Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Tax federalism refers to the distribution of tax powers across different government levels and is measured using the tax decentralization and tax autonomy indices. This paper focuses on analyzing the relationship between tax federalism and economic growth. Based on a sample of OECD countries from 2000 to 2022, using standard estimation techniques, it identifies a negative relationship between the tax decentralization indicator and economic growth. However, due to methodological distortions in the quantification of tax decentralization, this relationship does not appear to be reliable. Therefore, it is more appropriate to view tax federalism from the perspective of tax autonomy, which, within the model, demonstrates a positive and statistically significant relationship with economic growth. This suggests that countries aiming to foster economic growth should consider a broader delegation of tax competencies to lower government levels. When considering the economic development standpoint, the tax autonomy indicator loses its significance in less-developed countries.

Keywords

Tax federalism economic growth tax decentralization tax autonomy OECD countries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afonso

Blanco-Arana

M. C.

. 2024. “Unemployment and Financial Development: Evidence for OECD Countries.” Comparative Economics Study 66: 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-023-00227-5 .

Akinsola

F. A.

Odhiambo

N. M.

. 2017. “Inflation and Economic Growth: A Review of The International Literature.” Comparative Economic Research 20 (3): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0019

Amini

Delgado

M. S.

Henderson

D. J.

Parmeter

C. F.

. 2012. “Fixed vs. Random: The Hausman Test Four Decades Later.” Essays in Honor of Jerry Hausman (Advances in Econometrics) 29: 479–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-9053(2012)0000029021

Appiah

Amoasi

Frowne

D. I.

. 2019. “Human Development and Its Effects on Economic Growth and Development.” International Research Journal of Business Studies 12 (2): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs .

Arellano

2003. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199245282.001.0001.

Arellano

Bond

. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 .

Bird

R. M.

2012. “Fiscal decentralization in Colombia: A work (still) in progress (International Center for Public Policy Working Paper No. 12-23).” International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

Blanco Arana

M. C.

2020. “Socio-economic Factors on the Evolution of Mortality in Europe in the XXI Century: Policy Proposals to Face the COVID-19 Crisis.” Revista de Economía Mundial 56: 99–114. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i56.4854 .

Blöchliger

Akgun

. 2018. “Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth.” In Fiscal Decentralisation and Inclusive Growth, edited by Kim

Dougherty

, 25–47. Paris/KIPF, Seoul: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302488-en .

10.

Blöchliger

Égert

Alvarez

Paciorek

. 2015. “The stabilisation properties of immovable property taxation: Evidence from OECD countries.” In: OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1237, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5js0cqq93djg-en.

11.

Blöchliger

Égert

Frederiksen

K. B.

. 2013. “Fiscal Federalism and its Impact on Economic Activity, Public Investment and the Performance of Educational Systems.” In OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1051, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4695840w7b-en.

12.

Blöchliger

King

. 2007. “Less Than you Thought: The Fiscal Autonomy of SubCentral Governments.” OECD Economic Studies 43 (2006/2): 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2006-2-en .

13.

Blundell

R. W.

Bond

S. R.

. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 .

14.

Bodman

2008. “Fiscal Federalism and Economic Growth in the OECD.” MRG Discussion Paper Series, No.7.

15.

Bodman

Hodge

. 2010. “What Drives Fiscal Decentralisation? Further Assessing the Role of Income.” Fiscal Studies 31 (3): 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2010.00119.x .

16.

Boyes

Melvin

. 2012. Economics. 9th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.

17.

Brennan

Buchanan

J. M.

. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Breuss

Eller

. 2004. “Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Is There Really a Link?” CESifo DICE Report, Journal for Institutional Comparisons 2 (1): 3–9.

19.

Brueckener

J. K.

2006. “Fiscal Federalism And Economic Growth.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (10-11): 2107–2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.05.003 .

20.

Burret

H. K.

Feld

L. P.

Schaltegger

C. A.

. 2022. “Fiscal Federalism And Economic Performance: New Evidence from Switzerland.” European Journal of Political Economy 74: 102159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102159 .

21.

Canavire-Bacarreza

Martinez-Vazquez

Yedgenov

. 2020. “Identifying and Disentangling the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth.” World Development 127: 104142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104742 .

22.

Cayssials

German-Soto

Segarra

. 2023. “Population and Economic Growth in Mexico: Regime Dynamics and Causality.” Latin American Economic Review 32: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.60758/laer.v32.278

23.

Centinaio

Pacicco

Serati

Venegoni

. 2024. “Government Decisions and Macroeconomic Stability: Fiscal Policies and Financial Market Fluctuations.” International Review of Economics & Finance 96: 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103599 .

24.

Davoodi

Zou

. 1998. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study.” Journal of Urban Economics 43 (2): 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2042 .

25.

Desai

R. M.

Freinkman

Goldberg

. 2003. “Fiscal Federalism and Regional Growth: Evidence from the Russian Federation in the 1990s.” Policy, Research Working Paper, 3138. The World Bank.

26.

Driessen

G. A.

Hughes

J. S.

. 2020. “Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Practice.” Congressional Research Service Report, No. R46382.

27.

Edey

2009. “The Global Financial Crisis and Its Effects.” Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and POlicy 28 (3): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2009.00032.x .

28.

Elistia

Syahzuni

B. A.

. 2018. “The Correlation of the Human Development Index (HDI) Towards Economic Growth (GDP per Capita) in 10 ASEAN Member Countries.” Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 2 (2): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v2i2.949 .

29.

Feld

L. P.

Dede

. 2005, 31 March–3 April. “Fiscal federalism and economic growth: Cross-country evidence for OECD countries.” European Public Choice Society Meetings. Durham, UK.

30.

Feld

L. P.

Kirchgässner

Schaltegger

C. H. A.

. 2004. “Fiscal Federalism and Economic Performance: Evidence from Swiss Cantons.” Marburg Working Papers on Economics, 200420.

31.

Fleurke

Willemse

. 2006. “Measuring Local Autonomy: A Decision-Making Approach.” Local Government Studies 32 (1): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930500453542 .

32.

Gemmell

Kneller

Sanz

. 2013. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Spending Versus Revenue Decentralization.” Economic Inquiry 51 (4): 1915–2136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00508.x .

33.

Gillman

Harris

M. N.

. 2010. “The Effect of Inflation on Economic Growth.” The Economics of Transition 18 (4): 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00389.x .

34.

Gründler

Potrafke

. 2019. “Corruption and Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence.” In: European Journal of Political Economy 60: 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.08.001 .

35.

Gutierrez

R. G.

El-Khattabi

A. R.

. 2017. “Using a dynamic panel estimator to model change in panel data (Paper SAS0642-2017).” In SAS Global Forum 2017 Proceedings. SAS Institute.

36.

Hanif

Wallace

Gago-de-Santos

. 2020. “Economic Growth by Means of Fiscal Decentralization: An Empirical Study for Federal Developing Countries.” SAGE Open 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020968088 .

37.

Harman

2022. Validity of Okun Law in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. [manuscript].

38.

Headey

D. D.

Hodge

. 2009. “The Effect of Population Growth on Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis of Macroeconomics Literature.” Population and Development Review 35 (2): 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00274.x .

39.

Hurlin

Mignon

. 2007. Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests.

40.

Idris

Yusop

Habibullah

M. S.

. 2016. “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Causality Test in Panel Perspective.” International Journal of Business and Society 17 (2): 281–290. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.525.2016 .

41.

Idris

Yusop

Habibullah

M. S.

. 2018. “Openness and Economic Growth in Developing and OECD Countries.” International Journal of Economics and Management 12 (2): s. 693–s. 702.

42.

Iimi

2005. “Decentralization and Economic Growth Revisited: An Empirical Note.” Journal of Urban Economics 57 (3): 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.007 .

43.

K. S.

Pesaran

M. H.

Shin

. 2003. “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 115 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 .

44.

Ismail

A. G.

Hamzah

M. Z.

Ritonga

J. T.

. 2009. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: Evidence from Selected Muslim Countries.” Economic Journal of Emerging Markets 9 (2): 109–116. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.v9i2.615 .

45.

Jalles

J. T.

2024. “Pandemics and Economic Turmoil in the Short-run: The Role of Fiscal Space.” The World Economy 47: 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13527 .

46.

Jansen

Jiménez-Martín

Gorjón

. 2016. “The Legacy of the Crisis: The Spanish Labour Market in the Aftermath of the Great Recession.” Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2016-10, FEDEA.

47.

Jha

P. C. H.

2015. “Theory of Fiscal Federalism: An Analysis.” Journal of Social and Economic Development 17 (2): 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-015-0009-0 .

48.

Jílek

2015. “Factors of Tax Decentralization in OECD-Europe Countries.” In: European Financial and Accounting Jorunal 10 (2): s. 33–s. 49. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.efaj.140%0A .

49.

Kim

Lotz

Blöchliger

. 2013. Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation: Concepts and Policies, OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174849-en .

50.

Koch

Müller

. 2024. “Tax Amnesties and the Insurance Effect: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 108: 102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102130 .

51.

Kukaj

2018. “Impact of Unemployment on Economic Growth: Evidence from Western Balkans.” European Journal of Marketing and Economics 1 (1): 10–18. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejme.v1i1.p10-18 .

52.

Ladner

Keuffer

Baldersheim

. 2016. “Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014).” Regional & Federal Studies 26 (3): 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1214911 .

53.

Lee

K. S.

Werner

R. A.

. 2023. “Are Lower Interest Rates Really Associated with Higher Growth? New Empirical Evidence on the Interest Rate Thesis from 19 Countries.” International Journal of Finance and Economics 28 (4): 3960–3975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2630

54.

Linhartová

Židová

. 2016. “The Impact of Corruption on Economic Growth in OECD Countries.” Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 24 (2): 83–94.

55.

White

. 2014. “Robustness Checks and Robustness Tests in Applied Economics.” Journal of Econometrics 178 (1): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.016 .

56.

Maličká

2021. “Financial Autonomy of Local Governments in the Slovak Republic: A Panel Data Investigation.” Ekonomický Časopis 69 (7): 669–686. https://doi.org/10.31577/ekoncas.2021.07.01 .

57.

Maličká

Šuliková

Šoltés

. 2017. “Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in European Union Countries and Slovakia.” Journal of Economics 65 (9): 856–875.

58.

Mcquinn

Varthalitis

. 2018. “How Openness to Trade Rescued the Irish Economy.” In MPRA Paper, No. 90416. University Library of Munich, Germany.

59.

Meloche

J. P. H.

Vaillancourt

Yilmaz

. 2004. “Decentralization or Fiscal Autonomy? What Does Really Matter? Effects on Growth and Public Sector Size in European Transition Countries.” Policy Research Working Paper, No. WPS 3254. Washington, DC: World Bank.

60.

Mileva

2007. Using Arellano-Bond Dynamic Panel GMM Estimators in Stata.

61.

Nkoro

Otto

. 2023. “Fiscal Federalism and Economic Development in Nigeria: An Econometric Analysis.” International Journal of Economic Sciences 12 (1): s. 144–s. 162. https://doi.org/10.52950/ES.2023.12.1.007 .

62.

Nur-tegin

Jakee

. 2020. “Does Corruption Grease or Sand the Wheels of Development? New Results Based on Disaggregated Data.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 75: 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.02.001 .

63.

Oates

W. E.

1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

64.

Oates

W. E.

2006. “On the Theory and Practice of Fiscal Decentralization.” In IFIR Working Paper. No. 2006-05.

65.

Oates

W. E.

2008. “On The Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions.” National Tax Journal 61 (2): 313–334. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.2.08 .

66.

OECD. 2021. Fiscal Federalism 2022: Making Decentralisation Work. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/201c75b6-en .

67.

OECD. 2024. OECD Fiscal Decentralisation Database. https://www.oecd.org/ctp/federalism/fiscal-decentralisation-database.htm.

68.

OECD. n.d. “Tax Autonomy Survey: Methodological Guide.” OECD Network on Fiscal Relations across Levels of Government. Retrieved June 2025.

69.

Ollivaud

Turner

. 2014. “The Effect of the Global Financial Crisis on OECD Potential Output.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1166. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxwtl8h75bw-en.

70.

Oulasvirta

Turala

. 2009. “Financial Autonomy and Consistency of Central Government Policy Towards Local Governments.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (2): 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309104178 .

71.

Özkök

Çütcü

. 2022. “Does Fiscal Federalism Matter for Economic Growth? Evidence from the United States.” Applied Economics 54 (24): 2810–2824. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1998337 .

72.

Padovano

. 2004. “Leviathan Models of Government.” In The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, edited by Rowley

C. K.

Schneider

, 680–684. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_135 .

73.

Piper

A. T.

2014. “The Benefits, Challenges and Insights of a Dynamic Panel assessment of Life Satisfaction.” In MPRA Paper, No. 59556.

74.

Rodríguez-Pose

Ezcurra

. 2011. “Is Fiscal Decentralization Harmful for Economic Growth? Evidence from the OECD Countries.” Journal of Economic Geography 11 (4): 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq025 .

75.

Rodríguez-Pose

Krøijer

. 2009. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe.” Growth and Change 40 (3): 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00488.x .

76.

Roodman

2009. “How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 9 (1): s. 86–s.136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 .

77.

Rosca

E. R.

2010. “Stationary and Non-Stationary Time Series.” The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration 10 (1): 177–186.

78.

Rueben

Randall

. 2017. Revenue Volatility. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved June 2025.

79.

Salles

Belloze

Porto

Gonzales

P. H.

Ogasawara

. 2019. “Non-stationary Time Series Transformation Methods: An Experimental Review.” Knowledge-Based Systems 164: 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.10.041.

80.

Samini

A. J.

Petanlar

S. K.

Haddad

G. K.

Alizadeh

. 2010. “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Nonlinear Model for Provinces of Iran.” Iranian Economic Review 15 (26): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2010.32702 .

81.

Satoła

Standar

Kozera

. 2019. “Financial Autonomy of Local Government Units: Evidence from Polish Rural Municipalities.” Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 17 (2): 321–342. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.321-342(2019) .

82.

Stegarescu

2005. “Public Sector Decentralisation: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends.” Fiscal Studies 26 (3): 301–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00014.x .

83.

Suleymanov

M. M.

Magomedov

R. M.

Savina

S. V.

Fomicheva

T. L.

. 2018. “Basic Model of Tax Federalism in Global Practice: Specific Characteristics and Structural and Functional Organization.” Academy of Accounting and Financial Study 22 (3): 1–9.

84.

Thiessen

2000. “Fiscal federalism in Western European and Selected Other Countries: Centralization or Decentralization? What is Better for Economic Growth?” In DIW Discussion Papers, No. 224. DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

85.

Transparency International. 2025. Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022.

86.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2025. Human Development Index (HDI). https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI.

87.

Utouh

H. M. L.

Kitole

F. A.

. 2025. “The Impact of Fiscal and Monetary Policy on Economic Growth and Structural Transformation in Tanzania.” Cogent Economics & Finance 13 (1): 2499013. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2025.2499013 .

88.

Watts

R. L.

2009. “Spain: A Multi-National federation in disguise?” In Seminario internacional la federalización en España: Los déficit de la cooperación intergubernamental, pp. 1–30.

89.

Williams

2018. Fixed Effects vs Random Effects Models.

90.

World Bank. 2025a. Metadata Glossary. https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/statistical-capacity-indicators/series/5.51.01.10.gdp.

91.

World Bank. 2025b. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.

92.

Yushkov

2015. “Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth: Theory, Empirics, and the Russian Experience.” Russian Journal of Economics 4 (1): 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2016.02.004 .

Tax Federalism and Economic Growth: Revealing the Antagonistic Effect of Different Tax Federalism Indicators

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References