Psychological essentialism is the tendency to attribute a shared, underlying, and unobservable essence to social categories, which can lead to bias toward them. This meta-analysis synthesized correlational (N = 27,731 participants, k = 298 effects) and experimental (N = 3,728 participants, k = 22 effects) evidence (January 2000–May 2024) associating essentialism with ethnoracial (racial, ethnic, national groups) bias. Essentialism and bias were moderately positively correlated (r = 0.25, p < .001), which was attenuated when accounting for study-level and sample characteristics. Study region, setting, and gender were important covariates. Type of essentialism was a significant moderator. However, essentialism did not predict bias (g = 0.21, p = .181). This held across different types of essentialism, which may reflect low statistical power in some instances. We found no evidence that study quality moderated the essentialism–bias association but found evidence of publication bias only with the correlational studies. The correlational evidence, along with the absence of causal evidence, suggests that essentialism may predict bias only under certain conditions and/or that bias may lead to increases in essentialism. However, experimental limitations may obscure these effects. Future research should explore additional moderators, test motivational frameworks and associative mechanisms, and refine experimental manipulations.
*AndreychikM. R.GillM. J. (2015). Do natural kind beliefs about social groups contribute to prejudice? Distinguishing bio-somatic essentialism from bio-behavioral essentialism, and both of these from entitativity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214550341
2.
AppelbaumM.CooperH.KlineR. B.Mayo-WilsonE.NezuA. M.RaoS. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. The American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
*BernardoA. B.SalangaM. G. C.TjiptoS.HutapeaB.YeungS. S.KhanA. (2016). Contrasting lay theories of polyculturalism and multiculturalism: Associations with essentialist beliefs of race in six Asian cultural groups. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116641895
BorensteinM.CooperH.HedgesL.ValentineJ. (Eds.), (2009). Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610441384
7.
*ByrdW. C.RayV. E. (2015). Ultimate attribution in the genetic era: White support for genetic explanations of racial difference and policies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 661(1), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215587887
8.
CausadiasJ. M.VitriolJ. A.AtkinA. L. (2018). Do we overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities? Evidence of a cultural (mis)attribution bias in American psychology. The American Psychologist, 73(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000099
9.
CausadiasJ. M.VitriolJ. A.AtkinA. L. (2018). The cultural (mis) attribution bias in developmental psychology in the United States. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 59, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.01.003
10.
*^ChaoM. M.HongY. Y.ChiuC. Y. (2013). Essentializing race: Its implications on racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031332
CimpianA.SalomonE. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(5), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002197
13.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
Dar-NimrodI.HeineS. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 800–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021860
DiesendruckG. (2020). Why do children essentialize social groups? In RhodesM. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–64). Academic Press.
17.
DiesendruckG. (2021). A motivational perspective on the development of social essentialism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420980724
18.
DomkeD.LagosT.LapointeM.MeadeM.XenosM. (2000). Elite messages and source cues: Moving beyond partisanship. Political Communication, 17(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050179013
19.
^DonovanB. (2016). An experimental exploration of how text-based instruction in school biology affects belief in genetic essentialism of race in adolescent populations. Stanford University.
20.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084–1121). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029
21.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel‐plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
22.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
23.
EpsteinR.FonnesbeckC.WilliamsonE.KuhnT.LindegrenM. L.RizzoneK.McPheetersM. (2015). Applicability tables. In Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions for disruptive behavior in children and adolescents [internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).
24.
FarrokhiF.Mahmoudi-HamidabadA. (2012). Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792
FuR.GartlehnerG.GrantM.ShamliyanT.SedrakyanA.WiltT. J.TrikalinosT. A.OremusM.RainaP.IsmailaA.SantaguidaP.LauJ. (2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010
27.
GelmanS. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.
GelmanS. A.ColeyJ. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.26.5.796
30.
GelmanS. A.FrazierB. N.NolesN. S.ManczakE. M.StilwellS. M. (2015). How much are Harry Potter’s glasses worth? Children’s monetary evaluation of authentic objects. Journal of Cognition and Development: Official Journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 16(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2013.815623
31.
GelmanS. A.WareE. A.KleinbergF.ManczakE. M.StilwellS. M. (2014). Individual differences in children’s and parents’ generic language. Child Development, 85(3), 924–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12187
Gil-WhiteF. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 42(4), 515–554. https://doi.org/10.1086/321802
34.
GjerdevikM.HeuchI. (2014). Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-109
35.
*GlasgowJ.ShulmanJ.CovarrubiasE. (2009). The ordinary conception of race in the United States and its relation to racial attitudes: A new approach. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9(1-2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853709X414610
36.
GuidettiM.CarraroL.CastelliL. (2021). Children’s inequality aversion in intergroup contexts: The role of parents’ social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism and moral foundations. PLoS One, 16(12), Article e0261603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261603
37.
HaslamN. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: Commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022386
38.
HaslamN. (2017). The origins of lay theories: The case of essentialist beliefs. In ZedeliusC. M.MüllerB. C. N.SchoolerJ. W. (Eds.), The science of lay theories: How beliefs shape our cognition, behavior, and health (pp. 3–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_1
39.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363
40.
HaslamN.WhelanJ. (2008). Human natures: Psychological essentialism in thinking about differences between people. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1297–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00112.x
41.
HedgesL. V. (2019). Statistical considerations. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 37–48). Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864.6
42.
HeineS. J.Dar-NimrodI.CheungB. Y.ProulxT. (2017). Essentially biased: Why people are fatalistic about genes. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 137–192). Academic Press.
43.
HeymanG. D.GelmanS. A. (2000). Preschool children’s use of trait labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2555
44.
HigginsJ. P. T.EldridgeS.LiT. (2023). Including variants on randomized trials. In HigginsJ. P.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.3, updated February 2022). Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-23
45.
HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press.
46.
*HodsonG.SkorskaM. N. (2015). Tapping generalized essentialism to predict outgroup prejudices. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12083
47.
*^HoA. K.RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615596436
HuicA.JelicM.KamenovZ. (2018). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality predict positive and negative behavioral intentions toward lesbian women and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(12), 1631–1655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1383104
50.
*HuntW. (2022). Backdoor to essentialism? Genetic ancestry testing and the social deconstruction of whiteness. Wayne State University.
51.
^JamesD. (2018). Component racialism and race-based perceptions: The roles of racial and biogeographical ancestries. Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago.
52.
*JamesD.BonamC. M. (2023). Biogeographic ancestry information facilitates genetic racial essentialism: Consequences for race‐based judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12932
53.
JayaratneT. E.GelmanS. A.FeldbaumM.SheldonJ. P.PettyE. M.KardiaS. L. (2009). The perennial debate: Nature, nurture, or choice? Black and White Americans’ explanations for individual differences. Review of General Psychology: Journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, 13(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014227
54.
*JayaratneT. E.YbarraO.SheldonJ. P.BrownT. N.FeldbaumM.PfefferC. A.PettyE. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations: GPIR, 9(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059863
55.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
56.
KalishC. (1998). Natural and artifactual kinds: Are children realists or relativists about categories?Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.376
57.
KeilF. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902
58.
*^KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
*KendeA.HadaricsM.LášticováB. (2017). Anti-Roma attitudes as expressions of dominant social norms in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 60, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.06.002
61.
*KimelS. Y.BierwiaczonekK. M.ObaidiM.FoemanA.LawtonB.SidaniusJ.KunstJ. R. (2024). Finding your roots: Do DNA ancestry tests increase racial (in)tolerance?Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 30(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000488
^KomisarchikM. (2019). Essays on race and representation in American politics. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
64.
*^KungF. Y.ChaoM. M.YaoD. J.AdairW. L.FuJ. H.TasaK. (2018). Bridging racial divides: Social constructionist (vs. essentialist) beliefs facilitate trust in intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.008
65.
KurzbanR.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(26), 15387–15392. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251541498
66.
*^LandryA. P.IhmE.ProtzkoJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2022). Essentially subhuman: Psychological essentialism facilitates dehumanization. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 28(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000587
67.
*LeffersJ. S.ColeyJ. D. (2021). Do I know you? The role of culture in racial essentialism and facial recognition memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101791
68.
LinL.AloeA. M. (2021). Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 40(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8781
69.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
70.
LujanH. L.DiCarloS. E. (2024). Misunderstanding of race as biology has deep negative biological and social consequences. Experimental Physiology, 109(8), 1240–1243. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091491
71.
*LynchJ.BevanJ.AchterP.HarrisT.ConditC. M. (2008). A preliminary study of how multiple exposures to messages about genetics impact on lay attitudes towards racial and genetic discrimination. New Genetics and Society, 27(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770701843634
72.
MandalaywalaT. M. (2020). Does essentialism lead to racial prejudice? It is not so Black and white. In RhodesM. (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 59, pp. 195–245). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.05.007
73.
*MandalaywalaT. M.AmodioD. M.RhodesM. (2018). Essentialism promotes racial prejudice by increasing endorsement of social hierarchies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617707020
74.
*MandalaywalaT.RhodesM. (2016). Racial essentialism is associated with prejudice towards blacks in 5-and 6-year-old white children. In Cognitive Science. Wiley.
75.
MedinD.OrtonyA. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge University Press.
76.
MoeyaertM.UgilleM.BeretvasS.FerronJ.Van Den NoortgateW. (2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: A comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189
77.
MoolaS.MunnZ.TufanaruC.AromatarisE.SearsK.SfetcuR.CurrieM.QureshiR.MattisP.LisyK.MuP.-F. (2020). Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In AromatarisE.MunnZ. (Eds.), JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
78.
NamH. H.SawyerK. (2024). Scientific supremacy: How do genetic narratives relate to racism?Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 43(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2023.15
79.
*NapierJ. L. (2010). Is status destined or deserved? Divergent system rationalizations among members of disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Doctoral dissertation. New York University.
80.
*NoS.HongY.-y.LiaoH.-Y.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012978
81.
NorenzayanA.HeineS. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know?Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.763
82.
OutramS.GravesJ. L.PowellJ.WolpertC.HaynieK. L.FosterM. W.BlanchardJ. W.HoffmeyerA.AgansR. P.RoyalC. D. M. (2018). Genes, race, and causation: US public perspectives about racial difference. Race and Social Problems, 10(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-018-9223-7
83.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
84.
PalmerC. A.BowerJ. L.ChoK. W.ClementiM. A.LauS.OosterhoffB.AlfanoC. A. (2024). Sleep loss and emotion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 50 years of experimental research. Psychological Bulletin, 150(4), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000410
85.
*PaukerK.AmbadyN.ApfelbaumE. P. (2010). Race salience and essentialist thinking in racial stereotype development. Child Development, 81(6), 1799–1813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01511.x
86.
*PaukerK.CarpinellaC.MeyersC.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2018). The role of diversity exposure in Whites’ reduction in race essentialism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731496
87.
*PaukerK.XuY.WilliamsA.BiddleA. M. (2016). Race essentialism and social contextual differences in children’s racial stereotyping. Child Development, 87(5), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12592
88.
Peretz-LangeR. (2021). Why does social essentialism sometimes promote, and other times mitigate, prejudice development? A causal discounting perspective. Cognitive Development, 59, Article 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101085
89.
^PhelanJ. C.LinkB. G.FeldmanN. M. (2013). The genomic revolution and beliefs about essential racial differences: A backdoor to eugenics?American Sociological Review, 78(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413476034
90.
PigottT. D. (2009). Handling missing data. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 399–416). Russell Sage Foundation.
PronovostM. A.ScottR. M. (2021). 20-month-olds use social categories to make inductive inferences about agents’ preferences. Journal of Cognition and Development, 22(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021.1893734
93.
PronovostM. A.ScottR. M. (2022). The influence of language input on 3-year-olds’ learning about novel social categories. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103729
94.
*RangelU.KellerJ. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1056–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022401
95.
ReinerP. B. (2011). The rise of neuroessentialism. In IllesJ.SahakianB. J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neuroethics (pp. 161–176). Oxford University Press.
96.
RhodesM.GelmanS. A.KaruzaJ. C. (2014). Preschool ontology: The role of beliefs about category boundaries in early categorization. Journal of Cognition and Development: Official Journal of the Cognitive Development Society, 15(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.713875
97.
RhodesM.LeslieS.-J.SaundersK.DunhamY.CimpianA. (2018). How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations?Developmental Science, 21(1), Article e12509. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12509
98.
RhodesM.MandalaywalaT. M. (2017). The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 8(4), Article e1437. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1437
99.
RhodesM.MotyK. (2020). What is social essentialism and how does it develop? In RhodesM. (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 59, pp. 1–30). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.05.001
*RoetsA.Van HielA. (2011). The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X491567
102.
RosengrenK. S.GelmanS. A.KalishC. W.McCormickM. (1991). As time goes by: Children’s early understanding of growth in animals. Child Development, 62(6), 1302–1320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130808
103.
RothW. D.van SteeE. G.Regla-VargasA. (2023). Conceptualizations of race: Essentialism and constructivism. Annual Review of Sociology, 49(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-034017
104.
RothbartM.TaylorM. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). Sage Publications, Inc.
105.
*RothschildL. S. (2000). Psychological essentialism: Social categories, and the impact of prejudice. New School for Social Research.
106.
*RudmanL. A.SaudL. H. (2020). Justifying social inequalities: The role of social Darwinism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219896924
107.
SassenbergK.DitrichL. (2019). Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838781
108.
^SchmalorA.CheungB. Y.HeineS. J. (2021). Exploring people’s thoughts about the causes of ethnic stereotypes. Plos One, 16(1), Article e0245517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245517
109.
*SchudsonZ. C.GelmanS. A. (2023). Social constructionist and essentialist beliefs about gender and race. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(2), 406–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211070792
110.
ShahbaziG.SamaniH.MandalaywalaT. M.BorhaniK.DavoodiT. (2024). The development of social essentialist reasoning in Iran: Insight into biological perception, cultural input, and motivational factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 153(11), 1–26. APA PsycInfo. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001616
111.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In JostJ. T.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Political psychology (pp. 315–332). Psychology Press.
112.
^Skinner-DorkenooA. L.RogbeerK. G.SarmalA.WareC.ZhuJ. (2023). Challenging race-based medicine through historical education about the social construction of race. Health Equity, 7(1), 764–772. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0036
113.
SmedleyA.SmedleyB. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. The American Psychologist, 60(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.16
114.
SmythK.FeeneyA.EidsonR.ColeyJ. (2017). Development of essentialist thinking about religion categories in Northern Ireland (and the United States). Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000253
115.
*Soylu YalcinkayaN. S.BranscombeN. R.GebauerF.NiedlichC.HakimN. H. (2018). Can they ever be one of us? Perceived cultural malleability of refugees and policy support in host nations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.018
116.
*Soylu YalcinkayaN.Estrada-VillaltaS.AdamsG. (2017). The (biological or cultural) essence of essentialism: Implications for policy support among dominant and subordinated groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00900
117.
*SrinivasT. (2018). Predicting and shifting attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: Testing a model and communication strategy. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
118.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
119.
*TawaJ. (2017). The Beliefs About Race Scale (BARS): Dimensions of racial essentialism and their psychometric properties. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(4), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000151
120.
*TawaJ. (2023). Racial essentialism and stress: A deadly combination for prospective police officers’ encounters with Black suspects. Race and Social Problems, 15(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-022-09356-5
121.
TawaJ. (2020). Does social constructionist curricula both decrease essentialist and increase nominalist beliefs about race?Science & Education, 29(6), 1513–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00125-7
122.
TiptonE. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000011
123.
^TsukamotoS.EnrightJ.KarasawaM. (2013). Psychological essentialism and nationalism as determinants of interethnic bias. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(5), 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.795926
124.
VerkuytenM. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de‐) essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322438215
125.
*VerkuytenM.BrugP. (2004). Multiculturalism and group status: The role of ethnic identification, group essentialism and protestant ethic. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(6), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.222
126.
ViechtbauerW. (2007). Accounting for heterogeneity via random-effects models and moderator analyses in meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.104
127.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
128.
VoorspoelsW.BartlemaA.VanpaemelW. (2014). Can race really be erased? A pre-registered replication study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01035
129.
WangM.XuY.MotyK.RhodesM. (2024). The cognitive precursors of early developing essentialist beliefs. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 46, 3873–3881. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pt9s590
130.
WelderA. N.GrahamS. A. (2001). The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants’ inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 72(6), 1653–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00371
131.
*^WilliamsM. J.EberhardtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1033–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033
*WiltonL. S.ApfelbaumE. P.GoodJ. J. (2019). Valuing differences and reinforcing them: Multiculturalism increases race essentialism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618780728
134.
*WongY. J.HornA. J.ChenS. (2013). Perceived masculinity: The potential influence of race, racial essentialist beliefs, and stereotypes. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030100
135.
*YangX. L.LiuL.ShiY. Y.LiY. S.TanX.HuX. M.SunX. M. (2015). The relationship between cultural anxiety and ethnic essentialism: The mediating role of an endorsement of multicultural ideology. PLoS One, 10(11), Article e0141875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141875
136.
*YaylacıŞ.RothW. D.JaffeK. (2021). Measuring racial essentialism in the genomic era: The genetic essentialism scale for race (GESR). Current Psychology, 40(8), 3794–3808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00311-z
137.
*YogeeswaranK.VerkuytenM.EalamB. (2021). A way forward? The impact of interculturalism on intergroup relations in culturally diverse nations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(6), 945–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220918651
138.
*YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.WiltonL. S. (2013). At the crossroads of race: Racial ambiguity and biracial identification influence psychological essentialist thinking. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(4), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032565
139.
*YoungD. M.WiltonL. S.HowanskyK. (2022). Initial evidence for shifting race essentialism beliefs in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 51(4), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221127384
140.
YzerbytV.RocherS.SchadronG. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Blackwell Publishing.
141.
*ZagefkaH.NigburD.GonzalezR.TipL. (2013). Why does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority members?International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 48(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.729841
142.
*ZagefkaH.PehrsonS.MoleR. C.ChanE. (2010). The effect of essentialism in settings of historic intergroup atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.639
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
