Individuals who believe that racial groups have fixed underlying essences use stereotypes more than do individuals who believe that racial categories are arbitrary and malleable social-political constructions. Would this essentialist mind-set also lead to less creativity? We suggest that the functional utility derived from essentialism induces a habitual closed-mindedness that transcends the social domain and hampers creativity. Across studies, using both individual difference measures (in a pilot test) and experimental manipulations (Experiments 1, 2a, and 2b), we found that an essentialist mind-set is indeed hazardous for creativity, with the relationship mediated by motivated closed-mindedness (Experiments 2a and 2b). These results held across samples of majority cultural-group members (Caucasian Americans, Israelis) and minority-group members (Asian Americans), as well as across different measures of creativity (flexibility, association, insight). Our findings have important implications for understanding the connection between racial intolerance and creativity.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235.
2.
BastianB.LoughnanS.KovalP. (2011). Essentialist beliefs predict automatic motor-responses to social categories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 559–567.
3.
BrehmJ. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
ChaoM. M.ChenJ.RoismanG.HongY.-y. (2007). Essentializing race: Implications for bicultural individuals’ cognition and physiological reactivity. Psychological Science, 18, 341–348.
5.
ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y.DweckC. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30.
6.
DunckerK. (1945). On problem solving (LeesL. S., Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58(5, Whole No. 270).
7.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
8.
GuilfordJ. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
9.
HigginsE. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. E. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
HongY.-y.ChanG.ChiuC.-y.WongR. Y.HansenI. G.LeeS.. . . FuH.-y. (2003). How are social identities linked to self-conception and intergroup orientation? The moderating effect of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1147–1160.
11.
HongY.-y.ChaoM. M.NoS. (2009). Dynamic interracial/intercultural processes: The role of lay theories of race. Journal of Personality, 77, 1283–1309.
12.
HongY.-y.LevyS. R.ChiuC.-y. (2001). The contribution of the lay theories approach to the study of groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 98–106.
13.
JayaratneT. E.YbarraO.SheldonJ. P.BrownT. N.FeldbaumM.PfefferC. A.PettyE. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 77–94.
14.
KellerJ. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702.
15.
LeungA. K.ChiuC.-y. (2010). Multicultural experiences, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 1–19.
16.
LevyS. R.ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y. (2006). Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 5–24.
17.
LevyS. R.StroessnerS. J.DweckC. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436.
18.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.
19.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
20.
NoS.HongY.-y.LiaoH.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991–1004.
21.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
22.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 202–206.
23.
PruittD. G.LewisS. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621–633.
24.
SassenbergK.MoskowitzG. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506–514.
25.
SchoolerJ. W.MelcherJ. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In SmithS. M.WardT. B.FinkeR. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
SimontonD. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27.
StangorC.LangeJ. E. (1994). Mental representations of social groups: Advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 357–416). London, England: Academic Press.
28.
TadmorC. T.GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W. (2012). Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 520–542.
29.
TadmorC. T.HongY.-y.ChaoM. M.WiruchnipawanF.WangW. (2012). Multicultural experiences reduce intergroup bias through epistemic unfreezing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 750–772.
30.
TadmorC. T.TetlockP. E. (2006). Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 173–190.
31.
TadmorC. T.TetlockP. E.PengK. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 105–139.
32.
WardT. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.
33.
WardT. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In SmithS. M.WardT. B.FinkeR. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 157–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
WardT. B.SmithS. M.FinkeR. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.
36.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1997). Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 133–173.
