Learning in national parks often occurs in the context of family groups. Understanding the motivations, needs, and outcomes of family groups is critical to engaging a substantial portion of the National Park Service (NPS) audience. This literature review was prompted by an NPS initiative to improve lifelong learning. It explores research about the nature of family learning, factors that influence it, and recommendations for enhancing it.
This review uses Falk and Dierking's (2000) Contextual Model of Learning as a framework for understanding personal, sociocultural, and physical factors that contribute to family learning outcomes in free-choice settings. Recommendations for improving family learning include: tapping into the motivations of family visits, helping families converse to construct meaning, and creating physical spaces for visitors of many ages to interact. The NPS can enhance visitors’ connections to parks if park programs, exhibits, and interpretive media are effectively and deliberately designed to engage families. National parks and similar sites need to thoughtfully design education programs and exhibits to engage learners of all ages in meaningful, relevant, and memorable ways.
AllenS., & GutwillJ. P. (2009). Creating a program to deepen family inquiry at interactive science exhibits.Curator: The Museum Journal, 52 (3), 289–306. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.tb00352.x
3.
AshD. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (2), 138–162. doi: 10.1002/tea.10069
4.
Astor-JackT., WhaleyK. L. K., DierkingL. D., PerryD. L., & GaribayC. (2007). Investigating socially mediated learning. In FalkJ.H., DierkingL.D., & FoutzS. (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 217–228). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
5.
BachmanJ., & DierkingL. D. (2010). Learning from empowered home-educating families.Museums & Social Issues, 5 (1), 51–66. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
6.
BanksJ.A., AuK.H., BallA. F., BellP., GordonE.W., GutiérrezK.D., & ZhouM. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-wide, life-long, and life-deep learning. Retrieved from http://life-slc.org/docs/Banks_etal-LIFE-Diversity-Report.pdf
BengstonV. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds.Journal of Marriage and Family, 63 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x
9.
BenjaminN., HadenC. A., & WilkersonE. (2010). Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver–child interactions in a children's museum.Developmental Psychology, 46 (2), 502–515. doi: 10.1037/a0017822
10.
BentonG. (2008). Visitor meaning-making at Grand Canyon's Tusayan museum and ruin.Curator: The Museum Journal, 51 (3): 295–309. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00313.x
BorunM., ChambersM., & CleghornA. (1996). Families are learning in science museums.Curator: The Museum Journal, 39 (2), 123–138. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1996.tb01084.x
14.
BorunM., ChambersM. B., DritsasJ., & JohnsonJ.I. (1997). Enhancing family learning through exhibits.Curator: The Museum Journal, 40 (4), 279–295. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01313.x
15.
BorunM., CleghornA., & GarfieldC. (1995). Family learning in museums: A bibliographic review.Curator: The Museum Journal, 38 (4), 262–270. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1995.tb01064.x
16.
BorunM., & DritsasJ. (1997). Developing family-friendly exhibits.Curator: The Museum Journal, 40 (3), 178–196. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01302.x
17.
BorunM., DritsasJ., JohnsonJ. I., PeterN.E., WagnerK.F., FadiganK., JangaardA., WengerA. (1998). Family learning in museums: The PISEC perspective.Philadelphia: Franklin Institute.
18.
Briseño-GarzónA., AndersonD., & AndersonA. (2007a). Adult learning experiences from an aquarium visit: The role of social interactions in family groups.Curator: The Museum Journal, 50 (3), 299–318. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2007.tb00274.x
19.
Briseño-GarzónA., AndersonD., & AndersonA. (2007b). Entry and emergent agendas of adults visiting an aquarium in family groups.Visitor Studies, 10 (1), 73–89. doi: 10.1080/10645570701263461
20.
BrodyM., & TomkiewiczW. (2002). Park visitors’ understanding, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA.International Journal of Science Education, 24 (11), 1119–1141. doi: 10.1080/09500690210134820
21.
CrowleyK., & JacobsM. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In LeinhardtG., CrowleyK., & KnutsonK. (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DierkingL. D., & FalkJ. H. (1994). Family behavior and learning in informal science settings: A review of the research.Science Education, 78 (1), 57–72. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730780104
24.
DowneyS., KrantzA., & SkidmoreE. (2010). The parental role in children's museums: Perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors.Museums & Social Issues, 5 (1), 15–34. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
25.
EllenbogenK. M., LukeJ. J., & DierkingL. D. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix?Science Education, 88(S1), S48–S58. doi: 10.1002/sce.20015
FalkJ. H. (2007). Toward an improved understanding of learning from museums: Filmmaking as metaphor. In FalkJ.H., DierkingL.D., & FoutzS. (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 3–16). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
28.
FalkJ. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
29.
FalkJ. H., & DierkingL. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
FalkJ. H., DierkingL. D., & FoutzS. (2007). Preface. In FalkJ.H., DierkingL.D., & FoutzS. (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. xiii–xx). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
32.
FalkJ.H., HeimlichJ.E., & BronnenkantK. (2008). Using identity-related visit motivations as a tool for understanding adult zoo and aquarium visitor's meaning making.Curator: The Museum Journal, 51 (1), 55–79. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00294.x
33.
FalkJ.H., MoussouriT., & CoulsonD. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning.Curator: The Museum Journal, 41 (2), 107–120. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x
34.
FalkJ.H., & StorksdieckM. (2005). Using the Contextual Model of Learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition.Science Education, 89 (5), 744–778. doi: 10.1002/sce.20078
35.
FalkJ. H., & StorksdieckM. (2010). Science learning in a leisure setting.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (2), 194–212. doi: 10.1002/tea.20319
36.
ForistB. E. (2003). Visitor use and evaluation of interpretive media: A report on visitors to the national park system.National Park Service. Retrieved from U.S. Department of the Interior. Social Science Program: http://nature.nps.gov/socialscience/docs/Visitor_Use_and_Evaluation.pdf
GrossM. P., & ZimmermanR. (2002). Park and museum interpretation: Helping visitors find meaning.Curator: The Museum Journal, 45 (4), 265–276. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00064.x
39.
GutwillJ. P., & AllenS. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits.Science Education, 94 (4), 710–742. doi: 10.1002/sce.20387
40.
HatalaM., TanenbaumK., WakkaryR., MuiseK., MohabbatiB., CornessG., … LoughinT. (2009). Experience structuring factors affecting learning in family visits to museums. In CressU., DimitrovaV., & SpechtM. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 5794. Learning in the synergy of multiple disciplines (pp. 37–51). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_6
41.
HoneyR. E., AugareH., & Sachatello-SawyerB. (2010). Reciprocal relationships: Effective strategies for working with parents at the Blackfeet Native Science Field Center.Museums & Social Issues, 5 (1), 117–135. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
LeinhardtG., & KnutsonK. (2006). Grandparents speak: Museum conversations across the generations.Curator: The Museum Journal, 49 (2), 235–252. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00215.x
44.
LyonsL., BeckerD., & RobertsJ. A. (2010). Analyzing the affordances of mobile technologies for informal science learning.Museums & Social Issues, 5 (1), 87–102. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
45.
McManusP. (1992). Topics in museums and science education.Studies in Science Education, 20 (1), 157–182. doi: 10.1080/03057269208560007
46.
MelberL. M. (2006). Learning in unexpected places: Empowering Latino parents.Multicultural Education, 13 (4), 36–40. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ759638.pdf
47.
MoussouriT. (2003). Negotiated agendas: Families in science and technology museums.International Journal of Technology Management, 25 (5), 477–489. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2003.003114
48.
National Education Council [NEC]. (2006a). Interpretation and education renaissance action plan.Retrieved from National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Interpretation and Education Program: http://www.nps.gov/interp/renaissance/lowresolutionieactionplan.pdf
49.
National Education Council [NEC], Education and Evaluation Coordination Team (2006b). Servicewide interpretation and education evaluation strategy. Volume 2: The foundations.Draft v11. Retrieved from National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior: http://www.nps.gov/interp/evaluation/NEC_EVAL/SIEES_Volume_Two.pdf
National Research Council [NRC]. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits.Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, & M. A. Feder (Eds.) Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
53.
NoveyL., & HallT. (2007). The effect of audio tours on learning and social interaction: An evaluation at Carlsbad Caverns National Park.Science Education, 91 (2), 260–277. doi: 10.1002/sce.20184
54.
PackerJ. (2006). Learning for fun: The unique contribution of educational leisure experiences.Curator: The Museum Journal, 49 (3), 329–344. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00227.x
55.
PackerJ., & BallantyneR. (2005). Solitary vs. shared: Exploring the social dimension of museum learning.Curator: The Museum Journal, 48 (2), 177–192. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2005.tb00165.x
56.
PatchenJ. H., & RandA. G. (2007). Fostering effective free-choice learning institutions: Integrating theory, research, practice, and policymaking. In FalkJ. H., DierkingL. D., & FoutzS. (Eds.), In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions (pp. 167–179). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
PhippsM. (2010). Research trends and findings from a decade (1997–2007) of research on informal science education and free-choice science learning.Visitor Studies, 13 (1), 3–22. doi: 10.1080/10645571003618717
59.
RennieL., & JohnstonD. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums.Science Education, 88(Suppl. 1) S4–S16. doi: 10.1002/sce.20017
60.
RosenthalE., & Blankman-HetrickJ. (2002). Conversations across time: Family learning in a living history museum. In LeinhardtG., CrowleyK., & KnutsonK. (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 305–329). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61.
RoweS., & KisielJ. (2012). Family engagement at aquarium touch tanks: Exploring interactions and the potential for learning. In DavidssonE., and JakobssonA., (Eds.), Understanding interactions at science centers and museums: Approaching sociocultural perspectives (pp. 63–78). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
62.
SanfordC., KnutsonK., & CrowleyK. (2007). –We always spend time together on Sundays”: How grandparents and their grandchildren think about and use informal learning spaces.Visitor Studies, 10 (2), 136–151. doi: 10.1080/10645570701585129
63.
SchaubleL., GleasonM., LehrerR., BartlettK., PetrosinoA., AllenA.…StreetJ. (2002). Supporting science learning in museums. In LeinhardtG., CrowleyK., & KnutsonK. (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 425–452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64.
ShouseA., LewensteinB. V., FederM., & BellP. (2010). Crafting museum experiences in light of research on learning: Implications of the National Research Council's report on informal science education.Curator: The Museum Journal, 53 (2), 137–154. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2010.00015.x
65.
SteinJ. K., GaribayC., & WilsonK. E. (2008). Engaging immigrant audiences in museums.Museums & Social Issues, 3 (2), 179–195. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
66.
SzechterL. E., & CareyE. J. (2009). Gravitating toward science: Parent-child interactions at a gravitational-wave observatory.Science Education, 93 (5), 846–858. doi: 10.1002/sce.20333
67.
TenenbaumH. R., PriorJ., DowlingC. L., & FrostR. E. (2010). Supporting parent–child conversations in a history museum.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (2): 241–254. doi: 10.1348/000709909X470799
68.
WoodE., & WolfB. (2010). When parents stand back is family learning still possible?Museums & Social Issues, 5 (1), 35–50. Retrieved from http://www.lcoastpress.com/journal.php?id=4
69.
WuK., HolmesK., & TribeJ. (2010). –Where do you want to go today?” An analysis of family group decisions to visit museums.Journal of Marketing Management, 26 (7-8), 706–726. doi: 10.1080/02672571003780007
