Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An emerging alternative to conventional animal models in toxicology research is the zebrafish. Their accelerated development, regenerative capacity, transparent physical appearance, ability to be genetically manipulated, and ease of housing and care make them feasible and efficient experimental models. Nonetheless, their most esteemed asset is their 70% (+) genetic similarity with the human genome, which allows the model to be used in a variety of clinically relevant studies. With these attributes, we propose the zebrafish is an excellent model for analyzing cognitive and neuromuscular responses when exposed to toxicants. Neurocognition can be readily analyzed using visual discrimination, memory and learning, and social behavior testing. Neuromuscular function can be analyzed using techniques such as the startle response, assessment of activity level, and evaluation of critical swimming speed. Furthermore, selectively mutated zebrafish is another novel application of this species in behavioral and pharmacological studies, which can be exploited in toxicological studies. There is a critical need in biomedical research to discover ethical and cost-effective methods to develop new products, including drugs. Through mutagenesis, zebrafish models have become key in meeting this need by advancing the field in numerous areas of biomedical research.

Keywords

zebrafish cognition mutant neuromuscular function behavior

Introduction

It is well established that zebrafish have numerous qualities that make them excellent models for scientific research.^1-3 The goal of this review is to establish the feasibility of the zebrafish as a convenient and functionally appropriate model organism for use in behavioral studies. Examples will be given demonstrating their robust cognitive capabilities, methods to test their cognition, and observable stereotyped motor behaviors which can be manipulated upon application of toxicants to their environments. To add validity, functional similarities between the zebrafish and humans will be discussed to portray how zebrafish as mutant models are evolving and becoming key to toxicology investigations. To conclude, the ethical benefits of zebrafish will be addressed.

Materials and Methods

Articles referenced were accessed through PubMed’s database of biomedical literature, the Zebrafish International Resource Center, the Humane Society International, and Stanford Medicine. Keywords searched included zebrafish, zebrafish neuromuscular function, zebrafish motor function, zebrafish toxicology, zebrafish mutants, animal models toxicology, object recognition memory zebrafish, recognition memory zebrafish, zebrafish social behavior, zebrafish social behavior review, shoaling zebrafish. Exclusion criteria prioritized the most recent experimental studies except for a few seminal publications. Figures were developed using Microsoft Office and Adobe PDF software systems.

Results and Discussion

Convenience and Feasibility

Zebrafish practicality is evidenced by their low maintenance housing and care,^4-8 accelerated life span,^9-11 capability to regenerate,^12-17 transparent physical appearance,^18,19 and their ability to be genetically manipulated.^20-25 The natural habitat of zebrafish are freshwater creeks and lakes in tropical regions of India and Nepal.²⁶ Although native to South Asia, zebrafish can survive in habitats of varying pH, temperature, depth, and speed of waterways.^4-7 Their adaptability makes creating an optimal experimental environment simple without disrupting their living habits.^4-8 For example, stocking density can vary between 16-200 embryos per petri dish in the early larval stage without adversely affecting survival rates.⁵ Additionally, experimentation itself can be made quite simple; even tests analyzing higher order function can be completed using basic lab equipment.^27-32

During the adult stage, creating a proper environment is simple, requiring minimal maintenance and basic equipment.^33,34 The process is made even easier to manage with guidelines that are readily available for investigators to follow. These guidelines include information on supply and housing conditions as well as how to perform experiments with specified chemical variables, water quality levels, pH, and temperature.^4,5,7 Keeping a favorable supply of zebrafish without breeding is also quite feasible with their cost being considerably lower than rodents⁸ and primates.³⁵

Zebrafish development is rapid in comparison to humans. As young as 3 days post-fertilization (dpf), the embryonic development stage is completed in addition to a large degree of their biological shaping and structure.⁹ Metamorphic changes rapidly progress from the juvenile and adult stages and are completed by 22 dpf, finalizing their social and physical maturation.^9-11 Concerning appearance, during the first two weeks of life, zebrafish are translucent, which allows an investigator to easily measure alterations in morphological changes in the developing brain, muscle,^18,19 and other anatomical structures.^36-41 Zebrafish can also be readily manipulated genetically to serve as mutant models.^20-25 This is of particular interest since over 70% of their genome is homologous to the human genome.⁴² Because of these reasons, the zebrafish model is becoming a relevant and valuable alternative in biomedical research, especially toxicology.^{33,34,36-39,43}

Zebrafish as a Model of Cognitive Function

Cognitive function has been researched for decades using a variety of animal models, including rats, mice, and monkeys⁴⁴ to explore three major aspects of neurobiology: visual discrimination,²⁷ memory and learning,^45,46 and social behavior.^47-49 Recently, zebrafish have emerged as an effective model of cognitive function and have shown promise in advancing the field by uncovering unknown mechanisms of neurological disease in humans.^50,51 Numerous publications have shown evidence that zebrafish are effective models for investigating human neuroscience, as they strike a remarkable balance between system complexity and practical simplicity.^48,50,52,53 Furthermore, these models show evidence for delving into the realm of toxicological investigation.^48,54-56 A summary table of research supporting the efficient use of zebrafish in cognitive research can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Cognitive Function.

Age	Chemical Exposure	Tests Completed	Findings	Reference
Adult	N/A	Assessing escape responses and red-blue non-spatial discrimination learning using a 3-chambered fish tank	Capability of distinguishing colors post conditioning	Arthur and Levin,²⁷ 2001
Adult	N/A	Observing effects of exposure to specific colors and patterns paired with food using a divided tank	Capability of discriminating between visual stimuli (colors and patterns)	Fetsko,²⁸ 2002
Adult, males	N/A	Assessing effects of a visual/behavioral discrimination task that uses multiple forms of reward	Capability of distinguishing shapes and (first demonstration of) amodal completion perception	Sovrano et al,²⁹ 2002
Adult, males	N/A	Using a tank with individual sectors and different numbers of female fish to determine whether male fish can distinguish between numbers using sectors of a tank	Capability to distinguish quantities to a limited extent	Potrich et al,³ 2022
Adult (∼1 yr.)	N/A	Use of a transparent tank with controlled sound and lighting to present colored stimuli that vary with food as a reward	Ability to distinguish between colored stimuli with distractors	Proulx,³⁰ 2014
Assessment of adults when toxicants were exposed 1-5 dpf	Chlorpyrifos	T-maze: 3-chambered fish tank to differentiate response latency from choice accuracy	Assessment of spatial discrimination and response latency after exposure to the toxicant Chlorpyrifos	Levin et al,⁶¹ 2003
Embryos	Nicotine	T-maze	There are dose-dependent effects of nicotine on spatial alteration	Svoboda et al,⁶² 2002
Larvae	N/A	The novel object recognition test (NORt)	Zebrafish exhibit learning through stationary objects	Bruzzone et al,⁸⁵ 2020
Adult: 8-12 mo.	Cocaine	Conditioned Place Preference (CPP)	Zebrafish exhibit learning through addictive compounds	Darland et al, 2001⁴⁶
Adult, males	N/A	Using a tank with individual sectors and different numbers of female fish to determine whether male fish can distinguish between numbers using sectors of a tank. Food is used as a reward stimulus	Zebrafish exhibit learning through feeding	Potrich et al,³ 2015
Adult: 6 mo.-1.5 yrs.	Ethanol	Repeated exposure to ethanol with assessment of locomotor activity	Zebrafish demonstrate sensitization to noxious substances	Blaser et al,⁶⁸ 2010
Larvae and Adult	Apomorphine, Ketamine, and Haloperidol	Prepulse Inhibition (PPI) of the startle response	Zebrafish are an effective model to study Prepulse Inhibition (PPI) in neuropsychiatric disorders	Burgess and Granato,⁷⁷ 2007
Adult: 8-12 mo.	Cocaine	Place preference test	Zebrafish demonstrate Pavlovian Conditioning	Darland and Dowling,⁴⁶ 2001
Adult	Intracerebroventricular injections of monoclonal antibody against the HNK-1 epitope or polyclonal antibodies against ependymins	Recall testing using a retention score system	There is an inhibition of memory consolidation when exposed to cell adhesion molecules	Pradel et al,⁷⁸ 1999
Adult – 1 yr.	N/A	The novel object recognition test (NORt)	Zebrafish distinguish between normal and novel objects	DePasquale et al,⁸⁶ 2021
Adult, male (15 mo.)	3 different doses of 17-beta-estradiol (E2)	Object Recognition (OR) and Object Placement (OP) Memory Tests	17-beta-estradiol (E2) improves memory consolidation within adult zebrafish in 2 hours	Naderi et al,⁸⁷ 2020
Adult	Nicotine and Phenylbutyrate	Color cue-based novel object recognition tests	Object recognition memory is enhanced by exposure of nicotine and phenylbutyrate in specific contexts	Faillace et al,⁸⁸ 2017

Visual Discrimination

At the dawn of the 21^st century, two key findings were published regarding zebrafish’s visual discrimination abilities. In 2001, Arthur and Levin²⁷ determined that zebrafish can distinguish colors after being conditioned. A year later, it was demonstrated zebrafish possess the ability to discriminate between visual stimuli in more advanced capacities.²⁸ Using a divided tank, zebrafish distinguished between different colors (e.g., blue and yellow, blue and orange, blue and green, yellow and orange) and different patterns (e.g., vertical lines and horizontal lines) when the stimuli were paired with food.²⁸ These two experiments formed the foundations for further exploration. Interestingly, zebrafish may be naturally attracted to specific colors because of their short cones’ responses to their surroundings.⁵⁷ Siregar et al⁵⁸ established evidence-based standardized methods for testing natural color preference, allowing visual discrimination experiments to be implemented more effectively. Subsequent experiments showed that zebrafish are capable of distinguishing between shapes.²⁹ Potrich et al later discovered that zebrafish exhibit amodal completion using simple shapes.²⁹ With this ability, they can identify certain objects as being whole, even when the objects are partially blocked from their line of sight. Furthermore, zebrafish are able to distinguish quantities to a limited extent.³

Another cognitive trait of zebrafish is their ability to implement visual parallel search mechanisms; for example, they can distinguish between different colored stimuli amidst other distractors.³⁰ In fact, when the distractions increased up to 10 times, the accuracy of the response was not diminished.³⁰ Since zebrafish can discriminate between objects and colors simultaneously, this also means they can distinguish between objects or colors independently. For example, they would be able to recognize the difference between two cubes of the same color while also recognizing the difference between a cube and a sphere of the same color. These findings reveal yet another layer of complexity to the zebrafish’s cognitive abilities.

Zebrafish’s visual abilities, like humans, can be significantly affected by environmental toxicants.⁵⁹ For example, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) causes retinal degeneration in zebrafish.⁵⁹ In humans, cannabis can hinder contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination.⁶⁰ Studying the effects of neurotoxicants on zebrafish could help us understand this relatively unexplored condition.

Memory and Learning

Visual Discrimination and Learning

Zebrafish are now a choice model to test memory and learning along with visual discrimination.⁵¹ Memory and learning are often analyzed alongside visual discrimination using a T-maze apparatus. Colwill et al⁴⁵ provided the basis for this model using three visual discrimination experiments. In their first two experiments, they established that color selection could be conditioned and then extinguished. The same result was demonstrated in a third experiment with pattern selection. In this context, zebrafish were rewarded with food for choosing the correct arm of the maze. The fish soon learned to choose the correct arm, but this skill was quickly extinguished when the stimulus was repeatedly presented without the food reward. The same T-maze design was used by Levin et al⁶¹ to test the effect of chlorpyrifos on acquiring spatial discrimination learning in zebrafish. In a subsequent experiment, Levin et al determined that nicotine significantly improved zebrafish’s learning of delayed spatial alteration in low doses but diminished it in higher doses.⁶²

Zebrafish can also demonstrate learning without using colors as cues. Since Colwill et al foundational experiments, researchers have used cues ranging from stationary objects^63,64 to addictive compounds⁴⁶ to feeding.³ In each context, the zebrafish forms a cognitive link between a stimulus and a sensation. In this context, learning takes place by association, and a memory is formed.

Non-Associative Learning

Multiple studies have shown that the strength of an animal’s response to a stimulus can decrease over time without sensory adaptation, motor fatigue, or injury.^65-67 In other words, learning can occur without true memory, which has been demonstrated in zebrafish.⁵⁵ The current theory used to explain this phenomenon is the dual-process theory, which describes two connected forms of non-associative learning: sensitization and habituation (followed by dishabituation).⁵² Figure 1 displays graphical examples of the effect of habituation and sensitization in zebrafish. Sensitization occurs when an organism is exposed to an arousing stimulus that causes a response⁶⁵; this stimulus is often noxious. Zebrafish have been shown to demonstrate sensitization to many substances, including nicotine⁵⁵ and alcohol.⁶⁸ Klee et al⁵⁵ suggested that zebrafish are an effective preclinical model for understanding the mechanisms behind the effects of nicotine exposure in humans, in large part because of their high reproduction rate and transparent embryos. These aspects allow zebrafish to be studied in large numbers and with unique precision; researchers can directly observe the impact of a developmental neurotoxin on the maturation stages of nervous system development.^62,69

Figure 1.

Graphical representation of habituation and sensitization curves in zebrafish. (A) Habituation—as rapid, repeated stimuli increase, responsiveness decreases over time and (B) sensitization—when stimuli are presented with larger time intervals, responsiveness increases to the point of complete sensitization.

In most cases, the same substance employed to sensitize an organism can be used to elicit a habituation response.⁶⁵ As shown in Figure 1(B), habituation describes the process of repeated exposure to a stimulus, which leads to a decreased response.⁵² This has direct relevance to human toxicology studies: nicotine, for example, is known to generate habituation/addiction in humans.⁷⁰

Although poorly understood mechanistically, habituation is a prerequisite for more complex types of learning.⁶⁶ One example of habituation in zebrafish is that they respond less to startling stimuli over time.⁶⁵ Zebrafish exhibit a stereotyped C-start response to startling sensory stimuli⁶⁵; their bodies form a C-shaped curve, as depicted in Figure 2(A). Similarly, zebrafish have been shown to perform an O-bend at the extinction of light.⁶⁵ This is essentially the same reaction with a much larger amplitude, as seen in Figure 2(B). As Roberts et al⁶⁵ explain, three types of startle response habituation exist in zebrafish larvae. Rapid habituation develops after 50-120 rapid auditory pulses but lasts only 3 to 15 minutes.⁷¹ Short-term habituation is created by increased time intervals in auditory training (about 5 minutes in length), and its effects last up to 1 hour.⁷¹ Long-term habituation requires six-spaced blocks of auditory training, but its effects can last up to 18 hours.⁷² Dishabituation occurs when the fish’s reduced response is recovered by presenting a novel stimulus.⁶⁶ A brief pulse of light⁷³ and a tactile stimulus with a handheld poker to the head⁷⁴ have been used to generate this effect. Most research focuses on the habituation of zebrafish larvae, but adult zebrafish have also been reported to exhibit the same pattern.⁷⁵ Essentially, all organisms, including humans, use non-associative learning to adapt their behavioral response to repeated recent stimuli.⁷⁶ Because of this, studies such as Burgess and Granato’s⁷⁷ experiment make zebrafish an appealing model to study neuropsychiatric disorders in humans. Their experimentation revealed both larvae and adult zebrafish use sensorimotor gating by looking at prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response. Thus, zebrafish are an effective model to better study PPI, which is present in numerous human neuropsychiatric disorders.

Figure 2.

Startle response behavior in zebrafish. (A) C-start response is characteristic of a C-bend of the body and (B) O-bend response; amplification of the C-start response.

Basic Associative Learning—Pavlovian Conditioning

Darling and Dowlin first demonstrated Pavlovian Conditioning in zebrafish in its most basic appetitive form using a “place preference” test consisting of a 2-liter tank divided by a perforated wall.⁴⁶ When given cocaine, the zebrafish tended to gravitate toward the cocaine-associated side of the container. Interestingly, cocaine also increased their visual threshold, making them less sensitive to light. To explain this phenomenon, Darling and Dowlin proposed a direct effect on the zebrafish brain; an electroretinogram confirmed that these changes were physiological (the brain itself was affected) and not behavioral.⁴⁶ Cocaine sensitivity also has a genetic component; in their experiments, two fish with low cocaine sensitivity produced an F₂ generation with significantly lower cocaine sensitivity than controls.⁴⁶ Similarly, Williams et al trained fish to alternate feeding sites in a simple rectangular tank.³ There is also evidence of avoidance learning in zebrafish. This is essentially the negative form of Pavlovian Conditioning, in which zebrafish learn to avoid a stimulus vs gravitating toward it. Research has revealed that avoidance learning is influenced by group size,⁴⁷ cell adhesion molecules,^78,79 and NMDA.⁸⁰

Pavlovian fear responses have also been demonstrated in zebrafish.^80,81 This response has been linked to second-order conditioning, a phenomenon that has yet to be extensively researched in humans.^82,83 Many different aspects of Pavlovian conditioning have been characterized in zebrafish, making them a helpful model to investigate similar behaviors in humans.

Object Recognition Memory

Extensive research has been conducted regarding the zebrafish’s ability to distinguish between novel and familiar objects in addition to their preference for one or the other. This ability is most often tested using the novel object recognition test (NORt).⁶⁴ Using this test, researchers have explored object recognition memory in zebrafish. Contrary to results in rodents, however, zebrafish spend more time exploring familiar objects vs novel objects.⁸⁴ It has been predicted that this is the result of “neophobia” caused by natural anti-predatory behavior. Such neophobia has been speculated to be the case in larvae as well. Bruzzone et al⁸⁵ discovered that zebrafish explore novel objects more often at 14 days post-fertilization (dpf) than at 21 dpf, when their anti-predatory instincts are more developed.

Multiple factors affect object recognition memory in zebrafish. For one, environmental enrichment (i.e., gravel substrate and plastic plants) positively influences object recognition memory in the NORt.⁸⁶ 17-beta-Estradiol (E2), a substance known to modulate memory and learning in zebrafish, has been shown to increase object recognition memory in high doses by activating estrogen receptors.⁸⁷ E2 improves memory consolidation in male adult zebrafish within 2 hours. Naderi et al⁸⁷ showed that exposure to E2 also increases the number of synaptic protein-encoding genes, which suggests that E2 affects the specific proteins that encode neural pathways. In addition, nicotine and phenylbutyrate increase object recognition memory, although within different timeframes.⁸⁸

Social Behavior

Memory and learning in zebrafish are not limited to colors, patterns, shapes, and objects; like humans, zebrafish exhibit an impressive capacity for social learning.^47,89-91 In 1977, Gleason et al⁴⁷ demonstrated that groups of zebrafish learn to avoid an electric shock faster than individual zebrafish. In later experiments, it was discovered that zebrafish release an “alarm substance” when a predator is nearby, alerting other conspecifics of the predator’s presence.^89,90 This pheromone generates spastic swimming toward the bottom of the tank.⁸⁹ Al-Imari and Gerlai⁹¹ have even shown that, when seeing other conspecifics, this social interaction can be used as a positive unconditioned stimulus. As zebrafish are highly social animals in nature,⁹² this organism has been proposed as an effective model with which to test vertebrate social behavior and understand its underlying biological mechanisms.⁴⁸ A summary table of research supporting the efficient use of zebrafish to investigate social behavior can be found in Table 2.

Table 2.

Social Behavior.

Age	Chemical Exposure	Tests Completed	Findings	Reference
Adult	N/A	Rate of avoidance was determined using a LaFayette Instrument A-660 aquatic conditioning unit in three different fish groups	Groups of zebrafish learn to avoid danger faster than individuals	Gleason et al,⁴⁷ 1977
Adult (6-12 mo. male and female)	Alarm substance from “donor” zebrafish	Observation and video-tracking behavior quantification to assess alarm-substance induced behavioral changes	Zebrafish emit an alarm substance when a predator is nearby	Speedie and Gerlai,⁹⁰ 2008
Adult	N/A	Use of a plus-shaped maze to determine whether zebrafish prefer staying close to a conspecific group and if co-presentation of the stimulus fish with a visual cue is associated by the zebrafish/if the zebrafish can learn the visual cue is predictive of the stimulus fish	Social interaction can be used as a positive condition response	Al-lmari and Gerlai,⁹¹ 2008
Larvae and Juvenile	N/A	Body length and morphological feature development measurements; social behavior by place preference and orienting behavior using a dyad assay	Social behavior begins by at least 2 weeks of age	Stednitz and Washbourne,¹¹ 2020
Adult males	N/A	Use of videoplayback to determine the role of conspecific form and biological motion in zebrafish social affiliation	Zebrafish recognize one another by body form and biological motion	Nunes et al,⁹³ 2020
Adult males	N/A	A mutant oxytocin model was also assessed		Nunes et al,⁹³ 2020
Full Lifespan	N/A	Field study documentation	Zebrafish prefer to form shoals of their own species which can vary in size	Engeszer et al,²⁶ 2007
Adult (male and female)	Arginine vasotocin acetate salt and Fluoxetine HCL	Pharmacological manipulation followed by observation and gene quantification	Specific neurological pathways activation regulates aggressive behavior	Filby et al,¹⁰⁷ 2010
			Aggression level differs between genders
			Structural patterns are used in male fights leading to hierarchies within the species
Adult (3-4 mo.)	N/A	Quantification of responses of an individual experimental fish to its mirror image using videotracking/motion detection photocell systems	Aggressive behaviors include bites, fin movements, and other body movements and can be tested to a large degree by a simple mirror image	Gerlai et al,⁵⁴ 2000
Adult (6-12 mo.)	Hypoxanthine 3-N-oxide	Quantification of motor patterns and behavior such as erratic movement, quick direction changes, jumping using the caudal fin, and immobility/freezing by the Observer ColorPro event recorder software	Anti-predatory responses are evident when zebrafish are exposed to alarm substances from other zebrafish	Parra et al,¹¹⁰ 2009
Adult (3-5 mo. male and female)	Alarm pheromone, ethanol, fluoxetine, and caffeine	Behavior analysis of exposure to alarm pheromone, chronic exposure to fluoxetine, acute exposure to caffeine, and exposure to ethanol quantified robust anxiogenic effects, reduced exploration, increased erratic movements and freezing behavior. Video-tracking aided in quantification of the stated behaviors	Anxious zebrafish tend to swim toward the bottom of the container, move erratically, and may freeze	Egan et al,¹¹⁴ 2009
Adult (3-5 mo. male and female)	Alarm pheromone, ethanol, fluoxetine, and caffeine	Secondarily, physiological stress was measured on a method based on a human salivary cortisol assay		Egan et al,¹¹⁴ 2009

Conspecific Social Interaction

Social behavior in zebrafish begins at a very young age.^11,53,56 Hinz et al⁵³ showed that visualizing conspecifics has “rewarding properties” in 6- to 8-day-old larval zebrafish, suggesting that it can act as an unconditioned stimulus when paired with light as a conditioned stimulus. Contrary to this finding, Dreosti et al⁵⁶ showed when using a compartmental behavioral assay, zebrafish show no social preference at one week. This suggests that social behavior begins to develop at two weeks and becomes more advanced by three weeks post-fertilization. Most recently, Stednitz and Washbourne¹¹ demonstrated that zebrafish develop a variety of complex social behaviors between 10 and 16 dpf. Although conflicting data exist on the precise time that social development begins, it is clear that zebrafish larvae prefer to swim near conspecifics by three weeks. This aligns with the rapid development of human social behavior which is exhibited within the first year of life.

The development of social behavior in humans and how it may be impacted by neurotoxicants can be explored using zebrafish. Nunes et al⁹³ provide a comprehensive description of how zebrafish recognize conspecifics visually. In summary, zebrafish recognize one another through two visual features: body form and biological motion. In their experiment, zebrafish exhibited social behavior when seeing an image of the conspecific alone, but the effect was more significant when biological motion was implemented. Biological motion also inherently generates social behavior. Similarly, humans also can distinguish conspecifics using mere form and motion; for example, Kozlowski and Cutting⁹⁴ demonstrated that humans can recognize the gender of someone walking using only a point-light display. Nunes et al⁹³ have suggested that a common underlying mechanism may exist in all vertebrates that deduce information from mere form and motion.

Shoaling Behavior (“Shoaling Zebrafish”)

Zebrafish prefer to form groups with phenotypically similar individuals of their own species; these groups are referred to as shoals.^26,95-97 Shoaling behavior of wild zebrafish has been fairly well-documented and provides information on zebrafish interactions with one another.^26,92,98,99 Shelton et al conducted a comprehensive study of zebrafish shoals at four sites in India, one of many South Asian regions where the fish naturally thrive.²⁶ In this study, it was discovered that zebrafish shoals vary significantly in size (from 2000 fish per group to only 11 fish per group) and average nearest-neighbor distances (NNDs). These differences largely depended on water flow, as faster-flowing water led to increased group size and decreased NND. Vegetation surprisingly had no effect, which contrasts with laboratory experiments performed on wild zebrafish, suggesting that vegetation increases aggression.^98,99 Additionally, it has been shown that not all members of this species act in the same manner. It was shown in an experiment comparing six zebrafish strains, each strain displayed its own distinct level of aggressiveness, interest in conspecifics, and shoaling habits.¹⁰⁰ Because of this, a remarkable number of zebrafish strains have been employed as behavioral models,^87,100,101 and additional strains and mutant models might be useful for measuring uninvestigated cognitive functions translatable to human neuroscience research.

Experimentation on shoaling behavior in zebrafish might seem laborious to quantify, as it involves keeping track of up to 2000 individual zebrafish in a single group. Fortunately, Miller and Gerlai¹⁰² have developed a simple and efficacious computer software system to track zebrafish shoaling. In cases of extremely large shoals, smaller groups are sampled via video recording and used as a representative sample or scaled by calculations to estimate values for the group as a whole. This central cognitive function can be measured effectively in zebrafish.

Aggression

Zebrafish aggression is most often measured by observing dyadic fights involving two zebrafish competing for dominance.¹⁰³ These interactions include counting the number of chases and bites in each fight.^104,105 Aggressive interactions between male zebrafish follow a structured pattern.¹⁰⁶ These battles begin with an extension of the fins, circling, and biting attempts. Battles gradually increase in intensity until both fish implement frequent biting attempts, chasing, and attempted strikes at the opposing fish.¹⁰⁶ The losing fish eventually becomes submissive and exhibits passive, subordinate behavior like freezing. The dominant-submissive hierarchies that arise from these fights can last five days or longer,^105,106 and these dominant fish remain more aggressive than their submissive counterparts.⁹² Generally, males are more aggressive than females.^107,108 This model could be a helpful method to understand various vertebrates’ biological aggression mechanisms between sexes, and it could even shed light on human aggression.

Zebrafish aggression can be tested using mirror image simulation,¹⁰⁹ which involves placing a mirror at a 22.5° angle outside a zebrafish’s tank.⁵⁴ The zebrafish’s aggressive reaction (bites, fin movements, etc.) is measured in response to its mirror image. This test is simple and does not harm the fish, but it does not perfectly capture aggression; a zebrafish’s reaction to its mirror image is a poor representation of a wild interaction between zebrafish.¹⁰³ Therefore, other methods have been explored which have more than compensated for these shortcomings. Most notably, investigations using a direct dyadic interaction between two zebrafish are highly effective in providing a realistic model of aggression.¹⁰⁶ Additionally, Gutierrez et al have established an automatic mirror image aggression model using one-month-old zebrafish, allowing higher throughput experiments.²⁶ The primary use of this model focuses on juvenile fish because of their small size. Using larval models, researchers could explore how potentially toxic chemicals mitigate or even increase aggressive behavior. Although models are still being developed, zebrafish aggression has been well-documented and has tremendous potential to enlighten the scientific community about human aggression.

Predator Avoidance

Zebrafish exhibit anti-predatory responses when exposed to alarm substances from other zebrafish, such as synthetic hypoxanthine 3-N-oxide.¹¹⁰ Interestingly, researchers have demonstrated that humans may respond similarly to certain substances, which is a phenomenon called drug-induced panic attacks.¹¹¹ After this discovery, researchers were able to produce anxiety responses on command in zebrafish, which has allowed their predator avoidance capabilities to be studied in greater depth.

The nature of anxiety responses in zebrafish has been extensively studied.^112,113 Anxious zebrafish tend to swim toward the bottom half of a container, move erratically throughout the container, and exhibit freezing behavior.¹¹⁴ Speedie and Gerlai⁹⁰ have hypothesized that the intention behind this behavior is to generate turbulence and stir up debris, thus clouding the zebrafish from nearby hunters. This hypothesis explains all three of zebrafish’s most stereotypical anxiolytic behaviors. It is a reasonable hypothesis that, in the wild, zebrafish might swim toward the bottom of a creek to locate themselves near sediment, generate a cloud of debris by swimming erratically, and then quickly freeze to prevent detection from nearby predators.

It has been estimated that human anxiety disorder has a worldwide prevalence of 12.9%,¹¹⁵ and up to 33.7% of the worldwide population are burdened by some type of anxiety disorder during their lifetime.¹¹⁶ In addition, only about 60%–85% of individuals experience positive effects from anti-anxiolytic medicine, and only 50% of these responders reach complete recovery.¹¹⁷ Anxiety disorder is on the rise in the United States, although it is debated whether this increase is caused by a relaxation in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Nevertheless, human anxiety has extensive and detrimental effects on human life.¹¹⁸ Any research findings that could alter this mental disorder's prognosis could literally change the world.

Zebrafish as a Model of Neuromuscular Structure and Function

Structural Organization

As previously shown with respect to cognitive function, zebrafish have also shown great promise in elucidating the mechanisms involved in behavioral changes and neuromuscular function. The zebrafish is structurally homologous to humans with respect to genetics, protein structure, muscle anatomy, and neuroanatomy.^{8,36,42,119-121} About 80% of a fish’s body mass is skeletal muscle,¹²² and in the case of zebrafish, the skeletal muscle structure is easily observed because of its transparent nature.^{18,19,122,123} Commonalities between the motor units of zebrafish and humans are easily identifiable and include the structure of spinal motor neurons, skeletal muscle fibers, the brainstem, and the motor cortex.¹²⁴ Babin et al¹²⁴ showed evidence of similarity between motor units using in vivo applications. A key similarity between the spinal motor neurons of humans and zebrafish is their shared alpha-motor neurons and various subtypes of motor neurons. Furthermore, zebrafish and humans share aspects of skeletal muscle fiber structure, such as the preservation of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex, excitation-contraction coupling machinery, and the contractile apparatus; dysfunction of these structures results in human muscle diseases.¹²⁵ The similarities in protein structure, muscle anatomy, and neuroanatomy between humans and zebrafish allow for a wide range of investigations for studying the effects, causes, and potential treatments of human muscular diseases.

Assessment of Motor Function

Structure determines function.^126,127 Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that with the vast number of structural similarities between zebrafish and humans, there would be numerous functional similarities as well.¹²⁸ To test functionality, there are several neuromuscular tests that hold promise for investigating toxic variables using zebrafish. As outlined in Tierney’s three tier Behavioral Hierarchy Model,¹²⁸ the lowest tier and most fundamental is motor function analysis through measurement of swimming patterns, swimming speeds, and/or distance covered. The second tier is sensorimotor responses, which can be analyzed through assessments of food attraction, odor attraction, and alarm response (i.e., startle response).^36,37,128 The highest behavioral assessment level, placed at the top tier, is a cognitive response; this is where the cognitive endpoints are determined by investigating learning and memory. These behavioral responses can be predicted through the testing of a subject's locomotor function in response to toxic variables.¹²⁹ Tests involving neuromuscular function in zebrafish can provide critical insight into neuromuscular dysfunction.

There are three motor function tests that portray the functional similarities of zebrafish to humans. Startle response testing examines the fish’s immediate response to stimuli.¹²⁸ The effects observed can be further analyzed to determine the lasting neurobehavioral consequences of various toxicants. In a study to measure the acute and chronic effects of ethanol exposure on different strains of zebrafish, Dlugos and Rabin identified distinctions among three strains by analyzing behavioral abnormalities or tolerances in response to ethanol exposure. Genotypic differences among three strains of zebrafish were identified based on varying responses of the central nervous system (CNS).³⁶ Another study conducted by Martin et al¹³⁰ analyzed behavioral changes in zebrafish embryos exposed to cyanotoxins B-methylamino-L alanine (BMAA) and microcystin leucine arginine (MCLR) and saw a dose-dependent increase in acoustic startle response activity. Both experiments observing the effects of ethanol and cyanotoxin exposure highlight the zebrafish model’s use to predict expected endpoints of toxicant exposure using the startle response.

Activity level testing is another method used to investigate toxic effects on the developmental behavior of zebrafish.^38,128 These tests include but are not limited to, prolonged negative effects on spatial discrimination and response latency.³⁸ Results from Lopez-Patino et al showed immediate effects of hyperactivity from an initial 24 to 72-hour period of drug withdrawal and behavioral endpoints, including lasting anxiety into adulthood.³⁹ Additionally, Green and Planchart showed that exposure to cadmium directly influences activity levels by inducing hyperactivity and circling behavior in larvae. Further experimentation revealed this was due to inappropriate otolith and inner ear formation; hence, improper development had occurred as a result of the heavy metal.¹³¹

The Critical Swimming Speed test measures the effects of exercise in addition to a chosen variable’s influence on the subject ranging from chemical exposure^40,132 to environmental differences.^41,133 The optimal swimming speeds of zebrafish have been measured by subjecting the fish to varying velocities of water flow⁴⁰ and toxicant exposure.^132,134 In an effort to show the zebrafish is an efficient exercise model, oxygen consumption and routine metabolic rate were measured at increments of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of critical swimming speed. Results of the study indicated that zebrafish have strikingly higher swimming speeds than twenty-two other measured fish species and that exercise-enhanced growth was not only evident in development but also during adult stages.⁴⁰ Another study measured the swimming capability of zebrafish using four tests. These distinct assessments all measured diverse variables, such as gender, water temperature, caudal fin length, and genetic strain, that may affect the swimming capability of the zebrafish model.⁴¹ The examples of neuromuscular assessments provide evidence that the zebrafish is an excellent model for evaluating neuromuscular function. Numerous published experiments further exemplify the functionality of the zebrafish as an excellent alternative model for toxicology and other biological studies (Figure 3). A summary table of research supporting the beneficial use of zebrafish to investigate neuromuscular structure and function can be found in Table 3.

Figure 3.

Depiction of behavioral responses in zebrafish. Each form of testing is ordered according to the complexity of the assessment. Neuromuscular responses are the most basic behavioral response and lead to more complex sensory responses, which coalesce with cognitive responses. Sub-categories illustrate different methods of testing previously used to investigate behavioral endpoints.

Table 3.

Neuromuscular Structure and Function.

Age	Chemical Exposure	Tests Completed	Findings	Reference
Embryos	Staining	Staining and analysis using electron microscopy	Zebrafish and humans share numerous molecular and histological characteristics including the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex, excitation-contraction coupling machinery, and the contractile apparatus	Gibbs et al,¹²⁵ 2013
Embryonic to larval stage and Adults	Varying concentrations of chlorpyrifos, nicotine, and pilocarpine	Behavioral assessment including startle response using a digital-video camera centrally positioned in the arena that feeds to running tracking software (Noldus EthoVision)	Sensorimotor responses can be assessed resulting from environmental toxin/toxicant exposure	Eddins et al,³⁷ 2010
Adult (4 mo.)	Varying doses of erythromycin	Post exposure, critical swimming speed and burst speed were tested and compared between the varying concentration doses of erythromycin followed by histological analysis of muscle fibers and mRNA expression levels of select genes to determine genetic impacts of erythromycin exposure	Effects of toxic variables can be identified based on the locomotor function of the zebrafish post exposure	Li and Zhang,¹³² 2020
0-5 dfp exposure and analysis later (2 mo.)	Varying concentrations of chlorpyrifos	Startle response analysis post exposure to toxicant	Startle response testing analyzes a fish’s immediate reaction to stimuli	Eddins et al,³⁷ 2010
Adult	Ethanol at varying doses	Analysis of the startle response with an Intel Digital Camera hovering over a blocked grid that would be uploaded on image J	Ethanol exposure can help differentiate between strains of species by behavioral abnormalities and tolerances to different doses	Dlugos and Rabin,³⁶ 2003
Adult	Ethanol at varying doses	For behavioral analyses, a digital imaging system using the Intel Digital Camera, computer, and the Intel Create and Share Software		Dlugos and Rabin,³⁶ 2003
1-5 dfp exposure and testing on days 6-9 with follow-up in adulthood	Varying concentrations of Chlorpyrifos	Swimming activity analyzed spatial discrimination and response latency using a video camera and video cassette recorder atop an Olympus SZH10 dissecting scope stage and segmented sheet	Prolonged effects on spatial discrimination and response latency due to toxins can be measured by activity level	Levin et al,³⁸ 2004
Adult (8 mo. male)	Varying levels of alcohol concentration	Analysis of swimming speed and metabolic performance with a miniature swimming tunnel respirator, muscle fixation and staining, qRT-PCR, and Western Blot	Testing toxicant exposure by analyzing signs and markers of atrophy and autophagy	Wen et al,¹³⁴ 2022
Adult	N/A	Critical swimming speed and optimal swimming speed was assessed, post exercise regimen, length and weight measurements were obtained, and expression analysis of growth marker genes were analyzed by Q-PCR	Zebrafish have significantly higher swimming speeds than other fish models and exercise further increases their development in during adult and prior developmental stages	Palstra et al,⁴⁰ 2010
Larvae	β-methylamino-l-alanine (BMAA) and microcystin leucine and arginine (MCLR)	Analysis of recorded locomotor activity using a Photron mini UX-50 high-speed camera and FLOTE software, kinematic parameters, Prism 8 software for intensity metrics, and stats with JMP pro 14	Evaluation of toxins produced by cyanobacteria that enhance neurotoxicity and elicit morphological deficits and locomotor behavior abnormalities	Martin et al,¹³⁰ 2020
Larvae		Further analysis was performed using proteomic analysis allowing for explanation on differences in observed behaviors		Martin et al,¹³⁰ 2020
Embryo and Larvae (4 h to 7dpf)	Cadmium (0-60 ppb)	Light microscopy to measure effects on otoliths and behavior analysis by Danio Visionbox with EthoVision XT software	Ability to test environmental toxicants that impact the vestibular structures of the brain that potentiate behavioral abnormalities	Green et al,¹³¹ 2023

Zebrafish Mutants

The similarities between zebrafish and humans in protein structure and function, in addition to the ease of testing their motor function, make mutant models of the zebrafish desirable for toxicology investigations. As was mentioned previously, zebrafish contain more than 70% of the human genome and 47% of human genes have a one-to-one relationship with a zebrafish ortholog.¹³⁵ Furthermore, a remarkable >82% of human genes are linked with comorbidities containing at least one orthologous zebrafish gene.^124,129,136 An example of a gene homolog affecting cognitive function is the dopamine receptor (drd5) gene which is associated with working memory. When treated with a D1/D5 receptor agonist, zebrafish showed age-related declines in working memory, which is similar to what is seen in adult humans.¹³⁷ Additionally, zebrafish share three isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase and all but two of the GABA_A receptor orthologs with humans.¹³⁸ The GABA_A receptors serve a wide range of functions in both humans and fish, including motor control,¹³⁹ vision,¹⁴⁰ and learning and memory.¹⁴¹ Neuromuscular gene homologs are another characteristic that makes zebrafish an attractive model for toxicological studies. For example, the tardbp gene encodes for the RNA binding TDP-43 protein, which has been investigated recently to help study human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Overexpression of the cytoplasmic variety of tardbp leads to neuromuscular degeneration.¹³⁰ Another neuromuscular degenerative disease is myofibrillar myopathy, which is caused by misfolded myosins. Specifically, zebrafish contain gene orthologs for two proteins associated in the formation of this disease: unc-45b and 503unc where 503unc expression is essential for the expression of other genes that promote proper muscle formation.¹⁴² A final example of homology is seen where 23 of the 25 human genes associated with muscular dystrophy have orthologs in zebrafish.¹⁴³

Since their development, zebrafish mutant use has expanded to an array of research interests, including cardiovascular disease,¹⁴⁴ immunology,¹⁴⁵ cancer,^146,147 and toxicology.^2,120 The sapje dystrophin mutant is a model for exploring candidate molecules to remediate muscle degeneration in cases of human muscular dystrophy.^20,25,42,148 The trrap mutant is specifically used to investigate the physiological function of the trrap gene in vertebrates. By studying this mutant, it has been observed that genetic alterations in the trrap gene have resulted in facial dysmorphisms, microcephaly, and the development of the eyes and pharyngeal arches.¹⁴⁹ Another mutated gene, sin3b, demonstrated a decrease in fitness, size, changes in locomotor behavior, and delayed bone development.¹⁵⁰

In zebrafish, mutants have the potential to be used in drug discovery as disease models. Specifically, investigations have looked at the development of trpm7 mutants. They are abnormally sensitive to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, which is a neurotoxicant that interferes with the mitochondrial electron transport chain.¹⁵¹ These mutants are missing the gene which programs the trpm7 ion channel kinase.

Similar yet more complex mutants have been developed. Choi et al¹⁵² demonstrated that larval zebrafish with three transgenes Tg(lratd2a:QF2)^c601, Tg(slc5a7a:Cre)^c662, and Tg(QUAS:loxP-mCherry-loxP-GFP-CAAX)^c679 show a significantly reduced response to touch stimuli after exposure to botulinum neurotoxin, which reduces synaptic transmission. This inhibited transmission caused the zebrafish to exhibit reduced repulsion to cadaverine, which is normally an aversive stimulus. Another study used acetylcholinesterase inhibitors galanthamine (GAL), eserine (ESE), tacrine (TAC), and edrophonium (EDRO) to determine how similar the treated zebrafish would be to fish with the functional acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChE) gene.¹⁵³ Only GAL “chemocopies” the AChE mutant, meaning that it exhibits similar mannerisms as a fish without the AChE gene. Many studies have shown that zebrafish mutants are considered effective models for a variety of advancing research fields,^{50,121,144,154} and with the fields of behavioral and pharmacological research growing, it is likely more mutant models will emerge. A summary table of mutant zebrafish used in various research disciplines that cross with toxicology can be found in Table 4.

Table 4.

Genetic Mutants.

Mutant	Model Type	Experimentation	Age	Reference
heg1	Pharmacotherapy/Cardiovascular Disease	Generation of the heg1-specific knockout followed by observation of malformations due to the mutation (heg1): Abnormal heart formation, vascular development, blood stagnation, and differences seen in candidate drug application (Salviae miltiorrhiza, Radix astragali, Hirudu, Myrrha, salvianolic acid B, paeoniflorin, and ferulic acid)	Embryos through Adults (developmental analysis)	Lu et al,¹⁴⁴ 2020
rag1(-/-)	Infectious Disease	PCR protocols to validate the mutant genotype, bacterial culture preparation and dose determination, administration of specific bacterial dosages, and observations for signs of disease and mortality	Adult testing	Hohn and Petrie-Hanson,¹⁴⁵ 2012
tp53	Cancer	Generation of mutant lines, flow cytometry, paraffin embedding and sectioning, electron microscopy for defects, apoptosis assay, RT-PCR, and tumor transplantation Specific analysis was conducted on the development of nerve sheath tumors and modification of the cell-cycle	Generation of mutants followed by analysis through development	Berghmans et al,¹⁴⁷ 2005
sin3B	Neuromuscular and Skeletal	CRISPR-Cas9 to disrupt Sin3b followed by assessment of behavior and development in terms of fitness, size, locomotor behavior (swim length and velocity), immunohistochemistry to look at motor neuron development, and bone development	Embryonic stage through Adult	Moravec et al,¹⁵⁰ 2017
Sapje dystrophin	Musculoskeletal	Confirmation of sapje and sapje mutant models, candidate drug testing (serotonin precursors, products and serotonin receptor agonists, tricyclic antidepressants, reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), and tests for the dystrophic muscle phenotype in the short-term birefringence assay and a prolonged lifespan in a long-term survival assay	Embryo to 30 dpf	Spinazzola et al,²⁵ 2020
trrap	Structural Development	Creation of the mutant using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing followed by analysis of structural/development changes in the trrap gene-knockout by histological analysis, whole-mount in situ hybridization, and neuromast labeling	Embryo through Adulthood	Suzuki et al,¹⁴⁹ 2021
Trpm7	Toxicology	Motility monitoring via the Zebrabox and Viewpoint software, culturing of melanocytes, cell culture, drug treatments, whole-cell voltage clamp recordings, peripheral nerve recordings, electroretinogram recordings, free-swimming assay, histology, and RT-PCR to determine the efficacy of trpm7 mutants for use in toxicology and defects in the neuromuscular system	Larvae (5-6dpf)	Decker et al,¹⁵¹ 2014
Oxtr^(-/-)	Behavior	Analysis of social behaviors relating to higher-order cognitive mechanisms	Adult	Nunes et al,⁹³ 2020

Ethics

The benefit of using zebrafish in toxicology is not limited to being a comparable model to humans. They also offer an ethical solution to overcome some of the controversial aspects of scientific research. Steven Cassar et al² provide an application of “The Three Rs” (3Rs) concept in the use of zebrafish by detailing the benefits of connecting the model with humans in in vitro assays and mammalian in vivo studies for drug discovery. According to the European Commission Directive from 2010, experimentation in the early life stages of zebrafish can be conducted without qualifying as an “animal” research study. Independent feeding begins at 5dpf; thus, before this period, zebrafish do not qualify as an “animal” study. Because of their alignment with the 3Rs, zebrafish provide an optimal model for neuromuscular testing and are a quality alternative to animal studies.^2,120

Conclusion

The use of the zebrafish model has significantly increased across several scientific fields of study. This upsurge is not merely attributed to the convenient and feasible nature of the model but primarily due to the 70% (+) genetic similarity to humans in terms of cognition, anatomical structure, and neuromuscular function. Zebrafish have been established as pivotal models to investigate cognitive behaviors such as visual discrimination, memory and learning, and social behavior. These studies have illuminated their value in neuroscience investigations with the ever-increasing rates of depression, anxiety, and stress disorders across the world. Because of these applications, toxicology/pharmacology investigations have found zebrafish promising in investigating drug-related cognitive and neuromuscular behavioral responses. The latest avenue of zebrafish research has involved the development of mutant models, which has facilitated the ability to further investigate cardiovascular abnormalities, immunological disorders, and muscular degenerative diseases. As has been evidenced, the zebrafish offer an effective alternative model in a multitude of scientific fields, and as a result, it is to be expected their use to grow exponentially.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the library personnel at Florida College and the institution for providing access to journal articles and guidance in attaining information for this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Clevenger, T. contributed to conception and design, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, and drafted manuscript; Paz, J. contributed to conception and design, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, and drafted manuscript; Hayes, W. contributed to conception, contributed to interpretation, and critically revised manuscript; Stafford, A. contributed to conception, contributed to analysis and interpretation, and critically revised manuscript; Amos, D. contributed to conception and design, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, and critically revised manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

A. Wallace Hayes

References

Mizgirev

Revskoy

. A new zebrafish model for experimental leukemia therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;9:895-902

Cassar

Adatto

Freeman

, et al. Use of zebrafish in drug discovery toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020;33:95-118.

Potrich

Sovrano

Stancher

Vallortigara

. Quantity discrimination by Zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Psychol. 2015;129:388-393.

Aleström

D’Angelo

Midtlyng

, et al. Zebrafish: housing and husbandry recommendations. Lab Anim. 2020;54:213-224.

Tsang

Zahid

Ansari

Lee

RCY

Partap

Gerlai

. Breeding zebrafish: A review of different methods and a discussion on standardization. Zebrafish. 2017;14:561-573.

Osborne

Paull

Grierson

, et al. Report of a meeting on contemporary topics in zebrafish husbandry and care. Zebrafish. 2016;13:584-589.

Lawrence

Mason

. Zebrafish housing systems: A review of basic operating principles and considerations for design and functionality. ILAR J. 2012;53:179-191.

Sprague

Doerry

Douglas

Westerfield

. The Zebrafish information network (ZFIN): A resource for genetic, gemomic, and developmental research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;29:87-90. Available from: https://zebrafish.org/home/guide.php

Kimmel

Ballard

Kimmel

Ullmann

Schilling

. Stages of embryonic development of the Zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253-310.

10.

Parichy

Elizondo

Mills

Gordon

Engeszer

. Normal table of postembryonic zebrafish development: Staging by externally visible anatomy of the living fish. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:2975-3015.

11.

Stednitz

Washbourne

. Rapid progressive social development of zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2020;17:11-17.

12.

Kaliya-Perumal

Ingham

. Musculoskeletal regeneration: A zebrafish perspective. Biochimie (Paris). 2022;196:171-181.

13.

Cao

Meng

Gong

, et al. Calcineurin controls proximodistal blastema polarity in zebrafish fin regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2009539118.

14.

Marques

Lupi

Mercader

. Model systems for regeneration: Zebrafish. Development. 2019;146:dev167692.

15.

Saera-Vila

Kasprick

Junttila

, et al. Myocyte dedifferentiation drives extraocular muscle regeneration in adult zebrafish. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:4977-4993.

16.

Saera-Vila

Kish

Kahana

. Fgf regulates dedifferentiation during skeletal muscle regeneration in adult zebrafish. Cell Signal. 2016;28:1196-1204.

17.

Becerra

Montes

Bexiga

SRR

Junqueira

LCU

. Structure of the tail fin in teleosts. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;230:127-137.

18.

Brugman

. The zebrafish as a model to study intestinal inflammation. Dev Comp Immunol. 2016;64:82-92.

19.

d’Amora

Sancataldo

Cella Zanacchi

Diaspro

. Influence of nanoparticle exposure on nervous system development in zebrafish studied by means of light sheet fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. 2016;110:148a.

20.

Guyon

Steffen

Howell

Pusack

Lawrence

Kunkel

. Modeling human muscle disease in zebrafish. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1772:205-215.

21.

Lim

Xiong

, et al. Cavin4 interacts with Bin1 to promote T-tubule formation and stability in developing skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 2021:220;e201905065.

22.

Zhao

Ding

Liu

Lin

. Zebrafish p53 protein enhances the translation of its own mRNA in response to UV irradiation and CPT treatment. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1220-1225.

23.

Di Donato

Auer

Duroure

Del Bene

. Characterization of the calcium binding protein family in Zebrafish Mueller F editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53299.

24.

Dou

Andersson-Lendahl

Arner

. Structure and function of skeletal muscle in zebrafish early larvae. J Gen Physiol. 2008;131:445-453.

25.

Spinazzola

Lambert

Gibbs

, et al. Effect of serotonin modulation on dystrophin-deficient zebrafish. Biol Open. 2020;9:053363.

26.

Engeszer

Patterson

Rao

Parichy

. Zebrafish in the wild: a review of natural history and new notes from the field. Zebrafish. 2007;4:21-40.

27.

Arthur

Levin

. Spatial and non-spatial visual discrimination learning in zebrafish ( Danio rerio ). Anim Cogn. 2001;4:125-131.

28.

Fetsko

. What Can Be Learned from a Fish: An Analysis of Visual Discrimination in the Zebrafish, Danio rerio. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University; 2002. Available from: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=6709125

29.

Sovrano

Vicidomini

Potrich

Miletto Petrazzini

Baratti

Rosa-Salva

. Visual discrimination and amodal completion in zebrafish Sakakibara M editor. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0264127.

30.

Proulx

Parker

Tahir

Brennan

. Parallel mechanisms for visual search in zebrafish neuhauss SCF, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e111540.

31.

Williams

White

Messer

. A simple spatial alternation task for assessing memory function in zebrafish. Behav Processes. 2002;58:125-132.

32.

Braubach

Wood

Gadbois

Fine

Croll

. Olfactory conditioning in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2009;198(1):190–198.

33.

Teoh

Sapri

SRB

Yusof

MRBM

Yahaya

Das

. Construction of an affordable Open-design recirculating zebrafish housing system. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020;59:512-518.

34.

Avdesh

Chen

Martin-Iverson

, et al. Regular care and maintenance of a zebrafish (Danio rerio) laboratory: An introduction. J Vis Exp. 2012;69:e4196.

35.

Khabib

MNH

Sivasanku

Lee

Kumar

Kue

. Alternative animal models in predictive toxicology. Toxicology. 2022;465:153053.

36.

Dlugos

Rabin

. Ethanol effects on three strains of zebrafish: model system for genetic investigations. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;74:471-480.

37.

Eddins

Cerutti

Williams

Linney

Levin

. Zebrafish provide a sensitive model of persisting neurobehavioral effects of developmental chlorpyrifos exposure: comparison with nicotine and pilocarpine effects and relationship to dopamine deficits. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2010;32:99-108.

38.

Levin

Swain

Donerly

Linney

. Developmental chlorpyrifos effects on hatchling zebrafish swimming behavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26:719-723.

39.

López-Patiño

Cabral

Zhdanova

. Anxiogenic effects of cocaine withdrawal in zebrafish. Physiol Behav. 2008;93:160-171.

40.

Palstra

Tudorache

Rovira

, et al. Establishing zebrafish as a novel exercise model: Swimming economy, swimming-enhanced growth and muscle growth marker gene expression Calbet JAL, editor. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14483.

41.

Wakamatsu

Ogino

Hirata

. Swimming capability of zebrafish is governed by water temperature, caudal fin length and genetic background. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16307.

42.

Tonelli

Bek

Besio

, et al. Zebrafish: a resourceful vertebrate model to investigate skeletal disorders. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:489.

43.

Hsu

Wang

. Neurotoxicity of fipronil affects sensory and motor systems in zebrafish. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2021;177:104896.

44.

Levin

Buccafusco

. Animal Models of Cognitive Impairment. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781420004335

45.

Colwill

Raymond

Ferreira

Escudero

. Visual discrimination learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Processes. 2005;70:19-31.

46.

Darland

Dowling

. Behavioral screening for cocaine sensitivity in mutagenized zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98:11691-11696.

47.

Gleason

Weber

. Effect of group size on avoidance learning in zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Anim Learn Behav. 1977;5:213-216.

48.

Oliveira

. Mind the fish: zebrafish as a model in cognitive social neuroscience. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:131.

49.

Facciol

Gerlai

. Zebrafish shoaling, its behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms, and its alteration by embryonic alcohol exposure: a review. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:572175.

50.

Kalueff

Stewart

Gerlai

. Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35:63-75.

51.

Soussi-Yanicostas

. Zebrafish as a model for neurological disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:4321.

52.

Groves

Thompson

. Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychol Rev. 1970;77:419-450.

53.

Hinz

Aizenberg

Tushev

Schuman

. Protein synthesis-dependent associative long-term memory in larval zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2013;33:15382-15387.

54.

Gerlai

Lahav

Guo

Rosenthal

. Drinks like a fish: zebra fish (Danio rerio) as a behavior genetic model to study alcohol effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000;67:773-782.

55.

Klee

Ebbert

Schneider

Hurt

Ekker

. Zebrafish for the study of the biological effects of nicotine. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:301-312.

56.

Dreosti

Lopes

Kampff

Wilson

. Development of social behavior in young zebrafish. Front Neural Circuits. 2015;9:39.

57.

Oliveira

Silveira

Chacon

Luchiari

. The zebrafish world of colors and shapes: preference and discrimination. Zebrafish. 2015;12:166-173.

58.

Siregar

Juniardi

Audira

, et al. Method standardization for conducting innate color preference studies in different zebrafish strains. Biomedicines. 2020;8:271.

59.

Maurer

Tschopp

Tappeiner

Sallin

Jazwinska

Enzmann

. Methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced retinal degeneration and regeneration in the zebrafish: histological and functional characteristics. J Vis Exp. 2014;8:e51909.

60.

Mikulskaya

Martin

. Contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination in cannabis users. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018;235:2459-2469.

61.

Levin

Chrysanthis

Yacisin

Linney

. Chlorpyrifos exposure of developing zebrafish: effects on survival and long-term effects on response latency and spatial discrimination. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2003;25:51-57.

62.

Svoboda

Vijayaraghavan

Tanguay

. Nicotinic receptors mediate changes in spinal motoneuron development and axonal pathfinding in embryonic zebrafish exposed to nicotine. J Neurosci. 2002;22(24):10731-10741.

63.

Ennaceur

Delacour

. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats: Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res [Internet]. 1988;31(1):47–59.

64.

Antunes

Biala

. The novel object recognition memory: neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn Process. 2012;13:93-110.

65.

Roberts

Bill

Glanzman

. Learning and memory in zebrafish larvae. Front Neural Circuits [Internet]. 2013;7:9.

66.

Thompson

Spencer

. Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1966;73:16-43.

67.

Rankin

Abrams

Barry

, et al. Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92(2):135-138.

68.

Blaser

Koid

Poliner

. Context-dependent sensitization to ethanol in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;95:278-284.

69.

Thomas

Welsh

Galvez

Svoboda

. Acute nicotine exposure and modulation of a spinal motor circuit in embryonic zebrafish. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;239:1-12.

70.

Karelitz

Perkins

. Tobacco smoking may delay habituation of reinforcer effectiveness in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) [Internet]. 2018;235:2315-2321.

71.

Roberts

Reichl

Song

, et al. Habituation of the C-start response in larval zebrafish exhibits several distinct phases and sensitivity to NMDA receptor blockade Tanimoto H editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e29132.

72.

Roberts

Pearce

Choe

, et al. Long-term habituation of the C-start escape response in zebrafish larvae. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016;134:360-368.

73.

Best

Berghmans

Hunt

JJFG

, et al. Non-associative learning in larval zebrafish. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:1206-1215.

74.

Wolman

Jain

Liss

Granato

. Chemical modulation of memory formation in larval zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(37):15468-15473.

75.

Park

Clements

Issa

Ahn

. Effects of social experience on the habituation rate of zebrafish startle escape response: empirical and computational analyses. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:7.

76.

Christoffersen

GRJ

. Habituation: Events in the history of its characterization and linkage to synaptic depression. A new proposed kinetic criterion for its identification. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;53:45-66

77.

Burgess

Granato

. Sensorimotor gating in larval zebrafish. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4984-4994.

78.

Pradel

Schachner

Schmidt

. Inhibition of memory consolidation by antibodies against cell adhesion molecules after active avoidance conditioning in zebrafish. J Neurobiol. 1999;39(2):197-206.

79.

Pradel

Schmidt

Schachner

. Involvement of L1.1 in memory consolidation after active avoidance conditioning in zebrafish. J Neurobiol. 2000;43(4):389-403.

80.

Scott-Scheiern

Kempker

Simons

. Active avoidance conditioning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007;87:72-77.

81.

Blank

Guerim

Cordeiro

Vianna

MRM

. A one-trial inhibitory avoidance task to zebrafish: rapid acquisition of an NMDA-dependent long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:529-534.

82.

Suboski

Bain

Carty

McQuoid

Seelen

Seifert

. Alarm reaction in acquisition and social transmission of simulated-predator recognition by zebra danio fish (Brachydanio rerio). J Comp Psychol. 1990;104:101-112.

83.

Lee

. Second-order conditioning in humans. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:672628.

84.

May

Morrill

Holcombe

, et al. Object recognition memory in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2016;296:199–210.

85.

Bruzzone

Gatto

Lucon Xiccato

, et al. Measuring recognition memory in zebrafish larvae: issues and limitationL. PeerJ [Internet]. 2020;8:e8890.

86.

DePasquale

Kemerer

White

, et al. The influence of an enriched environment in enhancing recognition memory in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:749746.

87.

Naderi

Salahinejad

Attaran

Niyogi

Chivers

. Rapid effects of estradiol and its receptor agonists on object recognition and object placement in adult male zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2020;384:112514.

88.

Faillace

Pisera-Fuster

Medrano

Bejarano

Bernabeu

. Short- and long-term effects of nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor phenylbutyrate on novel object recognition in zebrafish. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017;234:943-955.

89.

Waldman

. Quantitative and developmental analyses of the alarm reaction in the zebra Danio. Brachydanio rerio. Copeia. 1982;1982:1.

90.

Speedie

Gerlai

. Alarm substance induced behavioral responses in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2008;188:168-177.

91.

Al-Imari

Gerlai

. Sight of conspecifics as reward in associative learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2008;189:216-219.

92.

Shelton

Daniel

, et al. Collective behavior in wild zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2020;17:243-252.

93.

Nunes

Carreira

Anbalagan

Blechman

Levkowitz

Oliveira

. Perceptual mechanisms of social affiliation in zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2020;10:3642.

94.

Kozlowski

Cutting

. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Percept Psychophys. 1977;21(6):575–580.

95.

Carreño Gutiérrez

Vacca

Pons

Norton

WHJ

. Automatic quantification of juvenile zebrafish aggression. J Neurosci Methods. 2018;296:23-31.

96.

Pitcher

. Heuristic definitions of fish shoaling behaviour. Anim Behav. 1983;31:611-613.

97.

Saverino

Gerlai

. The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behav Brain Res. 2008;191:77-87.

98.

Suriyampola

Sykes

Khemka

Shelton

Bhat

Martins

. Water flow impacts group behavior in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Ecol. 2017;28(1):94–100.

99.

Bhat

Greulich

Martins

. Behavioral plasticity in response to environmental manipulation among zebrafish (danio rerio) populations Brennan CH editor. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0125097.

100.

Audira

Siregar

Strungaru

Huang

Hsiao

. Which zebrafish strains are more suitable to perform behavioral studies? A comprehensive comparison by phenomic approach. Biology. 2020;9:200.

101.

Granato

van Eeden

Schach

, et al. Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behavior of the zebrafish embryo and larva. Development [Internet]. 1996;123:399-413.

102.

Miller

Gerlai

. Quantification of shoaling behaviour in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2007;184:157-166.

103.

Freudenberg

Carreño Gutierrez

Post

Reif

Norton

WHJ

. Aggression in non-human vertebrates: genetic mechanisms and molecular pathways. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016;171:603-640.

104.

Schmidt

Fang

Cossins

. Molecular correlates of social dominance: A novel role for ependymin in aggression de Polavieja GG editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(4):e18181.

105.

Larson

O’Malley

Melloni

. Aggression and vasotocin are associated with dominant–subordinate relationships in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2006;167:94-102.

106.

Oliveira

Silva

Simões

. Fighting zebrafish: characterization of aggressive behavior and winner–loser effects. Zebrafish. 2011;8:73-81.

107.

Filby

Paull

Hickmore

Tyler

. Unravelling the neurophysiological basis of aggression in a fish model. BMC Genom. 2010;11:498.

108.

Jin

Jeong

, et al. Gender differences in aggression-related responses on EEG and ECG. Exp Neurobiol. 2018;27:526-538.

109.

Lissmann

. Die umwelt des kampffisches (betta splendens regan). Z Für Vgl Physiol [Internet]. 1932;18(1):65–111.

110.

Parra

Adrian

Gerlai

. The synthetic substance hypoxanthine 3-N-oxide elicits alarm reactions in zebrafish (danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2009;205:336–341.

111.

Abadie

Essilini

Fulda

, et al. Drug-induced panic attacks: Analysis of cases registered in the french pharmacovigilance database. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;90:60-66.

112.

Barcellos

LJG

Ritter

Kreutz

, et al. Whole-body cortisol increases after direct and visual contact with a predator in zebrafish. Danio rerio. Aquaculture [Internet]. 2007;272:774-778.

113.

Levin

Bencan

Cerutti

. Anxiolytic effects of nicotine in zebrafish. Physiol Behav. 2007;90:54-58.

114.

Egan

Bergner

Hart

et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2009;205:38-44.

115.

Steel

Marnane

Iranpour

, et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:476-493.

116.

Bandelow

Michaelis

. Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:327-335.

117.

Garakani

Murrough

Freire

, et al. Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: Current and emerging treatment options. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:595584.

118.

Nechita

Motorga

. A review of the influence the anxiety exerts on human life. Romanian J Morphol Embryol Rev Roum Morphol Embryol. 2018;59(4):1045-1051.

119.

Basnet

Zizioli

Taweedet

Finazzi

Memo

. Zebrafish larvae as a behavioral model in neuropharmacology. Biomedicines. 2019;7:23.

120.

Russell

WMS

. The development of the three rs concept. Altern Lab Anim. 1995;23:298-304.

121.

El Fersioui

Pinton

Allaman-Pillet

Schorderet

. Premature vertebral mineralization in hmx1-mutant zebrafish. Cells. 2022;11:1088.

122.

Jackson

Ingham

. Control of muscle fibre-type diversity during embryonic development: the zebrafish paradigm. Mech Dev. 2013;130:447-457.

123.

Maves

. Recent advances using zebrafish animal models for muscle disease drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2014;9:1033-1045.

124.

Babin

Goizet

Raldúa

. Zebrafish models of human motor neuron diseases: advantages and limitations. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;118:36-58.

125.

Gibbs

Horstick

Dowling

. Swimming into prominence: the zebrafish as a valuable tool for studying human myopathies and muscular dystrophies. FEBS J [Internet. 2013;280:4187-4197.

126.

Floyd

. Manual of Structural Kinesiology. 21ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2021:450.

127.

Welsh

Prentice-Craver

. Hole’s Human Anatomy & Physiology. 16th ed. Dubuque: McGraw Hill LLC; 2022.

128.

Tierney

. Behavioural assessments of neurotoxic effects and neurodegeneration in zebrafish. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Mol Basis Dis. 2011;1812:381-389.

129.

Currie

. Zebrafish genetics: mutant cornucopia. Curr Biol. 1996;6:1548-1552.

130.

Martin

Bereman

Marsden

. BMAA and MCLR interact to modulate behavior and exacerbate molecular changes related to neurodegeneration in larval zebrafish. Toxicol Sci. 2021;179:251-261.

131.

Green

Wall

Weeks

Mattingly

Marsden

Planchart

. Developmental cadmium exposure disrupts zebrafish vestibular calcium channels interfering with otolith formation and inner ear function. Neurotoxicology. 2023;96:129-139.

132.

Zhang

. The effect of acute erythromycin exposure on the swimming ability of zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:3389.

133.

Cano-Barbacil

Radinger

Argudo

Rubio-Gracia

Vila-Gispert

García-Berthou

. Key factors explaining critical swimming speed in freshwater fish: a review and statistical analysis for Iberian species. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18947.

134.

Wen

Sun

Chen

, et al. Alcohol induces zebrafish skeletal muscle atrophy through HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling. Life. 2022;12:1211.

135.

Howe

Clark

Torroja

, et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature (London). 2013;496:498-503.

136.

Varshney

Burgess

. Mutagenesis and phenotyping resources in zebrafish for studying development and human disease. Brief Funct Genomics. 2014;13:82-94.

137.

Cleal

Fontana

Double

, et al. Dopaminergic modulation of working memory and cognitive flexibility in a zebrafish model of aging-related cognitive decline. Neurobiol Aging. 2021;102:1-16.

138.

Cocco

Rönnberg

AMC

Jin

, et al. Characterization of the γ-aminobutyric acid signaling system in the zebrafish (Danio rerio Hamilton) central nervous system by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Neuroscience. 2017;343:300-321.

139.

Hubbard

Böhm

Prendergast

, et al. Intraspinal sensory neurons provide Powerful inhibition to motor circuits ensuring postural control during locomotion. Curr Biol. 2016;26(21):2841-2853.

140.

Connaughton

Nelson

Bender

. Electrophysiological evidence of GABAA and GABAC receptors on zebrafish retinal bipolar cells. Vis Neurosci. 2008;25(2):139-153.

141.

Monesson-Olson

McClain

Case

, et al. Expression of the eight GABAA receptor α subunits in the developing zebrafish central nervous system. Burgess HA editor. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0196083.

142.

Berger

Currie

. 503unc, a small and muscle-specific zebrafish promoter. Genesis 2000. 2013;51(6):443–447.

143.

Steffen

Guyon

Vogel

, et al. Zebrafish orthologs of human muscular dystrophy genes. BMC Genom. 2007;8(1):79.

144.

Wang

, et al. Generation and application of the zebrafish heg1 mutant as a cardiovascular disease model. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1542.

145.

Hohn

Petrie-Hanson

. Rag1−/− mutant zebrafish demonstrate specific protection following bacterial re-exposure. Boudinot P editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e44451.

146.

Dang

Fogley

Zon

. Identifying novel cancer Therapies using chemical genetics and zebrafish. In: Langenau

, ed. Cancer and Zebrafish. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 103–124. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; vol. 916). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-30654-4_5

147.

Berghmans

Murphey

Wienholds

, et al. tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:407-412.

148.

Coffey

Pasquarella

Goody

Henry

. Ethanol exposure causes muscle degeneration in zebrafish. J Dev Biol. 2018;6:7.

149.

Suzuki

Hirai

Uehara

Ohga

Kosaki

Kawahara

. Involvement of the zebrafish trrap gene in craniofacial development. Sci Rep. 2021;11:24166.

150.

Moravec

Yousef

Kinney

, et al. Zebrafish sin3b mutants are viable but have size, skeletal, and locomotor defects: zebrafish sin3b Mutants are Viable but Have Defects. Dev Dyn. 2017;246:946-955.

151.

Decker

McNeill

Lambert

, et al. Abnormal differentiation of dopaminergic neurons in zebrafish trpm7 mutant larvae impairs development of the motor pattern. Dev Biol. 2014;386:428-439.

152.

Choi

Duboue

Macurak

Chanchu

Halpern

. Specialized neurons in the right habenula mediate response to aversive olfactory cues. Elife. 2021;10:e72345.

153.

Behra

. The use of zebrafish mutants to identify secondary target effects of acetylcholine esterase inhibitors. Toxicol Sci 2004;77:325-333.

154.

Sourbron

Schneider

Kecskés

, et al. Serotonergic modulation as effective treatment for Dravet syndrome in a zebrafish mutant model. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016;7:588-598.

An Evaluation of Zebrafish,an Emerging Model Analyzing the Effects of Toxicants on Cognitive and Neuromuscular Function

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results and Discussion

Convenience and Feasibility

Zebrafish as a Model of Cognitive Function

Visual Discrimination

Memory and Learning

Visual Discrimination and Learning

Non-Associative Learning

Basic Associative Learning—Pavlovian Conditioning

Object Recognition Memory

Social Behavior

Conspecific Social Interaction

Shoaling Behavior (“Shoaling Zebrafish”)

Aggression

Predator Avoidance

Zebrafish as a Model of Neuromuscular Structure and Function

Structural Organization

Assessment of Motor Function

Zebrafish Mutants

Ethics

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References