In this study, we recast the formula of the social marginal cost of public funds (SMCF) and highlight the role of what we call individual marginal costs of public funds (IMCF). After elaborating on aspects of distributional weights, we estimate the wage elasticity of labor supply and the IMCFs on a household basis. This allows us to explore not only the distributions of the elasticity and the IMCFs but also their relations to household income, which helps us assess the assumptions made in previous studies. Further, we use the SMCF estimates to evaluate the system of personal income taxes in Japan.
AndreoniJamesMillerJohn. 2002. “Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism.”Econometrica70:737–53.
2.
BastaniSpencerBlomquistSörenMichelettoLuca. 2010. “Public Provision of Private Goods, Tagging and Optimal Income Taxation with Heterogeneity in Needs.”CESifo Working Paper No. 3275, Category 1: Public Finance, Munich, Germany.
3.
BloemenHans G.KapteynArie. 2008. “The Estimation of Utility-consistent Labor Supply Models by Means of Simulated Scores.”Journal of Applied Econometrics23:395–422.
4.
BlomquistSören. 1996. “Estimation Methods for Male Labor Supply Functions: How to Take Account of Nonlinear Taxes.”Journal of Econometrics70:383–405.
5.
BlomquistSörenEklöfMatiasNeweyWhitney. 2001. “Tax Reform Evaluation Using Non-parametric Methods: Sweden 1980–1991.”Journal of Public Economics79:543–68.
6.
BlundellRichardMaCurdyThomas. 1999. “Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid, Vol. 3A, 1559–695. New York: North Holland.
BrentRobert J.1984. “Use of Distributional Weights in Cost-benefit Analysis: A Survey of Schools.”Public Finance Review12:213–30.
9.
BrowningMartinMeghirCostas. 1991. “The Effects of Male and Female Labor Supply on Commodity Demands.”Econometrica59:925–51.
10.
DahlbyBev. 1998. “Progressive Taxation and the Social Marginal Cost of Public Funds.”Journal of Public Economics67:105–22.
11.
DahlbyBev. 2008. The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
DawkinsChristinaSrinivasanT. N.WhalleyJohn. 2001. “Calibration.” In Handbook of Econometrics, edited by HeckmanJames J.LeamerEdward, Vol. 5, 3653–703. New York: North Holland.
13.
DeatonAngusMeullbauerJohn. 1980. Economic Theory and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DickensWilliam T.LundbergShelly J.1993. “Hours Restrictions and Labor Supply.”International Economic Review34:169–92.
15.
DodgsonJohn S.1980. “Social Welfare Functions, Income Distribution, and Welfare Weights in the United Kingdom.”The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies48:1–16.
16.
DodgsonJohn S.1983. “Expenditure Function Estimates of the Efficiency and Distributive Impact of Indirect Taxes in the United Kingdom.”European Economic Review20:59–78.
17.
EissaNadaKlevenHenrik JacobsenKreinerClaus Thustrup. 2008. “Evaluation of Four Tax Reforms in the United States: Labor Supply and Welfare Effects for Single Mothers.”Journal of Public Economics92:795–816.
18.
EklöfMatiasSacklénHans. 2000. “The Hausman-MaCurdy Controversy: Why do Results Differ between Studies?”Journal of Human Resources35:204–20.
19.
EricsonPeterFloodLennart. 1997. “A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Labor Supply Models.”Empirical Economics22:431–60.
20.
GahvariFirouz. 2006. “On the Marginal Cost of Public Funds and the Optimal Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Public Economics90:1251–62.
21.
HausmanJerry A.1983. “Stochastic Problems in the Simulation of Labor Supply.” In Behavioral Simulation in Tax Policy Analysis, edited by FeldsteinMartin S., 47–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
KanekoMamoru. 1981. “The Nash Social Welfare Function for a Measure Space of Individuals.”Journal of Mathematical Economics8:173–200.
23.
KanekoMamoruNakamuraNenjiro. 1979. “The Nash Social Welfare Function.”Econometrica47:423–35.
24.
KlevenHenrik JacobsenKreinerClaus Thustrup. 2006. “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Hours of Work versus Labor Force Participation.”Journal of Public Economics90:1955–73.
25.
LiuLiqun. 2004. “The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Shadow Prices of Public Sector Inputs and Outputs.”International Tax and Public Finance11:17–29.
26.
LiuLiqun. 2006. “Combining Distributional Weights and the Marginal Cost of Funds: The Concept of Person-Specific Marginal Cost of Funds.”Public Finance Review34:60–79.
27.
MaysharJoram. 1990. “On Measures of Excess Burden and Their Application.”Journal of Public Economics43:263–89.
28.
MusgraveRichardThinTun. 1948. “Income Tax Progression, 1928–48.”Journal of Political Economy56:498–514.
29.
PencavelJohn. 1986. “Labor Supply of Men: A Survey.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by AshenfelterOrleyLayardRichard, Vol. 1, 3–102. New York: North Holland.
30.
PoapongsakornNiponCharnvitayapongKovitLaovakulDuangmaneeSuksiriserekulSomchaiDahlbyBev. 2000. “A Cost-benefit Analysis of the Thailand Taxpayer Survey.”International Tax and Public Finance7:63–82.
31.
RobertsKevin. 1980. “Price-independent Welfare Prescriptions.”Journal of Public Economics13:277–97.
SandmoAgnar. 1998. “Redistribution and the Marginal Cost of Public Funds.”Journal of Public Economics70:365–82.
34.
ShovenJohn B.WhalleyJohn. 1992. Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
SlemrodJoelYitzhakiShlomo. 1996. “The Cost of Taxation and the Marginal Efficiency Cost of Funds.”International Monetary Fund Staff Papers43:172–98.
36.
SnowArthurWarrenRonald S.Jr1996. “The Marginal Welfare Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Estimates.”Journal of Public Economics61:289–305.
37.
Van SoestArthur. 1995. “Structural Models of Family Labor Supply: A Discrete Choice Approach.”Journal of Human Resources30:63–88.
38.
WooldridgeJeffery M., 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
YamadaKen. 2008. “Estimating Labour Supply and Time Allocation by Married Japanese Men and Unmarried Japanese Women.”Applied Economics Letters15:659–66.
40.
YitzhakiShlomo. 2003. “Cost-benefit Analysis and the Distributional Consequences of Government Projects.”National Tax Journal56:319–36.
41.
ZabalzaAntoni. 1983. “The CES Utility Function, Non-linear Budget Constraints and Labor Supply: Results on Female Participation and Hours.”Economic Journal93:312–30.
42.
ZiliakJames P.KniesnerThomas J.2005. “The Effect of Income Taxation on Consumption and Labor Supply.”Journal of Labor Economics23:769–96.
