This article considers appropriate debt-funding strategies for state and municipal governments in the presence of a positive, tax-exempt term premium. In this context, the term premium measures the additional expected funding cost from issuing fixed-rate debt as opposed to issuing floating-rate debt. The correlation between a measure of income from rate-sensitive assets and the tax-exempt floating rate is the principal focus of the analysis. A single-period framework is used to identify the most important information required to design the optimal proportion of tax-exempt floating-rate debt for a municipal government. From this analysis, there are several compelling reasons for municipal entities to increase the quantity of floating-rate debt. This framework is used to assess the optimal state government debt maturity structure based on historical data.
Boothe, Paul, and Bradford Reid. 1992. Debt management objectives for a small open economy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking24 (1): 43-60.
2.
Brooks, Robert. 1999. Interest rate modeling and the risk premiums in interest rate swaps. Charlottesville, VA: The Research Foundation of the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts.
3.
Brooks, Robert. 2002. The cost of tax policy uncertainty: Evidence from the municipal swap market. Journal of Fixed Income12 (3): 71-87.
4.
Brooks, Robert, and Pradeep Kumar. 1997. Optimal currency composition of external debt via surplus optimization: Case for less developed countries. Emerging Markets Quarterly1 (4): 68-75.
5.
Chalmers, John M. R.1998. Default risk cannot explain the Muni puzzle: Evidence from municipal bonds that are secured by U.S. Treasury obligations. Review of Financial Studies11 (2): 281-308.
6.
Cohen, K. J., and F. S. Hammer. 1965. Optimal coupon schedules for municipal bonds. Management Science12 (1): 68-82.
7.
Cohen, K. J., and F. S. Hammer. 1966. Optimal level debt schedules for municipal bonds. Management Science13 (3): 161-166.
8.
Ezra, D. Don. 1991. Asset allocation by surplus optimization. Financial Analysts Journal47 (5): 51-57.
9.
Fama, Eugene F.1976. Forward rates as predictors of future spot interest rates. Journal of Financial Economics3 (4): 361-377.
10.
Fama, Eugene F.1984. The information in the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics13 (4): 509-528.
11.
Fortune, Peter. 1991. The municipal bond market, part I: Politics, taxes, and yields. New England Economic Review, September, 13-36.
12.
Green, Richard C.1993. A simple model of the taxable and tax-exempt yield curves. Review of Financial Studies6 (2): 233-264.
13.
Grove, Myron A.1966. A model of the maturity profile of the balance sheet. Metroeconomics18 (1): 40-55.
14.
Jordan, B. D., and R. D. Jorgensen. 1998. Measuring the benefit of a bond refunding. Financial Practice and Education8 (1): 29-36.
15.
Kalotay, A. J., and G. O. Williams. 1992. The valuation and management of bonds with sinking fund provisions. Financial Analysts Journal48 (2): 59-67.
16.
Koch, Timothy W., and Duane Stock. 1997. An analysis of implied tax rates on long-term taxable and tax-exempt bonds. Journal of Business Research38 (2): 171-176.
17.
Leibowitz, Martin L., Stanley Kogelman, and Lawrence N. Bader. 1992. Asset performance and surplus control: A dual-shortfall approach. Journal of Portfolio Management18(2):28-37.
18.
MacBeth, James D., David C. Emanuel, and Craig E. Heatter. 1994. An investment strategy for defined benefit plans. Financial Analysts Journal50 (3): 34-41.
19.
McNulty, James E., and Stephen D. Smith. 1998. Correlated interest rate risk and funding strategies for nonfinancial firms. The Financial Review33 (1): 31-44.
20.
Modigliani, Franco, and Merton Miller. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review48 (3): 261-297.
21.
Modigliani, Franco, and Merton Miller. 1963. Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review53 (3): 433-443.
22.
Morris, J. R.1976. On corporate debt maturity strategies. Journal of Finance31 (1): 29-37.
23.
Peskin, Michael W.1997. Asset allocation and funding policy for corporate-sponsored defined-benefit pension plans. Journal of Portfolio Management23 (2): 66-73.
24.
Poterba, James M.1986. Explaining the yield spread between taxable and tax-exempt bonds: The role of expected tax policy. In Studies in state and local public finance, edited by Harvey S. Rosen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Poterba, James M.1989. Tax reform and the market for tax-exempt debt. Working Paper No. 2900, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
26.
Puelz, Amy V., and Sang M. Lee. 1992. A multiple-objective programming technique for structuring tax-exempt serial revenue debt issues. Management Science38 (8): 1186-1200.
27.
Sharpe, William F., and Lawrence G. Tint. 1990. Liabilities—A new approach. Journal of Portfolio Management16 (2): 5-10.
28.
Slemrod, Joel, and Timothy Greimel. 1999. Did Steve Forbes scare the U.S. municipal bond market?Journal of Public Economics74 (1): 81-96.
29.
Sorensen, Eric H.1983. Who puts the slope in the municipal yield curve?Journal of Portfolio Management9 (4): 61-65.
30.
Stanhouse, Bryan, and Duane Stock. 2001. The optimal redemption schedule of serial municipal debt: A dynamic reconciliation of revenues, reinvestment rates and the term structure. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting16 (1): 5-32.
