We apply spatial econometric techniques to models of state and local fiscal policy convergence. Our work extends the work of Scully and Annala in much the same way that Rey and Montouri extended the literature on income convergence among U.S. states. Our results indicate that most fiscal policies have been converging and that the growth paths of state and local fiscal policies are not independent. In addition, we find that total expenditures have been converging faster than output, whereas total tax revenues have been converging slower than output. Our models further demonstrate that state expenditure growth is dependent on expenditure growth in economically and demographically similar states, while output growth and revenue growth in a state are dependent on output growth and revenue growth, respectively, in contiguous states.
Abreu, Maria, Henri L.F. De Groot , and Raymond J. G. M. Florax.2004. Space and growth: A survey of empirical evidence and methods. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, the Netherlands.
2.
Annala, Christopher N.2003. Have state and local fiscal policies become more alike? Evidence of beta convergence among fiscal policy variables. Public Finance Review31 (2): 144-65.
3.
Anselin, Luc.1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4.
———. 1995. SpaceStat, A software program for the analysis of spatial data, version 1.80. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
5.
Anselin, Luc, Anil K. Bera, Raymond Florax, and Mann J. Yoon.1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics26 (1): 77-104.
6.
Baffoe-Bonnie, John.1998. The dynamic impact of macroeconomic aggregates on housing prices and stock of houses: A national and regional analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance andEconomics17 (2): 179-97.
7.
Bailey, Michael A., Mark Carl Rom, and Matthew M. Taylor .2004. State competition in higher education: A race to the top, or a race to the bottom? Economics of Governance5 (1): 53-75.
8.
Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin .1995. Economic growth. Advanced series in economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case.1995. Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review85 (1): 25-45.
10.
Brueckner, Jan K.2003. Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review26 (2): 175-88.
11.
Bukenya, James, Tesfa Gebremedhin, and Peter Schaeffer .2002. Income convergence: A case study of West Virginia counties. Alabama A&M University research paper.
12.
Carlino, Gerald, and Leonard Mills.1996. Convergence and the U.S. states: A time-series analysis . Journal of Regional Science36 (4): 597-616.
13.
Case, Anne C., Harvey S. Rosen, and James R. Hines Jr. 1993. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics52 (3): 285-307.
14.
Cliff, A.D., and J.K. Ord.1981. Spatial processes: Models and applications . London: Pion Limited.
15.
Conley, Timothy G., and Ethan Ligon.2002. Economic distance and cross-county spillovers. Journal of Economic Growth7 (2): 157-87.
16.
Coughlin, Cletus C., and Thomas B. Mandelbaum .1988. Why have state per capita incomes diverged recently?Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review70 (5): 24-36.
17.
DeJuan, Joseph, and Marc Tomljanovich .2005. Income convergence across Canadian provinces in the 20th century: Almost but not quite there. The Annals of Regional Science39 (3): 567-92.
18.
Durlauf, Steven N.2001. Manifesto for a growth econometrics. Journal ofEconometrics100 (1): 65-69.
19.
Easterlin, Richard A.1960. Regional growth of income. In Population redistribution and economic growth in the United States, 1870-1950, edited by Simon Kuznets, Ann Ratner Miller, and Richard A. Easterlin , 140-203, Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
20.
Fingleton, Bernard, ed. 2003. European regional growth. New York/ Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Fisher, Ronald.1996. State and local public finance. Chicago : Irwin Custom Publishing.
22.
Hernández-Murillo, Rubén.2003. Strategic interaction in tax policies among states. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review85 (3): 47-56.
23.
Hoover, Kevin D., and Stephen J. Perez .2004. Truth and robustness in cross-country growth regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics66 (5): 765-98.
24.
Kanbur, Ravi, and Michael Keen.1993. Jeux sans frontieres: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review83 (4): 877-92.
25.
Kelejian, Harry H., and Ingmar R. Prucha .1998. A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance andEconomics17 (1): 99-121.
26.
Le Gallo, Julie. 2004. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review27 (2): 138-63.
27.
Magrini, Stefano.2004. Regional (di)convergence. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, edited by V. Henderson and J. Thisse, 2741-2796, New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
28.
Merriman, David, and Mark Skidmore.2002. Convergence in state government health care spending and fiscal distress. Proceedings: Ninety-fourth Annual Conference on Taxation, Baltimore, MD, November 8-10, 2001, and minutes of the annual meeting of the National Tax Association, 81-89.
29.
Miller, Jon, and Ismail Gene.2005. Alternative regional specifications and convergence of U.S. regional growth rates. The Annals of Regional Science39 (2): 241-52.
30.
Moreno, Ramon, and Bharat Trehan.1997. Location and the growth of nations. Journal of Economic Growth2 (4): 399-418.
31.
Owyang, Michael T., Jeremy Piger, and Howard J. Wall.2005. Business cycle phases in U.S. states. Review of Economics and Statistics87 (4): 604-16.
32.
Pritchett, Lant.1997. Divergence, big time. Journal of Economic Perspectives11 (3): 3-17.
33.
Quah, Danny.1993. Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review37 (2/3): 426-34.
34.
Ramirez, Maria Teresa, and Ana Maria Loboguerrero .2002. Spatial correlation and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of countries. Central Bank of Columbia Working Paper, Bogota DC.
35.
Rey, Sergio J., and Mark V. Janikas. 2005. Regional convergence, inequality, and space . Journal of Economic Geography5 (2): 155-76.
36.
Rey, Sergio J., and Brett D. Montouri .1999. U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies33 (2): 143-56.
37.
Romer, David.1996. Advanced macroeconomics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Scully, Gerald W.1991. The convergence of fiscal regimes and the decline of the Tiebout effect. Public Choice72 (1): 51-59.
39.
Solow, Robert M.1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics70 (1): 65-94.
40.
Tiebout, Charles.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64 (5): 416-24.
41.
Webber Don J., Paul White, and David O. Allen.2005. Income convergence across U.S. states: An analysis using measures of concordance and discordance. Journal of Regional Science45 (3): 565-89.
42.
Wilson, John Douglas.1991. Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments. Regional Science and Urban Economics21 (3): 423-51.
43.
———. 1999. Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal52 (2): 269-304.
