The dramatic expansion of the international dimension in higher education has incited broadened and diverse interpretations of internationalization. As faculty members are integral in achieving many expected higher education goals, understanding their perspectives on the internationalization process is critical. Administrative leaders also play a vital role in influencing the conditions of internationalization and working alongside the faculty. Addressing the rationales, strategies, and barriers encountered, our study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of faculty internationalization. Employing a phenomenological design, we interviewed 22 participants, including central administrators of two public research universities and both faculty and administrative leaders of these universities’ colleges of education. Revealing diverse rationales, strategies, and barriers, our findings confirm faculty’s initiator and maintainer roles in operationalizing internationalization. Our study also corroborates the need for sustainable mechanisms and a consensus between faculty perspectives and institutional priorities. Recommendations are made to improve faculty engagement in internationalization.
AgnewM. (2013). Strategic planning: An examination of the role of disciplines in sustaining internationalization of the university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 183–202.
2.
AltbachP. G.ReisbergL.RumbleyL. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education : Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO.
3.
American Council on Education. (2017). Mapping internationalization on U.S. campuses.
4.
AustinA. E. (1990). Faculty cultures, faculty values. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1990(68), 61–74.
5.
BecherT.TrowlerP. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. SRHE and Open University Press.
6.
BedenlierS.Zawacki-RichterO. (2015). Internationalization of higher education and the impacts on academic faculty members. Research in Comparative and International Education, 10(2), 185–201.
7.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE.
8.
BoyerE. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9.
BurnettS.-A.HuismanJ. (2010). Universities’ responses to globalisation: The influence of organisational culture. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(2), 117–142.
10.
ÇalıkoğluA. (2017). Factors influencing faculty involvement in internationalization: A mixed methods study on rationales, incentives, and barriers [Doctoral dissertation]. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
11.
CantwellB.KauppinenI. (Eds.) (2014). Academic capitalism in the age of globalization. Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
ChildressL. K. (2010). The twenty-first century university: Developing faculty engagement in internationalization. Peter Lang.
13.
CriswellJ. R. (2014). Faculty internationalization perceptions survey: Development and validation [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri.
14.
Egron-PolakE.HudsonR. (2014). Internationalization of higher education: Growing expectations, essential values [IAU 4th global survey report]. International Association of Universities.
15.
EimersM. T. (1997). The role of intrinsic enjoyment in motivating faculty. Thought & Action, 13(2), 125–142.
16.
FairweatherJ. S. (2002). The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 97–108.
17.
FinkelsteinM.SethiW. (2014). Patterns of faculty internationalization: A predictive model. In HuangF.FinkelsteinM.RostanM. (Eds.), The internationalization of the academy: Changes, realities and prospects (pp. 237–257). Springer.
18.
FriesenR. (2013). Faculty member engagement in Canadian university internationalization: A consideration of understanding, motivations and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(3), 209–227.
19.
HenkelM. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1), 155–176.
20.
HudzikJ. K. (2011). Comprehensive internationalization: From concept to action. NAFSA Association of International Educators.
21.
IosavaL.RoxåT. (2019). Internationalisation of universities: Local perspectives on a global phenomenon. Tertiary Education and Management, 25(3), 225–238.
22.
JonesE.de WitH. (2012). Globalization of internationalization: Thematic and regional reflections on a traditional concept. AUDEM: The International Journal of Higher Education and Democracy, 3(1), 35–54.
KlybergS. G. F. (2012). The faculty experience of internationalization: Motivations for, practices of, and means for engagement [Doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
25.
KnightJ. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
26.
KnightJ. (2014). Is internationalisation of higher education having an identity crisis? In Maldonado-MaldonadoA.BassettR. M. (Eds.), The forefront of international higher education: A festschrift in honor of Philip G. Altbach (pp. 75–87). Springer.
27.
LeaskB. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(2), 205–221.
28.
LeaskB. (2013). Internationalizing the curriculum in the disciplines—Imagining new possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 103–118.
29.
LeeJ. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 41–55.
30.
LeeJ. J.RhoadsR. A. (2004). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 739–760.
31.
LiB.TuY. (2016). Motivations of faculty engagement in internationalization: A survey in China. Higher Education, 71(1), 81–96.
32.
MaringeF.FoskettN.WoodfieldS. (2013). Emerging internationalisation models in an uneven global terrain: Findings from a global survey. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 9–36.
33.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.
34.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
35.
MusselinC. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657–683.
36.
PashbyK.de AndreottiV. (2016). Ethical internationalisation in higher education: Interfaces with international development and sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 771–787.
37.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
38.
ProctorD. J. (2016). Academic staff and international engagement in Australian higher education [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.
39.
RobbinsS. P. (2013). From the editor—Balancing the personal and professional in an era of transformed faculty roles. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 191–193.
40.
RostanM. (2015). International aspects of academic work and career at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In TeichlerU.CummingsW. K. (Eds.), Forming, recruiting and managing the academic profession (pp. 241–258). Springer.
41.
RostanM.HöhleE. A. (2014). The international mobility of faculty. In HuangF.FinkelsteinM.RostanM. (Eds.), The internationalization of the academy (pp. 79–104). Springer.
42.
RumbleyL. E. (2010). Internationalization in the universities of Spain: Changes and challenges at four institutions. In MaringeF.FoskettN. (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in higher education: Theoretical, strategic and management perspectives (pp. 207–222). Continuum.
43.
SchusterJ. H.FinkelsteinM. J. (2006). The American Faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
44.
SeeberM.MeoliM.CattaneoM. (2020). How do European higher education institutions internationalize?Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 145–162.
45.
StohlM. (2007). We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 359–372.
46.
TeichlerU. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5–26.
47.
TeichlerU. (2017). Internationally mobile academics: Concept and findings in Europe. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(1), 15–28.
48.
TurnerY.RobsonS. (2007). Competitive and cooperative impulses to internationalization: Reflecting on the interplay between management intentions and the experience of academics in a British university. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 1(1), 65–82.
49.
WardK. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement [ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report]. Jossey-Bass.
50.
WeidmanJ. C.TwaleD. J.SteinE. L. (2003). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? [ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report]. Jossey-Bass.
