Episodes of large tax differentials between neighboring states create an incentive for cigarette tax avoidance by border crossing. We use unique quarterly panel data at the county level for the state of Kansas on cigarette retailers’ sales tax remittances by distance to a state border to gauge the extent of smuggling activity and revenue effects of increases in cigarette excise tax rates. For quantities sold near an urban, low-tax border, we find sizable effects of higher excise tax rates on sales and cigarette excise tax revenues. Implications for cross-border state revenue leakages are discussed.
BaltagiBadi H.GoelRajeev K.. 2004. “State Tax Changes and Quasi-experimental Price Elasticities of U.S. Cigarette Demand: An Update.”Journal of Economics and Finance28:422–29.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. 2012b. “Deadly Alliance.”How Big Tobacco and Convenience Stores Partner to Market Tobacco Products and Fight Life-saving Policies. Accessed January 29, 2014. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org.
5.
ChaloupkaFrankSafferHenry. 1992. “Clean Indoor Air Laws and the Demand for Cigarettes.”Contemporary Policy Issues10:72–83.
6.
ChaloupkaFrankWarnerKenneth. 2000. “The Economics of Smoking.” In The Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1B, edited by CulyerAnthonyNewhouseJoseph, 1539–627. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
7.
ChiouLesleyMuehleggerErich. 2008. “Crossing the Line: Direct Estimation of Cross-border Cigarette Sales and the Effect on tax Revenue.”The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy8:Article 48.
8.
EmerySherryWhiteMartha M.GilpinElizabethPierceJohn. 2002. “Was the Significant Tax Evasion after the 1999 Fifty Cent Per Pack Cigarette Tax Increase in California?”Tobacco Control11:130–4.
9.
FisherRonald C.2007. State and Local Public Finance. 3rd ed. Mason, OH: Thompson-Southwestern.
10.
GoolsbeeAustanLovenheimMichael F.SlemrodJoel. 2010. “Playing with Fire: Cigarettes, Taxes, and Competition from the Internet.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy2:131–54.
11.
GruberJonathanSenAnindyaStabileMark. 2003. “Estimating Price Elasticities When There Is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada.”Journal of Health Economics22:821–42.
12.
HardingMatthewLeibtagEphraimLovenheimMichael F.. 2012. “The Heterogeneous Geographic and Socioeconomic Incidence of Cigarette Taxes: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan data.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy4:169–98.
13.
LovenheimMichael F.2008. “How Far to the Border? The Extent and Impact of Cross-border Casual Cigarette Smuggling.”National Tax Journal61:7–33.
14.
MerrimanDavid. 2010. “The Micro-geography of Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Littered Cigarette Packs in Chicago.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy2:61–84.
15.
RibislKurtEvansWilliamFeigheryEllen. 2011. “Falling Cigarette Consumption in the United States and the Impact on Tobacco Retailer Employment.” In After Tobacco: What Would Happen if Americans Stopped Smoking? edited by BearmanPeterNeckermanKathrynWrightLeslie, 131–59. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
StehrMark. 2005. “Cigarette Tax Avoidance and Evasion.”Journal of Health Economics24:277–97.
17.
SungHai-YenHuTeh-WeiKeelerTheodore. 1994. “Cigarette Taxation and Demand: An Empirical Model.”Contemporary Economic Policy12:91–100.
18.
The Tax Burden on Tobacco. 2009. Historical Compilation. Vol. 44. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski and Walker.
19.
Tobacco Merchants Association. 2012. Accessed January 1, 2012. http://www.tma.org.
20.
US Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2012. Accessed January 1, 2012. http://www.bea.gov.
21.
YurekliAydaZhangPing. 2000. “The Impact of Clean Indoor-air Laws and Cigarette Smuggling on Demand for Cigarettes: An Empirical Model.”Health Economics9:159–70.
