This article considers the relationship between labor income taxes and output. An illustrative model indicates that the sign of the output effect of labor taxation policies is ambiguous and depends not only on the technology parameters but also on the taxation level. The empirical evidence for fifteen Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries over the period 1974—97 shows that the effect is heterogeneous across countries both in the short run and in the long run when considering the average tax rate. We also find a common positive and significant long-run relationship for the marginal tax rate.
Agell, Jonas, Thomas Lindh, and Henry Ohlsson.1997. Growth and the public sector: A critical review essay. European Journal of Political Economy13:33-51.
2.
Agell, Jonas, Henry Ohlsson, and Peter Skogman Thoursie .2006. Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A comment. European Economic Review50:211-8.
3.
Attanasio, Orazio, Lucio Picci, and Antonello E. Scorcu .2000. Saving, growth and investment: A macroeconomic analysis using a panel of countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics82:182-211.
4.
Barro, Robert J.1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth . Journal of Political Economy98:S103-25.
5.
Barro, Robert J.2000. Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth5:5-32.
6.
Bassanini, Andrea, and Stefano Scarpetta .2002. Does human capital matter for growth in OECD countries? A pooled mean-group approach. Economics Letters74:399-405.
7.
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip E. Keefer, and Patrich Walsh.2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15:165-76.
8.
Blackburne, Edward F., and Frank, Mark W.2007. Estimation of non-stationary panels. Stata Journal7:197-208.
9.
Bleaney, Michael, Norman Gemmell, and Richard Kneller .2001. Testing the endogenous growth model: Public expenditure, taxation and growth over the long-run. Canadian Journal of Economics34:36-57.
10.
Blundell, Richard, Alan Duncan, and Costas Meghir.1998. Estimating labor supply responses using tax reforms. Econometrica66:827-61.
11.
Daveri, Francesco, and Guido Tabellini .2000. Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries. Economic Policy15:47-104.
12.
Easterly, William, and Sergio T. Rebelo .1993. Fiscal policy and economic growth. An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics32:417-58.
13.
Fuest, Clemens, and Bernd Huber.2000. Is tax progression really good for employment? A model with endogenous hours of work. Labor Economics7:79-93.
14.
Kleibergen, Frank, and Mark E. Schaffer .2007. Ranktest: Module for testing the rank of a matrix using the Kleibergen-Paap rk statistic, Statistical Software Components, S456865, Boston College Department of Economics , Boston.
15.
Lee, Young, and Roger H. Gordon .2005. Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics89:1027-43.
16.
Leibfritz, Willi, John Thornton, and Alexandra Bibbee .1997. Taxation and economic performance . OECD working papers n. 176, Paris.
17.
Li, Wenli, and Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte.2004. Progressive taxation and long-run growth. The American Economic Review94:1705-16.
18.
Lockwood, Benjamin, and Alan Manning.1993. Wage setting and the tax system. Journal of Public Economics52:1-29.
19.
Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, and Aurelia Bengochea-Morancho.2004. Pooled Mean Group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Economic Letters82:121-6.
20.
Myles, Gareth D.2000. Taxation and economic growth. Fiscal Studies21:141-68.
21.
Pesaran, Hashem M., and Smith, Ron P.1995. Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics68:79-113.
22.
Pesaran, Hashem M., Shin, Yongcheol, and Smith, Ron P.1999. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association94:621-34.
