Few would question that the Great Recession and its aftermath have proved challenging for government financial management. This depressed economic environment has renewed interest in research involving the accumulation and use of the unassigned fund balance. In this study, we use data on Florida cities to examine the factors affecting the unassigned fund balance before, during, and after the Great Recession. According to our findings, building and maintaining savings at high levels have become routine for Florida cities, irrespective of their government form and the economic conditions they face. This research also provides evidence that Florida cities adapt their savings accumulation strategy, depending on the level of unassigned fund balance they are targeting. As a result, Florida cities consider different factors when accumulating unassigned fund balance above, rather than within or below, the minimum range suggested by the Government Finance Officers Association.
AmmonsDavid N.SmithKarl W.StenbergCarl W.. 2012. “The Future of Local Government: Will Current Stresses Bring Major, Permanent Changes?” State & Local Government Review44:64S–75S.
2.
ArapisTheodore. 2013. “Enterprise Fund Transfers and Their Impact on Governmental Spending and Revenue Patterns of Georgia Municipalities.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management25:446–73.
3.
BahlRoy. 1985. “Financing State and Local Governments in the 1980s.” Land Economics61:332–35.
BrooksRichard C.MeadDean Michael. 2010. “Statement 54: Implementation Problems and Solutions.” Journal of Government Financial Management59:24–31.
6.
CameronColin A.PravinTrivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChapmanJeffrey. 2008. “State and Local Fiscal Sustainability: The Challenges.” Public Administration Review68:S115–31.
8.
DiLorenzoThomas J.1982. “Utility Profits, Fiscal Illusion, and Local Public Expenditures.” Public Choice38:243–52.
9.
DouglasJames W.GaddieRonald K.. 2002. “State Rainy Day Funds and Fiscal Crises: Rainy Day Funds and the 1990–1991 Recession Revisited.” Public Budgeting & Finance22:19–30.
10.
DuncombeWilliamHouYilin. 2014. “The Savings Behavior of Special Purpose Governments: A Panel Study of New York School Districts.” Public Budgeting & Finance34:1–23.
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2008. “State and Local Governments: Persistent Fiscal Challenges Will Likely Emerge Within the Next Decade.” GAO-07-1080SP. Accessed February 15, 2016. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d071080sp.pdf.
13.
GauthierStefan J.2009. “Fund Balance: New and Improved.” Government Finance Review25:11–14.
14.
GianakisJerrySnowDouglas. 2007. “The Implementation and Utilization of Stabilization Funds by Local Governments in Massachusetts.” Public Budgeting & Finance27:86–103.
GreenblattAlan. 2010. “Local Squeeze: The Budget Pain Felt by State Lawmakers for the Past Two Years Has Made its Way to Cities and Counties.” National Conference of State Legislatures. Accessed February 10, 2016. http://www.ncsl.org/research/fiscal-policy/local-squeeze.aspx.
17.
HembreeHollySheltonMichaelTyerCharlie. 1999. “Benchmarking and Municipal Reserves: Theory versus Practice.” Public Management Magazine81:16–21.
18.
HendrickRebecca. 2006. “The Role of Slack in Local Government Finance.” Public Budgeting & Finance26:14–46.
19.
HitchcockHenry H.CoatesJoseph F.. 1985. The Future of State and Local Government as Seen in the Futures Literature. Washington, DC: Academy for State and Local Government.
20.
HoeneChristopher W.PaganoMichael A.. 2011. Research Brief on America’s Cities: City Fiscal Condition in 2011. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
21.
HouYilin. 2003. “What Stabilizes State General Fund Spending during Downturns: Budget Stabilization Fund, General Fund Unreserved Undesignated Balance, or Both?” Public Budgeting and Finance23(3):64–91.
22.
HouYilin. 2004. “Budget Stabilization Fund: Structural Features of the Enabling Legislation and Balance Levels.” Public Budgeting & Finance26:38–64.
23.
ICMA (International City/County Management Association). 1979. New Worlds of Service: Report to the Profession from the ICMA Committee on Future Horizons. Washington, DC: ICMA
24.
JoycePhilip G.2001. “What’s So Magical About Five Percent? A Nationwide Look at Factors that Influence the Optimal Size of State Rainy Day Funds.” Public Budgeting & Finance21:28–48.
25.
JoycePhillip G.ScottPattison. 2010. “Public Budgeting in 2020: Return to Equilibrium, or Continued Mismatch between Demands and Resources?” Public Administration Review70:S24–32.
26.
KlohaPhilipWeissertCarol S.KleineRobert. 2005. “Someone to Watch Over Me: State Monitoring of Local Fiscal Conditions.” American Review of Public Administration35:236–55.
27.
KnightBrianLevinsonArik. 1999. “Rainy Day Funds and State Government Savings.” National Tax Journal52:459–72.
28.
LevineCharles H.1978. “Organizational Decline and Cutback Management.” Public Administration Review38:316–25.
29.
LevineCharles H.1979. “More on Cutback Management: Hard Questions for Hard Times.” Public Administration Review39:179–83.
30.
LevineCharles H.Rubin IreneS.George GWolohojian. 1982. “Managing Organizational Retrenchment Preconditions, Deficiencies, and Adaptations in the Public Sector.” Administration & Society14:101–36.
31.
MarloweJustin. 2004. “The Local Fund Balance: Explanations and Implications.” Dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
32.
MarloweJustin. 2005. “Fiscal Slack and Counter-cyclical Expenditure Stabilization: A First Look at the Local Level.” Public Budgeting & Finance25:48–72.
33.
MarloweJustin. 2006. “Fund Balance, Working Capital, and Net Assets.” Public Administration and Public Policy-New York-119:357.
34.
MarloweJustin. 2012. “Fiscal Slack, Reserves and Rainy Day Funds.” In Handbook of Local Government Fiscal Health, edited by LevineHelisseScorsoneEric A.JusticeJonathan B., 321–43. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
35.
MartinLawrence L.LeveyRichardCawleyJenna. 2012. “The New Normal for Local Government.” State & Local Government Review44:17S–28S.
36.
MattoonRichard. 2004. “Creating a National State Rainy Day Fund: A Modest Proposal to Improve Future State Fiscal Performance.” In Proceedings: Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 118–24. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
37.
McNicholElizabethLavIris. 2009. “New Fiscal Year Brings No Relief from Unprecedented State Budget Problems.” Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Accessed February 8, 2016. http://www.606institute.com/images/CBPP_9-8-08sfp.pdf.
38.
MusgraveRichard A.1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
NavinJohn C.NavinLeo. 1994. “An Evaluation of State Budget Stabilization Funds among Midwestern States.” Growth and Change25:445–46.
41.
OatesWallace E.1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcout Brace Jovanovich.
42.
PollockRichardSuyderhoudJack P.. 1986. “The Role of Rainy Day Funds in Achieving Fiscal Stability.” National Tax Journal4:485–97.
43.
SheltonMichaelTyerCharlie. With the assistance of Holly Hembree. 2000. “Local Government Reserve Funds and Fund Balance: Some Applications of Business Concepts.” Municipal Finance Journal21: 1–18.
SobelRussellHolcombeRandall G.. 1996. “The Impact of State Rainy Day Funds in Easing State Fiscal Crises during the 1990-1991 Recession.” Public Budgeting & Finance25:28–48.
StewartLa Shonda M.2009. “Examining Factors that Impact Mississippi Counties’ Unreserved Fund Balance during Relative Resource Abundance and Relative Resource Scarcity.” Public Budgeting & Finance29:45–73.
48.
StewartLa Shonda M.2011. “Governmental Influence on Unreserved Fund Balances for Mississippi Counties.” Journal of Accounting, Budgeting, and Financial Management23:478–506.
49.
StewartLa Shonda M.PhillipsJeremey N.ModlinSteve. 2013. “An Evaluation of the Connection between Economic Volatility and Governmental Savings Levels for Illinois, North Carolina, and Mississippi Counties.” Public Finance and Management13:361–82.
50.
StraussRobert P.WertzKenneth L.. 1976. “The Impact of Municipal Electric Profits on Local Public Finance.” National Tax Journal29:22–30.
51.
SvaraJames H.1990. Official Leadership in the City: Patterns of Conflict and Cooperation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
TyerCharlie B.1989. “Municipal Enterprises and Taxing and Spending Policies: Public Avoidance and Fiscal Illusions.” Public Administration Review49:249–56.
53.
TyerCharlie B.1993. “Local Government Reserve Funds: Policy Alternatives and Political Strategies.” Public Budgeting and Finance13:75–84.
54.
UCF (University of Central Florida). 2014. Florida & Metro Forecast. Institute of Economic Competitiveness. Accessed February 15, 2016. https://issuu.com/ucfbusiness.
55.
VanyolosIstavan. 2009. “The Role of Rainy Day Funds in Local Spending—Evidence from Florida Counties.” Paper presented at the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management, 2009 Annual Conference.
56.
VasheDavid J.BradWilliams. 1987. “Optimal Governmental Budgeting Contingency Reserve Funds.” Public Budgeting and Finance7:66–82.
57.
VogtJohn. 1978. “Operating Revenue of North Carolina Municipal Governments: Overview and Comparison of Electric and Nonelectric Cities.” Popular Government44:11–20.
58.
WagnerGary A.2003. “Are State Budget Stabilization Funds Only the Illusion of Savings? Evidence from Stationary Panel Data.” Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance43: 213–38.
59.
WangWenHouYilin. 2012. “Do Local Governments Save and Spend across Budget Cycles? Evidence from North Carolina.” American Review of Public Administration42:152–69.
60.
WolkoffMichael J.1987. “An Evaluation of Municipal Rainy Day Funds.” Public Budgeting & Finance7:52–63.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
