The authors examine data on giving and volunteering to determine whether public provision of social services and other public goods affects donations of time and money and provides evidence of crowding out. They find a negative and statistically significant relationship between government spending and donations of money and time. They also find that volunteers have demographic and other characteristics that are associated with high values of time and money.
Andreoni, James. 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy97:1447-1458.
2.
Andreoni, James. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal100:464-477.
3.
Barro, Robert. 1974. Are government bonds net wealth?Journal of Political Economy82:1095-1117.
4.
Bergstrom, Theodore, L. Blume, and HalVarian. 1986. On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics29:25-49.
5.
Brown, Eleanor. 1997. Altruism towards groups: The charitable provision of private goods. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26:175-184.
6.
Brown, Eleanor, and Hamilton Lankford. 1992. Gifts of money and gifts of time: Estimating the effects of tax prices and available time. Journal of Public Economics47:321-341.
7.
Cnaan, Ram, A. Kasternakis, and R. Wineburg. 1993. Religious people, religious congregations and volunteerism in human services: Is there a link?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22:33-51.
8.
Congressional Budget Office. 1986. Trends in family income: 1970-1986.Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
9.
Day, K. M., and R. A. Devlin. 1996. Volunteering and crowding out: Canadian econometric evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics29 (1): 37-53.
10.
Department of Commerce. 1996. Government finances. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
11.
Freeman, Richard. 1997. Working for nothing. Journal of Labor Economics15:S140-S166.
12.
Handy, Femida, Ram A. Cnaan, Jeffrey L. Brudney, Ugo Meijs Ascoli, C. M. P. Lucas, and Shree Ranade. 2000. Public perception of who is a volunteer: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross cultural perspective. Voluntas11 (1): 45-65.
13.
Independent Sector. 1986. Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1986.Princeton, NJ: The Gallop Organization [producer].
14.
Independent Sector. 1996. Giving and volunteering, 1996. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization [producer]. Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research [distributor].
15.
Kingma, B.1989. An accurate measure of the crowd-out effect, income effect, and price effect for charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy97:1197-1207.
16.
Menchik, Paul, and Burton Weisbrod. 1987. The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Public Economics32:153-183.
17.
Roberts, R.1984. A positive model of private charity and public transfers. Journal of Political Economy92:136-148.
18.
Rockefeller Brothers Fund, New York, NY.
19.
Steinberg, Richard. 1986. The revealed objective functions of nonprofit firms. The RAND Journal of Economics17 (4): 508-526.
20.
Steinberg, Richard. 1987. Voluntary donations and public expenditures in the federalist system. American Economic Review77 (1): 24-36.
21.
Steinberg, Richard. 1993. Public policy and the performance of nonprofit organization: A general framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly26 (1): 13-32.
22.
Steinberg, Richard, and Gray H. Bradford. 1993. The role of nonprofit enterprise in 1992: Hansman revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly22 (4):297-316.
23.
Steinberg, Richard, Patrick Rooney, Kathy Steinberg, and Paul Schervish. 2001. Amethodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly30:551-568.
24.
Warr, P.1982. Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. Journal of Public Economics19:131-138.
