time, and (c) increase stakeholder capacity to engage in efficient and effective collaborative practices. Use of the CEIF to operationalize and assess the construct of collaboration can enable the evaluator to ascertain how collaborative efforts correlate with indicators of organizational impact and outcomes.
AmbroseD. (1987). Managing complex change. Pittsburgh, PA: The Enterprise.
2.
AndersonT.SilveraC.WoodlandR.HuttonM. (2011). Massachusettsnurse regulators use of collaboration theory to promote safe medication administration. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2, 56–61.
3.
ArgyrisC.SchönD. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
AustinJ. (2000). The collaboration challenge: How non-profits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BaileyD.KoneyK. M. (2000). Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations: From affiliations to consolidations [ABRIDGED]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
BarnardC. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BatageljV.MrvaA. (2008). Pajek–Program for analysis and visualization of large networks. Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Retrieved fromhttp://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/
8.
CrossJ. E.DickmanE.Newman-GoncharR.FaganJ. M. (2009). Using mixed-method design and network analysis to measure development of inter-agency collaboration. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 310–329.
9.
DealT.PurintonT.Cook WaetjenD. (2009). Making sense of social networks in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/Sage.
10.
DozY. L.BaburogluO. (2000). From competition to collaboration: The emergence and evolution of R&D cooperatives. In FaulknerDavid O.RondMark de (Eds.), Cooperative strategy: Economic, business and organizational issues (pp. 173–192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
DuFourR.EakerR. (1998). Professional learning communities that work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Solution Tree.
12.
DuFourR.EakerR.DuFourR. (2005). On common ground: The power of professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
13.
ElliottD. S.HamburgB.WilliamsK. (1998). Violence in American school. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
15.
FullanM. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, England: Falmer Press.
16.
GajdaR. (2004). Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 65–77.
17.
GajdaR. (2006). Safe schools through strategic alliances: How assessment of collaboration enhances school violence prevention and response. Journal of School Violence, 5, 63–79.
18.
GajdaR.CravediL. (2006). Assimilating “real” teachers into pre-service teacher education: The benefits and limitations of a PDS course delivery model. Action in Teacher Education, 28, 42–52.
19.
GajdaR.KolibaC. (2007). Evaluating the imperative of inter-personal collaboration: A school improvement perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 26–44.
20.
GajdaR.KolibaC. (2008). Evaluating and improving the quality of teacher collaboration: A field-tested framework for school leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 92, 133–154.
21.
GonglaP.RizzutoC. R. (2001), Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40, 842–861.
22.
GoodladJ.Mantle-BromleyC.GoodladS. J. (2004). Education for everyone: Agenda for education in a democracy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
24.
GrattonL.EricksonT. (2007, November). Ways to build collaborative teams. Harvard Business Review, 85, 101–109.
25.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
HogueT. (1993). Community based collaboration: Community wellness multiplied. Oregon state university: Oregon center for community leadership. Retrieved January 24, 2001, fromhttp://crs.uvm.edu/nnco/collab/wellness.html
27.
HogueT.PerkinsD.ClarkR.BergstrumA.SlinkskiM., & Associates. (1995). Collaboration framework: Addressing community capacity. Columbus, OH: National Network for Collaboration.
28.
HordS. (2004). Learning together leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
HouseE. R. (1993). Professional evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
HughesJ.WeissJ. (2007, November). Simple rules for making alliances work. Harvard Business Review, 14, 1–10.
31.
JacobsonD. (2010). Coherent instructional improvement and PLCs: Is it possible to do both?Phi Delta Kappan, 91, 38–45.
32.
KolibaC. (2008). Characteristics of a governance network: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Dallas, TX: American Society of Pubic Administration Annual Conference.
33.
KolibaC.GajdaR. (2009). Communities of practice as an analytical construct: Implications for theory & practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 97–135.
34.
LeanaC. R.PilF. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organizational Science, 17, 353–366.
35.
LiljerosF.EdlingC. R.AmaralL. A. N. (2003). Sexual networks: Implications for transmission of sexually transmitted infections. Microbes Infect, 5, 189–196.
36.
McCannJ. E. (1983). Design guidelines for social-probem solving intervention. Journal of Applicied Behavioral Science, 19, 177–192.
37.
O’SullivanR. G.D’AgostinoA. (2002). Promoting evaluation through collaboration with community-based programs for young children and their families. Evaluation, 3, 372–387.
38.
PetersonN. L. (1991). Interagency collaboration under Part H: The key to comprehensive, multidisciplinary, coordinated infant/toddler intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 89–105.
39.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 22–43.
40.
PinchotG.PinchotE. (1993). The intelligent organization: Engaging the talent & initiative of everyone in the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Pub.
41.
PounderD. G. (1998). Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls. Albany: State University of New York Press.
42.
PreskillH.TorresR. T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttp://www.R-Project.org
44.
Rodriguez-CamposL. (2005). Collaborative evaluations: A step-by-step model for the evaluator. Tamarac, FL: Llumina Press.
45.
SengeP.KleinerA.RobertsC.RossR.RothG.SmithB. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges of sustaining momentum in learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
46.
StewartM.SnapeD. (1996, September). Pluralism in partnership: The emergence of multiple structures for interorganizational collaboration in urban policy. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Interorganizational Relations, Strathelyde University, Glasgow.
47.
TeitelL. (Winter 2008/2009). School/university collaboration: The power of transformative partnerships. Childhood Education, 85, 75–80.
48.
ThomsonA. M.PerryJ. L.MillerT. K. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 23–56.
49.
TuckmanB. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.
50.
TuckmanB.JensenM. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.
51.
VangenS.HuxhamC. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5–31.
52.
WoodD.GrayB. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139–162.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
