Internationalizing Educational Leadership: How a University Department Jumps the Curve From Local to International

Abstract

Purpose: This study describes how an educational leadership department transformed its regional identity and localized practices over a ten-year period (1997-2007) to become internationalized in terms of research, teaching, and service. Research Methods/Approach (e.g., Setting, Participants, Research Design, Data Collection and Analysis): A basic qualitative approach (written narratives, interviews and document analysis) was used. All faculty holding tenured, tenure earning, and clinical, non-tenured positions were invited to participate. Fifteen out of 18 department faculty chose to participate. Findings: We found that the success of internationalization rests not only with individual faculty champions and flexible opportunism, but also with collective actions. In one decade, the department shifted from individual, isolated pursuits in the international arena, to a department having an integral, international dimension across research, teaching, and service. Many factors contributed to stages of internationalizing: The role of the department chair was instrumental; having a willing and capable faculty was necessary to reach the more advanced stages of internationalization; international activities were always contingent and voluntary, not mandated or controlled; and, the recruitment, participation, and encouragement of international and internationally oriented graduate students were critical to supporting a bottom-up, top-down synergy. Implications for Research and Practice: The study of internationalization within higher educational institutions, specifically in educational leadership, involves complex theory[ies]. Like Dimmock and Walker before us, we sought to overcome superficial comparisons of attitudes, behaviors and policies which lead to simple, but often misleading correlations. We recommend, instead, a conceptual framework that can account for changes over time and across individual-group interactions, that is, multi-organizational levels.

Keywords

internationalizing internationalism nested group analysis longitudinal case study educational leadership faculty development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appiah, K.A. ( 2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: Norton.

Barnett, B. ( 2006). Emerging trends in international education. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 1(1). http://www.ucea.org/storage/JRLE/pdf/v011_issue1_2006/Barnett.pdf (accessed May 28, 2008).

Biesta, G. ( 2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future . Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

Bogotch, I. , Miron, L. , & Biesta, G. ( 2007). Effective for what? Effective for whom? Two questions SESI should not ignore. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 93-110). Dordrecht , Netherlands: Springer.

Bussey, L.H. (Winter, 2007). International insights on evaluating leadership preparation: An interview with Allan Walker and Olof Johansson. UCEA Review , XLVI(1), 24.

Culbertson, J. ( 1969). A new initiative in educational administration. In G. Baron , D. Cooper , & W. Walker , (Eds.), Educational administration: International perspectives (pp. 1-7). Chicago : Rand McNally.

Culbertson, J. ( 1979). Improve educational policy and administration: The role of international organizations, learned societies, and professional associations . Paper presented at the Inter-American Congress on Educational Administration, Brasilia, Brazil (December).

Culbertson, J. ( 1981). International networking: Expanded vistas for leadership development. Theory into Practice, 20(4), 278-284.

Culbertson, J. ( 1995). Building bridges: UCEA’s first two decades. University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.

10.

DeCieri, H. , Fenwick, M. & Hutchings, K. ( 2005). The challenge of international human resource management: Balancing the duality of strategy and practice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(4), 584-598.

11.

Dimmock, C. , & Walker, A. ( 1998). Towards comparative educational administration: Building the case for a cross-cultural school based approach. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 379-401.

12.

Gouldner, A.W. ( 1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles-I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(3), 281-306.

13.

Hallinger, P. , & Leithwood, L. ( 1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98-116.

14.

Hurd, D. ( 2007). Leading transformational change: A study of internationalization at three universities in the United States. Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.

15.

Jacobson, S. (in press 2010). Personal reflections on an organizational transformation: UCEA’s re-emerging role in a world of interdependent nations. In A. Tooms & C, Boske (Eds.), Bridge leadership: Connecting educational leadership and social justice to improve schools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

16.

Klein, K. , Dansereau, J. , & Hall, R. ( 1994). Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195-229.

17.

Knight, J. ( 2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education , 8(1), 5-31.

18.

Leithwood, K. ( 2005). Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 619-629.

19.

MacBeath, J. ( 2007). Improving school effectiveness: Retrospective and Prospective . In T. Townsend (Ed.), International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement (pp. 57-74). Dordrecht , Netherlands: Springer.

20.

Merriam, S. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

21.

Rousseau, D.M. ( 1985). Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior , 7, 1-37.

22.

Schoorman, D. ( 2000). What really do we mean by ‘internationalization’ ?" Contemporary Education, 71(4), 5-11.

23.

Schoorman, D. ( 1999). The pedagogical implications of diverse conceptualizations of internationalism: A US-Based Case Study. Journal of Studies of International Education, 3(2), 19-46.

24.

Schweitz, M. ( 2006). Internationalization of the academic profession: An exploratory study of faculty attitudes, beliefs and involvement at public universities in Pennsylvania. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburg , Pittsburg, PA.

25.

Stoll, L. , & Sammons, P. ( 2007). Growing together: School effectiveness and school improvement in the UK. In T. Townsend (Ed.). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 207-222). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

26.

Stone, F. ( 1978). Educational administration: International movement. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 7-8(Summer), 18-28.

27.

Walker, A. , & Dimmock, C. ( 2004). The international role of the NCSL: Tourist, colporteur or confrere?" Educational Management Administration and Leadership , 32(3), 269-287.

28.

Walker, W. ( 1972). Centralization and decentralization: An international viewpoint on an American dilemma. Eugene: University of Oregon, Special Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration.

29.

Walker, W. ( 1977). Values, unorthodoxies and the ‘unscientific’ in educational administration research. Paper presented at the American Association of Educational Research, New York (April).