Visual appeal is an important consideration in the design of interior service environments because attractiveness influences consumer behavior. Employing both an experiment and a field study, we show that visual complexity reduces a service environment’s attractiveness. Furthermore, we find that the complexity-attractiveness relationship is mediated by processing fluency and its instantaneous affective companion, pleasure. Our findings provide novel insights into the underlying process mechanism involved in channeling the effect of visual complexity on attractiveness. Furthermore, both studies confirm that customers’ field dependence moderates the complexity-fluency relationship and that shopping motivation (i.e., hedonic vs. utilitarian shopping goals) moderates the fluency-pleasure relationship. Our findings suggest that it is generally better to reduce the complexity of interior service environments. To achieve this, service firms should reduce the number of objects in the environment, enhance the visual organization and symmetry of their arrangement, and use fewer colors, textures, and materials.
AikenLeona S.WestStephen G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AkalinAysuYildirimKemalWilsonChristopherKilicogluOnder (2009), “Architecture and Engineering Students’ Evaluations of House Façades: Preference, Complexity and Impressiveness,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29 (1), 124–132.
3.
ArnoldMark J.ReynoldsKristy E. (2009), “Affect and Retail Shopping Behavior: Understanding the Role of Mood Regulation and Regulatory Focus,”Journal of Retailing, 85 (3), 308–320.
4.
ArthurWinfredDayDavid V. (1991), “Examination of the Construct Validity of Alternative Measures of Field Dependence/Independence,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72 (6), 851–859.
5.
BabinBarry J.DardenWilliam R.GriffinMitch (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–656.
6.
BakerJulieParasuramanA.GrewalDhruvVossGlenn B. (2002), “The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (2), 120–141.
7.
BakerJulieGrewalDhruvParasuramanA. (1994), “The Influence of Store Environment on Quality Inferences and Store Image,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (4), 328–339.
8.
BerlyneDavid E. (1971), Aesthetics and Physiobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
BitnerMary (1992), “Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (2), 57–71.
10.
BlochPeter. H.RidgwayNancy M.DawsonScott A. (1994), “The Shopping Mall as Consumer Habitat,”Journal of Retailing, 70 (1), 23–42.
11.
ChitturiRavindraRaghunathanRajagopalMahajanVijay (2008), “Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (3), 48–63.
12.
ChoHyejeungSchwarzNorbert (2010), “I Like Those Glasses on You, But Not in the Mirror: Fluency, Preference, and Virtual Mirrors,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 471–475.
13.
ChoiIncheolKooMinkyungChoiJong An (2007), “Individual Differences in Analytic versus Holistic Thinking,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (5), 691–705.
14.
CreusenMarielle E. H.VeryzerRobert W.SchoormansJan P. L. (2010), “Product Value Importance and Consumer Preference for Visual Complexity and Symmetry,”European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1437–1452.
15.
DemangeotCatherineBroderickAmanda J. (2010), “Consumer Perceptions of Online Shopping Environments: A Gestalt Approach,”Psychology & Marketing, 27 (2), 117–140.
16.
DengXiaoyanHuiSam K.Wesley HutchinsonJ. (2010), “Consumer Preferences for Color Combinations: An Empirical Analysis of Similarity-based Color Relationships,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 476–484.
17.
DharRajivWertenbrochKlaus (2000), “Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (1), 60–71.
18.
EisnerDonald (1972), “Developmental Relationships between Field Independence and Fixity-mobility,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34 (3), 767–770.
19.
ErogluSevgin A.MachleitKaren A.DavisLenita M. (2003), “Empirical Testing of a Model of Online Store Atmospherics and Shopper Responses,”Psychology & Marketing, 20 (2), 139–150.
FisherJeffrey D. (1974), “Situation-specific Variables as Determinants of Perceived Environmental Aesthetic Quality and Perceived Crowdedness,”Journal of Research in Personality, 8 (8), 177–188.
22.
FrazierPatricia A.TixAndrew P.BarronKenneth E. (2004), “Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research,”Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51 (1), 115–134.
23.
GeisslerGary L.ZinkhanGeorge M.WatsonRichard T. (2006), “The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent,”Journal of Advertising, 35 (2), 69–80.
24.
GoodenoughDonald R. (1987), “The Nature of Individual Differences in Field Dependence,”Journal of Research in Personality, 21 (3), 81–99.
25.
GrewalDhruvBakerJulieLevyMichaelVossGlenn B. (2003), “The Effects of Wait Expectations and Store Atmosphere Evaluations on Patronage Intentions in Service-intensive Retail Stores,”Journal of Retailing, 79 (4), 259–268.
26.
HalberstadtJaminRhodesGillian (2000), “The Attractiveness of Nonface Averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces,”Psychological Science, 11 (4), 285–289.
27.
Harmon-JonesEddieAllenJohn J. B. (2001), “The Role of Affect in the Mere Exposure Effect. Evidence from Psychophysiological and Individual Differences Approaches,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (7), 889–898.
28.
HaytkoDiana L.BakerJulie (2004), “It’s All at the Mall: Exploring Adolescent Girls’Experiences,” Journal of Retailing, 80 (1), 67–83.
29.
HeapsChristopherHandelStephen (1999), “Similarity and Features of Natural Textures,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (2), 299–320.
30.
HekkertPaulSneldersDirkWieringenPiet C. W. van (2003), “Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable: Typicality and Novelty as Joint Predictors of Aesthetic Preference in Industrial Design,”British Journal of Psychology, 94 (1), 111–114.
31.
HendersonPamela W.GieseJoan L.CoteJoseph A. (2004), “Impression Management Using Typeface Design,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 60–72.
32.
HochStephen J.BradlowEric T.WansinkBrian (1999), “The Variety of an Assortment,”Marketing Science, 18 (4), 527–546.
33.
HuHaiyanJasperCynthia R. (2006), “Social Cues in the Store Environment and Their Impact on Store Image,”International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34 (1), 25–48.
34.
ImHyunjooLennonSharron J.StoelLeslie (2010), “The Perceptual Fluency Effect on Pleasurable Online Shopping Experience,”Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4 (4), 280–295.
35.
ImamogluÇagri (2000), “Complexity, Liking and Familiarity: Architecture and Non-architecture Turkish Students’ Assessments of Traditional and Modern House Facades,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (1), 5–16.
36.
JaniszewskiChrisMeyvisTom (2001), “Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (6), 18–32.
37.
JoyeYannick (2007), “Architectural Lessons from Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture,”Review of General Psychology, 11 (4), 305–328.
38.
KaplanRachelKaplanStephenRyanRobert L. (1998), With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
39.
KentRobert J.AllenChris T. (1994), “Competitive Interference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (7), 97–105.
40.
LandwehrJan R.LabrooAparnaHerrmannAndreas (2011), “Gut Liking for the Ordinary: Incorporating Design Fluency Improves Automobile Sales Forecasts,”Marketing Science, 30 (3), 416–429.
41.
LederHelmutCarbonClaus-Christian (2005), “Dimensions of Appreciation of Car Interior Design,”Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19 (5), 603–618.
42.
LeeAngela Y.LabrooAparna A. (2004), “The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (2), 151–165.
43.
MatthesJörgWirthWernerSchemerChristianKisslingAnna-Katerina (2011), “I See What You Don’t See,”Journal of Advertising, 40 (4), 85–100.
44.
MattilaAnna S.WirtzJochen (2008), “The Role of Store Environmental Stimulation and Social Factors on Impulse Purchasing,”Journal of Services Marketing, 23 (1), 562–567.
45.
MattilaAnna S.WirtzJochen (2006), “Arousal Expectations and Service Evaluations,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17 (3), 229–244.
46.
MattilaAnna S.WirtzJochen (2001), “Congruency of Scent and Music as a Driver of In-store Evaluations and Behavior,”Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 273–290.
47.
McGillAnn L.AnandPunam (1989), “The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (2), 188–196.
48.
MehrabianAlbertRussellJames A. (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
MummaGregory H. (1993), “The Embedded Figures Test: Internal Structure and Development of a Short Form,”Personality and Individual Differences, 15 (2), 221–224.
50.
NadalMarcosMunarEnricMartyGisèleCela-condeCamilo José (2010), “Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results,”Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28 (2), 173–191.
51.
NasarJack L.StampsArthur E.HanyuKazunori (2005), “Form and Function in Public Buildings,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25 (2), 159–165.
52.
NisbettRichard E.MiyamotoYuri (2005), “The Influence of Culture: Holistic versus Analytic Perception,”Cognitive Sciences, 9 (10), 467–473.
53.
OlivaAudeMackMichael L.ShresthaMochanPeeperAngela (2004), “Identifying the Perceptual Dimensions of Visual Complexity of Scenes,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ForbusKennethGentnerDedreRegierTerry, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Cognitive Science Society, 1041–1046.
54.
OlivaAudeTorralbaAntonio (2001), “Identifying the Perceptual Dimensions of Visual Complexity of Scenes,”International Journal of Computer Vision, 42 (3), 145–175.
55.
OliverRichard L.RustRoland T.VarkiSajeev (1997), “Customer Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight,”Journal of Retailing, 73 (3), 311–336.
56.
OrthUlrich R.HeinrichFraukeMalkewitzKeven (2012), “Servicescape Interior Design and Consumer Personality Impressions,”Journal of Services Marketing, 26 (3), 194–203.
57.
OrthUlrich R.MalkewitzKeven (2012), “The Accuracy of Design-based Judgments: A Constructivist Approach,”Journal of Retailing, 88 (3), 421–436.
58.
OrthUlrich R.MalkewitzKeven (2008), “Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (5), 64–81.
59.
PalmerStephen E. (1999), Vision Science Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
PanekPaul E. (1985), “Age Differences in Field-dependence/Independence,”Experimental Aging Research, 11 (2), 97–99.
61.
PetersonRobert A.SauberMatthew (1983), “A Mood Scale for Survey Research,” in Handbook of Marketing Scales (1993), BeardenWilliamNetemeyerRichardMobleyMary, eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 187–188.
62.
PietersRikWedelMichelBatraRajeev (2010), “The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (5), 48–60.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,”Behavior Research Methods, 36 (4), 717–731.
65.
RaynerKeith (1998), “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research,”Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422.
66.
ReberRolfSchwarzNorbertWinkielmanPiotr (2004), “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience?”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–382.
67.
ReberRolfWinkielmanPiotrSchwarzNorbert (1998), “Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments,”Psychological Science, 9 (1), 45–48.
68.
RosenDeborah E.PurintonElizabeth (2004), “Website Design,”Journal of Business Research, 57 (7), 787–794.
69.
RosenholtzRuthLiYuanzhenNakanoLisa (2007), “Measuring Visual Clutter,”Journal of Vision, 7 (2), 1–22.
70.
SchwarzNorbert (2004), “Meta-cognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (4), 332–348.
71.
SchwarzNorbertCloreGerald L. (1983), “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-being: Information and Directive Functions of Affective States,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (9), 513–523.
72.
SilviaPaul J. (2005), “Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions,”Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23 (2), 119–133.
73.
SirianniNancy J.BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.MandelNaomi (2013), “Branded Service Encounters: Strategically Aligning Employee Behavior with the Brand Positioning,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (6), 108–123.
74.
StampsArthur E. (2004), “Mystery, Complexity, Legibility and Coherence: A Meta-analysis,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (1), 1–16.
75.
TaylorRichard P.SpeharBrankaWiseJames A.CliffordColin W. G.NewellBen R.HagerhallCaroline M.PurcellTerryMartinTheodore P. (2005), “Perceptual and Physiological Responses to the Visual Complexity of Fractal Patterns,”Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 9 (1), 89–113.
76.
TinioPablo P. L.LederHelmut (2009), “Just How Stable Are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry, Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization,”Acta Psychologica, 130 (3), 241–250.
77.
TitusPhilip A.EverettPeter B. (2002), “The Consumer Retail Search Process: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (2), 106–119.
78.
Van der HelmPeter A. (2000), “Simplicity versus Likelihood in Visual Perception: From Surprisals to Precisals,”Psychological Bulletin, 126 (5), 770–800.
79.
VerhoefPeter C.LemonKatherine N.ParasuramanA.RoggeveenAnneTsirosMichaelSchlesingerLeonard A. (2009), “Customer Experience Creation: Determinants, Dynamics, and Management Strategies,”Journal of Retailing, 85 (1), 31–41.
80.
WakefieldKirk L.BakerJulie (1998), “Excitement at the Mall: Determinants and Effects on Shopping Response,”Journal of Retailing, 74 (4), 515–539.
81.
WinkielmanPiotrHalberstadtJaminFazendeiroTedraCattySteve (2006), “Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind,”Psychological Science, 17 (9), 799–806.
82.
WinkielmanPiotrCacioppoJohn T. (2001), “Mind at Ease Puts a Smile on the Face: Psychophysiological Evidence that Processing Facilitation Elicits Positive Affect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (6), 989–1000.
83.
WirtzJochenMattilaAnna S.TanRachel L. P. (2007), “The Role of Desired Arousal in Influencing Consumers’ Satisfaction Evaluations and In-store Behaviours,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18 (2), 6–24.
84.
WirtzJochenMattilaAnna S.TanRachel L. P. (2000), “The Moderating Role of Target-arousal State on the Impact of Affect on Satisfaction: An Examination in the Context of Service Experiences,”Journal of Retailing, 76 (3), 347–365.
85.
WitkinHerman A. (1950), “Individual Differences in Ease of Perception of Embedded Figures,”Journal of Personality, 19 (1), 1–15.
86.
WolfeJeremy M.HorowitzTodd S.KennerNaomi (2005), “Rare Items Often Missed in Visual Searches,”Nature, 435 (26), 439–440.
87.
YildirimKemalAkalin-BaskayaAysu (2007), “Perceived Crowding in a Café/Restaurant with Different Seating Densities,”Building and Environment, 42 (9), 3410–3417.
88.
ZhangLi-fang (2004), “Field-dependence/Independence: Cognitive Style or Perceptual Ability? Validating against Thinking Styles and Academic Achievement,”Personality and Individual Differences, 37 (10), 1295–1311.
89.
ZhaoXinshuLynchJohn G.JrChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
90.
ZhuRuiMeyers-LevyJoan (2009), “The Influence of Self-view on Context Effects: How Display Fixtures Can Affect Product Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (1), 37–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
