I investigate the relation between corruption and the composition of state government spending in the United States. The analysis reveals that the United States is not immune to the adverse effects of corruption documented in cross-country studies. Corruption lowers the share of state government spending devoted to higher education and raises the share of spending devoted to other and unallocable budget items. These results are robust to the use of political variables to instrument for corruption. There is also some evidence that corruption lowers the share of spending on corrections and public welfare and raises the share of spending on health and hospitals, housing and community development, and natural resources.
AdesAlbertoTellaRafael Di. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption.”The American Economic Review89:982–93.
2.
AghionPhillipeBoustanLeahHoxbyCarolineVandenbusscheJerome. 2009. The Causal Impact of Education on Economic Growth: Evidence from United States. Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
3.
AltJamesLassenDavid. 2008. “Political and Judicial Checks on Corruption: Evidence from American State Governments.”Economics and Politics20:33–61.
4.
AltJamesLassenDavid. 2012. “Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from the American States.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. First published online November 18, 2012. doi:10.1093/jleo/ews036
5.
BaraldiAnna. 2008. “Effects of Electoral Rules, Political Competition and Corruption on the Size and Composition of Government Consumption Spending: An Italian Regional Analysis.”The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy8:1–37.
6.
BaumChristopherSchafferMarkStillmanStevenWigginsVince. 2006. “Overid: Stata Module to Calculate Tests of Overidentifying Restrictions after ivreg, ivreg2, ivprobit, ivtobit, reg3.”Date accessed is Jan 22, 2014. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s396802.html.
7.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPraveen. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CordisAdriana. 2009. “Judicial Checks on Corruption in the United States.”Economics of Governance10:375–401.
9.
CordisAdrianaMilyoJeffrey. 2013. Measuring Public Corruption in the United States: Evidence from Administrative Records of Federal Prosecutions. Working paper. Columbia: University of Missouri.
10.
CordisAdrianaWarrenPatrick. In press. “Sunshine as Disinfectant: The Effect of State Freedom of Information Act Laws on Public Corruption.” Working paper. Journal of Public Economics.
11.
DelavalladeClara. 2006. “Corruption and Distribution of Public Spending in Developing Countries.”Journal of Economics and Finance30:222–39.
12.
EhrlichIsaacLuiFrancis. 1999. “Bureaucratic Corruption and Endogenous Economic Growth.”Journal of Political Economy107:270–93.
13.
FismanRaymondGattiRoberta. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from U.S. Federal Transfer Programs.”Public Choice113:25–35.
14.
GlaeserEdwardSaksRaven. 2006. “Corruption in America.”Journal of Public Economics90:1053–72.
15.
GoelRajeevNelsonMichael. 2011. “Government Fragmentation versus Fiscal Decentralization and Corruption.”Public Choice148:471–90.
16.
GuptaSanjeevDavoodiHamidAlonso-TermeRosa. 2002. “Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?”Economics of Governance3:23–45.
17.
GuptaSanjeevdeMelloLuizSharanRaju. 2001. “Corruption and Military Spending.”European Journal of Political Economy17:749–77.
18.
HabibMohsinZurawickiLeon. 2002. “Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment.”Journal of International Business Studies33:291–307.
19.
HansenLars. 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.”Econometrica50:1029–54.
20.
HauptHarryOberhoferWalter. 2000. “Estimation of Constrained Singular Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models.”Econometric Society World Congress. Contributed Papers 0398.
21.
HessamiZohal. 2010. Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure—Evidence from the OECD Countries. Working paper. Konstanz, Germany: University of Konstanz.
22.
JainArvind. 2001. “Corruption: A Review.”Journal of Economic Surveys15:71–121.
23.
JohnsonNoelLaFountainCourtneyYamarikSteven. 2011. “Corruption Is Bad for Growth (even in the United States).”Public Choice147:377–93.
24.
LambsdorffJohann. 2003. “How Corruption Affects Persistent Capital Flows.”Economics of Governance4:229–43.
25.
LeesonPeterSobelRussell. 2008. “Weathering Corruption.”Journal of Law and Economics51:667–81.
26.
LeiteCarlosWeidmannJens. 2002. “Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption and Economic Growth.” In Governance, Corruption and Economic Performance, edited by AbedGeorgeGuptaSanjeev, 159–96. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
27.
LevittSteven. 2002. “Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effects of Police on Crime: Reply.”The American Economic Review92:1244–50.
28.
MauroPaolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.”Quarterly Journal of Economics110:681–712.
29.
MauroPaolo. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.”Journal of Public Economics69:263–79.
30.
McCormickRobertTollisonRobert. 1981. Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy, An Inquiry into the Interest-group Theory of Government. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.
31.
MeierKennethHolbrookThomas. 1992. “I Seen my Opportunities and I Took ‘Em: Political Corruption in the American States.”Journal of Politics54:135–55.
32.
MéonPierreSekkatKhalid. 2005. “Does Corruption Grease or Sand the Wheels of Growth?”Public Choice122:69–97.
33.
MilliganKevinMorettiEnricoOreopoulosPhilip. 2004. “Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom.”Journal of Public Economics88:1667–95.
34.
MoPak. 2001. “Corruption and Economic Growth.”Journal of Comparative Economics29:66–79.
35.
OlkenBenjamin. 2009. “Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality.”Journal of Public Economics93:950–64.
36.
TanziVitoDavoodiHamid. 1997. Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth. Working paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
37.
ZellnerArnoldTheilHenri. 1962. “Three-stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations.”Econometrica30:54–78.
