We investigate the price effect of an excise tax in a duopoly setting. Previous studies have considered the Cournot and Bertrand models but ignore the Cournot–Bertrand model in which one firm competes in output and the other firm competes in price. This omission is important because Cournot–Bertrand behavior is observed in the real world, and the Cournot–Bertrand model provides dramatically different results. Unlike in the Cournot and Bertrand models, we find that firms in the same industry have different pass-through rates in the Cournot–Bertrand model even when they face identical demand and cost conditions. This provides another reason why tax incidence policy is so complex.
AlmJamesSennogaEdwardSkidmoreMark. 2009. “Perfect Competition, Urbanization and Tax Incidence in the Retail Gasoline Market.” Economic Inquiry47:118–34.
2.
AmirRabahGriloIsabel. 1999. “Stackelberg versus Cournot Equilibrium.” Games and Economic Behavior26:1–21.
3.
BergmanU. MichaelHansenNiels Lynggård. 2013. “Are Excise Taxes on Beverages Fully Passed through to Prices? The Danish Evidence.” Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen. Working Paper.
4.
ChengLeonard. 1985. “Inverting Systems of Demand Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory37:202–10.
5.
ChiouLesleyMuehleggerEric. 2010. “Consumer Response to Cigarette Excise Tax Changes.” Boston, MA: Harvard University. Working Paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
6.
FalbeJenniferRohasNadiaGrummonAnnaMadsenKristine A.. 2015. “Higher Retail Prices of Sugar-sweetened Beverages 3 Months after Implementation of an Excise Tax in Berkeley, California.” American Journal of Public Health105:2194–201.
7.
FullertonDonMetcalfGilbert E.. 2002. “Tax Incidence.” In Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 4, edited by AuerbachA. J.FeldbergM., 1787–872. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
8.
HamiltonStephen F.1999. “Tax Incidence under Oligopoly: A Comparison of Policy Approaches.” Journal of Public Economics71:233–45.
9.
HaraguchiJunichiMatsumuraToshihiro. 2014. “Price versus Quantity in a Mixed Duopoly with Foreign Penetration.” Economics Letters68:338–53.
10.
KatzM.RosenH.. 1985. “Tax Analysis in an Oligopoly Model.” Public Finance Quarterly13:3–19.
11.
KenkelDonald. 2005. “Are Alcohol Tax Hikes Fully Passed through to Prices? Evidence from Alaska.” American Economic Review95:273–77.
12.
KlempererPaulMeyerMargaret. 1986. “Price Competition vs. Quantity Competition: The Role of Uncertainty.” Rand Journal of Economics17:618–38.
13.
KopelMichael. 1996. “Simple and Complex Adjustment Dynamics in Cournot Duopoly Models.” Chaos, Solutions and Fractals7:2031–48.
14.
KotsogiannisChristosSerfesKonstantinos. 2014. “The Comparison of ad valorem and Specific Taxation under Uncertainty.” Journal of Public Economic Theory16:48–68.
15.
KrepsDavidScheinkmanJose. 1983. “Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes.” Bell Journal of Economics14:326–37.
16.
MaggiGiovanni. 1996. “Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition.” American Economic Review86:237–258.
17.
MylesGareth D.1995. Public Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
SchroederElizabethTremblayVictor J.. 2014. “Union Bargaining in an Oligopoly Market with Cournot–Bertrand Competition: Welfare and Policy Implications.” Economies2:95–208.
19.
SchroederElizabethTremblayVictor J.. 2015. “A Reappraisal of Strategic Trade Policy.” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade15:435–42.
20.
SchroederElizabethTremblayVictor J.. 2016. “Strategic Advertising Policy in International Oligopoly Markets.” The International Trade Journal30:3–13.
21.
SinghNirvikarVivesXavier. 1984. “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly.” Rand Journal of Economics15:546–54.
22.
SternN.1987. “The Effects of Taxation, Price Control and Government Contracts in Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition.” Journal of Public Economics32:133–58.
23.
SullivanRyan S.DutkowskyDonald H.. 2012. “The Effect of Cigarette Taxation on Prices: An Empirical Analysis Using Local-level Data.” Public Finance Review40:687–711.
24.
TremblayCarol HortonTremblayVictor J.. 2011. “The Cournot–Bertrand Model and the Degree of Product Differentiation.” Economics Letters111:233–35.
25.
TremblayVictor J.PolaskyStephen. 2002. “Advertising with Subjective Horizontal and Vertical Product Differentiation.” Review of Industrial Organization20:253–65.
26.
TremblayVictor J.TremblayCarol Horton. 2005. The U.S. Brewing Industry: Data and Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
TremblayVictor J.TremblayCarol Horton. 2012. New Perspectives on Industrial Organization: With Contributions from Behavioral Economics and Game Theory. New York: Springer.
28.
TremblayVictor J.TremblayCarol HortonIsariyawongseKosin. 2013a. “Cournot and Bertrand Competition When Advertising Rotates Demand: The Case of Honda and Scion.” International Journal of the Economics of Business20:125–41.
29.
TremblayVictor J.TremblayCarol HortonIsariyawongseKosin. 2013b. “Endogenous Timing and Strategic Choice: The Cournot–Bertrand Model.” Bulletin of Economic Research65:332–42.
30.
TremblayCarol HortonTremblayMark J.TremblayVictor J.. 2011. “A General Cournot–Bertrand Model with Homogeneous Goods.” Theoretical Economics Letters1:38–40.
31.
VivesXavier. 1999. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
