Emotions are crucial ingredients of meaningful and memorable tourism experiences. Research methods borrowed from experimental psychology are prime candidates for quantifying emotions while experiences are unfolding. The present article empirically evaluates the methodological feasibility and usefulness of ambulatory recordings of skin conductance responses (SCRs) during a tourism experience. We recorded SCRs in participants while they experienced a roller-coaster ride with or without a virtual reality (VR) headset. Ride elements were identified that related to physical aspects (such as accelerations and braking), to events in the VR environment, and to the physical theming of the roller coaster. VR rides were evaluated more positively than normal rides. SCR time series were meaningfully related to the different ride elements. SCR signals did not significantly predict overall evaluations of the ride. We conclude that psychophysiological measurements are a new avenue for understanding how hospitality, tourism and leisure experiences dynamically develop over time.
BakerC. A. (2016). Creative choices and fan practices in the transformation of theme park space. Transformative Works, 22. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2016.0974
BastiaansenM.LubX.MitasO.JungT.Passos AcençãoM.HanH.MoilanenT.SmitB.StrijboschW. (2019). Emotions as core building blocks of an experience. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(2), 651-668. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0761
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57(1), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
7.
BirenboimA.DijstM.ScheepersF. E.PoelmanM. P.HelbichM. (2019). Wearables and location tracking technologies for mental-state sensing in outdoor environments. The Professional Geographer, 71(3), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1547978
BurtM.LouwC. (2019). Virtual reality enhanced roller coasters and the future of entertainment–audience expectations. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2019.1639274
11.
ChenW.JaquesN.TaylorS.SanoA.FedorS.PicardR. W. (2015, August25-29). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for electrodermal activity [Paper presentation]. 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Milan, Italy.
FredricksonB. L. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 577-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402808
14.
HanD.-I. D. (2019). Calling for user-centric VR design research in hospitality and tourism. Hospitality & Society, 9(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1386/hosp.9.2.237_7
15.
HuangY. C.BackmanK. F.BackmanS. J.ChangL. L. (2016). Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2038
16.
JantzenC. (2013). Experiencing and experiences: A psychological framework. In SundboJ.SørensenF. (Eds.), Handbook on the experience economy (pp. 146-170). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004227.00013
17.
JungT.tom DieckM. C.RauschnabelP.AscençãoM.TuominenP.MoilanenT. (2018). Functional, hedonic or social? Exploring antecedents and consequences of virtual reality rollercoaster usage. In JungT.tom DieckM. C. (Eds.), Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 247-258). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_17
18.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
19.
KahnemanD.FredricksonB. L.SchreiberC. A.RedelmeierD. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x
20.
KahnemanD.RiisJ. (2005). Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In HuppertF. A.BaylisN.KeverneB. (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 285-304). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567523.003.0011
21.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (2003). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In BrocasI.CarrilloJ. D. (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions: Volume 1: Rationality and well-being (pp. 187-208). Oxford University Press
22.
KelseyM.PalumboR. V.UrbanejaA.AkcakayaM.HuangJ.KlecknerI. R.BarrettL. F.QuigleyK.SejdicE.GoodwinM. S. (2017, May5). Artifact detection in electrodermal activity using sparse recovery [Paper presentation]. Compressive Sensing VI: From Diverse Modalities to Big Data Analytics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2264027
23.
KimJ.FesenmaierD. R. (2015). Measuring emotions in real time: Implications for tourism experience design. Journal of Travel Research, 54(4), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514550100
24.
KimJ.-H.RitchieJ. B.McCormickB. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510385467
25.
KimT.BioccaF. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 3(2), JCMC325.
26.
LarsenR. J.FredricksonB. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40-60). Russel Sage Foundation.
LessiterJ.FreemanJ.KeoghE.DavidoffJ. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343612
29.
LiS.ScottN.WaltersG. (2015). Current and potential methods for measuring emotion in tourism experiences: A review. Current issues in Tourism, 18(9), 805-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.975679
30.
LiS.WaltersG.PackerJ.ScottN. (2018). A comparative analysis of self-report and psychophysiological measures of emotion in the context of tourism advertising. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517733555
OllanderS.GodinC.CampagneA.CharbonnierS. (2016, October9-12). A comparison of wearable and stationary sensors for stress detection [Paper presentation]. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844917
34.
PearceP. L.ZareS. (2017). The orchestra model as the basis for teaching tourism experience design. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 30(March), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.01.004
35.
PineB. J.GilmoreJ. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97-105.
36.
PineB. J.GilmoreJ. H. (2011). The experience economy: Harvard Business Press.
37.
RagotM.MartinN.EmS.PallaminN.DiverrezJ.-M. (2017, June14). Emotion recognition using physiological signals: Laboratory vs. wearable sensors [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60639-2_2
ShovalN.SchvimerY.TamirM. (2018). Real-time measurement of tourists’ objective and subjective emotions in time and space. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517691155
41.
SiegristM.UngC. Y.ZankM.MarinelloM.KunzA.HartmannC.MenozziM. (2019). Consumers’ food selection behaviors in three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality. Food Research International, 117, 50-59.
42.
SkavronskayaL.ScottN.MoyleB.LeD.HadinejadA.ZhangR.GardinerS.CoghlanA.ShakeelaA. (2017). Cognitive psychology and tourism research: state of the art. Tourism Review, 72(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2017-0041
43.
StrijboschW.MitasO.van GisbergenM.DoicaruM.GelissenJ.BastiaansenM. (2019). From experience to memory: On the robustness of the peak-and-end-rule for complex, heterogeneous experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01705
44.
TaylorS.JaquesN.ChenW.FedorS.SanoA.PicardR. (2015, August25-29). Automatic identification of artifacts in electrodermal activity data [Paper presentation]. 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318762
45.
TröndleM.GreenwoodS.KirchbergV.TschacherW. (2014). An integrative and comprehensive methodology for studying aesthetic experience in the field: Merging movement tracking, physiology, and psychological data. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 102-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512453839
46.
TröndleM.TschacherW. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: The effects of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30(1), 75-113. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.30.1.g
47.
TschacherW.GreenwoodS.KirchbergV.WintzerithS.van den BergK.TröndleM. (2012). Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception of artworks in a museum. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023845
48.
WeiW.QiR.ZhangL. (2019). Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors’ experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management, 71(April), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024
49.
WilliamsK.MascioniM. (2017). The out-of-home immersive entertainment frontier: Expanding interactive boundaries in leisure facilities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024
50.
WitmerB. G.SingerM. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225-240.
51.
ZajchowskiC. A.SchwabK. A.DustinD. L. (2016). The experiencing self and the remembering self: Implications for leisure science. Leisure Sciences, 39(6), 561-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1209140
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
