The past generation has seen a dramatic rise in multiracial populations and a consequent increase in exposure to individuals who challenge monolithic racial categories. We examine and compare two potential outcomes of the multiracial population growth that may impact people’s racial categorization experience: (a) exposure to racially ambiguous faces that visually challenge the existing categories, and (b) a category that conceptually challenges existing categories (including “biracial” as an option in addition to the monolithic “Black” and “White” categories). Across four studies (N = 1,810), we found that multiple exposures to faces that are racially ambiguous directly lower essentialist views of race. Moreover, we found that when people consider a category that blurs the line between racial categories (i.e., “biracial”), they become less certain in their racial categorization, which is associated with less race essentialism, as well. Importantly, we found that these two effects happen independently from one another and represent two distinct cognitive processes.
AmodioD. M.RatnerK. G. (2013). The neuroscience of social cognition. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 702–728). Oxford University Press.
2.
ArecharA. A.RandD. G. (2021). Turking in the time of COVID. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2591–2595.
3.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2008). Immigration from the perspective of hosts and immigrants: Roles of psychological essentialism and social identity. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(2), 127–140.
4.
BogartK. R.RosaN. M.SlepianM. L. (2019). Born that way or became that way: Stigma toward congenital versus acquired disability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 594–612.
5.
ChaoM. M.HongY. Y.ChiuC. Y. (2013). Essentializing race: Its implications on racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 619–634.
6.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 152–164.
7.
ChenJ. M.MoonsW. G.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2014). Motivation to control prejudice predicts categorization of multiracials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 590–603.
8.
ChenJ. M.NormanJ. B.NamY. (2021). Broadening the stimulus set: Introducing the American multiracial faces database. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 371–389.
9.
ChenJ. M.PaukerK.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2018). Black + White = not White: A minority bias in categorizations of Black-White multiracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 43–54.
10.
CloutierJ.MacraeC. N. (2007). Who or what are you?: Facial orientation and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1298–1309.
11.
CloutierJ.MasonM. F.MacraeC. N. (2005). The perceptual determinants of person construal: Reopening the social-cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 885–894.
12.
ColemanJ. M.HongY. Y. (2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7(1), 34–53.
13.
DavenportL. D. (2016). The role of gender, class, and religion in biracial Americans’ racial labeling decisions. American Sociological Review, 81(1), 57–84.
14.
DavisF. J. (1991). Who is black?: One nation’s definition. Pennsylvania State University Press.
15.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.KawakamiK. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5–21.
16.
FiedlerK.HarrisC.SchottM. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests–An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102.
17.
FreemanJ. B.PaukerK.SanchezD. T. (2016). A perceptual pathway to bias: Interracial exposure reduces abrupt shifts in real-time race perception that predict mixed-race bias. Psychological Science, 27(4), 502–517.
18.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239.
19.
GaitherS. E.ChenJ. M.PaukerK.SommersS. R. (2019). At face value: Psychological outcomes differ for real vs. computer-generated multiracial faces. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(5), 592–610.
20.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.
21.
HaslamN.BastianB.BainP.KashimaY. (2006). Psychological essentialism, implicit theories, and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(1), 63–76.
22.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127.
23.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 87–100.
24.
HoA. K.RobertsS. O.GelmanS. A. (2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639–1645.
25.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506.
26.
IacobucciD. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 582–594.
27.
LamerS. A.SweenyT. D.DyerM. L.WeisbuchM. (2018). Rapid visual perception of interracial crowds: Racial category learning from emotional segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 683–701.
28.
LeeJ.BeanF. D. (2004). America’s changing color lines: Immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(2), 221–242.
LevyA.HalperinE.van ZomerenM.SaguyT. (2019). Inter-racial gateways: The potential of biracials to reduce threat and prejudice in inter-racial dynamics. Race and Social Problems, 11(2), 119–132.
31.
LoveA.LevyA. (2019). Bridging group divides: A theoretical overview of the “what” and “how” of gateway groups. Journal of Social Issues, 75(2), 414–435.
32.
LuJ. G.NisbettR. E.MorrisM. W. (2020). Why East Asians but not South Asians are underrepresented in leadership positions in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4590–4600.
33.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35.
34.
NicolasG.SkinnerA. L.DickterC. L. (2019). Other than the sum: Hispanic and Middle Eastern categorizations of Black–White mixed-race faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 532–541.
35.
NoS.HongY. Y.LiaoH. Y.LeeK.WoodD.ChaoM. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans’ responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 991–1004.
36.
PaukerK.AmbadyN.FreemanJ. B. (2013). The power of identity to motivate face memory in biracial individuals. Social Cognition, 31(6), 780–791.
37.
PaukerK.CarpinellaC.MeyersC.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2018). The role of diversity exposure in whites’ reduction in race essentialism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 944–952.
38.
PaukerK.XuY.WilliamsA.BiddleA. M. (2016). Race essentialism and social contextual differences in children’s racial stereotyping. Child Development, 87(5), 1409–1422.
39.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. V. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973–977.
40.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280.
41.
PlaksJ. E.MalahyL. W.SedlinsM.ShodaY. (2012). Folk beliefs about human genetic variation predict discrete versus continuous racial categorization and evaluative bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 31–39.
42.
ThorstensonC. A.PazdaA. D.YoungS. G.SlepianM. L. (2019). Incidental cues to threat and racial categorization. Social Cognition, 37, 389–404.
WilliamsM. J.EberhardtJ. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1033–1047.
45.
YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.WiltonL. S. (2013). At the crossroads of race: Racial ambiguity and biracial identification influence psychological essentialist thinking. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(4), 461–467.
46.
YzerbytV. Y.RocherS. J.SchadronG. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In SpearsR.OakesP. J.EllemersN.HaslamS. A. (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Blackwell.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
