The use of local options sales taxes (LOSTs) is creating largely unexplored equity concerns with regard to the revenue raising capabilities of different local governments. This article focuses on differences among urban, suburban, and rural counties; the impact of proximity to urban (or retail) centers; and the impact of LOST decisions on tourism rich counties, a new category of local governments. Using data from 2003 to 2009 on all 100 North Carolina counties and a spatial Durbin error panel model, I identify factors relating to LOST revenue raising capacity (RRC). The results indicate that tourism rich counties have the greatest LOST capacity, suburban counties have the least, and there is a penalty for bordering an urban county. However, statistically significant differences in the RRC of the four types of counties disappear once property taxes are included in the mix.
Abdel-RahmanHesham M.1990. “Agglomeration Economies, Types, and Sizes of Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics27:25–45.
2.
ACIR (Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations). 1986. Changing Public Attitudes on Governments and Taxes. Pub. No.S-15. Washington, DC: ACIR.
3.
AfonsoWhitney B.2013. “Diversification toward Stability? The Effect of Local Sales Taxes on Own Source Revenue.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management25:649–74.
4.
AfonsoWhitney B.2014. “Local Sales Taxes as a Means of Increasing Revenues and Reducing Property Tax: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.” Public Budgeting and Finance34:24–43.
5.
AnselinLuc. 1995. “Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA.” Geographical Analysis27:93–115.
6.
AnselinLucArribas-BelDaniel. 2011. “Spatial Fixed Effects and Spatial Dependence.” RePEc Paper No. 1045, GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, Tempe, AZ.
7.
ArtzGeorgeanneStoneKenneth E.. 2003. “An Analysis of the Transfer of Funds from Weak Retail Counties to Strong Retail Counties in Iowa via Local Option Sales Taxes.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8.
BaltagiBadi H.YenYin-Fang. 2014. “Hospital Treatment Rates and Spillover Effects: Does Ownership Matter?” Regional Science and Urban Economics49:193–202.
9.
BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2015. Income (Place of Residence) and Earnings (Place of Work) by Industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
10.
BelGermàMurMelania. 2009. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Privatization and Waste Management Costs: Evidence from Rural Municipalities.” Waste Management29:2772–78.
11.
BurgeGregory S.PiperBrian. 2012. “Strategic Fiscal Interdependence: County and Municipal Adoptions of Local Option Sales Taxes.” National Tax Journal65:387–416.
12.
BurgeGregory S.RogersCynthia L.. 2011. “Local Option Sales Taxes and Consumer Spending Patterns: Fiscal Interdependence under Multi-tiered Local Taxation.” Regional Science and Urban Economics41:46–58.
13.
CarrollDeborah A.2009. “Diversifying Municipal Government Revenue Structures: Fiscal Illusion or Instability?” Public Budgeting and Finance29:27–48.
14.
CorniaGary C.GrimshawScottNelsonRayWaltersLawrence. 2010. “The Effect of Local Option Sales Taxes on Local Sales.” Public Finance Review38:659–81.
15.
CraftMatthew M.2002. “Lost and Found: The Unequal Distribution of Local Option Sales Tax Revenue among Iowa Schools.” Iowa Law Review88:199.
GolgherAndreVossPaul. 2014. How to Interpret the Coefficients of Spatial Models: Spillovers, Direct and Indirect Effects. Working Paper.
19.
GhausA. F. Aisha. 1995. “Optimal Local Sales Tax.” Urban Studies32:1369–81.
20.
HausmanJerry A.1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica46:1251–71.
21.
HouYilinSeligmanJason S.. 2008. “LOST Stability? Consumption Taxes and the Cyclical Variability of State and Local Revenues.” In Proceedings 100th Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, Vol. 100, 467–78. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
22.
IngramDeborah D.FrancoSheila J.. 2012. “NCHS Urban-rural Classification Scheme for Counties.” In Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 154. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23.
JungChanghoon. 2001. “Does the Local-option Sales Tax Provide Property Tax Relief? The Georgia Case.” Public Budgeting and Finance21:73–86.
24.
LawrenceDavid M.MillonziKara A.. 2007. “Revenues. (Article 13).” In County and Municipal Government in North Carolina, edited by LawrenceDavid M., 1–16. Chapel Hill: UNC School of Government.
25.
LewisPaul GeorgeBarbourElisa. 1999. California Cities and the Local Sales Tax. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
26.
MerrymanScott. 2008. USSWM: Stata Module to Provide US State and County Spatial Weight (Contiguity) Matrices. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
27.
MinkoffScott L.2009. “Minding Your Neighborhood: The Spatial Context of Local Redistribution.” Social Science Quarterly90:516–37.
28.
MoranPatrick A. P.1948. “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological)10:243–51.
North Carolina Department of Commerce. 2013b. Labor Force and Employment–Annual. Raleigh, N.C. Accessed October 3, 2013, www.nccommerce.com.
31.
North Carolina Department of Revenue. 2013a. Effective Dates of Local Sales and Use Tax Levies in North Carolina Counties. Raleigh, N.C. Accessed October 3, 2013, www.dornc.com/publications/archive/archive.html.
32.
North Carolina Department of Revenue. 2013b. County revenue data (provided upon request). Raleigh, N.C. Accessed November 12, 2013, http://www.dornc.com/localgovt/index.html.
33.
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer. 2013. Local Government Revenue by Source. Raleigh, N.C. Accessed October 3, 2013, www.nctreasurer.com/Pages/default.aspx.
34.
North Carolina Office of the Governor. 2013. Population and Migration. Raleigh, N.C. Accessed October 11, 2013, www.governor.state.nc.us.
35.
OatesWallace. 1991. “On the Nature and Measurement of Fiscal Illusion: A Survey.” In Studies in Fiscal Federalism, edited by OatesW. E., 431–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
36.
RogersCynthia L.2004. “Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Policy on the Urban Fringe.” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy34:25–50.
37.
RorkJonathan C.2000. “Neighboring Influences in State Tax Determination.” In Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, Vol. 93, 291–94. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
38.
SchwartzJonathan. 1997. “Prisoners of Proposition 13: Sales Taxes, Property Taxes, and the Fiscalization of Municipal Land Use Decisions.” Southern California Law Review71:183–217.
39.
SjoquistDavid L.WalkerMary BethWallaceSally. 2005. “Estimating Differential Responses to Local Fiscal Conditions: A Mixture Model Analysis.” Public Finance Review33:36–61.
40.
SjoquistDavid L.SmithWilliam J.WalkerMary BethWallaceSally. 2007. “An Analysis of the Time to Adoption of Local Sales Taxes: A Duration Model Approach.” Public Budgeting and Finance27:20–40.
TosunMehmet Serkan. 2003. “Cross-border Effects of Alcohol Sales and Intrastate Spatial Tax Incidence.” In Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, Vol. 96, 410–19. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
43.
WachsMartin. 2003. “Local-option Transportation Taxes: Devolution as Revolution.” State Tax Notes28:9–15.
44.
WangWenZhaoZhirong. 2011. “Fiscal Effects of Local Option Sales Taxes on School Facilities Funding: The Case of North Carolina.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management23:507–33.
ZhaoZhirong. 2005. “Motivations, Obstacles, and Resources: The Adoption of the General-purpose Local Option Sales Tax in Georgia Counties.” Public Finance Review33:721–46.
47.
ZhaoZhirongHouYilin. 2008. “Local Option Sales Taxes and Fiscal Disparity: The Case of Georgia Counties.” Public Budgeting and Finance28:39–57.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
