Because excise taxes are independent of product price, rate hikes are predicted to lower the relative cost of high-priced goods, encouraging a shift toward their purchase. Using scanner data on cigarette sales from twenty-nine states over a six-year period, we examine whether tax hikes encourage a flight to quality. Results demonstrate that a one-cent hike in taxes increases retail prices of name-brand and generic cigarettes by exactly one cent. We find no tax-induced substitution toward name brands but a large substitution away from carton to pack sales, suggesting that tax hikes encourage within-product changes in purchase but little between-product substitution.
AlchianArmen A.AllenWilliam R.. 1964. University Economics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
AlmJamesSennogaEdwardSkidmoreMark. 2009. “Perfect Competition, Urbanization and Tax Incidence in the Retail Gasoline Market.”Economic Inquiry47:118–34.
3.
BarzelYoram. 1976. “An Alternative Approach to the Analysis of Taxation.”Journal of Political Economy84:1177–97.
4.
BertonazziEric P.MaloneyMichaelMcCormickRobert E.. 1993. “Some Evidence on the Alchian and Allen Theorem: The Third Law of Demand.”Economic Inquiry31:383–93.
5.
BesleyTimothyRosenHarvey S.. 1999. “Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis.”National Tax Journal52:157–78.
6.
BohanonCecil E.Norman Van CottT.. 1991. “Product quality and taxation: a reconciliation.”Public Finance Review19:233–37.
7.
BronnenbergBart J.KrugerMichael W.MelaCarl F.. 2008. “The IRI Marketing Data Set.”Marketing Science27:745–48.
8.
CameronA. ColinMillerDouglassGelbachJonah B.. 2008. “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Standard Errors.”Review of Economics and Statistics90:414–27.
9.
ChaloupkaFrank J.PaculaRosalie L.. 1999. “Sex and Race Differences in Young People's Responsiveness to Price and Tobacco Control Policies.”Tobacco Control8:373–77.
10.
ChiouLesleyMuehleggerErich J.. 2010. “Consumer Response to Cigarette Tax Changes.”HarvardUniversity Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
11.
ChouinardHayleyPerloffJeffrey M.. 2004. “Incidence of Federal and State Gasoline Taxes.”Economic Letters83:55–60.
12.
CummingsK. MichaelHylandAndrewLewitEugeneShoplandDon. 1997. “Use of Discounted Cigarettes by Smokers in 20 Communities in the United States, 1988-1993.”Tobacco Control6:S25–30.
13.
DeCiccaPhilipKenkelDonald S.LiuFeng. 2010. “Who Pays Cigarette Taxes? The Impact of Consumer Price Search.”National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
14.
EvansWilliam N.FarrellyMatthew C.. 1998. “The Compensating Behavior of Smokers: Taxes, Tar and Nicotine.”RAND Journal of Economics29:578–95.
15.
EvansWilliam N.RingelJeanne S.. 1999. “Can Higher Cigarette Taxes Improve Birth Outcomes?”Journal of Public Economics72:135–54.
16.
EvansWilliam N.RingelJeanne S.StechDiana. 1999. “Tobacco Taxes and Public Policy to Discourage Smoking.” In Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 13, edited by PoterbaJames M., 1–55. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
FarrellyMatthew C.BrayJeremy W.. 1998. “Response to Increases in Cigarette Prices by Race/Ethnicity, Income, and Age Groups.”Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report47:605–9.
18.
FarrellyMatthew C.BrayJeremy W.PechacekTerryWoolleryTrevor. 2001. “Response by Adults to Increases in Cigarette Prices by Sociodemographic Characteristics.”Southern Economic Journal68:156–65.
19.
GoodhueRachael E.LaFranceJeffrey T.SimonLeo K.. 2009. “Wine Taxes, Production, Aging and Quality.”Journal of Wine Economics4:65–83.
20.
GoolsbeeAustan. 2004. “Taxes and the Quality of Capital.”Journal of Public Economics88:519–43.
21.
HansonAndrewSullivanRyan. 2009. “The Incidence of Tobacco Taxation: Evidence from Geographic Micro-Level Data.”National Tax Journal52:677–98.
22.
HardingMatthewLeibtagEphraimLovenheimMichael. 2012. “The Heterogeneous Geographic and Socioeconomic Incidence of Cigarette Taxes: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan Data.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, forthcoming.
JamesJenniferAlstonJulian. 2002. “Taxes and Quality: A Market-Level Analysis.”The Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics44:417–45.
25.
JohnsonTerry. 1978. “Additional Evidence of the Effects of Alternative Taxes on Cigarette Prices.”Journal of Political Economy86:325–28.
26.
KarpLarry S.PerloffJeffrey M.. 1989. “Estimating Market Structure and Tax Incidence: The Japanese Television Market.”Journal of Industrial Economics37:225–39.
27.
KayJohnKeenMichael. 1991. “Product quality under specific and ad valorem taxation.”Public Finance Review19:238–47.
28.
KeelerTheodore E.Teh-weiHuBarnettPaul G.ManningWilliardSungHai-Yen. 1996. “Do Cigarette Producers Price-Discriminate by State?”Journal of Health Economics15:499–512.
29.
KenkelDonald S.2005. “Are Alcohol Tax Hikes Fully Passed Through to Prices? Evidence from Alaska.”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings95:273–77.
30.
LancasterKelvin J.1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.”Journal of Political Economy74:132–57.
31.
LefflerKeith B.1982. “Ambiguous Change in Product Quality.”American Economic Review72:956–67.
32.
NesbitTodd. 2007. “Taxation and Product Quality: The Gasoline Market.”Economic Issues12:1–14.
33.
PoterbaJames M.1996. “Retail Price Reactions to Changes in State and Local Sales Taxes.”National Tax Journal49:165–76.
34.
SobelRussell S.GarrettThomas A.. 1997. “Taxation and Product Quality: New Evidence from Generic Cigarettes.”Journal of Political Economy105:880–87.
35.
SullivanDaniel. 1985. “Testing Hypotheses about Firm Behavior in the Cigarette Industry.”Journal of Political Economy93:586–98.
36.
SumnerMichael T.WardRobert. 1981. “Tax Changes and Cigarette Prices.”Journal of Political Economy89:1261–65.
37.
TaurasJohn A.ChaloupkaFrank J.. 1999. “Price, Clean Indoor Air Laws, and Cigarette Smoking: Evidence from Longitudinal Data for Young Adults.”National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
38.
WooldridgeJeffrey. 2005. “Cluster Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics.”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings93:133–38.
39.
YoungDouglas J.Agnieszka-Kwapisz. 2002. “Alcohol Taxes and Beverage Prices.”National Tax Journal55:57–73.
