Meta-analysis refers to a set of procedures for statistically summarizing, integrating and comparing the results of previous research. This article elucidates the place of meta-analysis in hospitality research. First, a brief overview of meta-analytic procedures is provided. Second, the superior precision, rigor and accuracy of meta-analytic over narrative reviews is illustrated by selecting a recent narrative review in the Hospitality Research Journal, conducting a meta-analysis of the same studies and comparing the conclusions of the meta-analysis with those of the narrative review. Third, the authors illustrate the use of meta-analysis to test new, theoretical hypotheses by describing a recent meta-analysis of potential interest to the hospitality industry. Lastly, the article discusses several issues concerning the application of meta-analysis in hospitality and other research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerF.FulfordM. D.KrazmienM. (1993).Human resources management in the 21st Century: Predicting partnerships for profit.Hospitality Research Journal: The Futures Issue,17, 87–102
2.
BitnerM. J.BoomsB. H.TetreaultM. S. (1990).The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents.Journal of Marketing,54, 71–84
3.
BodvarssonO. B.GibsonW. A. (1994).Gratuities and customer appraisal of service: Evidence from Minnesota restaurants.Journal of Socio-Economics,23, 287–302
4.
CrouchG. I. (1994).Demand elasticities for short-haul versus long-haul tourism.Journal of Travel Research,33, 2–7
5.
CrouchG. I. (1995).A meta-analysis of tourism demand.Annals of Tourism Research22, 103–118
6.
CruscoA. H.WetzelC. G. (1984).The Midas touch: The effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin10, 512–517
7.
DriskellJ. E.MullenB. (1990).Status, expectations and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of theory.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,16, 541–553
8.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (1981).Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex-differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies.Psychological Bulletin,90, 1–20
9.
FestingerL. (1950).Informal social communication.Psychological Review,57, 271–282
10.
FestingerL.SchacterS.BackK. (1950).Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
11.
FisherR. A. (1932).Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver and Boyd
12.
GlassG. V. (1976).Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research.Educational Research,5, 3–8
13.
HalvorsenK. T. (1994).The reporting format. In CooperH.HedgesL. (Eds), The handbook of research synthesis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
14.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis.Orlando, FL: Academic Press
15.
HoggM. A. (1992).The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity.New York: New York University Press
16.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings.Newbury Park, CA: Sage
17.
JohnsonB. T.MullenB.SalasE. (1995).Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches.Journal of Applied Psychology,80, 94–106
18.
KinickiA. J.CarsonK. P.BohlanderG. W. (1992).Relationship between an organization's actual human resource efforts and employee attitudes.Group and Organization Management,17, 135–152
19.
LottA. J.LottB. E. (1965).Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables.Psychological Bulletin,64, 259–309
20.
LynnM. (1988).The effects of alcohol consumption on restaurant tipping.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,14, 87–91
21.
LynnM.GrassmanA. (1990).Restaurant tipping: An examination of three “rational explanations”.Journal of Economic Psychology,11, 169–181
22.
LynnM.GravesJ. (1996).Tipping: An incentive/reward for service?Hospitality Research Journal,20, 1–14
23.
LynnM.LataneB. (1984).The psychology of restaurant tipping.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,14, 551–563
24.
MaccobyE.JacklinC. (1974).The psychology of sex differences.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
25.
MaheshV. S. (1988).Effective human resources management: Key to excellence in service organizations.Vikalpa,13, 9–15
26.
MarksG.MillerN. (1987).Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.Psychological Bulletin,102, 72–90
27.
MayJ. M. (1978).Tip or treat: A study of factors affecting tipping behavior.Unpublished masters thesis, Loyola University of Chicago
28.
MudrackP. E. (1989).Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look.Human Relations,9, 771–785
29.
MullenB. (1989).Advanced BASIC Meta-analysis.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
30.
MullenB.CopperC. M. (1994).The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.Psychological Bulletin,115, 210–227
31.
MullenB.HuL. (1988).Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations.British Journal of Social Psychology,27, 333–356
32.
MullenB.RosenthalR. (1985).BASIC Meta-analysis.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
33.
MullenB.SalasE.MillerN. (1991).Using meta-analysis to test theoretical hypotheses in social psychology.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,17, 258–264
34.
MullenM.MullenB.CareyM. (1993).The association between beta-agonist use and death from asthma: A meta-analytic integration of case control studies.Journal of the American Medical Association,270, 1842–1845
35.
PearsonK. (1933).On a method of determining whether a sample size n supposed to have been drawn from a parent population having a known probability integral has probably been drawn at random.Biometrika,25, 379–410
36.
RosenthalM. (1961).On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to experimenter bias. In H. W. Riecken (Chair), On the social psychology of the psychological experiment. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York
37.
RosenthalR. (1963).On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: The experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results.American Psychologist,51, 268–283
38.
RosenthalR. (1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage
39.
SchachterS. (1951).Deviation, rejection and communication.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,46, 190–207
40.
SchmidtF. L. (1992).What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis and cumulative knowledge in psychology.American Psychologist,47, 1173–1181
41.
SmithM. L.GlassG. (1977).Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcomes.American Psychologist,32, 752–760
42.
SnedecorG. W. (1946).Statistical methods (4th ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press
43.
SteinerI. (1972).Group cohesiveness, productivity and strength of formal leadership.Journal of Social Psychology,87, 99–105
44.
StockW. A. (1994).Systematic coding for research synthesis. In CooperH.HedgesL. (Eds), The handbook of research synthesis, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
45.
StoufferS. A. (1949).The American soldier. (Vol. 1: Adjustment during army life), Princeton: Princeton University Press
46.
SummersI.CoffeltT.HortonR. E. (1988).Work-group cohesion.Psychological Reports,63, 627–636
47.
ThorndikeR. L. (1933).The effect of the interval between test and retest on the constancy of the IQ.Journal of Educational Psychology,24, 543–549
48.
TzinerA. (1982).Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifying overview.Social Behavior and Personality10, 227–239
