Manufacturers across many industries use service infusion to address the changing customer demands and improve their competitive position. However, understanding the drivers of successful service infusion is a complex process. Using business model and configuration theories, this study conceptualizes and analyzes the interplay of different driver domains for suppliers, customers, and their business relationships. In particular, we analyze how service offering, service pricing, service capabilities, and the service infusion process interact in affecting service infusion success and failure. 137 interviews relating to 25 business relationships are analyzed via configuration analysis, particularly fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Results show that different equifinal configurations exist (i.e., different ways to succeed with service infusion). We also find that “more is not always better.” For example, service infusion success can be achieved without fully developed service capabilities. In addition, successful configurations are often very similar to those leading to failure. A dyadic analysis demonstrates that customer service capabilities are overall more important than those of suppliers. From these findings, we derive priorities for future research. In particular, our study points toward the need to better understand the interplay between service infusion drivers. Second, we advocate the augmentation of research perspectives in service infusion by taking into account the supplier, customer, and dyadic perspectives. Lastly, the importance of understanding drivers of service infusion failure is highlighted. For managers, our study shows the importance of relational audits as a starting point to deciding on how to infuse services in a business relationship.
AndersonJames C.NarusJames A. (1995), “Capturing the Value of Supplementary Services,” Harvard Business Review, 73 (1), 75–83.
2.
AntiocoMichaelMoenaertRudy K.LindgreenAdamWetzelsMartin G. M. (2008), “Organizational Antecedents to and Consequences of Service Business Orientations in Manufacturing Companies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (3), 337–358.
3.
BainesTimLightfootHoward W. (2013), “Servitization of the Manufacturing Firm: Exploring the Operations Practices and Technologies that Deliver Advanced Services,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34 (1), 2–35.
4.
BasurtoXavierSpeerJohanna (2012), “Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA),” Field Methods, 24 (2), 155–174.
5.
BenedettiniOrnellaNeelyAndySwinkMorgan (2015), “Why Do Servitized Firms Fail? A Risk-Based Explanation,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35 (6), 946–979.
6.
BöhmEvaEggertAndreasThiesbrummelChristoph (2017), “Service Transition: A Viable Option for Manufacturing Companies with Deteriorating Financial Performance?” Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 101–111.
7.
BraxSaara (2005), “A Manufacturer Becoming Service Provider-Challenges and a Paradox,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15 (2), 142–155.
8.
CohenWesley M.LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–152.
9.
DayGeorge S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37–52.
10.
EggertAndreasHogreveJensUlagaWolfgangMuenkhoffEva (2014), “Revenue and Profit Implications of Industrial Service Strategies,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (1), 23–39.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Building Theory from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.
13.
FangEricPalmatierRobert W.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M. (2008), “Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (5), 1–14.
14.
FissPeer C. (2011), “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research,” Academy of Management Journal, 54 (2), 393–420.
15.
FissPeer C. (2007), “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (4), 1180–1198.
16.
ForkmannSebastianRamosCarlaHennebergStephan C.NaudéPeter (2017), “Understanding the Service Infusion Process as a Business Model Reconfiguration,” Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 151–166.
17.
FriendScott B.MalsheAvinash (2016), “Key Skills for Crafting Customer Solutions within an Ecosystem: A Theories-in-Use Perspective,” Journal of Service Research, 19 (2), 174–191.
18.
FroesenJohannaLuomaJukkaJaakkolaMattiTikkanenHenrikkiAsparaJaakko (2016), “What Counts versus What Can Be Counted: The Complex Interplay of Market Orientation and Marketing Performance Measurement,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 60–78.
19.
GebauerHeikoBoEdvardssonGustafssonAndersWitellLars (2010), “Match or Mismatch: Strategy-Structure Configurations in the Service Business of Manufacturing Companies,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (2), 198–215.
20.
JohnsonMark W.ChristensenClaytonKagermannHenning (2008), “Reinventing Your Business Model,” Harvard Business Review, 86 (12), 57–68.
21.
JosephsonBrett W.JohnsonJean L.MariadossBabu JohnCullenJohn (2016), “Service Transition Strategies in Manufacturing: Implications for Firm Risk,” Journal of Service Research, 19 (2), 142–57.
22.
KanAnderson Konan SenyAdegbiteEmmanuelOmariSami ElAbdellatifMahamat (2016), “On the Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Management,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (4), 1458–1463.
23.
KindströmDanielKowalkowskiChristianSandbergErik (2013), “Enabling Service Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1063–1073.
24.
KowalkowskiChristianWindahlCharlottaKindströmDanielGebauerHeiko (2015), “What Service Transition? Rethinking Established Assumptions About Manufacturers’ Service-Led Growth Strategies,” Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 59–69.
25.
KowalkowskiChristianWitellLarsGustafssonAnders (2013), “Any Way Goes: Identifying Value Constellations for Service Infusion in SMEs,” Industrial Marketing Management, 42 (1), 18–30.
26.
KowalkowskiChristianKindströmDanielAlejandroThomas BrashearBregeStaffanBiggemannSergio (2012), “Service Infusion as Agile Incrementalism in Action,” Journal of Business Research, 65 (6), 765–772.
27.
KvaleSteinarBrinkmannSvend (2009), Interviews—Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
MacdonaldEmma K.KleinaltenkampMichaelWilsonHugh N. (2016), “How Business Customers Judge Solutions: Solution Quality and Value in Use,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 96–120.
29.
MadhavaramSreedhar R.HuntShelby H. (2008), “The Service-Dominant Logic and a Hierarchy of Operant Resources: Developing Masterful Operant Resources and Implications for Marketing Strategy,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 67–82.
30.
MahoneyJamesGoertzGary (2006), “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative Research,” Political Analysis, 14 (3), 227–249.
31.
MathieuValerie (2001), “Product Services: From a Service Supporting the Product to a Service Supporting the Client,” Journal of Business and Industrial Management, 16 (1), 39–58.
32.
MatthyssensPaulVandenbemptKoen (2008), “Moving from Basic Offerings to Value-Added Solutions: Strategies, Barriers and Alignment,” Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (3), 316–328.
33.
MilesMatthew B.HubermanMichael A. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
MisangyiVilmos F.AcharyaAbhijith G. (2014), “Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Journal, 57 (6), 1681–1705.
35.
NeelyAndy (2008), “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing,” Operations Management Research, 1 (2), 103–118.
36.
NeuWayne A.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Forming Successful Business-to-Business Services in Goods-Dominant Firms,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (1), 3–17.
37.
OlivaRogelioKallenbergRobert (2003), “Managing the Transition from Products to Services,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14 (2), 160–172.
38.
OrdaniniAndreaParasuramanA.RuberaGaia (2014), “When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Service Innovation Configurations,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (2), 134–149.
39.
OrdaniniAndreaMaglioPaul P. (2009), “Market Orientation, Internal Process, and External Network: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Key Decisional Alternatives in the New Service Development,” Decision Sciences, 40 (3), 601–625.
40.
OsterwalderAlexanderPigneurYves (2010), Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. New York, NY: John Wiley.
41.
OstromAmy L.ParasuramanA.BowenDavid E.PatrícioLiaVossChristopher A. (2015), “Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (2), 127–159.
42.
OstromAmy L.BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.BurkhardKevin A.GoulMichaelSmith-DanielsVickiDemirkanHalukRabinovichElliot (2010), “Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (1), 4–36.
43.
PayneAdrian F.StorbackaKajFrowPennie (2008), “Managing the Co-creation of Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 83–96.
RaddatsChrisBainesTimBurtonJamieStoryVicky MaryZolkiewskiJudy (2016), “Motivations for Servitization: The Impact of Product Complexity,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36 (5), 572–591.
46.
RaginCharles C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
RaginCharles C.SonnettJohn (2008), “Limited Diversity and Counterfactual Cases,” in Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, RaginCharles C., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 147–159.
48.
RaginCharles C. (2006), “Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluation Their Consistency and Coverage,” Political Analysis, 14 (3), 291–310.
49.
RaginCharles C.SonnettJohn (2005), “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis,” in Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft, KroppSabineMinkenbergMichael, eds. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 180–197.
50.
RaginCharles C. (2000), Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
RantalaKatiHellströmEeva (2001), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis and a Hermeneutic Approach to Interview Data,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4 (2), 87–100.
52.
RihouxBenoit (2006), “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods,” International Sociology, 21 (5), 679–706.
53.
RustRonald T.CooilBruce (1994), “Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (1), 1–14.
54.
SchneiderCarsten Q.WagemannClaudius (2010), “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets,” Comparative Sociology, 9 (3), 397–418.
55.
SchneiderMartin R.Schulze-BentropConradPaunescuMihai (2010), “Mapping the Institutional Capital of High-Tech Firms: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Capitalist Variety and Export Performance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2), 246–266.
56.
ShankarVenkateshBerryLeonard L.DotzelThomas (2009), “A Practical Guide to Combining Products and Services,” Harvard Business Review, 87 (11), 94–99.
57.
SteinerMichaelEggertAndreasUlagaWolfgangBackhausKlaus (2016), “Do Customized Service Packages Impede Value Capture in Industrial Markets?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (2), 151–165.
58.
StorbackaKajWindahlCharlottaNenonenSuviSalonenAnna (2013), “Solution Business Models: Transformation Along Four Continua,” Industrial Marketing Management, 42 (5), 705–716.
59.
StremerschStefanTellisGerard J. (2002), “Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 55–72.
60.
TeeceDavid J. (2010), “Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation,” Long Range Planning, 43 (2-3), 172–194.
61.
TóthZsófiaHennebergStephan C.NaudéPeter (2017), “Addressing the ‘Qualitative’ in Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: The Generic Membership Evaluation Template,” Industrial Marketing Management. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.008.
62.
TuliKapil R.KohliAjay K.BharadwajSundar G. (2007), “Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 1–17.
63.
UlagaWolfgangReinartzWerner J. (2011), “Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (6), 5–23.
64.
UlagaWolfgangEggertAndreas (2006), “Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (1), 119–136.
65.
VenkatramanNatarajan (1989), “Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement,” Management Science, 35 (8), 942–962.
66.
VisnjicIvankaWiengartenFrankNeelyAndy (2016), “Only the Brave: Product Innovation, Service Business Model Innovation, and Their Impact on Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33 (1), 36–55.
67.
Visnjic KastalliIvankaVan LooyBart (2013), “Servitization: Disentangling the Impact of Service Business Model Innovation on Manufacturing Firm Performance,” Journal of Operations Management, 31 (4), 169–180.
68.
VorhiesDouglas W.MorganNeil A. (2003), “A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (1), 100–115.
69.
VossChrisTsikriktsisNikosFrohlichMark (2002), “Case Research in Operations Management,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (2), 195–219.
70.
WirtzBernd W.PistoiaAdrianoUllrichSebastianGöttelVincent (2016), “Business Models: Origin, Development and Future Research Perspectives,” Long Range Planning, 49 (1), 36–54.
71.
WiseRichardBaumgartnerPeter (1999), “Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing,” Harvard Business Review, 77 (5), 133–141.
72.
WitellLarsLöfgrenMartin (2013), “From Service for Free to Service for Fee: Business Model Innovation in Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Service Management, 24 (5), 520–533.
73.
YeGuangliangPriemRichard L.AlshwerAbdullah A. (2012), “Achieving Demand-Side Synergy from Strategic Diversification: How Combining Mundane Assets Can Leverage Consumer Utilities,” Organization Science, 23 (1), 207–224.
74.
YinRobert K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
ZahraShaker A.GeorgeGerard (2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Journal, 27 (2), 185–203.
76.
ZeithamlValerie A.BrownStephen W.BitnerMary JoSalasJim (2014). Profiting from Services and Solutions. New York, NY: Business Expert Press.
77.
ZottChristophAmitRaphaelMassaLorenzo (2011), “The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research,” Journal of Management, 37 (4), 1019–1042.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
