This article examines the convergence of state and local fiscal policies among the United States. Based on the standard assumptions of the neoclassical growth model with a public sector, it is shown that state and local fiscal policies have indeed converged over the past 20 years, at a rate substantially faster than real per capita gross state product. These results are contradictory to the Tiebout hypothesis.
Annala, C., and S. Perez.2001. Convergence of public capital investment among the United States, 1977-1996. Public Finance and Management1 (2). Retrieved from http://spaef.com/PFM_PUB/v1n2.html
2.
Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin .1995. Economic growth. Advanced Series in Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Baumol, W.1986. Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare. American Economic Review76:1072-85.
4.
Greene, W.1997. Econometric analysis. 3d ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
5.
Hoover, K., and S. Perez.2000. Truth and robustness in cross-country growth regressions. Unpublished manuscript, Washington State University.
6.
Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, and D. Weil.1992. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics107:407-37.
7.
Solow, R.1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics70:65-94.
8.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-24.
9.
Vohra, R.1998. Convergence (divergence) and the U.S. States. Atlantic Economic Journal26:372-78.
10.
Wasylenko, M.1997. Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. New England Economic Review March/April: 37-52.
11.
Wildasin, D.1988. Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition. Journal of Public Economics35:229-40.
12.
Yu, W., M. Wallace, and C. Nardinelli.1991. State growth rates: Taxes, spending, and catching up. Public Finance Quarterly19:80-93.
